Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

The Fat Ladies in the Window: Lindy West Investigates!

Posted by on Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:33 PM

(Click to enlarge. HAR!!!)
  • (Click to enlarge. HAR!!!)
This is a thing I noticed today. This is a cartoon—affixed to windows of Barneys New York locations around the country—of a pair of fat women who physically could not shop at Barneys New York (because Barneys New York would burn itself down before carrying anything above a size 12) looking comically horrified as they hold up tiny, tiny pieces of clothing that they can't fit their fat asses into—the kind of tiny, tiny clothing sold for a million dollars inside the Barneys New York upon which the fat women are so hilariously painted. It is essentially a cartoon of what a fat person would experience if they entered Barneys New York and attempted to purchase clothing. Okay. So. Whaaaaaaaaat does that mean?

I (Lindy West, Girl Reporter) spoke to an extremely nice and cautious employee of Barneys New York at Pacific Place (who asked not to be identified), who told me, "I don't know that there's any real message," and directed me to the artist's website (describing her as "a larger Russian woman"—apparently this is large in the Barneys universe), explaining, "Without the context it does just look like random cartoon ladies, but if you actually look at the drawings in context it makes a lot more sense." I asked what the drawings meant in context. "There's just a lot of great imagery," I was told. I asked if the displays might be construed as insensitive. "Your observation—you wouldn't be the first to have that," the Barneys employee said, "but yeah. I mean, for people who aren't in on the joke, I can see how it could be offensive, but..."

"I'm still not totally clear on what the joke is," I said. "Yeah, I'm not either," admitted the Barneys employee. "That's why i don't want to say anything."

Personally, I actually feel the opposite of the Barneys employee—I don't think the artist's drawings are offensive in and of themselves; in fact they are rather cute. It's the context that made me do a "GWUUUUHHHH???" It is certainly Barneys New York's prerogative not to carry plus-size clothing. Not a problem. No big deal (no pun intended, etc etc). But fat women are acutely aware that it's difficult for them to find fashionable clothing (choices are limited to about three stores—get ten fat women in a room [HIDE THE DORITOS!] and six of them will be wearing the same dress) and physically impossible for them to buy high-end designer pieces. But does Barneys New York have to broadcast, as a big fat punchline (a self-described "joke") stenciled on their store windows, the disappointment and mild humiliation that awaits any foolish fat woman who dares to enter their store and attempt to purchase some stupid $4,000 shorts?

 

Comments (62) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
FAT WANK!! Get the popcorn
Posted by six five on June 29, 2011 at 4:38 PM
Anne in MA 2
See, there's no way I would have gotten the "joke" without your explanation, because those cartoon women would definitely fit in a size 10-12. I would have thought they were freaking out over the price tag or something.
Posted by Anne in MA on June 29, 2011 at 4:50 PM
3
Seriously. Where the FUCK are the doritos, Lindy??
Posted by hydra on June 29, 2011 at 4:50 PM
4
I choose Other: People pay more for shorts than I did for my car???
Posted by jzimbert on June 29, 2011 at 4:58 PM
5
I am totally not in on "the joke." I've also never set foot in a Barney's store. Even if they had my size and offered me my own private pattern-maker and designer, and my choice of the best fabrics from Italian mills, I would not be able to suppress my good sense. My inner-Luisita would be muttering "I could sew that for only $1000!" "I could sew that for $500 and it would look a lot better too." "I could sew that and I'd finish the goddamn seams, too!"

But there is no way that window display is anything but nasty. Sorry. Just plain nasty. Poop on Barneys NY. It's official! They have shown themselves to be big doody heads.
Posted by LuisitaPhD on June 29, 2011 at 5:00 PM
6
Perhaps this will become a whole series of "progressive and self-deprecating political statements"? If so, the next one should be two scarecrow-thin women sticking their fingers down their throats and vomiting up huge wads of cash
Posted by Daily in LA on June 29, 2011 at 5:01 PM
sirkowski 7
This whole subject matter is starting to piss me off.
Posted by sirkowski http://www.missdynamite.com on June 29, 2011 at 5:03 PM
alithea 8
man what is with WOMEN being so SENSITIVE. stop being so FAT if you're offended! its just a JOKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111
Posted by alithea on June 29, 2011 at 5:07 PM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 9
Obviously, they're discriminating against guys. Very few of us are a size 12.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on June 29, 2011 at 5:07 PM
procupcake 10
Where's the "Who cares?" button? Seriously, Barney's is stupid and only stupid people who like to throw away money shop there. They're hardly the example I would choose to promote progressive ideas about beauty and femininity.
Posted by procupcake on June 29, 2011 at 5:11 PM
gloomy gus 11
My goodness. I didn't know Barneys has a website where they interview the artists they choose for their windows. Here's an excerpt:
BNY: So many of your paintings depict graphic, curvaceous women. How does the female form inspire you?

EK: There are several layers to my engagement with this form. This type of representation stems from a long tradition: from Etruscan and Greek art to Rubens, Matisse and Picasso, women have always looked plentiful (perhaps because such forms would give the artist more to work with?). I’m sure there’s a better reason. Also, it has to do with exaggeration. The women in my paintings are all about to burst. It is probably some sort of existential bursting, but filtered through comedy. Humor is a way of coping with the idea of the body’s eventual demise, as well as the ongoing absurdities of life. I’m not implying that “hefting” equals funny. The humor is more in their interaction and reference to comics and cartoons. Body type can be easily politicized, but to me this is not a moral issue. I always separate reality from representation.
http://thewindow.barneys.com/in-the-barn…
Posted by gloomy gus on June 29, 2011 at 5:12 PM
12
Oh, I've stepped into a Barney's, in Beverly Hills, no less, and laughed hysterically at the prices on the handbags, before doing a turn out the door.

The rich don't give a crap about the rest of us. Just a reminder.
Posted by judybrowni on June 29, 2011 at 5:13 PM
Dougsf 13
@1: Compounded x1000 by expensive clothing in the NW component!
Posted by Dougsf on June 29, 2011 at 5:14 PM
14
Honestly, from the angle those are photographed, it looks like delightfully-curvy women wearing skimpy, sexy clothes. I don't get any sense of "they're trying it on and it doesn't fit". Perhaps a better angle would illustrate your point better?
Posted by Christy O on June 29, 2011 at 5:14 PM
starsandgarters 15
Is this hate on fatties day? First my workplace and now Barneys.
Posted by starsandgarters on June 29, 2011 at 5:15 PM
16
That shit is fucked up.
Posted by schmetterling on June 29, 2011 at 5:21 PM
17
These windows are like Woody Allen movies or the cartoons in the New Yorker: not funny, not relevant to 98% of the population. Who cares what it means? Life is too short.
Posted by Prettybetsy on June 29, 2011 at 5:26 PM
18
Who cares? Why is the "film editor" writing about mall windows and her Facebook problems? How about reviewing a film once in awhile...please Stranger, find someone to actually review films again....
Posted by Lindywestisa12yearoldgirl on June 29, 2011 at 5:27 PM
OuterCow 19
I thought this was hilarious anti-vapid-costly-signalling-consumerist graffiti when I saw it, but they PAID for it? wtf.
Posted by OuterCow on June 29, 2011 at 5:28 PM
Eva Hopkins 20
Not a fan.
Posted by Eva Hopkins http://www.lunamusestudios.com on June 29, 2011 at 5:33 PM
21
FYI, there are clothing stores that cater exclusively to heavy gals. I think one has "Bryant" in the name.
Posted by Thank You Susanswerphone on June 29, 2011 at 5:35 PM
hydrozoa 22
so, like, i realize that it defeats the point of fat acceptance to look at a woman and go O MY FG, SHE IS SO NOT FAT, HOW CAN YOU EVEN SAY, but i just clicked on that russian lady, and i cannot suppress my shock that this woman would be called "larger." it's not about the word fat being a compliment or an insult and me trying to valiantly defend her attractive quotient (AQ). it's just about words meaning things and that description being wrong. larger than what? a toddler? a fingernail paring? you, personally, barneys lady?

words mean things. that's the problem here, i guess, at its crux.

anyway, this cartoon-on-the-barneys-window thing is dangerous territory. it's as though they're deliberately obfuscating their point, which i suspect it "har har, you are fat and can't wear our great clothes that you care about and definitely wish you could wear." gotta bad feeling about this. don't like it.
Posted by hydrozoa on June 29, 2011 at 5:36 PM
23
What's with all the fat chicks in Seattle? My missus still wears the same slim clothes she bought at barneys 20 yrs ago, and that's after squeezing out some puppies. Seriously Seattle women, put the beers down and shed 40lbs.
Posted by Asian1981 on June 29, 2011 at 5:40 PM
24
Lindy,

I scoured the Barney's website for a pair of the a fore-mentioned $4000 shorts.

They don't exist.

Not on the website, anyway. I think I saw the most expensive pair of shorts for around $500. Which is ridiculous in my opinion.

But then I remember that there are many places in this country where the idea of paying $3.00+ for cup of coffee is absurd and is carried aloft as some sort of anti-liberal rallying cry. Which is also fucking stupid.

All of which makes me realize how the internet sure makes it easy to craft horseshit hyperbole on a slow news day merely to generate some sort of self-perceived pseudo-underclass outrage.

Congratulations.
Posted by tkc on June 29, 2011 at 5:49 PM
25
Went to the Barneys sale in New York that everyone makes such a big deal about and guess what? $1000 for a suit is not a sale bitches!

But if you're in Barneys bulimic target demographic, hatin' on the fatties sends you on a buying spree.
Posted by codswallower on June 29, 2011 at 6:06 PM
26
BTW, Lindy you are not fat and you'd be even smaller if you didn't review burger joints and pick bacon pieces out of "inedible" salads.
Posted by Thank You Susanswerphone on June 29, 2011 at 6:06 PM
27
"But if you're in Barneys bulimic target demographic"

French women don't get fat.
Posted by News flash: Fat cows hate slim women on June 29, 2011 at 6:32 PM
28
"Lindy you are not fat"

Really? I guess you're not delusional too.
Posted by Oh Lordy, she certainly is fat on June 29, 2011 at 6:34 PM
COMTE 29
All I want to know is: why can't all SLOG polls have this many possible responses?
Posted by COMTE http://www.chriscomte.com on June 29, 2011 at 6:38 PM
30
They're designing some "hip duds" to distract from your unhealthy weight, Garcia.
Posted by PugilistPuck on June 29, 2011 at 6:45 PM
seattlegrrrl 31
Comment no.10 -- Word!
Posted by seattlegrrrl http://heartseamonkeys.blogspot.com/ on June 29, 2011 at 6:59 PM
32
WOW, FAT PEOPLE. CARTOONS. HUMOR? FAT CHIPS. COOKIE FAT. WHAT?
Posted by funkathrusta on June 29, 2011 at 7:08 PM
33
"They're hardly the example I would choose to promote progressive ideas about beauty and femininity."

You mean a they're not a shop for fat and/or ugly birds? Good luck with that Progressive womyn's shop, you can call it 'The Fisherman's Wife'. Put in a tattoo parlor called 'Stretchable Tatts' and you have the Seattle womyn's perfect shop
Posted by Does progressive mean pussies that start at the navel? on June 29, 2011 at 7:14 PM
dwightmoodyforgetsthings 34
@23- We're all tired of hearing about your RealDoll.
Posted by dwightmoodyforgetsthings http://www.reddit.com/r/spaceclop on June 29, 2011 at 7:57 PM
Roma 35
Call the anarchists! They seem to love smashing windows.

But fat women are acutely aware that it's . . . physically impossible for them to buy high-end designer pieces.

Not being able to spend money on absurdly-priced clothing seems to me like a positive aspect being a fat woman.
Posted by Roma on June 29, 2011 at 7:58 PM
36
@35

Yeah, and not living to old age is a positive aspect of having AIDS.

Carry on purchasing your shapeless dumpy clothes at lane giant and fashion bug.

Posted by PugilistPuck on June 29, 2011 at 8:03 PM
37
I like the cartoon ladies, and I don't think they are fat. They're definitely zaftig. That is not a bad thing
Posted by catballou on June 29, 2011 at 8:04 PM
38
It's not a bad thing like early onset diabetes isn't.

Posted by PugilistPuck on June 29, 2011 at 8:10 PM
39
Sorry, that woman IS larger, in any universe
Posted by Reader1 on June 29, 2011 at 9:18 PM
Anne in MA 40
@ 25 - Oh, if you're getting a $1000 suit at that sale, you're getting a good deal. The issue isn't whether the suit is worth more than $1000 (it is); it's whether you need a $1000 suit.

Believe me, I wish I couldn't tell the difference.
Posted by Anne in MA on June 29, 2011 at 9:59 PM
41
@9 Word. I had the hardest time finding a size 22 prom dress last week. Granted it was to play rugby in, BUT STILL.

FYI big girls- "Two Big Blondes" in the CD. They'll hook you up!
Posted by UNPAID COMMENTER on June 29, 2011 at 10:01 PM
balderdash 42
EVERYTHING ABOUT THIS IS DUMB.

EVERYTHING.

Except Lindy. Everything else, though, definitely.
Posted by balderdash http://introverse.blogspot.com on June 29, 2011 at 10:18 PM
Soupytwist 43
Thank you for the reference to Silence of the Lambs, still the ONLY comedy to win an Oscar!
Posted by Soupytwist http://twitter.com/katherinesmith on June 29, 2011 at 10:26 PM
44
wow Lindy, that was real cool how you interrogated a random salesperson who has no creative control over the store's window art about the company's fat-aesthetic. but hey, big-womyn pride, amirite?
Posted by why are we wasting valuable internet on this crap? on June 29, 2011 at 10:43 PM
45
@44 of course Lindy "(12 year old) girl reporter", can't actually be bothered to interview someone who had actual control...that would take some effort. Better to just whine about how her coworkers and the world don't understand the travails of "hello I'm fat", than do anything thar resembles reporting or writing or...oh never mind I'm tired...hey there's a bear!
Posted by Lindywestisa12 yearoldgirl on June 29, 2011 at 11:22 PM
wittysobriquet 46
I think the artist is making a comment about Barney's, and getting Barney's to pay for it and show it at Barney's, which, in context is what it fairly interesting. The artist is also a good draughtsperson, too.
Posted by wittysobriquet on June 29, 2011 at 11:32 PM
47
Wow, the store actually paid for that to be there? When I saw the picture I thought it was a graffiti. Though I'm not really cool with graffiti I'll admit I found it an amusing mockery of the impossible sizes of these stores. Sort of a direct-action editorial cartoon.

But if this was actually commissioned by the corporation itself...well fuck. Several times Lindy I thought you were overreacting to slights or discussions of weight, but here I gotta say you're being way too nice. These people delight in making the store as overweight-unfriendly as they possibly can. I'm not overweight and though I've never been to Barneys, I have been to upscale stores apparently catered to obscenely rich 14 year-old girls. Thin ones. Saying that it might be a self-deprecating joke, instead of a fat-deprecating joke directed at the thin rich women who constitute their client base and can snigger as they go in, strikes me as an awfully generous reading.
Posted by Lynx on June 30, 2011 at 12:46 AM
billrm 48
Fuck Barney's and their stupid fucking moron skinny ass skanky cunt customers who would pay $4000 for a pair of shorts. Go to Target, pay $25 and send the other $3975 to Habitat for Humanity or the food bank or any other of the several hundred other charities that would love to have an extra $4K!
Posted by billrm on June 30, 2011 at 7:09 AM
lazylisa 49
"Get ten fat women in a room... and six of them will be wearing the same dress"

I'm glad I'm a "larger" chick myself so I can quote this all the time without sounding like an asshole. Cause it is TRUTH.
Posted by lazylisa on June 30, 2011 at 7:15 AM
rodolfo 50
Is there a release date for the Lindy West: Girl Reporter graphic novel?
Posted by rodolfo on June 30, 2011 at 7:37 AM
51
What an odd comment to make about the artist's size!
Posted by sall on June 30, 2011 at 8:08 AM
Certainly! 52
Where's the cake?
Posted by Certainly! on June 30, 2011 at 10:05 AM
53
I just saw these window displays this morning and was really confused, but I think you did miss the joke. On another window, there are decals of two women with weird faces on their dresses that seems like a weird sexual innuendo. I think the large women with small clothes image is actually making fun of the store not making fun of the women, and it's not tone deaf because the whole point of the image is to draw attention to the crass business of shopping for teeny tiny clothes to begin with.
Posted by jha on June 30, 2011 at 11:24 AM
platypusrex256 54
I am Joshua's total lack of compassion. You should try being a 28 year old male with a 28 inch waist and NOT shop at Barney's. Seriously. Target sells clown pants and Urban Outfitters sells denim leggings. Where the hell do I buy reasonable looking pants?
Posted by platypusrex256 http://platypusrex256.blogspot.com on June 30, 2011 at 11:54 AM
ms_molly 55
Barney's proved their complete stupidity a few years ago by displaying phrases like "Go Green" and "Green is the New Black" in bright lights in all their windows. This little brain fart (do rich people fart?) doesn't surprise me at all.

Now back to more important matters, like finding those damn Doritos!
Posted by ms_molly on June 30, 2011 at 2:57 PM
56
@6 - lol that would be awesome!
Posted by subwlf on June 30, 2011 at 3:51 PM
57
my take? As a size 12. . . I get totally peeved when everything is a size '0' . . . and built for women shaped like little boys.

So yeah, I saw myself in the cartoon getting pissed at yet another piece of clothing that's either "menswear" or "military" or "boyfriend" styled . . . and size '0.' wtf!? urgh.

Posted by Lady Ga Ga on July 1, 2011 at 5:11 AM
58
At first, I thought they were making fun of fatties, and sending a no-fatties-need-apply vibe. Then I went to the artist's website, which shows her art, featuring plus-size women looking great and doing strong and/or beautiful things (see 'Arm-Wrestling' ) I think that if you recognized the artist's work, it would seem that the artist is poking fun at Barney's and it's tiny clothes, and making a statment about society that prefers skinny women and would consider Marilyn Monroe to be a cow. Of course, the artist is obscure, and her website isn't part of the window display. So, to sum up, my guess is the display's purpose is to a) stir up controversy featuring the name "Barney's" and b) promote the artist.

That said, I don't shop at Barney's, but they're a high-end retailer, like, for example, Nordstrom, and they practice "vanity sizing'. That means that if you actually need a size two, and not a four marked two, you can't buy them outside the teen department, where they are often cheap and trashy. That pisses me off, as it makes me go around in baggy pants, making me look even more like a prepubescent boy than I already do.

Posted by AllisonM on July 1, 2011 at 10:19 AM
59
There's clearly a great business opportunity out there selling high fashion [and high-priced] clothes to plus-size women.

If the U.S. Government were to end Corporate Welfare, perhaps our great nation's entrepreneurs could focus on satisfying this need, rather than hiring lobbyists to kiss Congressional a-- to accompany a relative pittance in campaign contributions.

If Barney's chooses not to cater to plus-size women, well, those plus-size women will spend their money elsewhere, where it is welcome, and some smart businessperson will do very well serving this market.

Who cares if the media ignores such a company? 'No need to hire publicists to kiss reporters' a--es either, as word-of-mouth - for free - is the most credible advertising anyway. Media bias against people of size doesn't affect the cash register.
Posted by FightBack on July 2, 2011 at 9:33 AM
bugwitch 60
Fuck the Doritos, I want Lindy!
Posted by bugwitch on July 2, 2011 at 10:53 AM
Anne in MA 61
@ 57 - Yes, that's the way to respond to our society's fat-phobia. By calling thin women without much in the way of breasts "little boys." How enlightened and progressive of you.

Also, please stop abusing ellipses.
Posted by Anne in MA on July 2, 2011 at 2:06 PM
platypusrex256 62
you don't have to be plus sized to be frustrated by cute things that don't fit. its a universal experience. and those women in the drawing arn't fat. they're just feminine. its like an r.crumb thing. cartoons.
Posted by platypusrex256 http://platypusrex256.blogspot.com on July 3, 2011 at 3:37 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy