Slog Music

Music, Nightlife,
and Drinks

Friday, July 15, 2011

McGinn on Seattle Weekly Bosses: "They need to clean up their act."

Posted by on Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 5:31 PM

Mayor Mike McGinn met this afternoon with leaders of the Seattle Weekly and its parent company, Village Voice Media, to demand that they do more to prevent their online ads from being used as vehicles for child prostitution.

"They can do better—a lot better," McGinn said, flanked by Councilmember Tim Burgess and Assistant Police Chief Jim Pugel, who were both part of the meeting. "Other sites are, and as a moral issue they should.”

McGinn's complaint centers on, a web site owned by Village Voice Media and used by the Seattle Weekly for its escort advertising business. “This is the only site with which we have this problem in King County," McGinn said. "All of the cases we reported to them started at”

There have been 18 cases in King County over three years suggesting that is being used for child prostitution, according to city officials. Because of this, McGinn has been demanding that the Seattle Weekly and begin checking the IDs of people who wish to advertise escort services—rather than continuing to allow anyone to proceed with a transaction after merely clicking a mouse to affirm that he or she is 18 or older.

"If they don’t do it, we will continue to do what we have been doing," McGinn said. "Which is to put a spotlight on this problem until they address it.”

How did the leadership of Village Voice Media and the Seattle Weekly respond to McGinn's request for ID verification?

"They were not prepared to agree to that request immediately," McGinn said.

But, he added: "They indicated that they were taking that request seriously and would respond within one to two weeks. We have made our position clear and we expect them to take the actions we requested immediately. They need to clean up their act.”

The Seattle Weekly did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the meeting.

[UPDATE: Mike Seely, the Seattle Weekly's editor in chief, said in an e-mail, apparently referring to The Stranger's online escort ad service: "Naughty Northwest does, in fact, have a dog in this hunt."

It's not clear what he meant, but the materials McGinn's staff handed out to the media in advance of his press conference this afternoon included a screen-grab of the Naughty Northwest policies. Those policies require in-person verification of any prospective escort advertiser's ID, as well as proof of identity and age for anyone desiring to be pictured in an escort ad. It's this kind of ID verification that McGinn is asking the Seattle Weekly's owners to implement.]

Until he gets the response he expects, McGinn said, he'll continue the City of Seattle's advertising boycott of the Seattle Weekly. And, he's preparing to go a step further.

"I am considering contacting other mayors," McGinn said, adding that he'd already directed his office of intergovernmental relations to reach out to the leaders of other cities for information on their experiences with "If we could get some support from them, that would be great," he said.

As for what kind of impression all of this made on the leadership of the Seattle Weekly and its owners, McGinn said: "I think they were taken aback... They continue to try to minimize the severity of the problem."

McGinn said that after Seattle Weekly owners showed him a Power Point presentation of how they view the situation, he informed them that 180 individuals in King County were victimized by child prostitution between June of 2010 and May of 2011, and that is clearly contributing to the problem. He also showed them three ads that the city had noticed in the last 24 hours featuring escorts "which we knew were children."

“The key issue for us," McGinn said, "is that they need to take affirmative steps, in advance, to make sure that the individuals being advertised on their site are not under-aged.”


Comments (8) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Matt from Denver 1
Just a tip: If you're going to have an update, it ought to be visible before the jump.
Posted by Matt from Denver on July 15, 2011 at 6:23 PM · Report this
dnt trust me 2
I wholeheartedly believe that we can continue the centuries old practice of child prostitution without the help from Say it with me, Yes We Can!
Posted by dnt trust me on July 15, 2011 at 6:36 PM · Report this
Jesus, this mayor is a pansy.
Posted by riot gorl on July 15, 2011 at 6:44 PM · Report this
1. This guy McGinn did not think background checks were worthwhile when he hired his own staff to represent us all at City Hall. I am beating a dead horse with the name Chris Haugen for the slow kids in class.
2. The Mayor's oath of office says he will uphold the U.S. and State Constitutions i,e the law of the land. Prostitution, you can argue for its legality, is illegal. So the Mayor, if he insists on being all law-and-order all of the sudden should be against all prostition not just that of children. He is totally cherry picking in despartation for some gooe press. "What a brave man to condemn cruelty".
3. He is letting Ashton Kutcher set the agenda for the City.
4. Why not go after the "Johns" here and actually prevent some victimization instead of posturing for headlines?

For the record child exploitation in any form is bad.
Posted by Zander on July 15, 2011 at 8:33 PM · Report this
The Wretched Harmony 5

Making choices about law enforcement priorities is constitutional.
Posted by The Wretched Harmony on July 15, 2011 at 8:51 PM · Report this
Well, yeah, we're in some interesting legal territory here.

AFAIK, there's nothing inherently illegal about advertising an illegal service (the 1st amendment argument). So I don't know that the City has any way to force VVM/Backpage/SW to do anything. But it's certainly within the City's right to try and shame them into it, outside of the legal system.

Also, McGinn did make some statements in the press conference stating he believed catching the johns is the true priority.
Posted by Lack Thereof on July 15, 2011 at 9:31 PM · Report this
Hey Eli, can you put media-affiliations to the press faces who were asking questions? It seemed like only a few of the press people there were really having a conversation.

I think I recognized you in there but I have no idea who the others work for.
Posted by Lack Thereof on July 15, 2011 at 9:43 PM · Report this
Was just over at 5 Guys at The Landing in that place has really taken off...people so much more the Puget Sound of the 21st century than dowdy weird old Seattle.
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://_ on July 15, 2011 at 10:58 PM · Report this

Add a comment

Commenting on this item is available only to registered commenters.

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy