Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, September 16, 2011

They Are Visible

Posted by on Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 7:42 AM

Bisocial Network launches an online video campaign to combat "biphobia and bi-erasure." More info here.

 

Comments (25) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
A couple things that spring to mind:
1: I never realized there was such a thing as over enunciation before, but now I've seen it in action.
2: Videos seem much more professional if we can't see your arm move to click the mouse and stop the recording right before every cut.
3: This is just maybe an image thing, but... Were bi folks invisible before? I thought that's what the B in LGBT stood for. And as a straight guy who supports gay rights, I figured that when gay marriage and civil rights are established then bi people prosper in the same way as gays do. I mean, if you fall for a person of the other gender and decide to get hitched, you're already set. If you fall for a person of your gender, then once things are settled for gays, you're set too.

This is genuine befuddlement, not an attempt to start an argument. I'm confused, if you're making yourselves visible now, what you were before.
Posted by NateMan on September 16, 2011 at 8:23 AM
gloomy gus 2
Shouldn't the verb be past tense? It says the "launch" was in 2010. Those edits were funny.
Posted by gloomy gus on September 16, 2011 at 8:33 AM
3
I think this is a fine idea, though I think they missed the opportunity to address "bi-erasure" in the bi community as well.

I'm all for combating the homophobia driven discrimination of bis in the straight community and the incredulity driven biases within the queer community, but any discussion of bi-erasure has to include the fact that a lot of it has to do with bi folks marrying opposite sex partners and disappearing into an assumed-to-be-straight role. I understand the impulse to blend in if you can lead a fufilling life with an opposite sex partner, but every bi person who basically places one half of themselves back in the closet by not being open about their sexuality while partnered is also contributing to "bi-erasure".
Posted by Lynx on September 16, 2011 at 8:41 AM
4
As a bisexual woman, I have encountered the attitude from almost all of the men I've dated (starting back in high school) that I couldn't really be bi, and it was just in my head and I'd come around. I can't explain to you how frustrating that is. There's this general assumption that if a girl says she's bi, she's just "experimenting". I have gotten a similar attitude from women occasionally (that I can't really be bi, I must be lesbian, and I just haven't grown up enough to accept that). So yeah, biphobia and bi-erasure are real.

By the way, I married a man who accepts that I'm bi, and has no problem with me occasionally being with women. Not that it's easy to find those women... but I haven't married and "disappeared".
Posted by anyes on September 16, 2011 at 9:23 AM
5
Is Dan ill? No snarky comment about bisexual Pitbulls to get the comment thread going for the weekend? I'm concerned.
Posted by adam.smith on September 16, 2011 at 9:25 AM
6
oh Danny-
you are such an inspiring champion of all things Bi.....

*sigh*
Posted by hahahahahohohohohohohheeheeheehahahaha... on September 16, 2011 at 9:28 AM
7
Sound! Sound! Sound! Tip: if you're making a video, and seeking that professional touch, and can't afford a sound man and boom, at least use a clip-on lapel mic. That room echo says, "Cheap, cheap, cheap!"

Yeah, and everything @1 said.
Posted by Brooklyn Reader on September 16, 2011 at 9:32 AM
KittenKoder 8
@1 Actually ... the bisexual and trans communities have been pretty much invisible. Services for the two are lacking, equality ... well for different reasons that's lacking. But the bi's have it pretty tough to because they lack anything to make them stand out, half the time you just don't realize who they are. But here's the thing, as I have witnessed, many people complain that they they choose to be gay or straight. So I can see why they would worry about being invisible. Just because an organization includes something in their name or mission statement, doesn't mean there's anything they can do to help.
Posted by KittenKoder http://digitalnoisegraffiti.com/ on September 16, 2011 at 10:17 AM
luke1249 9
Almost all "straight" porn is bi porn. When it comes to chicks.
Posted by luke1249 on September 16, 2011 at 11:13 AM
BEG 10
There's apparently a signed version here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZRmzT-N_…

Although you can't see her sign if you have captions turned on o.O

Bi-erasure and bi-phobia (I think women get more of the erasure and men the phobia, so the latter has been harder for me to spot) are very present and very real. There's a lot of issues packed up in there.

A bi woman is either considered to be experimenting (and will return to the hetero fold soon enough) by the men around her. Or, she will be considered instant game for a ffm threesome (oddly, an mmf is never considered) and pursued on that account. There was a period of time in my life where I didn't tell potential sexual partners I was bi because I was so sick of the instant FFM! FFM! that would light up in so many eyes...

A bi man is quite often rejected as a potential partner by women fearing they'll run off with the next man. Or considered to be "experimenting" by gay men who assume he'll finish the process and come all the way out of the closet as gay eventually. Or he's a faggot anyway and beaten up by het men...ouch.
Posted by BEG http://twitter.com/#!/browneyedgirl65 on September 16, 2011 at 11:13 AM
11
I think they got the launch date wrong.
Posted by Dan Savage on September 16, 2011 at 11:53 AM
12
@9, I hate (most commercial) straight porn. There's too much focus on male pleasure, usually to the point that what the girls are doing looks uncomfortable or unstimulating to me, and their expressions of pleasure usually sound fake. Total turn-off. I may be bi, but I'm still a woman. I go for homemade stuff on youporn that's authentic girl on girl (not staged looking), or, more rarely, the straight porn where the guy is actually invested in the pleasure of his partner.
Posted by anyes on September 16, 2011 at 12:14 PM
Eva Hopkins 13
Dan, is this being posted in response to all the bi babes who didn't like being in parenthesis on your oral sex quiz? Just curious. Either way, thank you.

But #1 is right. This video needs more polish. I remember when I was marching/street billing/etc with folks on the edges of ACT UP in the late 80's/early 90's in NYC. The gay pride movement had a similarly raggedy, rough-edged approach to them, back then. Maybe if all us bi's who complain about invisibility - as I have - lend support to this & other budding bi-groups/communities, soon we won't have to bitch about sloppy video editing. & plus we'd meet people easier, & stop bitching about discrimination from both straight & gay communities.

Oh! And, after two seconds on the Bi Social Network site, I found a long-ago pal. So at least take a look, bi people.

Hmmm. *brain munching*

Posted by Eva Hopkins http://www.lunamusestudios.com on September 16, 2011 at 12:16 PM
14
Bi-erasure? I loved them!
Posted by beccoid on September 16, 2011 at 12:53 PM
saxfanatic 15
I hope they achieve the visibility for which they strive. Then they'll be free to turn their attention to audibility. Man, the guitar in that sound mix is overbearing.
Posted by saxfanatic on September 16, 2011 at 2:01 PM
venomlash 16
I read "They Are Visible", looked at the video still, and immediately thought "nah, that top isn't THAT revealing".
Posted by venomlash on September 16, 2011 at 2:52 PM
17
i WISH they were visible. too bad i gotta make do with some better-than-average cleavage instead.
Posted by whiskeypony on September 16, 2011 at 3:15 PM
18
Was that Tracy Morgan?
Posted by Mickey in Ar on September 16, 2011 at 4:59 PM
19
The music sucked, too.
Posted by Ivan on September 16, 2011 at 6:02 PM
20
More power to the concept, although it disinclines me to be an enthusiastic ally when I read such statements as:

"she ‘got’ him and he saw the person rather than the parts"

"they each understand that real love is about more than just gender"

I won't call such quotations monophobic, but they're certainly a pretty strong slap in the face.
Posted by vennominon on September 16, 2011 at 7:44 PM
Eva Hopkins 21
Again, the early gay movement had some clunkers, too. Let me just be happy the site exists for two minutes, okay?

...though I'll guiltily confess as soon as I saw the hot pink, unreadable type against the purple background, & the founder lady's hair improperly clipped out, my Photoshop-lovin' self was having similar thoughts.

Posted by Eva Hopkins http://www.lunamusestudios.com on September 16, 2011 at 10:08 PM
22
@3:

Yes, but the same thing happens when bisexual folks marry into same-sex relationships too. Unless we're actually seen screwing two people of opposite genders at the same time, noone thinks we're bi.

Not that it's strange or something. It's just a basic assumption everyone makes, without further information. We'd basically have to walk around wearing T-shirts that say "bisexual" all the time to really be recognized as such.

There's also another assumption. That basically, all bisexuals are sluts. Because the only ones they see are the ones on the internet boinking two people of opposite genders at once.
Posted by gromm on September 16, 2011 at 10:40 PM
Jubilation T. Cornball 23
OK that was a tranny, right?
Posted by Jubilation T. Cornball on September 17, 2011 at 9:20 AM
24
@16: You win the thread (as usual).
Posted by BlackRose on September 20, 2011 at 11:14 PM
25
@13-Eva-I was a part of the early gay/GLBT movement and bisexuals have always been a part of things ever since the start, despite how some people want to revise history or pretend that we were not there.

Dan Savage is biphobic and practices bisexual erasure since for decades he said how male bisexuals don't exist, supported the 2005 Bailey study, and even still in 2011 tells bisexual teens and young adults that they're eventually going to come out as gay/lesbian, and he likes to claim that somehow all bisexuals get involved in opposite gender relationships, and that gay men and lesbians should not have anything to do with having a relationship with a man or woman that's bisexual.
Yes he did write about the 2011 Bailey study but he's still biphobic and still practices bisexual erasure towards us.

Then again Dan's the biggest hypocrite and loves to run his mouth about stuff he knows nothing about which includes human sexuality and bisexuality. ;)
Posted by JamesT42 on September 20, 2011 at 11:37 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy