Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, June 10, 2011

From GLAAD to Worse

Posted by on Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 7:14 AM

Let's catch up on the GLAAD saga, shall we?

A former GLAAD board member went on Mike Signorile's show and accused GLAAD's current leaders, including GLAAD president Jarrett Barrios, of running the organization into the ground. She also accused GLAAD's current leaders of sucking AT&T's dick. AT&T is a major donor to GLAAD and one of GLAAD's board members—Troup Coronado—is a former Vice President at AT&T. GLAAD's connection to AT&T may explain the following sequence of events: GLAAD's president sent a letter to the FCC more than a year ago that seemed to back net neutrality. AT&T opposes net neutrality, which is the current status quo, while almost all liberal and progressive groups support net neutrality. GLAAD sent a second letter to the FCC retracting its previous letter. This second letter claimed that the first letter had been forged and that GLAAD's president had no knowledge of it—he didn't know who wrote it, who signed his name to it, or who sent it. Then another letter was sent to the FCC by GLAAD: this letter backed the proposed AT&T/T-Mobile merger, a merger most liberal and progressive groups oppose. GLAAD claimed that the merger would improve phone and web service and this would make it easier for LGBT organizations like GLAAD to get their messages out to their supporters. (It would also, as John pointed out at Americablog, make it easier for anti-gay groups to get their messages out, making the merger a wash for gay groups).

Back to Mike's show: former GLAAD board member Laurie Perper said the organization was in disarray and called for GLAAD to be dissolved. The head of GLAAD agreed to go on Mike's show to defend the organization... but at the last minute insisted that he be allowed to come on with a PR flack/minder/board member. Mike refused, GLAAD pulled out of the interview. GLAAD did speak to Bilerico—as did the PR flack, who told Bilerico that Barrios, GLAAD's president, wasn't "qualified" to speak about some of the issues that had been raised. (WTF?) GLAAD also told Bilerico that Barrios did, in fact, know who wrote, who signed, and who sent the letter Barrios retracted. Which means Barrios lied to the FCC, lied to the LGBT community, and dishonestly trashed Perper to cover his ass. Now Mike is calling on Barrios to resign.

And today one aspect of the GLAAD mess jumps to the straight press: Politico reports this morning that GLAAD, and other nonprofits, looks like its been bought:

AT&T is lining up support for its acquisition of T-Mobile from a slew of liberal groups with no obvious interest in telecom deals — except that they’ve received big piles of AT&T’s cash. In recent weeks, the NAACP, the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation and the National Education Association have each issued public statements in support of the deal. The groups all say their public positions have nothing to do with the money they received from AT&T. And AT&T says it supports nonprofit groups because it’s the right thing to do — and not because of any quid pro quo. “For decades, AT&T has proudly supported numerous diverse groups and organizations,” a company spokesperson told POLITICO.

But not everyone’s buying it. “The money that nonprofits receive from their corporate sponsors sticks not only in their bank accounts but in their minds,” Ellen Miller, executive director of the Sunlight Foundation, a nonprofit dedicated to government transparency, told POLITICO. “This is what I think of as deep lobbying — there is an expectation that when push comes to shove, these groups will come out in favor of their benefactors.”

GLAAD's a mess and, frequently, an embarrassment. Maybe it is time to pull the plug.

 

Comments (23) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Catalina Vel-DuRay 1
Dan dear, not to be nit-picky, but even though the Supreme Court has ruled that corporations are humans, they don't actually have body parts.

(Well, there is that organ farm that GE is operating in that Chinese political prison, but that doesn't count.)

Otherwise, spot on. I've never really understood GLAAD's purpose. They get worked up about dumb things, and then ignore other real insults. This AT&T thing is the last straw. They have no legitimacy whatsoever.

Posted by Catalina Vel-DuRay http://www.danlangdon.com on June 10, 2011 at 7:22 AM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 2
It's so nice to know that the $100 a month I pay AT&T is going towards horseshit like this.

Well, no, not really.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on June 10, 2011 at 7:38 AM
3
I've been pretty puzzled through this whole thing as to why GLAAD has been making any comment either way about the merger. Isn't GLAAD's stated purpose to monitor and comment on how gay people are portrayed in the media? How is this merger a gay issue?
Posted by 14thblackbird on June 10, 2011 at 7:39 AM
4
I agree this AT&T stuff is baloney. Do you think the plug should be pulled on the NEA and the NAACP too?

Also, I liked this part of what you said in this video:
As adults we have a responsibility when kids use "That's gay" to put it in their heads that that's a little fucked up.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTpXxx929…
Posted by cgd on June 10, 2011 at 7:42 AM
dirac 5
It's called magnetizing the base so they can *screw you* into the machine. They draw you to your little pet causes, and then take a big dump on you. This is why the left needs to dismiss amoralism and so-called pragmatism, which--surprise!--results in our accelerated decent into tyranny and regressivism. It's time to drop ALL groups that do this kind of astroturfing bullshit.

Posted by dirac on June 10, 2011 at 8:23 AM
dirac 6
@5 I mean, do you think gatekeepers are only made up of journalists and access bloggers?
Posted by dirac on June 10, 2011 at 8:24 AM
OuterCow 7
American corporations: we're really good at legal bribery.
Posted by OuterCow on June 10, 2011 at 9:09 AM
BEG 8
Jesus. It's like corporate lobbying (aka legalized bribery) is coming out of the closet. Not enough to just target the politicians anymore...o_O
Posted by BEG http://twitter.com/#!/browneyedgirl65 on June 10, 2011 at 9:19 AM
9
COI is de rigueur. "Perper"?
Posted by PugilistPuck on June 10, 2011 at 9:34 AM
10
Goodbye, GLAAD. HRC - you're next.
Posted by dak7e on June 10, 2011 at 9:48 AM
Kat 11
Dan, you can't pull the plug on something like GLAAD unless you have some way to completely defund them. It would seem the best way to obliterate GLAAD would be to oversee the construction of a more rigidly defined body.
Posted by Kat http://www.utopiatenation.com/blog on June 10, 2011 at 9:51 AM
12
GLAAD lost its bearings years ago, when it started down the road toward hosting awards parties and away from its actual mission. We need what GLAAD used to do (grass roots activism) and not what it currently seems to be doing (I.e., getting enmeshed with corporate donors. With all the other options available for grass roots activism, GLAAD is now superfluous.
Posted by Teeveedub on June 10, 2011 at 10:23 AM
13
This shit pisses me off to no end! GLAAD is so big and makes a big difference because it actually works. Those who hate on it can have a fucking bake sale for gay rights, fucking suck at it, realize they are shitty fundraisers and let people who do a FUCKING FAR BETTER JOB AT WHAT THEY CANNOT DO and - how do you say?: SHUT THE FUCK UP
Posted by A fundraiser for a living on June 10, 2011 at 10:26 AM
14
i'm very curious about how joe jervis, winner of GLAAD's first-ever outstanding gay blog award, feels about all this crap:

http://mpetrelis.blogspot.com/2011/06/jo…
Posted by MPetrelis on June 10, 2011 at 10:32 AM
15
GLAAD has been an embarassment for years. Just another example, here.
Posted by kubrickfan on June 10, 2011 at 10:55 AM
John Horstman 16
Yeah, let's not forget about them attacking gay media figures for trying to reclaim "fag" - you know, like LGBTQetc. activists did with "queer". Do they object to "dyke", or has that been successfully reclaimed to the point where it's a non-issue, too? (Obviously, in the real world of non-essentialized meanings for particular combinations of sounds, all of these depend on context; I'm curious about GLAAD's "our understandings of words are the only correct ones" fantasy world.)
Posted by John Horstman on June 10, 2011 at 11:10 AM
John Horstman 17
Ah, that was the "embarrassment" link, my bad.
Posted by John Horstman on June 10, 2011 at 11:11 AM
18
@ 3, 14thblackbird,

The article at the site below illustrates the situation most excellently. It's all about following the money and nothing else.

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/06/b…

http://gay.americablog.com/2011/06/glaad…
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/02/busine…
Posted by sgt_doom on June 10, 2011 at 11:30 AM
19
We should just assume that corporations buying off non-profits and stacking their boards with shills is the new normal. An easy way to spot when an organization you support has been bought off this way? When they are advocating for a cause that has nothing to do with their stated organizational goals. ("This merger will make it easier for our supporters to make phone calls?" What?)

Non-profits usually have their mission statements right on their website. It's an easy way to check if their advocacy has been hijacked.
Posted by Proteus on June 10, 2011 at 12:20 PM
20
You're a little off here, Dan. Firstly, as far as Mike Signorile goes, you're not telling the whole story - and neither is he. The offer was made to Jarrett, and Jarrett said yes - then the board member (which, in matters like these, a board of ANY size should be consulted) asked to join Jarrett as many of the lies told by the bitter ex-board member came long before Jarrett's time. Therefore, it was Mike who was clearly just out to "catch" Jarrett on something and refused to allow both Jarrett and the board member on the show - what was Mike so afraid of that he wouldn't let both people appear?

You also say that Jarrett "dishonestly trashed Perper." Did you listen to the interview? The entire time, all she did was make things up about GLAAD and everyone listened because we just LOOOVE to eat our own. Do you know ANYTHING about this source other than she was a former board member and now hates GLAAD? Seriously - if we spent half the time going after the people who hate us as we do the organizations trying to support us, wed have had our equality YEARS ago.
Posted by chrisreynolds on June 10, 2011 at 2:06 PM
21
You're a little off here, Dan. Firstly, as far as Mike Signorile goes, you're not telling the whole story - and neither is he. The offer was made to Jarrett, and Jarrett said yes - then the board member (which, in matters like these, a board of ANY size should be consulted) asked to join Jarrett as many of the lies told by the bitter ex-board member came long before Jarrett's time. Therefore, it was Mike who was clearly just out to "catch" Jarrett on something and refused to allow both Jarrett and the board member on the show - what was Mike so afraid of that he wouldn't let both people appear?

You also say that Jarrett "dishonestly trashed Perper." Did you listen to the interview? The entire time, all she did was make things up about GLAAD and everyone listened because we just LOOOVE to eat our own. Do you know ANYTHING about this source other than she was a former board member and now hates GLAAD? Seriously - if we spent half the time going after the people who hate us as we do the organizations trying to support us, wed have had our equality YEARS ago.
Posted by chrisreynolds on June 10, 2011 at 2:07 PM
22
This reminds me of the time some nuclear group showed up at our little Act-up meeting and wanted us to endorse Yucca Mountain. TWo highly paid people with 15 little Aids activists. What a show that was when one informed member just said" what the fuck?"
Posted by thedeserttower on June 10, 2011 at 10:12 PM
brian 23
Who the fuck is Chris Reynolds?
Posted by brian on June 11, 2011 at 9:22 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy