Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, December 23, 2011

Why Fat Americans Are Reducing Ferry Capacity

Posted by on Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 3:35 PM

Posted by news intern Marley Zeno

We've all seen the story that Washington State is reducing ferry capacity because Americans are getting fatter. But this story left us with some questions. If you can still drive heavy cars and trucks and SUVs onto a ferry, why would a few extra pounds from relatively light people make a difference? Is it about lifeboat capacity? I, your trusty unpaid intern, looked into it.

According to the US Coast Guard, which is setting the new rules, the issue is not with vehicles or lifeboats. It's a matter of ferryboat stability. Our ferries have wide hulls and a shallow draft, so they can be susceptible to tipping over if the load becomes too top heavy. US Coast Guard Lt. Eric Young explained that since the topside weight (people) has increased more than the bottom weight (cars), the number of people needed to be reduced to maintain stability. He told the Associated Press that with the new capacity, "the ferry wouldn't tip over even if everyone ran to the side at the same time to look at a pod of killer whales."

While the Coast Guard's stability requirements haven't changed since the 1960s, when the Center for Disease Control reported the average weight of an American was 160 pounds, the average American is now 25 pounds heavier. On ferries, those people hang out in the upper passenger decks.

A source familiar with the Washington State Ferries, who asked me to leave out his name, explains how this topside weight adds up: "Increasing the per passenger weight by 25 pounds for stability calculations on a 2,000-passenger capacity vessel can be 25 tons of additional topside weight."

But the new requirements only affect about one quarter of the fleet. The Washington State Department of Transportation reports that the Hyak, Kaleetan, and Yakima have reduced their capacities from 2,000 to 1,782 while The Evergreen State reduced capacity from 984 to 875 and the Tillikum reduced from 1192 to 1061. That's five ferries out of 22 total.

What does this mean for you? Not a lot, says Lt. Young. "Nobody is anticipating any type of impact on public transportation, or the normal traffic flow of the ferries." He went on to say that since the vessels are so large, "I haven't had any reports for any situations where vessels were approaching max capacity." In other words, even when a ferry is filled with cars it isn't necessarily carrying 2,000 people.

 

Comments (5) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
rob! 1
Also, elementary high-school physics:

1) The center of gravity for these vessels is near or below the waterline because the engines, generators, fuel, water, sewage tanks, and the heaviest (strongest, thickest) parts of the hull are down low;

2) Any added vehicle weight is quite close to the center of gravity so it doesn't affect stability much;

3) The added weight of people is, on average, well above the center of gravity so the potential lever arm (tendency to tip the vessel) is great even if the weight is relatively small, as when all the people rush to one side to see the killer whales or the pretty sunset;

4) Wind loads also act as a force applied well above the center of gravity and worst-case scenarios (like a strong wind directly at one side while all the people rush to see the amazing sight that happens to be on the leeward side) are taken into account when figuring safety margins.

Those capsizing disasters that happen a couple of times a year and drown hundreds of people usually occur in parts of the world (Indonesia, Philippines, coastal Africa, etc.) where government oversight is lax and crews are complacent because they've made successful crossings before with even more people/cargo; just not when all possible circumstances conspire in one direction.
Posted by rob! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZBdUceCL5U on December 23, 2011 at 6:23 PM
rob! 2
By the way, this is a clear illustration of why libertarians are idiots^h^h^h^h^h^h being unrealistic—we should wait for the market to point toward the safest freelance ferry lines (with who knows how many lives lost along the way) when common knowledge and some easily applied regulations will prevent disasters in the first place?
Posted by rob! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZBdUceCL5U on December 23, 2011 at 7:10 PM
3
Wait a minute here --

A source familiar with the Washington State Ferries, who asked me to leave out his name, explains how this topside weight adds up: "Increasing the per passenger weight by 25 pounds for stability calculations on a 2,000-passenger capacity vessel can be 25 tons of additional topside weight."

...You had to get an off-the-record quote on *simple arithmetic*? 25 tons is 50,000 pounds. 25 pounds/person x 2000 people is .. 50,000 pounds. Hey, you can even quote me on this, I don't mind.
Posted by Cow on December 23, 2011 at 10:19 PM
Cynic Romantic 4
@1 Nice post.

"...with the new capacity, "the ferry wouldn't tip over even if everyone ran to the side at the same time to look at a pod of killer whales.""

Sounds like a challenge to me...
Posted by Cynic Romantic on December 23, 2011 at 10:40 PM
Simone 5
I be the Cost Guard was worried about what happens when everyone on the ferry runs to one side, then to the other side and back over and over again.
Posted by Simone on December 24, 2011 at 11:40 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy