Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, June 16, 2011

A New (to Me) Theory about the Kennedy Assassination: It Was an Accident

Posted by on Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:15 PM

I am not a Kennedy assassination buff but I just read something that blew my mind.

51furIlnDjL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

I was recently at a dinner at the home of longtime family friends. The husband is a retired Marine (and heavily decorated, though he'd never say it himself) and the wife is a charming, witty woman from Long Island. They like steaks, martinis, and Catholicism.

When their kids were teenagers, the family spent a few years sailing around the Pacific, where they met all kinds of adventurous folks. One of those folks was Andy Kerr, a retired U.S. Navy lawyer who served as special counsel to four secretaries of the Navy. He wrote his memoir, A Journey Amongst the Good and the Great while cruising around French Polynesia. I saw it on a bookshelf before dinner—this couple maintains a real, old-fashioned cocktail hour in their library/living room—and the lady from Long Island loaned it to me.

Its prologue begins like this:

One day we got a letter from Lee Harvey Oswald. The name meant nothing to us then. The letter was long and handwritten and was mailed from Russia where Oswald was living with his wife, Marina. It was addressed to "The Honorable John Connally," who was then the secretary of the navy in the Kennedy administration.

Some secretary sent the letter to Kerr because it had "legal overtones."

It was essentially a complaint from Oswald about the character of his discharge from the Marine Corps, and a plea to Connally to use his authority as secretary of the navy to change the discharge to one more favorable... When Oswald left the Marine Corps and went to live in Russia, he was given an administrative discharge that was less than commendatory. As I recall, he was discharged as "undesirable." He thought that characterization unfair. Later events were to prove the epithet to have been exceptionally mild. The letter was an attention getter. You don't find many Marines defecting to the Soviet Union.

Kerr goes over Oswald's record to see if he ever did anything spectacularly great to merit clemency. He had not. (Kerr calls him "a lousy Marine.") Kerr wrote Oswald to say that his complaint was "without merit." And that, he thought, was that.

But that's not exactly the way it turned out. On 22 November 1963, while riding beside President Kennedy in a motorcade in Dallas, John Connally, then governor of Texas, was shot through his arm and lung by Lee Harvey Oswald. President Kennedy was shot and killed in the same incident. The history books say it slightly differently—that Connally was wounded during Oswald's assassination of President Kennedy. The assumption is always that Oswald was shooting at Kennedy and that Connally was hit by accident or as a secondary target of opportunity. Could it not, however, have been the other way around? In spite of all the investigations, including that of the Warren Commission, and the continuing fascination with and theories about the event, no one has yet come up with a credible motive for the shooting of Kennedy by Oswald. Against this, we know for a fact that Oswald once asked Connally for help in what may have been a cri du coeur. He was turned down flat.

What greater motivation does a psychopath need?

I just don't know what to think about that.

 

Comments (42) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
gloomy gus 1
True or not, the smart thing is to do a screenplay and sell it to Oliver Stone.
Posted by gloomy gus on June 16, 2011 at 1:26 PM
AmyC 2
@1 - nice.
Posted by AmyC on June 16, 2011 at 1:36 PM
bleedingheartlibertarian 3
Wow. Never heard that, either.

I suppose one could argue that if you want to assassinate a governor, there are much easier opportunities to do so than when he is appearing in public with the President. But you could also argue that people who conduct assassinations are not always acting rationally...
Posted by bleedingheartlibertarian on June 16, 2011 at 1:36 PM
Cui Bono 4
The theory that Connally may have been the actual target is nothing new, you think that in almost fifty years no one ever speculated about it?
Posted by Cui Bono on June 16, 2011 at 1:46 PM
5
So what was his motivation for supposedly trying to kill Edwin Walker? Or does this theory presume that Oswald wasn't responsible for that assassination attempt?
Posted by keshmeshi on June 16, 2011 at 1:55 PM
6
Luckily Oswald possessed a magic bullet that defied the laws of physics to carry out his dirty deed.
Posted by Jack Ruby on June 16, 2011 at 1:57 PM
dirac 7
I'm no conspiracy theorist but if you were a conspiracy believer, you'd think this story was a psy-ops job and a plant. Disinformation to take you further away from the truth.
Posted by dirac on June 16, 2011 at 2:09 PM
Sandiai 8
I saw a special on PBS about a hundred years ago that put forth this very theory. That show (it might have been Frontline) also showed Kennedy's body both before and after the autopsy, which was shocking to say the least.
Posted by Sandiai on June 16, 2011 at 2:13 PM
CupcakeHeartbreak 9
Perhaps "blew my mind" is an inappropriate phrase for this story...har har.
Posted by CupcakeHeartbreak http://cupcakeheartbreak.wordpress.com/ on June 16, 2011 at 2:14 PM
rob! 10
Wondering how (in particular, but not exclusively) Hyman Rickover and Robert McNamara got on the cover (or, indeed, in the book) along with Connally and Kennedy and Johnson.

Perhaps a follow-up later on, Brendan?
Posted by rob! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZBdUceCL5U on June 16, 2011 at 2:19 PM
sirkowski 11
@6 Oliver Stone's JFK is a work of fiction you know.
Posted by sirkowski http://www.missdynamite.com on June 16, 2011 at 2:22 PM
12
I always believed in the "Friendly Fire" theory: Oswald was trying to kill Connally and the Secret Service, in firing back, hit the president with a panic shot. Hence the magic bullet and the following cover-up. Can you imagine the reaction in 1963 that the Secret Service had assassinated the President? It would have destabilized the whole Cold War.

I have absolutely no proof of this - but it will be interesting to see what the unsealed Warren Report records say when they are opened in 2017.
Posted by Schweighsr on June 16, 2011 at 2:33 PM
13
@11 - So is the Warren Commission Report.

Posted by Jack Ruby on June 16, 2011 at 2:39 PM
Fnarf 14
Oswald didn't initially receive an undesirable discharge; he initially received a Hardship discharge, which is a subcategory of Honorable, but it was changed to a "Section 8" discharge after he went to the Soviet Union and threw several kinds of kooky shit-fit specifically including going to the embassy and trying to renounce his citizenship. A Section 8 is "mentally unfit". It's pretty easy to imagine him being bitterly upset about being called a nutter; most nutters are.

The Warren Report got it right, though.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on June 16, 2011 at 3:12 PM
johnyawl 15
@12 I will bet money that the Warren Report records will remain sealed.
Posted by johnyawl on June 16, 2011 at 3:19 PM
16
I first saw this same theory from Thomas Thompson in his novel Celebrity. Thompson was a journalist who covered the assassination for Life magazine. It's a pretty great read, and Thompson was a great reporter and writer who's been unjustly forgotten today.

Posted by Christopher Farnsworth http://presidentsvampire.com on June 16, 2011 at 3:40 PM
17
@12: No way the Warren Report's going to be unsealed if it shows the SS shot JFK by mistake.
Posted by tiktok on June 16, 2011 at 3:54 PM
Cascadian 18
Oswald did it, acting alone. The Warren Commission probably got some details wrong but their overall story is the most likely explanation.
Posted by Cascadian on June 16, 2011 at 4:00 PM
19
You frigging punk kids and your forever Dark Ager know-nothing mindsets!!!

That's an ancient planted story scenario, last appearing in that piece of godawful trash book by that former Montgomery County copper, who was allowed into the State Department's incredibly pathetic Bureau of Intelligence (their anit-terrorist subsection).

His book was titled, Ghost, and it was as idiotic as he was/is --- he's now with Stratfor, that corporate "national security" astroturfer firm.

To accept that one has to ignore an encyclopedia of data far more pertinent. Just go back and actually read something worthwhile for a change: David Talbot's Brothers: The Hidden History of the Kennedy Years, as well as James Douglass' JFK and the Unspeakable, now those are to phenomenal books backed by actual sources, and not that phony-baloney hearsay crapola you are now peddling.

Point of order: over this past year, concurrent with a number of declassified material releases from government agencies, we have witnessed an almost onslaught of JFK assassination anecdotes, etc.

The last one I heard was that crap on NPR, when the clown "journalist" from South Carolina, who had written that submediocre column, The Rambler, was retiring and volunteered to share with NPR's neoliberal airheaded audience his career highlight:

He said he had met a woman in the backwoods of Texas during his rambling, who had served in the US Marine Corps the same time as Oswald back in the '50s. She claimed she was with her unit at the firing range, where she witnessed a fellow Marine practising his marksmanship for hours on end, "Truly a crack shot," she so claimed.

Major problem with story: It was many, many years before women of any branch of the service, were allowed onto the firing range.

BTW, was that Kerr fellow any relation to the Kerr from the CIA, during the Bush administration, who was involved with the falsification of that so-called "weapons of mass destruction in Iraq intelligence"????

Would appreciate a reply to that. (That Kerr was last noted on the BoD of Mantech International, along with his bud, Richard Armitage.)

[My bona fides: one of the small number of volunteer researchers on the working staff of the House Select Committee on Assassinations (JFK section, the other section was on Rev. Martin Luther King).
More...
Posted by sgt_doom on June 16, 2011 at 4:12 PM
venomlash 20
YOU! SHALL NOT! TAG!
Posted by venomlash on June 16, 2011 at 4:16 PM
21
Sorry, should have proof read that so I caught the italics!

Also, a simple link analysis easily demonstrates that the two individuals who had zero degree of separation (meaning they knew everyone involved, excepting two) were David Rockefeller and Averell Harriman.

The two individuals both Rockefeller and Harriman had only one degree of separation from (meaning they knew at least one person who knew said indidivual) were Jack Ruby (a k a Jack Rubenstein, his legal name prior to marrying into the mob, and the same name when he once worked for the House Committee on Un-American Activities reporting to Rep. Richard Nixon), and Lee Harvey Oswald.

I wouldn't be at all surprised if John Negroponte, reputed to once have been a crack shot and then in the US Foreign Service at the Mexican Embassy, was indeed the shooter, or one of the shooters.

Now, Rockefeller's businesses were under attack from Kennedy, as well as the fact that Harriman was about to be fired by Kennedy for consistently disobeying his orders and doing exactly the opposite of what JFK had directed him to do. (This is easily verified in any number of documents, but readily accessible from a positively spun book, a biography from Rudy Abramson (who had complete access to Averell Harriman), titled, Spanning the Century - The Life of Averell Harriman, as well as the brilliant biography on John Kenneth Galbraith by Prof. Richard Parker (Harvard prof. and co-founder of Mother Jones magazine).

JFK had also put on the table the possible dissolution of the oil depletion allowance, a major hit on Rockefeller's oil businesses, and JFK had stood up to both GE (Morgan family and Rockefeller family business) and US Steel (principally a Morgan family biz), as well as having issued memos through the US State Deparment, ordering for the complete withdrawal of US troops from Vietname, to begin in the last week of November, 1963, and being completed prior to the upcoming presidential election.

And if there's one thing the Rockefellers (especially David Rockefeller) have always promoted, it is war!

More...
Posted by sgt_doom on June 16, 2011 at 4:27 PM
22
@14, Fnarf,

It's amazing how that snarky fnarf manages to get everything half-assed right.

Right on the first paragraph, but anyone and everyone who's bothered to read all 22 volumes of that BS commission report (and has there ever been a commission that's been anything other than BS???) knows it to be riddled with fiction and pure crapola.

James Angleton had an ongoing false defector operation going at that time, and most likely Oswald, especially given his ease in going back and forth between Russia and the USA, was part of that program.

I recall reading the newspaper the day, after I had delivered my newspaper route, when J. Edgar Hoover's attorney, one Ransom, I believe, who was a member with all the other planted stooges, did mistakenly mention to an interviewing Washington Post reporter that "they were going to get to the bottom of what Oswald had been training for when he was stationed at Monterrey while in the USMC."

Of course, I didn't realize until many years later, when I was in the military during the draft, where the Defense Language Institute was located, so of course Oswald was originally studying Russian there (I came in contact with someone who had gone through the course with Oswald, as well as a Navy tech, and USAF comm tech, both of whom had read the memos on the troop withdrawl from Vietnam which JFK had transmitted via State, during my time in the military).

Officially, Oswald was supposed to have been an Air Traffic Controller, but that was the reverse: he had originally been a linguistic cryptoanalyst (Russian), stationed in Japan, only later would he go through ATC training just prior to being separated as part of Angleton's "false defector" program.

The attorney, Ransom, had screwed up and that screwup has been forever recorded, along with numerous others for all to see.
More...
Posted by sgt_doom on June 16, 2011 at 4:38 PM
sirkowski 23
There is no magic bullet.
Jim Garrison (Kevin Costner in JFK) made a mistake about where the governor was sitting in front of Kennedy. As seen here, the front passenger seat was not directly in front of Kennedy, contrary to the Garrison model.
Posted by sirkowski http://www.missdynamite.com on June 16, 2011 at 4:49 PM
24
@5, keshmeshi,

"So what was his motivation for supposedly trying to kill Edwin Walker?"

Gen. Walker's testimony was supposed to lay the groundwork that Oswald was both a killer and crazy. Of course, one has to look just a little bit deeper to understand that this was the same Gen. Walker who had not too long ago been institutionalized by the Kennedys, as he was involved in urging on the rabble to kill one James Meredith, during the first week when Mr. Meredith had been the first Black-American student to attend Ole Miss (I believe that was the college?).

Gen. Walker was sprung from the mental institution by some of his hardcore, connected Republican buddies in the Senate, much to JFK's chagrin.

I forgot to mention the important factoid, although there are an endless amount pertaining to this, that John Foster Dulles had married into the Rockefeller family, and was a brother-in-law to David Rockefeller, as well has having long-established business connections through the Rockefeller law firm he had been clerking at, Sullivan and Cromwell.

(Geez, I wish people would read the books, this is way too tiresome to constantly be repeating this stuff for 33 years!)

Please take a moment to read the following:

Brothers, The Hidden History of the Kennedy Years, by David Talbot

JFK and the Unspeakable, by James Douglass

The Echo from Dealey Plaza, by Abraham Bolden (first Black-American member of the US Secret Service Presidential Detail [JFK], and later railroaded into jail when he attempted to contact the Warren Commission with vital and contradictory information)
Posted by sgt_doom on June 16, 2011 at 5:03 PM
Will in Seattle 25
I'm pretty sure it was a hit job by the Feminist Mafia.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on June 16, 2011 at 5:20 PM
26
Go read Libra by Don DeLillo and report back.
Posted by Swearengen on June 16, 2011 at 8:31 PM
27
There are Kennedy conspiracy theorists still alive. Amazing.
Posted by sarah68 on June 17, 2011 at 12:27 AM
28
Yes, it really is astonishing, but every once in a while I read about a group of "volunteer researchers" called the Lordites, who, if I understand correctly, are for some reason dedicated to proving that the ship that refused to come to the Titanic's assistance was not the Californian. They feel that its captain (Lord) was unfairly maligned in the inquiries. And that was 1912. And they're wrong.

It's ages since I read the Warren Commission (and I just read the short version, not the testimony) but in addition to General Walker, Oswald probably plotted to kill former VP Richard Nixon when he came to Dallas. So honestly, this is another interesting intellectual exercise, but really, it isn't anything more than that. Oswald was a nutter who saw himself as left wing, and tried to shoot famous people whom he saw as right wing, until eventually he succeeded.
Posted by Puschkin on June 17, 2011 at 8:25 AM
Roma 29
12/Schweighsr: I always believed in the "Friendly Fire" theory: Oswald was trying to kill Connally and the Secret Service, in firing back, hit the president with a panic shot. Hence the magic bullet and the following cover-up. Can you imagine the reaction in 1963 that the Secret Service had assassinated the President? It would have destabilized the whole Cold War.

Mortal Error, a book published in 1992, is about the "friendly fire" theory of Howard Donahue, a gun and ballistics expert from Maryland. In the book, Donahue said he was not a conspiracy theorist, that he believed Oswald acted alone, but that as he began to review the ballistic evidence he came to the conclusion that the infamous head shot accidentally came from George Hickey, one of the Secret Service agents who was riding in the back seat of the follow-up car. Donahue said that Hickey reacted very quickly to Oswald's shots and that, in grabbing the AR-15 and trying to return fire, he accidentally shot Kennedy. There is no doubt that an AR-15 was in the follow-up car; Donahue came across a photo of Hickey holding it as the cars raced to the hospital. The question, of course is: was it fired by Hickey and, if so, did the shot hit Kennedy?

Donahue lays out a number of intriguing points, among them: (1) unlike the full metal jacketed bullets Oswald was using, the AR-15 bullets were frangible; (2) a number of people in following cars said they smelled gunsmoke as they passed by the spot were Kennedy was shot (and it seems odd that gunsmoke would drift down from the 6th floor); (3) and, perhaps most oddly of all, the Secret Service taking Kennedy's body from Parkland in a hurry, over the objections of the doctors.

I never believed there was a coverup based on an intentional conspiracy to kill Kennedy (in fact, I never believed there was a conspiracy.) But a coverup of a horrible and profoundly embarrassing accident, especially an accident caused by the people charged with protecting the president, seemed very plausible to me.

Hickey ended up suing the publisher, St. Martin's Press. Wikipedia says: "the suit was dismissed in 1997 on the grounds that it had been filed too long after publication. In 1998, Hickey settled with the publishers of Mortal Error on undisclosed terms. I also read somewhere that two films taken by other spectators showed that Hickey did not have the gun pointed toward Kennedy at the precise moment that Kennedy's head was hit (the famous Zapruder film does not have the follow-up car in frame.)

Anyway, like I said, Donahue's theory was the most plausible one I've ever heard but, ultimately, it proved to be wrong. Also, in the book, Donahue said that he believes Oswald's second shot had mortally wounded Kennedy anyway so that even if Hickey had accidentally fired the head shot, it wouldn't have been the fatal shot (although it certainly was the most dramatic.)

The Connolly-as-primary-target theory is interesting but Oswald was obviously an extremely good shot and it seems likely that if he had intended to kill Connolly, he would have.

Oh, one other interesting thing Mortal Error mentions. Apparently, it was standard procedure back then for two Secret Service agents to be standing on the back bumper of the presidential limo. But the author says that Kennedy had been irked by this during a previous motorcade (I can't recall the reason why) and, supposedly, ordered them to not ride on the bumper in Dallas. Had they been there, they very well might have screened Kennedy from Oswald's shots.
More...
Posted by Roma on June 17, 2011 at 10:01 AM
30
Naturally enough, the entire world would have to suspend belief, both about the godawful piece of crap rifle Oswald was supposed to have used, that Mannlicher-Carcano crud. (I suspect I am the only commenter here today who qualifed as rifle expert in the military?)

Better still why not look into any possible kinship between Richard J. Kerr and Alex "Andy" Kerr?

One has seen this claptrap "coincidence theory" all over the web, and it pops up with absolute regularity of three years like clockwork.

Wow! Another coincidency, Jim V.'s review at Amazon:

http://www.amazon.com/Journey-Amongst-Go…

(Jim V.’s review)
I met Andy Kerr through my father. Dad worked for General Electric at the time and Mr. Kerr was winding down his stint as general counsel for the company. Although a very important and powerful man, he was very personable and down to earth. He seemed to me to be one of those guys who worked very hard and drove his own success, but was always surprised and happy about how lucky he was. Very humble.

This book is a fascinating read, especially for those of us who were growing up through Viet Nam and the seventies. Most interesting is his take on the Kennedy assasination. After his defection to the USSR, and return to the US, Lee Harvey Oswald wrote a letter to the Secrtary of the Navy (John Connally, who later became Govenor of Texas) asking to be reinstated to the US Marine Corps. Mr Kerr was the Navy JAG chief counsel to the SECNAV. He wrote the legal brief that argued against reinstating Oswald. Mr. Kerr argues that final rejection by Secretary Connally gave Oswald the motive to kill Govenor Connally. We all know Lee Harvey was not a great shot.

This book provides an interesting first person account by someone who worked directly for some of the most pwerful people in government and industry. You may not agree with Mr Kerr, but you will be provoked to thought.

[Personally, anyone who is a general counsel for GE should be beyond repute, certainly anyone in the US Navy should be beyond repute --- please ignore all those officers who were busted, convicted and now at Leavenworth (where they deserve to be, unlike Bradley Manning) for massive thievery and embezzlement during their time in Iraq -- just read over the Special Inspector General's Report on the Iraqi Reconstruction Funds.)]

To seriously believe that Superman Oswald performed a series of shots with that Mannlicher-Carano crap (which was an "up-yours" message from the bad guys, as any true arms expert will tell you), and then Secret Service agent Hickey turns around and blows away the President is truly the most incredible conspiracy theory I've yet heard, douchebaggers!

https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho…

BTW, ever heard of CIA deputy director, Charles Cabbell (Gen. Cabbell), whom JFK fired along with Dulles and Richard Bissell? By the world of unholy coincidences you guys inhabit, he just happened to be the brother of Dallas Mayor Cabbell (note similarity in names, an obvious item even for the deadheads amongst you), the guy who gave the word at the last moment to change the limousine's route that day.

Again, please read those three recommended books or forever remain ignorant (no doubt your normal state!). I realize the lone gunman fantasy is always to be preferred, and the dweebs today all believe they live on Peter G. Peterson's Sesame Street, without even an inkling as to who Peterson is nor how much of their lives he controls.

As you were, people, you may now return to the corner and j**k off....
More...
Posted by sgt_doom on June 17, 2011 at 11:05 AM
31
One final thought, which may be one thought too many for some of the commenters here today, but anyone interested might look into the background of the senior plans guy, Richard Bissell, and unknown and diabolical genius behind many of the most brilliant stuff to come out of the intelligence establishment, both at his time at the CIA, and later at the Pentagon's IDA.

He was the descendant of the guy considered to be the founder of the oil industry (I believe his name was either George Bissell or Henry Bissell?) as well as the guy behind the spy planes, both U-2, and its predecessor the SR-71) and the keyhole satellite as well as the one who was supposed to have originally come up with the idea of "chipping" -- quite successful during the '60s (speaking from personal experience).

The timeline was that Oswald was supposed to have been a defecting air traffic controller commie-lover from the USMC, who would hand over the coordinates for a later U-2 flight, which would then be shot down over the USSR and the plane's equipment captured and adopted by the Sovs. (Major problem with the plan -- supposedly Bissell's with Angleton overseeing -- was that Powers had been instructed to pull a switch on his pilot's chair should he have to eject [he wasn't aware of real plan, but later guessed it] which was supposed to have blown up his plane. Of course, Powers wasn't a complete idiot and examined both the chair and plane and noted that the explosive was in his chair, not the plane, so when the time came and he had to eject, Powers wisely ignored that directive.)

Sovs ended up not buying the phonied-up equipment Bissell and crew had put aboard the U-2 (which Bissell was already underway trying to replace with the soon-to-come-online SR-71, Blackbird).

But they would later find another use for Mr. Oswald, most unforunately, although he suspected it some months prior to his death.

It wasn't even a coincidence that Oswald was in the Civil Air Patrol, and the founder of the Civil Air Patrol was also the owner of the Texas School Book Depository.

Bissell was also supposed to have been the (little known) brains behind the Marshall Plan.

Well worth the research into these matters......
More...
Posted by sgt_doom on June 17, 2011 at 11:17 AM
32
Time to read the books that tell the truth--JFK and the Unspeakable--Why He Died and Why It Matters; Me & Lee: How I Came to know, Love and Lose Lee Harvey Oswald (both of these books were rated the top two on Jessie Ventura's 'best conspiracy books' list), Crossfire: the Plot that Killed Kennedy, Inside the ARRB, and Dr. Mary's Monkey. Five books that give the answers. We had the government investigate what the government DID--and got the mess called the Warren Commission, with the HSCA right behind griping that they were not given info from the CIA (gee, why not?). WHY should we care? scroll up and see all the responses. Among them the usual infiltrators throwing you off the tracks--including the old, silly idea that JFK wasn't the target. It IS important to see how government cover-ups work. Anyone who thinks we can trust the government to tell us "everything" should remember The Gulf of Tonkin lies, Watergate, Weapons of mass destruction in Iraq (not) and now, that Congress doesn't have to give Obama permission to bomb Libya because we're not engaged in 'hostilities' against Libya. Learn to recognize what happened and how the game works, folks. I will not reply to any comments.
Posted by Lola4jvb4LHO Youtube on June 17, 2011 at 4:04 PM
sirkowski 33
Don't. Talk. Shit.
Posted by sirkowski http://www.missdynamite.com on June 18, 2011 at 12:40 AM
34
Some months before JFK was shot he sign an Executive Order that would have effectively ended the Federal Reserve. with what we know about groups like the Bilderbergs, and others, this would be a good motive for JFK's demise.
Posted by Leonidcat on June 18, 2011 at 5:48 AM
35
December 1962: Covert back-channel communications from an official high within the USSR reveal that Nikita Khrushchev is planning to assassinate President Kennedy out of revenge of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Top secret messages from the source warn that that the Soviets are unable to remove the mentally unstable Khrushchev from office while he has the support of his Army. It has become apparent that Khrushchev will go to any lengths to kill Kennedy, an event that will likely start World War III. Out of options, Kennedy decides to beat Khrushchev to the punch.
There was nobody on the grassy knoll, there wasn’t a second shooter. The only conspiracy that took place in Dallas on November 22, 1963 was perpetrated by the President himself.
The Greatest Patriot is a thought provoking spin on the history of the last five decades that leaves its readers with a serious case of “What if?”

https://www.createspace.com/3440956


Posted by dsullivan on June 19, 2011 at 6:31 AM
36
Probably Mob (Marcello. Trafficante) with an assist from anti-castro Cubans and disgruntled CIA types who were not happy about the lack of air cover at the Bay OF Pigs..
Posted by rkpk on June 20, 2011 at 11:39 AM
37
LEE HARVEY NEVER PULLED A TRIGGER THAT DAY-CHARLES NICOLLETI AND JAMES FILES HIT THE PRESIDENT IN THE HEAD AT THE SAME TIME-C.N. WAS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF THE DAL-TEX BUILDING-J.F. WAS ON THE GRASSY KNOLL-BOTH FROM CHICAGO MOB UNDER SAM GIACANA--THE RIFLE THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE FIRED BY OSWALD WOULD NOT EVEN CHAMBER THE SHELLS THAT WERE FOUND IN THE DEPOSITORY-THE ONLY TRIGGER THAT OSWALD PULLED WAS IN THE TEXAS THEATER WHEN HE TRIED TO SHOOT THE ARRESTING OFFICERS-THAT PISTOL WAS GIVEN TO HIM BY JACK RUBY EARLIER THAT MORNING-THE GUN MIS-FIRED DUE TO A FIRING PIN THAT WAS INTENTIONALLY DAMAGED AND WOULD NOT FIRE-HE WAS SET UP TO DIE-NO DEFENSE-A PATSY AS HE SAID-READ THE INCREDIBLE TRUTH AND COMPLETE FACTS WWW.JFKMURDERSOLVED--IT MAY TAKE YOU MONTHS TO READ THRU IT ALL--AMAZING SITE..........
Posted by rick stevens on June 21, 2011 at 12:07 PM
38
The Connally-as-target theory was prominent in James Reston's 1988 biography of JBC - "Lone Star", publication of which coincided with the 25th anniversary of the assassination. I actually wrote to Connally in 1991 or so to ask him his thoughts on it. I still have his letter of reply somewhere, I'll have to dig it out. His response was simple and straightforward - that if LHO wanted to kill him, he could have easily done it on any street corner on any other day, and that to attempt it during the presidential motorcade on Nov 22nd, 1963 would be to consciously try to do under the most difficult of circumstances. I have to admit, this makes a ton of sense. Unless perhaps LHO wanted to attract mega news attention and publicity to the event - by killing him right in front of JFK and wife with crowds looking on, taking pictures, filming, etc.
Posted by ghc on July 15, 2011 at 11:49 AM
39
The Connally-as-target theory was prominent in James Reston's 1988 biography of JBC - "Lone Star", publication of which coincided with the 25th anniversary of the assassination. I actually wrote to Connally in 1991 or so to ask him his thoughts on it. I still have his letter of reply somewhere, I'll have to dig it out. His response was simple and straightforward - that if LHO wanted to kill him, he could have easily done it on any street corner on any other day, and that to attempt it during the presidential motorcade on Nov 22nd, 1963 would be to consciously try to do under the most difficult of circumstances. I have to admit, this makes a ton of sense. But I've still always wondered whether LHO wanted to attract mega news attention and publicity to the event - by killing him right in front of JFK and wife with crowds looking on, taking pictures, filming, etc.
Posted by ghc on July 15, 2011 at 11:56 AM
40
The Case Against LBJ (Part 1)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZzEbKxCF…

The Case Against LBJ (Part 2)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZcecy1bt…

The Case Against LBJ (Part 3)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BiYVw8ml…

The LBJ-CIA Assassination of JFK
http://www.federaljack.com/?p=18969

Read 1) BLOOD, MONEY & POWER, by Barr McClellan, 2) Mary’s Mosaic: Mary Pinchot Meyer & John F. Kennedy and Their Vision for World Peace, and 3) JFK: The CIA, Vietnam, and the Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy, by L. Fletcher Prouty.

Did you know, that LBJ would have gone to PRISON, for the murders of 8 people in Texas (including LBJ’s own SISTER!), at the hand of Mac Wallace, LBJ’s hired hit-man, had LBJ NOT become President? LBJ wanted DESPERATELY to become President. (Just like Tricky Dick Nixon, who was at Clint Murchison’s house, the night before the Assassination, along with many, many other colorful characters, such as J. Edgar Hoover, and Jack Ruby). TPTB (The Powers That Be) knew that JFK and RFK were trying to get LBJ OFF the ’64 ticket! In order for TPTB to reverse all of JFK’s actions as President (such as Executive Order 11110) – LBJ would HAVE TO BECOME PRESIDENT. The choice was clear – the deed would be done in Dallas, but only after they ruled out Chicago, and Tampa). LBJ suggested the Dallas venue. JFK agreed. Jack Ruby owed a favor to Carlos Marcello. That’s why he was the one who took out the patsy: Oswald.

FIVE important books on the subject:

1) Blood, Money & Power, by Barr McClellan
2) Mary's Mosaic: Mary Pinchot Meyer & John F. Kennedy and their Vision for World Peace, by Peter Janney
3) JFK: The CIA, Vietnam, and the Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy, L. Fletcher Prouty
4) Coup d'Etat in America: The CIA and the Assassination of John F. Kennedy, by Alan J. Weberman and Michael Canfield
5) Plausible Denial: Was the CIA Involved in the Assassination of JFK? by Mark Lane

More...
Posted by LBJ Killed JFK on November 3, 2011 at 7:25 PM
41
Robert Morrow Morrow321@aol.com 512-306-1510

Oswald was US intelligence and he shot NO ONE on 11/22/63, not JFK, not Connally, not Tippitt. Oswald was a fake defector to Russia for the CIA or ONI. And, yes, he did write Connally asking that his dishonorable discharge be removed.

Basically, Oswald studied Russian in the Marines, was tested by the Marines, then he left to go work for US spies. Then he gets posthumously framed in the LBJ-CIA Assassination of JFK.

1) LBJ: Mastermind of JFK's Assassination by Phillip Nelson
2) JFK and the Unspeakable:Why He Died and Why it Matters by James Douglass
3) Brothers: the Hidden History of the Kennedy Years by David Talbot
4) The Dark Side of Camelot by Seymour Hersh
5) Family of Secrets: The Bush Dynasty by Russ Baker.
6) Google the essay "LBJ-CIA Assassination of JFK" by Robert Morrow.
7) Google "National Security State and the Assassination of JFK by Andrew Gavin Marshall."
8) Google "Chip Tatum Pegasus."
9) Google "Vincent Salandria False Mystery Speech." Read everything Vincent Salandria ever wrote.
10) Google "Unanswered Questions as Obama Annoints HW Bush" by Russ Baker
11) Google "The Holy Grail of the JFK story" by Jefferson Morley
12) Google "The CIA and the Media" by Carl Bernstein
13) Google "CIA Instruction to Media Assets 4/1/67"
14) Google "Jerry Policoff NY Times." Read everything Jerry Policoff ever wrote about the CIA media cover up of the JFK assassination.
15) Google "CBS News and the Lone Assassin Story by Roger Feinman"
15) Google "Reasoning about Assassinations" by James Fetzer
16) Google "Murray Rothbard the JFK Flap"
18) Google "Preserving the Legacy by Mat Wilson"
19) Google "Bertrand Russell 16 Questions on the Assassination"
20) Watch on You Tube the extremely important videos The Men Who Killed Kennedy, episodes 7, 8, and 9 which focus on the role of Lyndon Johnson.
21) Watch on You Tube Jesse Ventura's show on the JFK assassination.
22) Watch the movie JFK director's cut by Oliver Stone.
23) Watch on You Tube "Evidence of Revision." - 8 hours of fantastic and rare footage relating to the JFK assassination.

Another key point: Lee Harvey Oswald was U.S. intelligence and he shot NO ONE on 11/2263. Re: Oswald's intelligence connections read 1) "Oswald and the CIA" by John Newman 2) "Spy Saga: Lee Harvey Oswald and US Intelligence" by Philip Melanson 3) "History Will Not Absolve Us" by Martin Schotz (Chapter V Oswald and U.S. Intelligence by Christopher Sharrett) 4) "Me and Lee" by Judyth Vary Baker (Oswald's mistress in New Orleans, summer 1963) 5) Google "Lee Harvey Oswald's reading habits summer 1963"
More...
Posted by Robert Morrow on January 12, 2012 at 12:28 PM
42
George Hickey killed JFK by accident with a three round burst from an AR-15. There's a selector switch on the weapon that allows you to fire three rounds with one trigger pull. Lee Harvey Oswald was indeed a patsy. The coverup was orchestrated by Bobby Kennedy. He thought it would be more dignified if history recorded JFK's death by an assassin, rather then from a Secret Service agent who tripped over himself, accidentally firing his weapon. The types of wounds JFK and Connally suffered, as well as the trajectories of the three bullets are all consistent with this event. The best Marine Corps snipers could not duplicate Oswald's alleged feat in repeated tests. Lee Harvey Oswald was not a deranged individual. He was a respected Marine who was used by the government to cover up their mistakes.
Posted by Ricardo3 on November 7, 2012 at 1:06 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy