Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Saturday, December 10, 2011

Watch Mitt Romney Casually Bet a Fifth of the Median American Household Income

Posted by on Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 8:18 PM

The first half of tonight's debate was feisty and crazy. The second half was not. Perry was all but drooling on himself; Bachmann started pushing an adapted version of Herman Cain's 999 plan, which she calls the "win-win-win" plan; Ron Paul sounded kinda reasonable occasionally; Rick Santorum reminisced about a time when most Americans didn't know his name; and Newt Gingrich told us how great bestselling author Newt Gingrich is, when he wasn't stumping for mining camps on the moon (seriously). But the thing everyone's talking about is this moment, when Mitt Romney casually tries to bet Rick Perry $10,000 the way most folks would say "I'll bet you $20." Here's the video:

This is not the dumbest thing Mitt Romney's ever said. It's not even the most outrageous thing he said at the debate tonight. But it could be the most damaging 35 seconds of his entire political career. Americans don't mind if their presidential candidates are filthy rich, but they sure don't like to be reminded that their presidential candidates are filthy rich. Romney's gonna have to have a whole lot of great days between now and January 3rd to make people forget about this.

(The median household income figure cited in the headline of this post is from 2009, as reported by the U.S. Census.)

 

Comments (31) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
wow

this is a BIG story......

these guys each have tens of millions
in their campaign funds.
Posted by oh no...is romney in the 1%? zzzzzzzzzzzzz on December 10, 2011 at 8:34 PM
2
let us reminisce about a time when most Americans didn't know that homosexual "love" = feces.
Posted by eColi on December 10, 2011 at 8:38 PM
3
I thought the same thing: "Did he just bet 10k?"

Bush was the best at feigning commoner authenticity. He also framed his campaign so voters would vote on his personal appeal, not his political positions: "You may not agree with me, but you know where I stand."

Newt's going to win... Yay for Obama!
Posted by Baldy on December 10, 2011 at 8:45 PM
4
we'll bet you a million dollars no one says a peep about this tomorrow- oh wait- what percentage of the Median American Household Income is a million bucks, Paul?
Posted by go to bed Paul. you're drunk. on December 10, 2011 at 8:45 PM
5
He might as well have said "They have no bread? Then let them eat cake."
Posted by TechBear on December 10, 2011 at 9:43 PM
6
Mitt was so into his interchange with Perry that he definitely forgot for a second that a sizable segment of the people watching the debate probably have a current net worth of less than that.

Speaking of Newt, though, I don't know how he polls so well with that high-pitched, whiny, droning voice of his. With the possible exception of Ron Paul, all the other candidates have better sounding voices. True, some of them aren't hooked up to fully operational brains, but neither are the Republican primary voters.
Posted by Brooklyn Reader on December 10, 2011 at 9:43 PM
7
Mormons aren't supposed to gamble.
Posted by Bad Mittens on December 10, 2011 at 10:16 PM
what_now 8
@7 That's what I was thinking! Next he'll be drinking coffee or not wearing his special underpants.
Posted by what_now on December 10, 2011 at 10:32 PM
9
$10K is not a fifth of what Americans have been taught (by the Republicans) to believe that they CAN make if that nasty gummint just doesn't overtax them. It won't hurt him at all. If Newt's personal life doesn't hurt him, $10K isn't going to hurt Romney.
Posted by sarah70 on December 10, 2011 at 10:45 PM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 10
Money talks, bullshit walks.

Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on December 10, 2011 at 11:02 PM
Catalina Vel-DuRay 11
Republicans are dreadful people. We already knew about their abnormal bowels and untrustworthy ways. Then Seattleblahs and the troll bravely let us know about their fecal fetish. Now we have to learn - from network TV, of all places - about their gambling issues?

I know my fellow sloggers will join me in praying for the souls of Republicans, and the unhealthy lifestyle choices they routinely make.
Posted by Catalina Vel-DuRay http://www.danlangdon.com on December 10, 2011 at 11:21 PM
SecretBYUBottomBoy 12
Did someone say "magic underpants"??
Posted by SecretBYUBottomBoy on December 10, 2011 at 11:59 PM
mikethehammer 13
I'll pray Catalina, but it's been my experience that the goddamn Flying Spaghetti Monster doesn't answer prayers for shit. Lousy-ass savior.

I gotta figure what he was probably aiming at was a technique I frequently employ when "betting" amongst co-workers, or other folks whom I know won't pay. Which is simply to propose some ridiculous amount in an effort to convey supreme and unwavering confidence in my position (though admittedly I usually opt for some utterly ridiculous figure like $8,000,000. I guess the crucial difference is that $10K isn't actually THAT ridiculous a sum to him.) That's how I'd expect him to spin it if pressed anyway.
Posted by mikethehammer on December 11, 2011 at 12:04 AM
Phoebe in Wallingford 14
Typically, these bet gestures are for a charity of course.
Posted by Phoebe in Wallingford on December 11, 2011 at 12:18 AM
ItsAllOverNow 15
In all fairness, I make less than the median income in this country and I've casually bet a few people roughly that sum of money over the years in situations when I know I am absolutely 100% right. I think in Romney's head he was just trying to say 'that is absolutely incorrect'.

They're both still assholes, but this clip is not a game ender.
Posted by ItsAllOverNow http://nowaybro.blogspot.com/ on December 11, 2011 at 1:17 AM
16
Like @13 said, $10k was supposed to be hyperbole or at least will be painted that way.
Posted by WestSeven on December 11, 2011 at 5:06 AM
17
wow

we learn more about Liberal PC everyday....

"oh no!
there are poooor people out there!
we dare not mention sums of money over $20
(the price of a vial of crack)
cause it will make them feel bad...."
Posted by You Are So Full of Shit on December 11, 2011 at 5:32 AM
18
11

oh Cat you rascal.

It's too late to walk away from Danny's Santorum obsession

(both of them- the one about frothy feces and the one about Rick's ass....)

We're Rubber, you're Glue-
all the SHIT you vomit up bounces off us and sticks to you.
Posted by here's a tissue- there's some dripping down your chin... on December 11, 2011 at 5:39 AM
19
This is EXCELLENT NEWS!!! FOR MITT!!! Mormons can't gamble, so Mitt offering to bet $10,000 proves that he's not a Mormon. Way to go Mitt!
Posted by miked on December 11, 2011 at 6:09 AM
20
I wish I could get a job betting $10K a pop against the truthfulness of statements by Rick Perry (or any of these GOP candidates).
Posted by Sebastián LeBang on December 11, 2011 at 6:13 AM
21
I do mind that the presidential candidates are filthy rich and completely out of touch with the realities of the finances of the average American. I mind that very much. But the political system is designed in such a way that you have to have a few extra million laying around that you don't mind pissing all over to even consider running for president. This was not the intentions under which this country was founded.

@5 callled it--very Marie Antoinette-ish of him. Sadly, the continuing reign of the elite is not ending.
Posted by catballou on December 11, 2011 at 6:39 AM
22
the correct response would have been, "Gee it must be great to have inherited all of daddys money."
Posted by frankdawg on December 11, 2011 at 7:03 AM
23
Hey, Mike @ 13! Don't dis the FSM, he does at least as good a job of answering prayers as any of the other cosmic muffins and hairy thunderers.
Posted by frankdawg on December 11, 2011 at 7:06 AM
Catalina Vel-DuRay 24
Really, Troll dear, again with the poo talk? No wonder no one asks you to parties. You really should try to cultivate some other interests. How about Toastmasters or Kiwanis or something?

But in the meantime, you'd better check on David Vitter. He's acting fussy. I think his nappy may need changed.
Posted by Catalina Vel-DuRay http://www.danlangdon.com on December 11, 2011 at 7:39 AM
passionate_jus 25
This will be the main reason why Mitt Romney will not beat Obama, if he even becomes the nominee, which is not looking very likely at this point.

Mitt Romney has assets worth between $190 - 250 MILLION; he doesn't even know how much he's worth!

He's already stepped in it this year twice before, by 1) claiming that corporations are people and 2) saying he understands what a lot of Americans are going through because he himself is unemployed (though he doesn't seem to understand that being unemployed with $5000 in the bank is a lot different than being unemployed with assets of $200,000,000).

Why he can't beat Obama:

1) The election is ONLY going to be about the economy.
2) Most people blame Bush and not Obama for the Great Recession.
3) People are not going to vote in a multi millionaire who was born a millionaire and has never had to work a day in his life. (Willard's father was governor of Michigan and was very wealthy himself)

I'd even bet $10 on it!

http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/el…
Posted by passionate_jus on December 11, 2011 at 7:51 AM
26
Perry really should have taken the bet. His campaign could use the money.

If Romney is able to weather Hurricane Newt and secure the nomination, Obama is going to have so much fun with this.
Posted by dirge on December 11, 2011 at 8:13 AM
venomlash 27
@26: It'll be GLORIOUS!
Posted by venomlash on December 11, 2011 at 10:02 AM
Roma 28
13: I gotta figure what he was probably aiming at was a technique I frequently employ when "betting" amongst co-workers, or other folks whom I know won't pay. Which is simply to propose some ridiculous amount in an effort to convey supreme and unwavering confidence in my position

15: I think in Romney's head he was just trying to say 'that is absolutely incorrect'.

That's exactly what he was trying to say. When you're absolutely confident you're right about something and you want to demonstrate that confidence by betting someone, you don't offer $25. Regardless, it wasn't a smart move.

I'm still positive that Romney, even with his Mormon handicap among a lot of Republicans, is going to end up being the nominee and that it's going to be a very close election, mainly due to the still-poor economy, but that Obama will edge out a win.

Posted by Roma on December 11, 2011 at 1:47 PM
dirac 29
I don't think this is a game ender for Mitt. But Mitt's a game ender for Mitt. Even if he wins after so many blunders, he's just not that likable and no 50000 runs of "I am a Mormon" ads are going to make people like him more. This is has got to be one of the more piss poor elections--at least since 2000 or 2004.
Posted by dirac on December 11, 2011 at 2:22 PM
30
29

well.
now you know what it was like
when the DemoCraps ran Gore and Kerry.
which would have been a smart move-
if only Presidential politics were the Special Olympics......
Posted by you can't beat something with nuthin on December 11, 2011 at 4:56 PM
31
I suppose the idea here is that Mitt Romney's request for a $10,000 bet reminded people that he has that much money to throw away and that's a problem. But the fact check sites seem to indicate Perry would have had to pay up. Politifact posted a PDF of the part of the book Perry seemed to have been referring to, and depending on your interpretation, it seems he was actually correct. Perry's screwing himself, so this won't hurt him either, but if people do their own research (which, most Republicans probably don't), they'll find that Romney's bet wasn't so much "look how much money I have," as "this is how confident I am that you're wrong."
Posted by J from Oregon on December 11, 2011 at 9:27 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy