Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Week 3 of the DC Relaunch: Blatant Sexism, Bad Kazoo Cover Songs, and Wonder Woman

Posted by on Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:46 PM

This month, DC Comics is publishing 52 first issues in an effort to pull in new readers. (You can find my other reviews here and here.) The third week of their New 52 initiative—which came out last Wednesday—features some decent work with the company’s most iconic characters, some mediocre stuff, and some awfully sexist dreck. Find a big, nerdy roundup review of all twelve comics after the jump.

This is like the textbook definition of sexy, right?
  • This is like the textbook definition of "sexy," right?
Let’s begin, as is now our custom, with the atrocious books. Laura Hudson at Comics Alliance has already eloquently expressed her shock and disappointment at Catwoman and Red Hood and the Outlaws. I don’t think there’s anything I can add to what she said—these two books are sexist, creepy, and just plain bad comics. They should be actively avoided.

Birds of Prey, the female cloak-and-daggery supergroup written by pulpy mystery novelist Duane Swierczynski, isn’t especially sexist, but it is a bad comic, full of cliches, awkward transitions, and vapid characterization. Compared with the earlier Birds series, this feels like a dud. Captain Atom, which reimagines the title character as a more Dr. Manhattanish figure, is bland, talky, and dull. And Legion of Superheroes is a total fucking mess. As I said last week, I’m a big Legion fan, and I still can’t fucking figure out what’s going on here or why I should care. The art, too, is notably bad: The last page features what I think is supposed to be a shocking panel that raises the stakes for the heroes, but the reveal is instead tucked away in what is perhaps the most undramatic action panel I’ve seen out of all DC’s first issues so far. This is like a rock song played by a tone-deaf kazoo player. What a mess.

This brings us, then, to the inoffensive middle ground. Supergirl is as forgettable a comic as you can slap together. Nothing really happens—Supergirl comes to on Earth for the very first time with a bad case of amnesia. The last page sets up a big fight with Superman to come (it feels as though half of DC’s 52 first issues end with the threat of a fight with Superman) and there’s no indication why anyone should care. DC Universe Presents Deadman tries to reimagine the title character as a kind of Quantum Leap-style do-gooder, hopping from body to body and resolving spiritual crises in random people. The writing isn’t so bad—it’s a little heavy-handed, but I’ve read much worse in a superhero comic—but the bland artwork and the pedestrian way Deadman’s origin is presented make the whole package feel like a flop. Neal Adams’s weird, wonderful work on Deadman raises the bar to levels that Paul Jenkins and Bernard Chang simply cannot hope to reach. Nightwing is all right. Kyle Higgins explains pretty well that we’re reading the story of Batman’s first sidekick, all grown up, but he doesn’t explain what makes Nightwing more than just a, well, kid sidekick all grown up. Reading Nightwing doesn’t make you want to die, but it doesn’t especially make you want to read the next issue, either.

Blue Beetle is a reboot of DC’s New Mexico-based Spider-Man riff. It’s solid comics, with Tony Bedard’s script tugging us along in a cheerful enough way, establishing the character's origin, and introducing a couple of credible threats by the end of the issue. (I’m a sucker for the Brotherhood of Evil.) Ig Guara’s art is good stuff—he’s got a future in superhero comics for sure. It’s a fun introduction to a young character who stands to be DC’s biggest breakout hit in at least a decade. This comic is everything that Static Shock wasn’t—fun superhero comics starring an interesting young protagonist.

WonderWoman1-194x300.jpeg
Green Lantern Corps was probably the biggest surprise of the batch for me. It boils the Green Lantern concept down to its most basic concept—space cops!—while explaining the mythology and introducing characters cleanly, efficiently, and sympathetically. Peter J. Tomasi writes believable characters, making Guy Gardner interesting for the first time in years, and sets up a story that promises to be part procedural, part good-old-fashioned posse story, and part space opera. I really dug this comic.

But the best two DC Comics to come out this week are Scott Snyder’s Batman and Brian Azzarello’s Wonder Woman. Snyder’s is the more traditional take on the character—this is your basic Batman story, with a breakout at Arkham Asylum (again?), a comprehensive look at the supporting cast, including a female reporter named Vicki Vale, and a few nods to technological advances adding to Batman’s crime fighting skill set. Greg Capullo’s art is, while slightly inconsistent, a dramatic and atmospheric addition to the script. It’s a good, solid Batman comic book that will keep your interest and leave you feeling that you got your three dollars’ worth of entertainment.

Wonder Woman feels like one of those late-80s DC Comics just before the Vertigo-mature readers divide that teeters on the edge between superhero fantasy and dark-edged horror. Wonder Woman, here drawn with an appealing exoticism and imposing stature by Cliff Chiang, seems to be the only defense humanity has from weird, fickle gods who like to mess in their affairs. Wonder Woman is one of those characters who needs a solid mission statement, and Azzarello seems to understand that by making her the line between reality and weird mythology. This is something that Superman can’t do, and if Azzarello can keep the dark horror vibe running, this relaunch could wind up being one of the most memorable takes on the character. His Wonder Woman almost makes up for the truly wretched depictions of women in Red Hood and Catwoman. Almost.

 

Comments (8) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
evilvolus 1
I'll save myself the effort of doing full reviews and say that I largely agree with you down the line.

I'd personally rank Batman & Robin as better than Batman, but it was a solid baseline Batbook.

I found Red Hood to be significantly more offensive than Catwoman. The latter is just cheesecake worth rolling eyes at and looking away. Red Hood didn't just turn Starfire into a slut, but a brain damaged slut. That was a book without anything even approaching a redeeming quality.

I probably liked all your "inoffensive middle ground" books more than you. But the lower-tier DC quality level has been so low in the last decade that maybe average just feels above average these days.
Posted by evilvolus on September 27, 2011 at 1:00 PM
evilvolus 2
For the final week, I'm really looking forward to GL: New Guardians, JL Dark, Superman, and Teen Titans. There's a couple other potential ones.

I wish they'd just let Seaman die, though. He's not even half as interesting as Namor, who is already one of the least interesting Marvel characters.
Posted by evilvolus on September 27, 2011 at 1:10 PM
3
Thanks for these reviews, Paul. Having been back into comics for a few years now, I decided upon hearing about the DC relaunch that I'd move away from getting monthly issues for the titles I was into and just wait for the trade paperback collections to come out. Now having read your reviews of a few titles I was interested in, I might not even do that. For example, I wasn't interested in Catwoman, but wanted to give Red Hood and the Outlaws a try, and now you (and Ms. Hudson's article) have helped me decide not to do so. Whether it's sexism or just crappy writing or art, I don't want to support it. It's why I'm likely not going to pick back up Birds of Prey post-relaunch -- Gail Simone did such a great job with it, seeing it someone else's hands just feels wrong.
Posted by bookworm on September 27, 2011 at 1:15 PM
4
Great review of the Starfire reboot by a seven-year-old girl: http://io9.com/5844355/a-7+year+old-girl…
Posted by Zuulabelle http://www.mellophant.com on September 27, 2011 at 2:05 PM
evilvolus 5
@4 - Awesome article. I was so relieved when I saw that the dad didn't actually let her sit and read Red Hood.

Best quote from the comments:
"It's like offering kids marijuana laced brownies as a gateway drug, and then when they're old enough to pay you steer them into injecting straight battery acid. Beyond the moral implications it's just bad business. You lose your prospective customers before you ever really made money off them."
Posted by evilvolus on September 27, 2011 at 2:50 PM
James McDaniel 6
So what's the reason for the DC reboot, again, and who was it done for? It sounds like they are doing only relatively minor tweaks to character concepts and origin stories. I grew up on Marvel comics (but haven't read them since college) so, as a person who doesn't know Nightwing from night elves, why do I care if 17% of his origin is different? It seems that most of the characters still fill the same role in the DC pantheon as they did before. If I didn't find DC compelling prior to the reboot, such small changes seem unlikely to change my mind. And if I *was* a reader beforehand, wouldn't it be annoying to have decades of canon discarded?

Certain reboots make sense to me, for example JJ Abrams "Star Trek". Most of the fun comes from seeing new actors inhabit such archetypal roles. Combined with the courage to fundamentally alter the setting (with the destruction of Vulcan) the end result was enjoyable and made you wonder where they would take things in the next movie.

The DC reboot feels less like a fundamental reset and more like they just decided to give all their titles new writers and new artists, all at the same time.
Posted by James McDaniel http://jamesmcdaniel.com on September 27, 2011 at 2:55 PM
evilvolus 7
@6 - The point was a publicity stunt, basically. I would have prefered that they had the balls to fully reboot and start everything truly fresh, but I'm not in charge over there. The end result is really just offering "new" readers a moment when they know that everything is supposed to be at a jumping-on point instead of having to guess.

I suspect it'll have much less effect on truly new readers, and much more on Marvel Zombies and lapsed-in-general comic fans. Bringing old readers back into the fold may not grow the industry sustainably, but it's more dollars at least.

I've always been more of a Marvel guy, myself, and this stunt has definitely increased the number of DC titles I'm likely to continue reading.
Posted by evilvolus on September 27, 2011 at 3:09 PM
8
Thanks! I am going to check out the new Wonder Woman and Blue Beetle.
Posted by Sparklynn on September 28, 2011 at 8:32 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy