Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, December 2, 2011

Prison Letter of the Day

Posted by on Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 12:41 PM

Since I started working on this story about crack sentencing guidelines, I've been receiving bunches of email, via Corrlinks, from people serving various sentences related to crack-cocaine charges. I thought I'd share a few:

Hello:

I would love to have my story told. I was given a reduction at sentencing in 2006 for my drug addiction, dad started me on drugs at 4 years old. I was denied on the first crack amendment (2008) and am being told i cant get on board for this.

I'm currently at williamsburg FCI. I grew up in key west florida. They say i can't get relief because i am a career offender, even though the majority of my crimes were either for drug possession or drug-induced petty crimes. You should note that some career offenders have gotten reductions even though they say i can't. I fully cooperated with the government every time yet they never helped me receive a reduction. I have been a drug addict all my life documented by letters from my mother, sisters and brother to the court hence the lower sentence i got originally (140 months for 26 grams of crack cocaine).

At a very young age my father introduced me to grass and alcohol and by the age of 9 i was smoking crack, snorting cocaine and from that point i never had a chance/choice it was too late. I'm now told even though my crime started as a drug offense for crack cocaine i cant get a reduction because of crimes i committed over 15 years ago, sounds discriminatory to me. I'm just a drug addict who got caught with a small amont of crack and am being punished like if i was a big time drug dealer, something is wrong with this system. Even worse the positive stuff i've done while in here (and its alot) counts for nothing while others can an are using it for further reductions. I sincerely hope you can use me to rectify/acknowledge this wrong. And yes i can provide documentation. Let me know what you need.

Respectfully, D.

D. is scheduled for release in May of 2020.

 

Comments (19) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Packeteer 1
Only sadists want to continue the current prison system and drug war.
Posted by Packeteer on December 2, 2011 at 12:55 PM
gloomy gus 2
I have to say, sentencing particulars aside, his claim of innocence makes me giggle. The appeals court decision is online. He leased a garage in which the feds later found five hundred kilos. They pulled him over after they saw him drive a car into the garage, then ten minutes later drive out again. They found fifty kilos in the trunk.
http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appe…
Posted by gloomy gus on December 2, 2011 at 1:08 PM
3
@2 - are you talking about the author of this letter?
Posted by shabadoo on December 2, 2011 at 1:14 PM
Fnarf 4
@2, wait, what? How did you figure that out from the letter?
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on December 2, 2011 at 1:15 PM
gloomy gus 5
Hay, waitaminute. Between the time I read the posted letter from Glenn Early and the time I slapped together my magnificent comment, the letter in the post changed to one from somebody completely different. Apologies that the switcheroo makes my comment not only a waste of time as usual but nonsensical.
Posted by gloomy gus on December 2, 2011 at 1:21 PM
Westlake, son! 6
Now I want to see the Glenn Early dishonest letter.
Posted by Westlake, son! on December 2, 2011 at 1:22 PM
gloomy gus 7
I swear, when I first read this post its featured letter was by a sixtysomething Chicagoan named Glenn Early, and it included a link Mr. Early provided to more details of his story, which my browser history still has at http://www.november.org/thewall/cases/ea…

Unless this is some form of alzheimer's hitting me in the form of phantom Slog posts. My comments may begin getting deranged at a level not Will nor SROTU has yet reached.
Posted by gloomy gus on December 2, 2011 at 1:29 PM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 8
Don't worry, Gus. It's impossible to get more deranged than Will and still retain the ability to type.

That is pretty weird, though.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on December 2, 2011 at 1:34 PM
rob! 9
I do think Slog should adhere to a firm policy of using strikethru text or other clear indications of changes/updates. It seems to me they used to do this regularly, and Dan stands out in my mind as still doing it pretty consistently. In most cases switcheroos don't amount to much in the great scheme of things, but to the extent that they make posters (Stranger staff) look more careful or more knowledgeable than they are, and commenters wrong or petty or moonbatty, the changes should be explicitly acknowledged.
Posted by rob! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZBdUceCL5U on December 2, 2011 at 1:37 PM
10
@9,

It also makes Brendan look dishonest/disingenuous when he just removes evidence of a letter from a career drug dealer. 500 kilos? Jesus Christ!
Posted by keshmeshi on December 2, 2011 at 1:45 PM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 11
Gus:

I still had it in my RSS feed. Here you go:

Hello Brendan:

I have sat here in federal prison for many years and during the last few, I have witnessed the crack cocaine offenders receive humble retroactive two-level sentence reductions, not only once, but now twice, and I am happy for those individuals.

However, here I remain for over six more years of my thirty-year prison sentence while not receiving any relief. If I were granted the same considerations for my possession of the less addictive powder cocaine, I too would be on my way home now.

First of all, there was absolutely no weapons or violence associated with my criminal case. What there was, was the government's extravagant story-telling in that I contolled more than a thousand kilograms of ninety-two percent pure cocaine, with a street value of two-hundred to three-hundred million dollars. In spite of the utter foolishness and after a lengthy trial, a jury of my supposed peers found me guilty of both conspiracy to distribute cocaine, and possession with the intent to distribute cocaine. Furthermore, I received a two-level sentencing enhancement for perjury, simply because I testified on my own behalf. The enhancement alone accounts for 67 months of my thirty-year sentence.

I have written about my criminal case and current situation numerous times. You will find a brief version posted at: www.november.org/thewall/cases/early-g/e….

After having exhausted all possible avenues for relief in the courts, I then petitioned Presidents Clinton, Bush, and Obama to grant me executive clemency. And, of course, with no success. However, I will submit my next and last petition for clemncy to President Obama in spring. This time with much more support and reason. Having a release date of May 2018, would cause most people to simply give up hope, but for me it only increases the drive and determination of this 62 year old Chicagoan.

You're not crazy.
More...
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on December 2, 2011 at 1:47 PM
Max Solomon 12
I googled D, and his story totally checks out.
Posted by Max Solomon on December 2, 2011 at 1:53 PM
gloomy gus 13
@11, many thanks for showing me my crazy was not taking the form of a hallucinated Slog post...
Posted by gloomy gus on December 2, 2011 at 1:59 PM
bedipped 14
@MileYrHigh
Are you suggesting that not only the internet but SLOG itself is subject to unremarked upon revision? Next thing you'll be telling me is two plus two equals four.
Posted by bedipped on December 2, 2011 at 2:05 PM
15
Sorry for the confusion gloomy gus. I initially posted the wrong letter and then swapped it out.
Posted by Brendan Kiley on December 2, 2011 at 2:17 PM
Fnarf 16
Yeah, OK, gus, you're in the clear for now. But we're keeping an eye on you. Any more foolishness and, well, we can't be held accountable for what might happen.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on December 2, 2011 at 2:44 PM
venomlash 17
Now, this D. fellow is exactly the sort of person who the court should have sent to rehab, not prison.
Posted by venomlash on December 2, 2011 at 3:41 PM
18
@17 He said he had multiple arrests for drug possession and other crimes related to his substance abuse problems. I'm guessing he'd been to rehab, probably more then once. Addicts often stay clean for a while, then relapse.
Posted by Ken Mehlman on December 2, 2011 at 11:27 PM
19
The sorry thing is always being for the so called criminal, because until you live it you cant beleive it.
Posted by beleiveme on December 7, 2011 at 3:56 PM

Add a comment

In an effort to keep the discourse respectful and on topic, commenting on this item is available only to registered commenters.
Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy