Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, June 30, 2011

UW Hikes Tuition 20 Percent; Largest Increase Ever

Posted by on Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:31 PM

As had been widely expected, the University of Washington Board of Regents approved a 20 percent resident undergraduate tuition hike this morning, from $8,701 to $10,574, the largest increase in tuition and fees ever. Following two consecutive years of 14 percent increases, the in-state cost of an undergraduate education will have increased by 55 percent over three years.

Over that same period, the state legislature has cut funding for higher education by more than 50 percent. Hmm. I wonder if there's a connection?

ASUW Government Relations Director Andrew Lewis decries the move as "another step in the direction of privatization." Lewis complains that there wasn't enough transparency in the process, there wasn't enough public input, and there wasn't enough thoughtfulness put into the final decision. According to Lewis, only three of the ten regents were actually physically present at today's meeting, with the remaining seven joining by conference call. "They literally phoned it in," says Lewis.

Amongst other things Lewis would like to see more public discussion about administrative costs, calling it "the huge bloated elephant in the room." But Lewis acknowledges that given the financial constraints, the regents' options were limited. "The state is the adversary," says Lewis. "This is the state abdicating its responsibility."

The good news, we're told, is that the UW is still a couple hundred dollars cheaper than elitist WSU, and remains a relative bargain compared to public universities in some other states. But that's little consolation to middle class families who are seeing tuition cost rise dramatically faster than financial aid. And despite an increase in financial aid money in the recently passed budget, the state is still falling far short of need, with as many as 22,000 eligible students not receiving a state need grant.

To this end the UW is increasing Husky Grant funding in order to try to make up the difference, with 50 percent of the tuition revenue increase being dedicated to financial aid, 15.6 percent of all tuition revenue. That should help the universities low income students cover much of the rising costs. But unless and until the state starts covering a bigger part of the financial aid side of the "High-Tuition/High-Financial-Aid" funding model we're moving towards, it's students from middle class families who will ultimately be priced out of our state's public colleges and universities.

 

Comments (30) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Still cheaper than daycare which, if you're a liberal arts major, is a comparable deal.
Posted by That's cheap Daycare for sociologism majors on June 30, 2011 at 2:44 PM
2
Oh young Andrew Lewis. The state is not the enemy. Students have always been in favor of legislative control of tuition. I have been deeply involved in these issues in the past, as I was the GPSS Vice President in 2005-2006.

And for the first time (in recent memory, and maybe ever), the UW regents are making the decisions about tuition increases behind closed doors (or rather at their vacation homes). The legislature should be setting tuition rates. Don't believe the administration. Legislators are held responsible by the public. Explain to me how the public fires the administration?
Posted by npeyton on June 30, 2011 at 2:51 PM
3
I have one year left at UW, and I'm being told I am no longer eligible for financial aid. Now, short of a miracle, I have a $50,000 bill with the federal government and no degree to show for it. Thanks UW.
Posted by RobinHood on June 30, 2011 at 2:51 PM
4
Largest dollar increase, but KUOW reported this morning that in 1985 there had been a 22% increase.
Posted by miked on June 30, 2011 at 3:03 PM
5
What's your beef, Goldy?????

After all, they've got to keep raising tuition in orde to continue securitizing student loans, and student fees and charges.

It's called "shadow banking" (unless they've changed the term while I was sleeping????) -- and there has been NO CHANGE, only things have gotten considerably worse under that Great Whistleblower Hunter, Prez. Barack Obama (and he ain't your mama, sonny!).

Nope, they've passed that "Doddering Frankenstein Financial Reform Act" claptrap, which only makes things ever so much worse, and now they are about to really crash things so they can pick up every thing in the aftermath for pennies, or less, on the dollar.
Posted by sgt_doom on June 30, 2011 at 3:07 PM
6
@2, in Andrew's defense isn't it accurate that the state, read: legislature, is the enemy when the legislature granted the regents unfettered tuition setting authority?

I'm totally with you on my sentiments toward the Regents, and their vacation homes. But the legislature just handed it to them.
Posted by miked on June 30, 2011 at 3:07 PM
TheMisanthrope 7
UW Pres salary: $802k/yr
Posted by TheMisanthrope on June 30, 2011 at 3:44 PM
Fnarf 8
Fuck the students. The modern Gladiator State University isn't about students. The purpose of the University is two-fold: football greatness and basketball greatness. They should get rid of the student body entirely and recruit the athletes from the prisons instead.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on June 30, 2011 at 3:54 PM
9
Over that same [two-year] period, the state legislature has cut funding for higher education by more than 50 percent

Not according to the state, they haven't. According to the state's budget trends web page:

2007-09 Higher Ed Spending: $11.68B
2009-11 Higher Ed Spending: $10.09B

That's a 14% decrease. That's quite significant, especially when one considers that in most other areas state spending continued to go up, despite the recession. (Total spending went from $68.5B to $70.9B, a 4% increase.) But it is nowhere near a 50% decrease. Care to cite a source for your 50 percent number?
Posted by David Wright on June 30, 2011 at 4:01 PM
Will in Seattle 10
Too bad Amazon won't pay it's sales taxes.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on June 30, 2011 at 4:16 PM
Goldy 11
@9... The UW has seen its state funding cut 50% over three years. At the same time it has increased tuition 14%, 14%, and now 20%.
Posted by Goldy on June 30, 2011 at 4:20 PM
douchus 12
Fnarf is an ass asssssss usual.
Posted by douchus on June 30, 2011 at 4:29 PM
gloomy gus 13
Trevor Griffey dropped a really good comment over on Publicola the other day relating how he sees this deadening our future political landscape:
Then there's jobs. In the late 1990s during the dot com boom, I was working odd jobs by day so I could devote my life to activism. Others did the same for arts, or just to bum around. It was possible then, not just because of cheap housing, but because of plentiful crappy jobs. I used to work 6 weeks on, 6 weeks off, temping around town, making enough to survive in the process. Temp agencies that used to call me with four different options largely went under with the dot com bust, and by the time I enrolled in grad school around 2003 some of my activist friends were on food stamps. Now unemployment is higher for 18-24 year olds than at any time since the Great Depression. When I teach at the UW, I've been surprised to find students working full-time jobs at Home Depot while taking a full load of classes, or working 2 jobs, and also living at their parents' place well into their 20s because they can't afford to live on their own without going deep into debt.

Which brings me to the cost of education. Student activism has long been essential to the left in this country. But when you work full time and accumulate massive debt in the process of going to school, you have much less time to form volunteer-based organizations or projects, you become more career-oriented earlier. I am inspired by the continued work of United Students Against Sweatshops at the UW, but they and a few other socialist groups are basically what remains of what had been a much broader activist youth culture around the time of the WTO. The dominant forms of student organization at the UW remain religious groups and fraternities and sororities. It's not, I think, because UW students are conservative, or "kids these days" aren't as cool as we were when we were young, but because many are too busy just trying to survive these mean times.
http://publicola.com/2011/06/29/punk-is-…
More...
Posted by gloomy gus on June 30, 2011 at 4:47 PM
OuterCow 14
The masses don't deserve subsidized education in the liberal arts. Let them pay their own way through vocational school until they build a dynasty that can afford to send its younglings to university.
Posted by OuterCow on June 30, 2011 at 4:52 PM
15
@11: Source on the 50% number? I don't see how that is compatible with the budget numbers at the state budget site I linked to. 2009 to 2011 is the only period in which there is ever any decrease at all. So if you extend the window back to 2008 or forward to 2012, the decrease would be lower than 14%, not higher.
Posted by David Wright on June 30, 2011 at 5:42 PM
care bear 16
@3 How is one year at UW going to set you back $50,000? I went to SU and even if I had had no financial aid at all I wouldn't be out that much money for one year.
Posted by care bear on June 30, 2011 at 5:47 PM
Fnarf 17
@16, the $50k isn't for the last year; it's for all the years up to it. She's saying she can't afford to finish her degree without financial aid, but she's still on the hook for the $50k for before that -- and now with no degree.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on June 30, 2011 at 5:57 PM
18
@14 Many of the kids going into debt to obtain college degrees would have better economic prospects if they were to become welders or plumbers instead, and many of them aren't interested in getting an education anyway. They just see college as a hoop they have to jump through.
Posted by Joe Glibmoron on June 30, 2011 at 8:07 PM
19
@18 So what about us who aren't?

Honestly not sure what I'm supposed to do. My degree is becoming out of my reach financially. Shit, life and having a family is becoming out of my reach.

I feel teary thinking about it but I have too much studying to do and don't have time to cry.
Posted by kersy on June 30, 2011 at 8:52 PM
20
Except for the TEach for America students who get to come in for two years and get their degree for about $11k. The majority of them will come from out of state so such a deal, no?
Posted by westello on June 30, 2011 at 8:53 PM
21
@19: Point taken. Sorry to be so, well, glib.
Posted by Joe Glibmoron on June 30, 2011 at 9:11 PM
22
@15: UW budget is only part of the whole higher education budget. Goldy is right about UW.
Posted by UW on June 30, 2011 at 10:17 PM
prompt 23
@8 Also known as the "Rick Neuheisel coaching strategy"
Posted by prompt on June 30, 2011 at 10:55 PM
tunanator 24
@18 "Many of the kids going into debt to obtain college degrees would have better economic prospects if..."

That's a crappy excuse for pricing them out of the picture. Maybe they'd like a chance at avoiding stuff as tedious as plumbing and welding. Maybe they're talents aren't mechanical. Maybe they're not cut out for hanging around the rednecks often found in those lines of work.

Why don't you just admit your elitist attitude and suggest they pick cotton or lettuce? "Can't afford to have goals like that, might as well learn to settle for drudgery." Sadly, it looks as though the UW's admins are slipping into the same elitism that ruled at colleges before the 1950s.

Too bad if people with major math or science skills weren't born with a silver spoon, right? You people are dragging this country back into the dark arges.
Posted by tunanator on July 1, 2011 at 12:25 AM
Karlheinz Arschbomber 25
This is just another economic bubble bursting; the incremental value of a generic college degree is now negative. Like a Las Vegas tract-house. In our decaying corporate kleptocracy, there's not much need for sociology and psych majors. Anonymous Coward @1 above pretty much nails it. Fnarf is correct as well. FUCK College athletics, and public subsidies to pro sports as well.
Posted by Karlheinz Arschbomber http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arschbombe on July 1, 2011 at 12:38 AM
Piper Scott 26
Can't afford to go to college? Get a job, blame your parents, find some other line of pursuit, but don't think you have a right to mooch off the taxpayer.

Or you could join the military and eventually take advantage of post-service educational benefits. I hear the Marines are hiring. Or are you too good for that?

Otherwise, the whining class needs to STFU.
Posted by Piper Scott on July 1, 2011 at 7:19 AM
dwightmoodyforgetsthings 27
The cost of financial aid is being billed to the other students?

It's appalling how the older generations are willing to screw the younger one these days. The wealthier Boomers and Gen Xers won't pay their fucking taxes when their parents and grandparents got taxed and gave them life on a silver platter.

Like Cracker said, I hate my generation.
Posted by dwightmoodyforgetsthings http://www.reddit.com/r/spaceclop on July 1, 2011 at 10:06 AM
28
Yeah we need to reserve education only for the likes of Scott St. Clair, flack for the Evergreen "Freedom" Foundation, and general all-around smug, condescending elitist right-wing prick, who thinks that the world belongs to the rich, and that democracy and public resources are just so quaint in today's modern world, where the rich rule the poor and the strong rule the weak.
Posted by Fuck you Scott on July 1, 2011 at 10:19 AM
29
@13, gloomy gus,

Good comments cited, and a little known factoid is that the once-largest temp agency in America, Manpower, closed 1,000 offices in 2003 throughout the USA, and opened approximately 1,000 offices in China.

Beginning around 1999, and continuing to the present, America has reached critical mass with the offshoring, and foreign creation by American-based multinationals and corporations of jobs. (A BLS study effectively demonstrated that between July, 1999 and July 2009, the private sector created zero jobs in the USA, but created many millions overseas, all the while continuing to offshore jobs.

Also as of 1999, the USA became a net importer of tech services, so the next time you hear some douchebagger proclaim, "But what about all the tech stuff we export here?" -- set them straight!

We screwed, baby, we really screwed........ time to follow the examples of those firebomb-throwing Greeks....
Posted by sgt_doom on July 1, 2011 at 12:18 PM
Cory 30
@26 Uh, mooch? It's the responsibility of taxpayers to invest in the future of the country by investing in its young minds.
Posted by Cory on July 2, 2011 at 1:16 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy