Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Another Loss for Kemper Freeman (Maybe)

Posted by on Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:06 PM

It's not been a good week for Bellevue's crazy uncle, Kemper Freeman. First Initiative 1125, his $1.1 million effort to block light rail from crossing the I-90 bridge, went down to defeat by a comfortable margin. Then Monday night the Bellevue City Council he's been so meticulously packing with anti-rail cronies gave up the fight and approved an agreement with Sound Transit to build light rail through downtown Bellevue. And now it looks likely that he's going to lose a presumed gimme in a close city council race.

Heading into election day land-use litigation attorney and devout Kemperite Aaron Laing was widely expected to cruise to victory over progressive activist John Stokes for the seat being vacated by retiring council member Grant Degginger. Laing had outspent Stokes by a two-to-one margin, while Freeman and his allies spent another $45,000 in "independent" expenditures on his behalf. Laing had the kind of financial advantage nobody expected Stokes could overcome.

But it didn't turn out that way. Stokes eked out a 127-vote lead on election night, a narrow margin that expanded slightly over the next few ballot drops before shrinking to 79 votes Monday and Tuesday. There's still about 2,500 ballots left to count, so it's far from impossible to reverse this margin, but Laing's percentage advantage in the past two drops suggests he'll likely fall just short of taking the lead.

And that would be a big loss for Freeman, who was counting on Laing's election to give him a 5-2 supermajority on the council. Perhaps there are some things that money just can't buy?

 

Comments (10) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Donolectic 1
Sounds like Bellevue has had enough of Kemper trying to buy their town. Good for them.

BTW, thanks a lot for covering this news on the eastside - I knew what Kemper was trying to do and was wondering how these council races were going to turn out.
Posted by Donolectic on November 16, 2011 at 12:24 PM
2
In the voter's pamphlet they both said they wanted light rail. I was confused.
Posted by amsellie on November 16, 2011 at 12:32 PM
3
@amsellie: I think there were two routes proposed: one through downtown Bellevue (which just got approved) and one through the 405 corridor, which would have missed most everything.

@Goldy: So there's at least one result this election that isn't related to money spent.
Posted by LMcGuff http://holyoutlaw.livejournal.com/ on November 16, 2011 at 12:35 PM
Fnarf 4
What's the automatic recount margin here? 0.25%? 79 votes is really close to that.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on November 16, 2011 at 1:03 PM
notaboomer 5
occupy bellevue square mall!
Posted by notaboomer on November 16, 2011 at 1:19 PM
Will in Seattle 6
@5 Remember The Hair Curlers!

Let that be your battle cry.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on November 16, 2011 at 1:51 PM
7
@4: A margin less than 0.5 percent triggers an automatic machine recount, a margin less than 0.25 percent triggers an automatic hand recount. We could very well end in hand recount territory.
Posted by Goldy on November 16, 2011 at 2:50 PM
Free Lunch 8
I'm not sure why Kemper thinks that adding light-rail access to his business would HURT his business. Are there studies to back that up?

Or is he worried that his now "captive" east-side customers would shop in Seattle if there were a light-rail line to it? Yeah, right: as if any Bellevue housewife would choose to go on a shopping trip without her pack-mule Escalade.
Posted by Free Lunch on November 16, 2011 at 6:15 PM
Joe Szilagyi 9
@8

Free Lunch 8
I'm not sure why Kemper thinks that adding light-rail access to his business would HURT his business.


Popular theory I keep hearing is that it will free up Eastside shoppers to bypass the malls and venues he and his cohorts own and control to shop and entertain themselves in Seattle more readily. It's a tactical gamble. If Light Rail makes it easier for us Seattle folk to go to the Eastside for a show, dinner, and whatever else--the same applies in reverse. They have a choke hold on the Eastside today. Light Rail levels the playing field more.

I personally don't believe in any of the ideological stuff playing a role here. It's business.
Posted by Joe Szilagyi http://www.joeszilagyi.com on November 16, 2011 at 6:52 PM
Free Lunch 10
Thanks, Joe.

The idea of a Bellevue resident shopping without a car doesn't pass the smell test, but there is a huge entertainment / fine-dining gap between Bellevue and Seattle. With light rail I can see eastsiders actually going to a game rather than watching it at their local Paddy Coyne's. Or, say, wanting to go to a restaurant that's not a chain / doesn't print pictures of each offering on the menu.
Posted by Free Lunch on November 16, 2011 at 7:30 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy