Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

Columbia City Cinema Closure: The City Responds

Posted by on Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:46 PM

Snap:

May 4, 2011

To Those Interested in Columbia City Cinema:

The Department of Planning and Development (DPD) and Fire Department have been working with the Columbia City Cinema for almost a year to try and resolve safety issues, in an effort to retain this important community facility and to ensure the safety of the public. We are disappointed that the operator has chosen to shut down the Cinema rather than address these safety concerns.

(Full text after the jump.)

The Columbia City Cinema has been in operation for several years, but unfortunately it has done so illegally. A permit for a movie theater was never obtained for this building, and installation of required safety improvements was never completed. The most critical concerns are providing safe exits for patrons and providing sprinklers. City staff confirmed with the owner that there were issues with both exiting and sprinklers when this issue was first brought to our attention. Over the last 12 months, the City has reached out and convened several meetings with the owner to help work on these issues while temporarily allowing the business to remain open at a reduced capacity.

There are several features of this building that make these upgrades particularly important. The cinema is housed within an old building which was originally used as a Masonic Lodge. This is a rare cinema in that it contains a large theater on an upper level of a building constructed of wood. Most older theaters are one floor only, and were built as theaters many years ago. When a new business such as a cinema occupies a structure like this, it requires a permit to install additional safety upgrades so that that the customers and families are able to safely exit the building during a fire. Sprinklers or increased fire-resistive construction have been required for a building of this type (containing an upper-level movie theater) since the 1940’s. Had the owner consulted with the City before occupying this space, we would have identified these issues in advance so that these safety upgrades would have been considered by the business owner.

The City has been committed to working with the owner of Columbia City Cinema on complying with the current code. The Fire Department, in consultation with DPD, agreed to grant temporary assembly permits for the cinema while progress was made towards obtaining a permit and completing the safety upgrades. However, it’s been 12 months since this issue was identified. The construction permit has not been obtained and it has become increasingly clear that the owner does not have a feasible plan to make the required safety upgrades to this building.

We had also informed the owner that he had a different option — sprinklers would not be required if capacity were reduced and only the lower screen was used. That remains an option for the owner.

The City recognizes the importance of this local institution, but we would be doing a disservice to the community if we allow the cinema to continue to operate in its current configuration without considering the safety of the public. Many business owners across the City have complied with these requirements, and it would not be fair to them to exempt other businesses from the same rules. We remain supportive of the Cinema and appreciate its value to the community, and urge the owner to address the public safety issues we have identified.

Sincerely,


Assistant Chief John Nelsen
Fire Marshal

Diane M. Sugimura, Director
Department of Planning and Development

 

Comments (18) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Uh oh--City response sounds quite reasonable. CCC sounds whiny and suffering from over-entitlement syndrome.
Posted by tiktok on May 4, 2011 at 3:53 PM
2
anyone who has worked with the current fire chief, the current police chief, SDOT or DPD can tell you how incredibly lame and inept they all are. This city is falling apart. No one worth a shit wants to take top jobs, and the mayor and his staff care about and work on the tunnel only, while council is either looking towards retirement, reelection, or election to a higher office. This is a high profile business shutting down because of that. It won't be the last, and what you'll never hear about is all the places that don't open or open in other cities because of the completely fucked up state of the City. There is no vision to help businesses open or operate. Regulators are dickheads who would rather fuck a business up than help them operate safely or properly.

The City (gov't) Sucks. The Mayor and Council couldn't give a fuck. Amazing.
Posted by tiredofthisshit on May 4, 2011 at 4:15 PM
3
@3 -

Nice to see you here, Mr. Doyle!
Posted by firecodesareimportant on May 4, 2011 at 4:21 PM
Beetlecat 4
@2 a high-profile business?
Posted by Beetlecat on May 4, 2011 at 4:27 PM
5
The last time I heard a sob story about city regulation stifling a business, it was the University Inn on 45th. The same place where I saw a rat the size of a football scare the bejeezus out of the bartender.
Posted by unpaid reader on May 4, 2011 at 4:33 PM
6
CCC sounds like every small business owner who won't take the time to find out the legal requirements to actually run their business until they're already in up to their hips, and then complains "HOW COULD I HAVE KNOWN??!! IT'S UNFAIR--SMALL BUSINESS IS THE BACKBONE OF THE EEECONOMEEE!!! WHY SHOULD I PERFORM DUE DILIGENCE OR FOLLOW THE RULES???!!!"

Please--just because the idea of an art-house movie theatre and performance space is attractive doesn't mean you get a pass on permitting and safety requirements.
Posted by tiktok on May 4, 2011 at 4:35 PM
7
Restaurant owners have to jump through so many hoops before opening, with the city, the county, the liquor control board & so on. How could this business have been open for so many years w/o completing the minimum requirements from the city to be operating?
Posted by olive oyl on May 4, 2011 at 4:52 PM
TVDinner 8
@7: By just saying, "To hell with it, I'm gonna do what I want." This letter says the owner failed to obtain the appropriate permits that any rational business owner would have obtained before opening the doors. This guy just opened the doors and bitches about the city doing its job.

I, for one, am very glad we have government that does this kind of stuff.
Posted by TVDinner http:// on May 4, 2011 at 5:00 PM
Catalina Vel-DuRay 9
Olive Oyl, he changed the use from (basically) single auditorium to tri-plex. That caused the code change. Otherwise it would have been grandfathered.

TVDinner, the fire code, like most codes, is national in scope. But almost every provision exists because someone was hurt or killed. Every city would enforce this.
Posted by Catalina Vel-DuRay http://www.danlangdon.com on May 4, 2011 at 5:38 PM
Farbe 10
No, city agencies in the aggregate are very fucked up. It becomes so obvious when one's project involves multiple departments and they have to interact with one another. It is a nightmare for the project manager.

Having said that, it clearly appears that the cinema operator is even more fucked up. The net result? A cluster fuck.
Posted by Farbe on May 4, 2011 at 5:42 PM
11
The only surprise is that the Columbia City Cinema survived as long as it did. The business model never was viable -- the operator has been appealing to "the community" for donations since before the place opened, And this for a for-profit business! Sheesh.

Had the operator been more thoroughly vetted seven-plus years ago, those who "invested" in the cinema would have saved their money, as the operator had a well-established history of failed movie theaters -- at both the Grand in Tacoma (now a not-for-profit) and the Grand Illusion in the U District (ditto). Dude just ain't much of a businessman, but he sure can talk a good game. But in all that chatter I've yet to hear a word about how much he's paid himself over these past seven years.

Perhaps more credible people will step forward and reopen the place as either a business that stands a reasonable chance of turning a consistent profit, or as a not-for-profit to which a person might make a donation without feeling like a complete sucker.
Posted by gracioussuburbanliving on May 4, 2011 at 6:17 PM
giffy 12
Fire codes are why things like this:
http://kstp.com/news/stories/s1889885.sh…
don't become things like this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laurier_Pal…
Posted by giffy on May 4, 2011 at 7:18 PM
13
@8 & 9 .. I know. I wasn’t saying that CCC is in the right, I was merely commenting that in order for a person to open a restaurant there are so many permits, sign offs and inspections, yet it seems that one can open a movie theatre be open for years and not be in compliance with the law ... amazing.
Posted by olive oyl on May 4, 2011 at 9:52 PM
John Scott Tynes 14
@6, FWIW it's not an art house cinema. They show regular Hollywood movies. They're just the only regular-Hollywood movie theater in a pretty big radius around those neighborhoods and as such were providing a real service.

@11, Paul addressed his salary in his letter announcing the closure.

But hey, if you guys want to keep showing your ignorance, be my guest. You sure sound important and informed.
Posted by John Scott Tynes http://www.johntynes.com/ on May 4, 2011 at 11:23 PM
15
WTF!! If the owner was a negro, black guy, the city would have shut them down 10 years ago operating without a permit and potentially trapping hundreds of colored people in a cramped, burning theatre. In reality, the lame owner is pasty white guy and most patrons are white people that live in gentrified Columbia City, Honkeytown, Seattle, USA.
Posted by coolmoedee on May 5, 2011 at 12:00 AM
tunanator 16
I wouldn't patronize that place - considering how many hundreds of people could die in the second story of a wooden building without sprinklers - and how often something like that has (very quickly!) happened in the US.

Posted by tunanator on May 5, 2011 at 1:37 AM
17
Not being on the operator's email list, I never saw that mention of salary to which you allude, #14. Had he ever mentioned it prior to this, or in his weekly missives on the cinema's website, or during any of those occasions when he came hat-in-hand to "the community"? Or was the bit of intelligence released only to you oh-so-well-informed insiders?

In any event, why would you believe him at this point? How do you explain the discrepancy between the city's version of this story and his? Dude has no credibility, man.

So please, spare the condescension.
Posted by gracioussuburbanliving on May 5, 2011 at 6:50 AM
18
If you want to read his letter go the CCC site: http://www.columbiacitycinema.com/

In reference to Salary all I could see was the following statement:
"It was a labor of love and obligation. I ran the cinema for the community, taking a salary, when I took it, that the average homeless person would deem inadequate."

I live in CC, the cinema will be missed
Posted by HB on May 5, 2011 at 3:52 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy