Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, September 8, 2011

Alcohol Is So Very, Very Bad

Posted by on Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:16 PM

The campaign to defeat Costco's Initiative 1183, which would end the state's control of liquor wholesaling and retailing, just released this teetotaling, booze-is-dangerous, think-of-the-children ad:

The campaign website goes on to declare that this measure is "just another attempt to profit at the expense of our public safety, kids and communities."

It may occur to you that these anti-liquor talking points—and and the claim that this is about the other side's profits—seem very weird when you consider that 96 percent of the campaign running this ad is funded by the liquor industry. Plain and simple, the liquor industry doesn't want to lose its wholesaling partnership with the state; that's the issue. Not the safety, not the kids.

 

Comments (21) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
sirkowski 1
So who's behind the Yes campaign then?
Posted by sirkowski http://www.missdynamite.com on September 8, 2011 at 1:29 PM
gloomy gus 2
That Renton firefighter/EMT Kristen Sloboden is smoking hot, though.
Posted by gloomy gus on September 8, 2011 at 1:32 PM
venomlash 3
They let convenience stores sell cigarettes, no?
The only reason ciggies don't kill more kids than alcohol is because they kill you more slowly. God hates fags, y'all!
Posted by venomlash on September 8, 2011 at 1:34 PM
Dominic Holden 4
@1) The yes campaign is funded by Costco, which is also in it for the profits.
Posted by Dominic Holden on September 8, 2011 at 1:41 PM
5
If it's so bad, why don't they ban it outright?

Idiots.
Posted by tired and true on September 8, 2011 at 1:44 PM
6
Isn't a 10,000 square-foot store a requirement to sell it? That's hardly a 'mini' mart.
Posted by Subdued Excitement on September 8, 2011 at 1:44 PM
slade 7
yea I saw the add and its pretty strange watching the state push alcohol and even worse firefighters and police and politipiggys toteing "State snake oil for sale" like kids have a problem getting drugs or booze?
Posted by slade http://www.youtube.com/user/guppygator on September 8, 2011 at 1:49 PM
Dougsf 8
Dude @:17 straight up said "mini-marts and gas stations" will be allowed to sell liquor. Not surprising, but shameless.
Posted by Dougsf on September 8, 2011 at 1:58 PM
wilbur@work 9
The Stranger -- Undisputed King of Flip-Flops.
Posted by wilbur@work on September 8, 2011 at 1:59 PM
10
Team COSTCO all the way!!!
Posted by Erok on September 8, 2011 at 2:04 PM
11
@7 "like kids have a problem getting drugs or booze?"

I moved to Washington State halfway through high school and was surprised at how much less readily available hard liquor was here.

Anecdotal, sure, but as a parent I'd rather my kids did their binge drinking experiments with lower proof booze.
Posted by Also, longtime member, but still kinda dislike Costco on September 8, 2011 at 2:31 PM
12
I wonder how many people who, like me, voted no last go-round are going to be thinking, "I'm sure they've addressed my prior reservations and those drunks at The Stranger sure do like it. I'll vote yes."
Posted by Erich on September 8, 2011 at 2:40 PM
13
@5 they tried that. It didn't work.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prohibition…

Posted by sonder on September 8, 2011 at 2:44 PM
Zebes 14
Both sides of the argument are funded by Wealthy Business Interests, so to vote yes or no based on whether you hate Wealthy Business Interests and their disingenuous advertising is sort of pointless.

I think I'll vote yes just because I can't stand the "THINK OF THE CHILDREN" angle and I am a spiteful jerk.
Posted by Zebes http://www.badrap.org/rescue/index.html on September 8, 2011 at 3:32 PM
Cascadian 15
I would vote yes if it was limited to smaller specialty stores rather than big box stores like Costco, and if it came with tax changes so the whole thing was revenue neutral.

As it is, as much as I hate the WSLCB, I'm voting no.
Posted by Cascadian on September 8, 2011 at 3:56 PM
Cui Bono 16
WAAAAAAAH!!!!
If you want mass-distributed liquor so bad, move to another fucking state, I-1183 is another bullshit slide down the slippery slope to all-out privatized liquor.
Posted by Cui Bono on September 8, 2011 at 4:01 PM
Matt from Denver 17
@ 16, you say that like all-out privatized liquor is a bad thing.
Posted by Matt from Denver on September 8, 2011 at 6:07 PM
lauramae 18
I enjoy shopping at Costco, but I don't think the 10,000 square foot thing is fair. Why would it be in my interest as a voter to privatize liquor sales and then limit it to the big stores?
Posted by lauramae on September 8, 2011 at 9:00 PM
Cory 19
I'd do the female firefighter.
Posted by Cory on September 9, 2011 at 12:37 PM
Will in Seattle 20
Very very effective with it's target audience.

Women.

Especially women with kids or grandkids.

Mock it if you want, but it pushes all the right buttons.

And another loss for Alcohol Pushers ...
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on September 10, 2011 at 2:16 PM
Will in Seattle 21
@2 for the Ironical Win.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on September 10, 2011 at 2:18 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy