Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Thanks for the Slug of Bourbon, Dom

Posted by on Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:20 PM

Here's to you. (And to Jack Nicholson, in his finest 45 seconds.)

And now, some Bernard DeVoto, in his finest snippet. (I know you like a Manhattan, Dom, so you'll have to forgive me/him.)

There are only two cocktails. One can be described straightforwardly. It is a slug of whiskey and it is an honest drink. Those who hold by it at 6:00 pm offend no canon of our fellowship. Scotch, Irish, rye, bourbon at your will—but of itself alone. Whiskey and vermouth cannot meet as friends and the Manhattan is an offense against piety. With dry vermouth it is disreputable, with sweet vermouth disgusting. It signifies that the drinker, if male, has no spiritual dignity and would really prefer white mule; if female, a banana split.

To make a slug of whiskey, you pour some whiskey on some ice. The slug of whiskey is functional; its lines are clean. Perhaps the friend for whom you make it will want two or three drops of bitters. Fine: there is no harm in bitters, so long as they are Angostura—all others are condiments for a tea-shoppe cookbook...

Happy cocktail hour, everybody.

If he wants fruit salad in it, remind him that cocktails are drunk, not eaten, but go along with him as far as a thin half-slice of orange or, better, one of lemon peel. Deny him pineapple, cherries, and such truck as you would cyanide. If he asks for sugar, tell him you put it in to begin with, and thereafter be wary in your dealings with him. For sugar means that he is backsliding and will soon cross the frontier to join the heathen, with bottles of grenadine and almond extract in his pack. But before you give a slug of whiskey to anyone be sure that it is cold. Cocktails are cold.

With the other cocktail we reach a fine and noble art, and we reach too the wars over the gospel that have parted brothers, wrecked marriages, and made enemies of friends. It is here that the heresies burgeon and the schismatics bay. I suppose it is natural enough. Those who seek the perfect thing must have intense natures; there are many roads for them to take, all difficult, none lighted more than fitfully. No wonder if they mistake marsh fires for light, or when they find a light believe that it is the only one. From their love comes their tirelessness to defend and praise their love—tenaciously, arrogantly, intolerantly, vindictively. We may understand how cults form with the martini as with all arts, how rituals develop, how superstitious or even sorcerous beliefs and practices betray a faith that is passionate and pure but runs easily to fanaticism. But though we understand these matters we must not be lenient toward them for they divide the fellowship. Always remember that differences among ourselves will give arms to heathen. Frighten a woman with a bit of ritual and you may produce a hostess who will serve Manhattans. Affront a man with cultish snobbery and you may turn him, God forbid, to rum.

For instance, there is the widespread notion that women cannot make martinis, just as some islanders believe that they cast an evil spell on the tribal fishnets. This is a vagrant item of male egotism: the art of the martini is not a sex-linked character...

Of men and women alike it requires only intelligence and care—oh, perhaps some additional inborn spiritual fineness, some feeling for artistic form which, if it isn't genius, will do quite well. Or take the superstition, for I cannot dignify it as a heresy, that the martini must not be shaken. Nonsense. This perfect thing is made of gin and vermouth. They are self-reliant liquors, stable, of stout heart; we do not have to treat them as if they were plover's eggs. It does not matter in the least whether you shake a martini or stir it. It does matter if splinters of ice get into the cocktail glass, and I suppose this small seed of fact is what grew into the absurdity that we must not "bruise the gin." The gin will take all you are capable of giving it, and so will the vermouth. And old hand will probably use a simple glass pitcher, as convenient or functional; it has no top and so cannot readily be shaken. But if a friend has given you a shaker, there are bar strainers in the world and you need have no ice splinters in your martinis.

We have proved our friends, but anyone else's invitation to a cocktail party or casual suggestion that we stop by for a drink may take us to a house where martinis are made of sweet vermouth or of sweet mixed with dry. It is a grievous betrayal of trust; the bottles should not even be kept on neighboring shelves, still less brought near the martini pitcher. Indeed, sweet vermouth should not be kept on any shelf in my house or yours; the heathen put it to many uses but we know none of it. And, I suppose, nothing can be done with people who put olives in martinis, presumably because in some desolate childhood hour someone refused them a dill pickle and so they go through life lusting for the taste of brine. Something can be done with people who put pickled onions in: strangulation seems best.

But there is a deadlier enemy than these, the man who mixes his martinis beforehand and keeps them in the refrigerator till cocktail time. You can no more keep a martini in the refrigerator than you can keep a kiss there. The proper union of gin and vermouth is a great and sudden glory; it is one of the happiest marriages on earth and one of the shortest-lived. The fragile tie of ecstasy is broken in a few minutes, and thereafter there can be no remarriage. The beforehander has not understood that what is left, though it once was a martini, can never be one again. He has sinned as seriously as the man who leaves some in the pitcher to drown.

* * *

Sound practice begins with ice. There must be a lot of it, much more than the catechumen dreams, so much so that the gin smokes when you pour it in. A friend of mine has said it for all time; his formula ends "and five hundred pounds of ice." Fill the pitcher with ice, whirl it till dew forms on the glass, pour out the melt, put in another handful of ice. Then as swiftly as possible pour in the gin and vermouth, at once bring the mixture as close to the freezing point of alcohol as can be reached outside the laboratory, and pour out the martinis. You must be unhurried but you must work fast, for a diluted martini would be a contradiction in terms, a violation of nature's order. That is why the art requires so much ice and why the artists will never mix more than a single round at a time, counting noses.

And I'm sorry, you are not a bartender. There are cultists whose pride is to achieve the right proportion by instinct, innate talent, the color of the mixture, or what Aunt Fanny said about born cooks. They are extreme fanatics and would almost as soon drink an Alexander as measure out their wares. I honor a great many of them who have served me sound martinis made of what they thought of as perfected skill. I honor them—but the martinis vary from round to round, and one or another must fall short of perfected skill. Serenely accept the cultist's scorn and measure your quantities with an extra glass.

There is a point at which the marriage of gin and vermouth is consummated. It varies a little with the constituents, but for gin of 94.4 proof and a harmonious vermouth it may be generalized at about 3.7 to one. And that is not only the proper proportion but the critical one; if you use less gin it is a marriage in name only and the name is not martini. You get a drinkable and even pleasurable result, but not art's sunburst of imagined delight becoming real. Happily, the upper limit is not so fixed; you may make it four to one or a little more than that, which is a comfort if you cannot do fractions in your head and an assurance when you must use an unfamiliar gin. But not much more. This is the violet hour, the hour of flush and wonder, when affections glow and valor is reborn, when the shadows deepen magically along the edge of the forest and we believe that, if we watch carefully, at any moment we may see a unicorn. But it would not be a martini if we should see him.

So made, the martini is only one crush stroke short of the perfect thing, and I will rebuke no one who likes to leave it there. But the final brush stroke is a few drops of oil squeezed from lemon rind on the surface of each cocktail. Some drop the squeezed bit into the glass; I do not favor the practice and caution you to make it the rind, not peel, if you do. And, of course, you will use cocktail glasses, not cups of silver or any other metal, and they will have stems so that heat will not pass from your hand to the martini. Purists chill them before the first round. If any of that round (or any other) is left in the pitcher, throw it away.

The goal is purification and that will begin after the first round has been poured, so I see no need for preliminary spiritual exercises. But it is best approached with a tranquil mind, lest the necessary speed become haste. Tranquility ought normally to come with sight of familiar bottles. If it doesn't, feel free to hum some simple tune as you go about your preparations; it should be nostalgic but not sentimental, neither barbershop nor jazz, between the choir and the glee club. Do not whistle, for your companions are sinking into the quiet of expectation. And you need not sing, for presently there will be singing in your heart.

Remember always the three abominations are: (1) rum, (2) any other sweet drink, and (3) any mixed drink except one made of gin and dry vermouth in the ratio I have given.

 

Comments (35) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Packeteer 1
To teach people that whiskey must be drank cold shows how little one knows of the substance. Whiskey is, of course, meant to be enjoyed and if the imbiber enjoys it with sugar, salt, ice or heat that is their choice.

However when someone says that whiskey must be drank with ice and without vermouth they are clearly trying to carve out their little corner of pretentious un-thoughtful alcohol snobbery.

Good whiskey is better drank room tempurature or lukewarm if you are accustomed to the burn of the alcohol. If you make a face you are drinking it wrong, and I don't mean wrong in some intangible way. I mean you need t breath in through your nose before sipping, sip, then breath out through your mouth. It is that easy to avoid the burn and unpleasantness. If you sip your whiskey like this, warm and well, you will notice all kinds of flavors you never noticed before.
Posted by Packeteer on July 19, 2011 at 3:46 PM
Fnarf 2
I revere Bernard DeVoto, but there is nothing on earth so tedious as a cocktail bigot. While I share his aversion to the overly sweet, I hold rum higher than all other spirits, and the correct ratio for a martini can be anywhere from 10:1 to 1:10, or outside that if you're experimenting; and experimenting is one of the chief pleasures of the bar. Just last night I invented a drink made of half vermouth, half tonic water, with no gin at all, and it was good; and both sweet and dry vermouth make fabulous aperitifs all by themselves (with maybe a twist of lemon).

What DeVoto has fallen victim here is the midcentury curse of Hemingway Manliness. Straight whisk(e)y is actually a pretty horrible cocktail, i.e., preprandial drink; it's too goddamn strong, and the alcohol deadens your palate. There's a reason for aperitifs, which are weaker, and, with acidity, are designed to stimulate the appetite. The whole reason for the cocktail in the first place, including all those frou-frou girlie drinks, is to get some acid and sugar into the mix. Straight booze before dinner is just stupid.

Whisk(e)y is something you drink AFTER dinner.

DeVoto and his fellow smoking-jacket machos were only going to be eating a giant slab of grey overcooked meat, so it perhaps didn't matter so much what they were drinking. If you are eating something interesting, it does.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on July 19, 2011 at 3:47 PM
Fnarf 3
@1, I like my whisky, and my whiskey, and my rum and tequila and whatever else you've got, with a lump of ice. Not enough to make it freezing, but enough to cool it off a little. Then it warms in the mouth, and the flavor comes out. I like to hold it in there for a good minute, if it's good stuff. The melting ice also dilutes it a little, and the best spirits need a little bit -- a very little bit -- of watering down to take edge off. Whisky snobs call this "letting it bloom". Traditionally Scotch is served with a porcelain pitcher of water, and bourbon with a glass of "branch", or spring water. And the traditional "room", especially in Scotland, is going to be quite a bit colder than "room temperature" as that phrase is understood by an American.

My favorite Scotch anecdote is told about the visitor to Glenlivet, who asked the head distiller if he took his whiskey with water or without. "I take it in lemonade myself" he said, meaning what we call lemon soda.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on July 19, 2011 at 3:54 PM
DeaconBlues 4
Fnarf pretty much covered everything I was going to say. Cocktail snobs are tedious and insufferable.
Posted by DeaconBlues http://radzillas.blogspot.com/ on July 19, 2011 at 3:57 PM
Packeteer 5
@2 You summed up my feelings that I did not cover in my #1 post very well. Snobbery is pretentious and grating but there is a "correct" technique to doing a few things. There also is a time and place to break any rule but first it is important that you know what the rules are. As I outlined above how you drink a full strength spirit will change a lot of how much it burns. You did point out however that regardless of how much of the burn you can deal with the alcohol will numb your taste buds before a meal. When I have gone to good whiskey tastings they serve water but it is not ice water. You splash however much water is appropriate for your personal taste as well as whether you are drinking before or after a meal.

Some snobs say that watering down is also wrong but they cannot be more wrong themselves. Bourbon is traditionally drank as "bourbon and branch" which means water from a fast moving stream. You can make your own water at home right from Seattle tap water. Seattle water is generally not hard water although further out from the city limits there can be hard water. Just pour some water out of the tap and let it sit on the counter for 24 hours, not in the fridge. This allows the chlorine to evaporate off and the water will absorb some oxygen. Use this water at room temperature later to splash into your whiskey and enjoy the flavor without the burn of alcohol or the numbness from cold ice.
Posted by Packeteer on July 19, 2011 at 3:58 PM
6
Oh, I don't really care about DeVoto's rules. I break them daily. I just enjoy his writing.
Posted by Brendan Kiley on July 19, 2011 at 3:58 PM
STJA 7
Regardless, that was fun to read.
Posted by STJA on July 19, 2011 at 4:00 PM
wisepunk 8
I don't agree with all of this, but it is the best fucking thing I have read in weeks.
Posted by wisepunk on July 19, 2011 at 4:02 PM
Fnarf 9
@5, people who object to watering down Scotch or bourbon should be informed that it's already watered down in the bottle, and they probably couldn't handle "cask strength" without a little water -- and why would you want to? 60% alcohol isn't enjoyable; it's an endurance test.

The only thing I personally won't put a little ice into is good brandy. In fact, I'll warm it in my hand (that's what the globe shape of the snifter is for). The best way to enjoy Cognac or Armagnac, of course, is in a snifter floating in the bath water with you!
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on July 19, 2011 at 4:06 PM
Packeteer 10
@3 I often drink liquor with ice in it. My point that perhaps I failed to make is not that you can't drink with ice in your drink. My points is that you should try both.

Sometimes I am not trying to sit and taste whiskey, something I am spending time with friends trying to get drunk. In that case its a few ice cubes and drinking fast while laughing at jokes.

Maybe I am sitting with a friend and talking a lot and I don't want my voice to get hoarse from the 100 proof alcohol at 70 degrees. In that case I might put a little water or even 1 ice cube in.

If I am at a whiskey tasting or drinking a high end bottle at home then I doubt I am going to be adding any ice.

I feel that I am not being pretentious enough so I will end my post by saying "suum cuique."

Posted by Packeteer on July 19, 2011 at 4:08 PM
Packeteer 11
@9 Again, you are on the same page as me and even 1 step ahead. I never considered floating a snifter in the bath. At the risk of sounding like a raging alkey I have to say that sounds like as good of an idea as shower beer.

Also the warming brandy with your hand is ideal but it should be pointed out that wine is the opposite. A wine glass has a stem so you can hold it by pinching the stem so as to not get the heat from your hand into the wine. I have worked at some of the higher end restaurants in Seattle and seen quite a few 40 somethings gab about all the wine stuff they know and about how they are a connoisseur of fine wine yet manhandle the wine glass. All I could think of is "the poseur is strong with this one" but they were paying customers so they are free to buy all the $300 bottles of wine they want.
Posted by Packeteer on July 19, 2011 at 4:16 PM
jjm84 12
A man who believes in absolutes, especially when booze is involve, is a fool.
Posted by jjm84 on July 19, 2011 at 4:19 PM
spaceapple 13
As a stoner, I found this to be a beautiful piece of writing.
Posted by spaceapple on July 19, 2011 at 4:23 PM
Reverse Polarity 14
I'm with Brendon. The rules are nonsense, but the writing is fun to read.
Posted by Reverse Polarity on July 19, 2011 at 4:36 PM
Dougsf 15
I'm thirsty.
Posted by Dougsf on July 19, 2011 at 4:40 PM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 16
Pfft. After the first couple of shots, it doesn't much matter what you're drinking . . . or how you drink it.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on July 19, 2011 at 4:54 PM
Fnarf 17
@10, all I can add is, that's some cuique you've got there!

If using bubbles in your bath, which I highly recommend (see my avatar), just be careful to keep them away from the lip of your glass. One thing I feel confident in forbidding is soap in your Corvoisier or Martell!
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on July 19, 2011 at 5:02 PM
basmatic 18
@9 The only way I survived winter commutes by motorcycle was hot bubble baths accompanied by armagnac or cognac. Warms the very soul.
Posted by basmatic on July 19, 2011 at 5:37 PM
Sir Vic 19
@1 Good notes on drinking whiskey. I learned that technique, too, during many visits to FX McRory's. Befriending a bartender at an establishment like that can certainly expand your bourbon experiences.

@2 Easiest "cocktail" I know involves rum. Just squeeze a fresh lime wedge into a rocks glass, and add dark rum to desired level. Great on a hot day, should we ever have another'n.
Now if I could only find some little bottles of Schweppes Bitter Lemon to make my Electric Sprite! (gin, lime, SBL)
Posted by Sir Vic on July 19, 2011 at 5:40 PM
20
I've done several Bourbon tours in Kentucky. Every single one of the higher quality distilleries has some "Branch" water from the same source as the water used to "cut" the finished product. This is because they want their customers to dilute the whiskey to their own taste. It's how bourbon is properly served when it is intended to be sipped.

Wou can sometimes buy "Branch" water from the very same source as the water used to cut the whiskey. It really does make a difference to taste.

Of course, any water from Kentucky or Tennessee that is pure bottled at the source will be better than your water at home or fancy bottled water from somewhere else. Having had branch water in Kentucky and water in some of the more well known places in Europe, I have to say we Americans win that one. And Kentucky really does have the best water table in the U.S. Limestone is a wonderful thing.

As for mixing bourbon it with other substances, Bourbon has ALWAYS been intended to be mixed. I'm sure the people at the Kentucky Derby will be happy to know about the great mistake they are making in serving Mint Juleps.

WRT to the bourbon in the Stranger offices, I can highly recommend touring the Maker's Mark distillery if one ever finds oneself in the area. It's beautiful and very informative. Stop by in Bardstown and do Heaven Hill too....it's much more industrial in focus, but well worth seeing. If you can, get one of the long-timers to talk about the great fire of 2003 when they lost a few warehouses full of the stuff.
Posted by ABW on July 19, 2011 at 6:36 PM
kim in portland 21
I enjoy Booker Noe served neat, it strength varies but 63% to 65% is common. You have to breathe right when sipping it, though. I didn't find it much changed by adding water, but my Dad blends wine for a living and I might just have some of his skills for tasting or not.
Posted by kim in portland http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2010/11/fast-paced_video_provides_a_fu.html on July 19, 2011 at 7:41 PM
sailormouth 22
Agree with almost everything above, particularly Fnarf's posts, EXCEPT that a martini cannot be 9:1, at which point it turns into a different drink called a clarito.
Posted by sailormouth on July 19, 2011 at 8:24 PM
DeaconBlues 23
t Brendan: I found it to be really funny if I pretended that the piece was written satirically. Under that reading, it's genius.
Posted by DeaconBlues http://radzillas.blogspot.com/ on July 19, 2011 at 8:40 PM
Fnarf 24
@19, they very recently had Schweppes Bitter Lemon at the QFC on 45th in Wallingford. Big bottles, not little ones, so drink it up or it goes flat, but at least they have it. Makes the best Pimm's Cup (though Fresca is a pretty interesting option).

@22, a 9:1 "clarito" is better known by it's alternate name "damn near straight gin".
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on July 19, 2011 at 9:25 PM
25
Holy. Crap. This post and its comment thread just gave me a massive O. It does help that I downed one White Russian just before reading it and a second while reading it (second and third White Russian in all my 32 years). High West whiskey on ice is my usual, or Pendleton or Knob Creek when I'm feeling impoverished, so this is a bit of an experiment. Carry on, boys. Carry on.
Posted by katallred on July 19, 2011 at 11:12 PM
26
Of course the shame is...if you don't ask for a "Gin" Martini you are likely to get a vodka cocktail. Bleh.

Posted by bornhere on July 19, 2011 at 11:13 PM
Will in Seattle 27
As my dad would say, this is a bunch of crap.

If you're not Scottisth, you don't know shit about whiskey or martinis.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on July 19, 2011 at 11:38 PM
Will in Seattle 28
Scottish ... Damn You, Apple, Fix the autocorrect!
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on July 19, 2011 at 11:40 PM
29
You're a dummy, Will in Seattle.

There. I said it. And it felt good.
Posted by katallred on July 19, 2011 at 11:50 PM
30
@29, katallred, every village needs its idiot and Will is ours.
Posted by gnossos on July 20, 2011 at 12:37 AM
31
The guy has good writer's craft, but he is using it to say something stupid. He can be responded to by simply looking him in the eye and saying with honesty: De gustibus non disputandem.
Posted by I have always been... east coaster on July 20, 2011 at 6:04 AM
Fistique 32
I like that Fnarf correctly identified the Scottish drink as whisky, and Will in Seattle appealed incorrectly to the Irish drink as a mark of Scottitisth authenticity.
Posted by Fistique on July 20, 2011 at 6:14 AM
33
Liquor snobs are a boorish as food douches. They quickly ruin a cocktail hour, just as fast as foodies ruin a meal.

I tended bar for 15 years, and there's something beautiful about learning a person's choice of cocktail—especially when it's unpredictable. I much preferred making Sex on the Beaches for giggling birthday girls than shots of whiskey for sleepy old men.
Posted by mitten on July 20, 2011 at 7:11 AM
jasonzenobia 34
Beautiful writing from Avis's husband to start my day, snobby and random though it may be.

Do I really have to wait 10 hours before cocktail hour?
Posted by jasonzenobia http://jasonzenobia.blogspot.com/ on July 20, 2011 at 7:26 AM
35
I want a job where I can drink (alcohol) while I work!
Posted by AKTheresa on July 20, 2011 at 7:42 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy