Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

The Gangs of D.C.

Posted by on Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:07 PM

The gay gangs of D.C.:

"I just got tired of people beating on me and calling me faggie,” Tayron Bennett, 21, told me recently. He’d helped to organize Check It while a student at Hine Junior High School. Other gay youths from his Trinidad neighborhood in Northeast soon joined, followed by gay youths from throughout the city.

D.C. police estimate that Check It has a core membership of about 20 and counts between 50 and 100 others as “associates.”

“At first, I tried fighting bullies one-on-one, but they don’t fight fair; they fight two and three on one,” Bennett said. So the youths got together and “started carrying mace, knives, brass knuckles and stun guns, and if somebody messed with one of us then all of us would gang up on them.”

They're bashing back. Good for them... so long as they're just bashing bashers.

 

Comments (56) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Vince 1
I like it! Stand up to bullies! That goes for kids and adults. We have the right to defend ourselves.
Posted by Vince on September 28, 2011 at 2:11 PM
gloomy gus 2
"For Bennett, the focus now is just on staying out of trouble. But sitting at home all day is “boring,” as he put it. Adding to the restlessness, he knows that Check It members are just a tweet away, eagerly awaiting word from him to meet downtown and start the drama anew."

This would make an ama-hazing documentary.
Posted by gloomy gus on September 28, 2011 at 2:12 PM
3
Way to go, fellas. The only reason the bullies and ministers pick on teh gays is they're perceived to be weak and alone. Kick some ass and then you'll be respected. I hate to think this way and wish we were more sane as a species, but I'd rather see people standing up for themselves than otherwise.
Posted by mran on September 28, 2011 at 2:17 PM
Banna 4
Someone has already posted surveillance footage of these toughs in action.
Posted by Banna http://www.ucp.org on September 28, 2011 at 2:18 PM
LogopolisMike 5
Not to make light of a pretty serious subject matter, but I can't help but smile a little that the outrageous bigotry permitted and supported by anti-gay crusaders are now pretty much responsible for creating this, which is both:

1) their worst kind of scare tactic nightmare (roaming! gay! gangs!)
2) an actual gay porn scenario I've seen coming to life
Posted by LogopolisMike http://logopolis.typepad.com on September 28, 2011 at 2:21 PM
Towanda 6
Sounds like the Pink Posse from Queer as Folk. And it sounds like it could get out of hand really fast, but until it does I can't help but root for them.
Posted by Towanda on September 28, 2011 at 2:22 PM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 7
Sounds like a good way to get dead in a hurry. Don't fuck with this shit unless you really know what you're doing. Some people do.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on September 28, 2011 at 2:22 PM
MacCrocodile 8
I'd like to take this opportunity to coin the word "gayng" and bury it forever. No one is allowed to use that word. Ever.
Posted by MacCrocodile on September 28, 2011 at 2:28 PM
9
Sounds sort of analogous to the Pink Pistols, although their M.O. is geared toward lawful concealed carry and is probably not popular among a lot of the Capitol Hill crowd, especially the younger crowd.
Posted by Reg on September 28, 2011 at 2:29 PM
10
This could go either way. This matter could escalate into something awful.

No, the gays shouldn't have to shut up and take it, and yes, this young man was provoked into action, but is it working? Is it stable? Or are the homophobic gangs just getting bigger in response?
Posted by DRF on September 28, 2011 at 2:31 PM
rob! 11
Well. Hum. So if a bunch of urban gay black kids can go from bullied to bullies, maybe the Dems DON'T have to raise their knees up around their ears every time the Rethuglicans decide to slap them around.
Posted by rob! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZBdUceCL5U on September 28, 2011 at 2:34 PM
Chris in Vancouver WA 12
What Vince said. Dan, why would they bash anyone who isn't a basher? Is the use of violence in self-defense really that much of a slippery slope?

If you're thinking, "Let the police take care of it", well, the police don't go after anonymous gay-bashers, just like they won't go after the guy on the bus who stole your wallet.
Posted by Chris in Vancouver WA on September 28, 2011 at 2:35 PM
gloomy gus 13
@4, I did not see that one coming at all. Nicely done.
Posted by gloomy gus on September 28, 2011 at 2:36 PM
I Hate Screen Names 14
Carrying lethal weapons like knives is not the bestest of ideas. It drastically elevates the risk of serious injury or worse, both for your assailant and you. More importantly, most jurisdictions do not allow the use of lethal countermeasures to non-lethal attacks, and the kid could be charged and convicted of manslaughter-- even though he wasn't the original assailant.

Put more simply, if you punch me in the face, I don't get to pull out my gun and shoot you. I have to be in reasonable fear of my life or "serious bodily harm" before I'm permitted to use lethal self-defense. A broken nose does not qualify.

[Aside: I don't necessarily agree with the law; I'm just stating what the law usually is.]
Posted by I Hate Screen Names on September 28, 2011 at 2:36 PM
15
"Bashing" as you put it is never a thing to celebrate. Even violence in self defense is tragic. There are effective non-violent models to follow if you care look at history or, for that matter, if you care to look past your own primal impulse to wound back.

Shouldn't we aspire to be more than animal brutes?

WWGD? (what would Gandhi do)
Posted by Mr. J on September 28, 2011 at 2:37 PM
16
Fuck you, Dan. You have officially crossed the line into blithering, incomprehensibly short-sighted repugnance. Enjoy your time in the company of the likes of Hitchens and Rooney.

This isn't a fucking revenge movie. It's not a TV show. These kids are going to start carrying weapons, and other kids, both bashers and innocent bystanders, are going to get hurt. Cheering on gangs, any kind of gang, puts blood on your hands.

So again, fuck you, Dan, you worthless hypocrite. If you're so gung-ho for violence-based solutions, get your ass out on the street and do it yourself.
Posted by One eyed man on September 28, 2011 at 2:44 PM
hans millionaire 17
“If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters. This struggle may be a moral one; or it may be a physical one; or it may be both moral and physical; but it must be a struggle.”
― Frederick Douglass
Posted by hans millionaire on September 28, 2011 at 2:49 PM
hans millionaire 18
“Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will.”
― Frederick Douglass
Posted by hans millionaire on September 28, 2011 at 2:50 PM
19
I was in DC a year ago and sat on the subway near a group of gay gang banger kids who fit that description. They were very loud and boisterous, and constantly play-fighting and bumnping into other passengers. I wanted to film them because they were hilarious, but they might have taken umbrage.
Posted by yuiop on September 28, 2011 at 2:51 PM
Free Busch On Tuesday 20
@15

We shouldn't ask what Ghandhi would do, rather what would our opponents do to Ghandhi. These conservatives would gleefully slaughter men, women and children as long as they were liberals, leftists or non-Christians. Look at the response to Utoye Island,. Troy Davis execution, the Kelly Thomas execution.

These people are ready to kill us at the drop of a hat. There is no reason why we shouldn't be armed, trained and ready to fight.

I'd follow Zapata before I'd follow Gandhi.
Posted by Free Busch On Tuesday on September 28, 2011 at 2:54 PM
21
This makes me nervous, violence is always a last resort. That being said there are definitely groups that need to fight back, and I believe the gay community has tried to blend peacefully for long enough.
Obviously I don't want to see people being drug behind a truck down a gravel road... oh wait, actually I would like to see that happen to the soulless individuals who torture others because they are 'different'.
Posted by lemonrose on September 28, 2011 at 2:55 PM
BEG 22
I wish them the best and hope that none of this blows back too hard (I mean, if they are also black, that could go horribly horribly wrong if anything winds up getting the police called in).

Hopefully Check It is in terms of checking the violence (surprised that interpretation didn't come up in the article).

That said, @4 FTW!
Posted by BEG http://twitter.com/#!/browneyedgirl65 on September 28, 2011 at 3:00 PM
Collin 23
You mean someone actually created the Gay Mafia?
Posted by Collin on September 28, 2011 at 3:02 PM
Matt from Denver 24
Two-pronged tactics work better than single-pronged. People forget that MLK's success was at least in part because whitey was shit scared of Malcolm X, the Black Panthers, and other militant groups. And I'm pretty sure there was the threat of unrest in Gandhi's time, too.
Posted by Matt from Denver on September 28, 2011 at 3:02 PM
Free Busch On Tuesday 25
@21

There is justified violence, wars of independence, wars of revolution, wars of national liberation and wars of the People. Non-violence would have taken decades to free the Slaves. It would have failed in Kosovo, it would have failed in Chechnya, it failed in Russia.

That being said, violence in this case is not directly necessary. However the implied value of force is essential in the defense of minorities. If it won't be provided by the police force, the government, and the society, it is up to the minority to defend itself, whether through force or implied force.
Posted by Free Busch On Tuesday on September 28, 2011 at 3:04 PM
dangerousgift 26
If anyone's interested, the book "Captive Genders" has some really great narrative histories of gay street youth organizations that would probably be considered gangs today, that formed in the late 60's and early 70's. Pretty neat stuff. Here's a link:

http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/99540…

Also, GO TEAM!
Posted by dangerousgift on September 28, 2011 at 3:05 PM
27
@20

How did Gandhi die?

Did he accomplish anything?

How is he remembered?

Did the whole world learn anything from his life?

How many violent characters are loose in the world today, lashing out, destroying those around them and then being swept into the dustbin of history?
Posted by Mr. J on September 28, 2011 at 3:09 PM
MacCrocodile 28
@27 - Yeah, fame is an accurate measure of influence. Is it possible Gandhi gets all the credit because he took a fairly novel approach? Because he had a dramatic death? Because we prefer to remember the end of British occupation of India as being peaceful and pleasant?
Posted by MacCrocodile on September 28, 2011 at 3:13 PM
29
Good for them... so long as they're just bashing bashers.


Sure, as long as vigilantism doesn't get, you know, out of hand, it should be fine, right? What could go wrong?

On a completely unrelated note, have you ever noticed that the governmental department that's in charge of sending planes to far away countries to drop bombs on them is called the department of "defense?"
Posted by Proteus on September 28, 2011 at 3:15 PM
mixy 30
I see folks from this group in Chinatown on the regular and they are often really irritating... but all in all, I'm glad they've found a group that will stick up for each other. I just worry there will be an ever-escalating need to do things to prove themselves to rival gangs and general bigots.
Posted by mixy on September 28, 2011 at 3:16 PM
Free Busch On Tuesday 31
@27

Gandhi helped birth two of the most violent nations in the history of the modern world. Gandhi didn't change a thing other than borders. India and Pakistan still suffer atrocious crimes that are part of the structure of their societies. Rape, honor killing, institutional/cultural/religious prostitution (including child sex slavery), and other issues. India has one of the longest running Marxist insurgencies in the world.

I mean I guess if you want to worship someone who was assassinated after only hastening the end of colonialism in the Indian subcontinent (which was going to happen eventually) sure go on right ahead. Just realize that India is still a corrupt autocratic society ruled by a cultural and wealthy elite while the poor suffer daily.

Oh and in case you don't get it, Gandhi didn't change a damn thing. If you think he did, you're delusional.
Posted by Free Busch On Tuesday on September 28, 2011 at 3:31 PM
Free Busch On Tuesday 32
@28

The end of British rule was peaceful, the birth of India and Pakistan was not. Violence began and it has not ended. Sikhs, Muslims and Hindus started murdering each other the first day of Independence.
Posted by Free Busch On Tuesday on September 28, 2011 at 3:36 PM
Vince 33
The Stonewall riots were drag queens kicking the ass of cops that had been kicking the drag queen's asses for too long. White Night riots were the GLBT fighting back. Minorities get no respect until they fight back and stand up and say "Enough!".
Posted by Vince on September 28, 2011 at 4:01 PM
Knat 34
I gotta finish the rest of Queer As Folk. I keep running into references to it lately.
Posted by Knat on September 28, 2011 at 4:16 PM
35
Self defense is great. Taking on bullies is great. Gangs with the corresponding attitudes, not so much. When it escalates to guns, there won't be much cheering.
Posted by SatanicMechanic on September 28, 2011 at 4:21 PM
Sargon Bighorn 36
Self defense, it's legally, morally, ethically, and socially acceptable.
Posted by Sargon Bighorn on September 28, 2011 at 4:46 PM
37
Consequences. Until there are consequences for those who taunt, abuse and assault LGBT folk, the abuse won't stop.

The consequences can be social condemnation, criminalization and prosecution, or getting your head beat in.

Of the three, the third is frought with problems, including legal, but hey, whatever works. If LGBT victims aren't such a pain-free target anymore, the cowards who beat on them might think twice.

Meanwhile, can't we put some more effort into the first two?
Posted by Brooklyn Reader on September 28, 2011 at 5:07 PM
38
Um, guys, the article said that this kid was expelled because he flew into a rage and assaulted a teacher. The teacher's crime? Said that Bennett 'acted gay'.

I can see carrying mace and stun guns, and rallying quickly to each others' defense. I'm okay with fighting back physically, when violence is offered. Knives and brass knuckles will put someone in the hospital or the morgue. Let's not celebrate this kid as a freedom fighter just yet.
Posted by clashfan on September 28, 2011 at 8:22 PM
Lechugo 39
This worries me sick.
Posted by Lechugo on September 28, 2011 at 9:38 PM
40
....Where do I sign up?
Posted by dakoneko on September 28, 2011 at 10:50 PM
KittenKoder 41
"... so long as they're just bashing bashers."? So ... now they go to Westboro to?
Posted by KittenKoder http://digitalnoisegraffiti.com/ on September 28, 2011 at 11:12 PM
Tetchy Brit 42
@42 Well now I have an idea for a sequel to Red State! I'd best get Kevin Smith on the phone!
Posted by Tetchy Brit on September 29, 2011 at 2:03 AM
43
I have to admit, my initial reaction is "f*** yeah!"
I hope they don't go overboard though.
Posted by niko4ever on September 29, 2011 at 4:27 AM
44
The article kind of makes it sound like they go out looking for, and if not finding, stirring up trouble. Self defense is one thing, attacking is something else entirely.

But it is the Washington Post.....
Posted by Barbara on September 29, 2011 at 5:39 AM
Posted by Rob in Baltimore http://www.wishbookweb.com/ on September 29, 2011 at 5:46 AM
46
Here's another gang that started out "defending" themselves and their people:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wUP17oqmM…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=m93a…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrFABkdO4…

The Hells Angels started out as a legitimate motorcycle club. FSU started out targeting drug dealers and skinheads. Look what they turned into. There is no difference between a gay street gang, a hardcore gang or a biker gang. Gang violence is gang violence is gang violence.
Posted by Terminally Frosty on September 29, 2011 at 6:38 AM
John Horstman 47
I see nothing wrong with kicking the shit out of violent homophobic bullies in the imminent defense of oneself or others, but, as with all vigilantism, this has the potential to get out of hand. It sounds like it might already be courting a retaliation/escalation model, which usually winds up bad for everyone involved. What if they start defining homophobia in the same way as GLAAD? They could wind up going after e.g. gay men for reclaimed/disempowered uses of "fag".
Posted by John Horstman on September 29, 2011 at 8:47 AM
48
Good strategy. Every bully is a cringing coward inside.
Posted by Whitey's Conspiracy on September 29, 2011 at 9:39 AM
Dingo 49
Not a very well thought out post. There's a vast difference between safety in numbers and fighting back when someone attacks you on one hand, and being "one of the largest, more aggressive gangs in the city," assaulting people with weapons when they merely call you names, and going out and seeking violence on the other.
Posted by Dingo on September 29, 2011 at 9:54 AM
50
Who doesn't want to wear the ribbon?!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGaqI20WH…
Posted by Doug Wright on September 29, 2011 at 10:20 AM
lewlew 51
I have been waiting a long time for this. I'm generally a pacifist, but that doesn't always work. Black people got no respect until the Black Panthers came along and scared the shit out of white people. Only then was grudging respect given. Gay people will have to make it clear that violence will be overcome by any means possible. Then it will change.
Posted by lewlew on September 29, 2011 at 12:15 PM
52
The outpouring of gleeful and bloodthirsty cheerleading for vigilante violence in this thread is both distressing and disappointing. What happened to the moral highground? Being part of a civil society means not condoning violence just because it affords the thrill of acting out adolescent revenge fantasies.
Posted by seriouslyguys on September 29, 2011 at 10:25 PM
53
@19, they won't take umbrage, they'll just take your phone, for realz. Groups of roving teens in DC - gay, straight, whatever - are a menace to society. I can see why they reacted in such a way, but it's not something to be celebrated, rounding down to the lowest common denominator or whatnot. Standing up for yourself/your friends =/= to creating a violent street gang, which now doesn't just "bash the bashers" but is part and parcel of the problems at Gallery Place: fights, theft, threats to passers-by, harassment, and other unsavory behaviors. I LIVE where these kids live, I probably pass them on the street from time to time (alone or in a small group at that point), and I STILL avoid the sidewalk by the National Portrait Gallery because I do not need to be harassed or feel that if I answer my phone it will be jacked faster than I can say "hello." Groups embolden people, and when that group is set on being violent, uncivilized, and obnoxious, the results are disastrous.

Also, surprised to see Courtland Milloy speak AGAINST this. Overall, though, I highly recommend you avoid Milloy's work, Dan. This was a rare gem, but he ultimately thinks you're a myopic little twit, too.
Posted by Ms. D on September 30, 2011 at 9:05 AM
54
Agree with 46. Saw a documentary about gangs and apparently a lot of them started out as vigilante groups formed to protect the innocent, but then they have a tendency degrade into street thugs (power corrupts). In theory it's self-defense, but in reality vigilantes typically do more harm than good and rarely stay true to their original cause. Most are torch-carrying mobs on a witch hunts looking for scapegoats to blame. Sort of like owning a gun- statistically much more likely to wind up in the wrong hands and harm someone you love than to be used for self-protection. You can't take a handful of suicides or murders and make them justification for street gangs- just doesn't work.
Posted by eye for and eye and everyone is blind on October 1, 2011 at 5:59 AM
55
20

Slaughter?
oh my....
Just how many Americans have conservatives slaughtered?
Two? Three?...
How many people are infected with AIDS by homosexuals?
In a week. Every week....
A thousand? Two?

While you are shivering under your bed ponder the concept of proportional allocation of resources.
Posted by You Are Your Own Slaughterer on October 1, 2011 at 6:18 AM
56
Many places the British enlightened reverted to seething savage hellholes once the British left...
Posted by White Mans' Burden on October 1, 2011 at 6:21 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy