Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

City Finds 37 Medical Pot Dispensaries Failing to Comply with New Licensing Rules

Posted by on Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:01 PM

Updated after the jump with comments from Bryan Stevens, a spokesman for the city's Department of Planning Development.

Dozens of medical marijuana dispensaries in Seattle have failed to get the proper business license, city officials say, despite City Hall's best efforts to give them some sort of legal shelter.

The problems began last year when Governor Christine Gregoire gutted and signed a medical marijuana bill that seemed to prohibit hundreds of dispensaries in Washington State. Last July, as cities across Washington followed suit by banning dispensaries from operating in their jurisdictions, Mayor Mike McGinn signed a law that would allow the city of Seattle to license, tax, and regulate medical marijuana dispensaries "just like any other business," as McGinn said at the time. The gesture creates at leas the appearance the the city accepts these businesses, hopefully deterring state or federal enforcement.

But three months after the law took affect, the city's Department of Finance and Administrative services estimates that there are 105 medical marijuana dispensaries operating in Seattle—however, 37 of them have failed to obtain business licenses. "We only have 68 dispensaries currently licensed in our system," says Denise Movius, a spokeswoman for the city's business licensing division. "We've gotten the names of the rest by reading The Stranger and other advertisements."

Movius's has been contacting the rogue dispensaries to remind them to get a business license. "Most have been very responsive to us," Movius says. "We haven't had to take action to shut anyone down."

Ignoring the city's $90 business license doesn't conclusively mean these shops are disregarding Seattle's land-use and fire-code regulations. But it could be an indicator: The city's customer service bureau has received at least seven complaints about dispensaries in recent months, prompting investigations of violations from Planning Development. "The general complaint is that the businesses are operating illegally but about half of the sites had no violations," says Bryan Stevens, a spokesman for the DPD. "Three were conducting business in places where they were not permitted," including a residential area and an office building.

Stevens says it's "not uncommon" to find that small businesses, like dispensaries, are unfamiliar with permitting practices, but as the city tries in good faith to regulate a federally-mandated illegal substance, clearly it's a troubling sign that these businesses either aren't aware of city laws or are unwilling to follow them.

 

Comments (10) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Hmmmm, ASA, Greta Carter, CDC, Rachael Kurtz..... you ladies met with the city council on our behalf last Thursday. There were questions asked of the membership of several groups for input to the Mayor. These questions were prosecutorial and self incriminating in nature. Now we have the stage set for the DEA to intervene to eliminate the "rogue dispensaries". Other cities have seen the same pattern of actions. Please ask yourselves what the common denominator is and react accordingly.
Posted by pupuguru on October 18, 2011 at 1:17 PM
2
Really Slog? Click to keep reading? That single additional paragraph?
Posted by BornAgainInBellevue on October 18, 2011 at 1:18 PM
3
Am I the only one who has a hard time understanding what @1 is talking about or is that a super-inside-baseball comment? I get general concern, but the rest of it needs a bit more context.
Posted by Gidge on October 18, 2011 at 1:36 PM
4
Any way to find out which ones got hit?
Posted by POH on October 18, 2011 at 2:29 PM
Cienna Madrid 5
@2, it's a space thing, sorry.

@3, You are not alone--I have very little idea what the fuck @1 is taking about.
Posted by Cienna Madrid on October 18, 2011 at 2:37 PM
6
ASA and CDC (American for Safe Access and Cannabis Defense Coalition) are cannabis activist groups...the two ladies are directors of the groups. Both groups were asked by the Mayor to provide tax information, financial arrangements, security measures, etc concerning operation of access points.

This sort of information is often used by the DEA to arrest patients and providers. Business license implies taxes, taxes not paid are reason to investigate "rogue dispensaries".

The question being asked is "How to provide safe access to patients who need cannabis medicines?" Since all cannabis in access points is being grown by patients and the end users are also patients, why is there a need for an access point?

Politics and money... yeah it was very insider, I guess.

Join one or both of the groups for an insider look up close...;-D
Posted by pupuguru on October 18, 2011 at 3:00 PM
7
Do some research on the MMJ scene in San Diego vis a vis ASA and perhaps do some research as to policy making on this subject here in Seattle. Cienna, were you at the Thursday meeting? Have you ever attended any of the policy making groups meetings? There is a CDC Safe Access meeting tonight in Georgetown at the Alternative Care Clinic on 4th Ave. Love to have your input...;-D
Posted by pupuguru on October 18, 2011 at 3:30 PM
8
sam (aka pupuguru) is incorrect. the city asked general questions to know what is going on in the world of access points. a sheet with some general business model examples that various access points are using (they're all really making it up as they go) was provided for them but we never even got to it in the meeting. the city in no way requested or received any information about any individual access points. everything said is general unless the people at the table want to talk about their own particular access point. sam is spreading paranoid rumors and is basically a bully.
Posted by rachel kurtz on October 18, 2011 at 6:08 PM
9
But I am not a name caller....that is harsh from a lawyer and CDC director to a member... thanks...;-D
Posted by pupuguru on October 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM
10
Greta, Rachel....we all know each other. The second either of you think that you can speak as real activists here, think you are experts on the topics discussed, or speak on behalf of the patients, you better do a serious reality check. The two of you might want to sit down and have a conversation with me before you decide to speak on behalf of the "community" or speak with the City. We can have lunch tomorrow if you like.

Last I heard....you represent far less than 1% of this community and you are coming close to putting all of us in serious danger. You can be stupid on your own behalf all you like, but just never claim that you represent ANYONE but yourselves (or the CDC) when you talk to City officials.

The writer in this story needs some serious education too. The real problem is NOT city licensing...it's STATE licensing. It's L & I, it's the Department of Revenue, it's Employment Security. If you don't understand even that much of the situation facing all of us, you might want to educate yourselves before trying to discuss this issue with anyone at the city.

If any of you want to discuss this, you each have my cell phone number. I suggest you use it before you end up causing any more damage and angering our friends that work for the City of Seattle. As far as I can see, they're the only friends we have. Please don't try to deceive them into thinking that you represent the medical cannabis community. We all know that tha's simply not the truth. Hell, Greta, you've only live here for six months! If you'd like to argue these issue here publicly, I'll be happy to do that too, but leave our city officials alone.


Steve Sarich
CannaCare 206-407-3017
Posted by CannaCare on October 19, 2011 at 8:53 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy