Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

1,801 Affordable Housing Units Proposed for Yesler Terrace

Posted by on Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:32 AM

Yesler Terrace as it now stands.
  • Kelly O
  • Yesler Terrace as it now stands.
At a crowded, three-hour public meeting held last Thursday in Yesler Terrace's community center, the Seattle Housing Authority announced its preference to replace the 561 decrepit, extremely low-income housing units of Yesler Terrace with a dense mix of 1,801 affordable housing units and 3,199 market-rate units, interspersed with four parks, on roughly 30 acres of land just west of downtown Seattle.


Virginia Felton, a spokeswoman for the SHA, says a final development plan won't be approved until the organization has a chance to digest the project's environmental impact study (EIS), which is slated for release this Thursday. The SHA still hasn't committed to one-to-one on-site replacement of its extremely low income units, as some critics have demanded. Felton says that between 70 and 83* of those units could be relocated two blocks east of the current Yesler Terrace site, closer to the International District. "But we're proposing adding almost 1,000 workforce housing units to the site for people who aren’t super affluent or very low income, which is a big deal," Felton adds.

Some affordable housing advocates are still critical of the plan. "It’s hard for me to understand the emphasis on workforce housing when studies show that the biggest gap in affordable housing availability is on the lowest end of the scale—30 percent and below median income level," says Tim Harris, director of Real Change newspaper. "That said, I think that any addition of affordable housing is a step in the right direction."

Specifically, the housing breakdown looks like this: 561 extremely low-income replacement units (for example, a two-person household would have to make less than $20,600 to qualify); 290 very low-income units (two people making less than $34,250); and 950 workforce units (two people making less than $51,550). The remaining units—3,199—would be higher end market-rate units for families who earn Seattle's median income of $85,600 or above.

*This post has been updated to reflect a new range of extremely low-income units proposed for off site development.

Along with analyzing the environmental impacts of adding 4.3 million square feet of residential space to the area, the EIS will include impact projections for 900,000 square feet of office space, 88,000 feet of commercial space, 5,100 parking stalls, and 65,000 square feet of space devoted to community centers and day cares.

Felton says the SHA is aware that transit advocates think 5,000 parking stalls is too much. "I think we’re all in agreement that we want less than that," Felton says. "The goal of the preferred alternative is to use the maximums so we get the best information about appropriate mitigation. It's not necessarily what we want to shoot for." She adds that the SHA doesn't yet have a more realistic number of parking stalls the redevelopment will hold but says the organization is exploring dual-duty parking lots, which would be reserved for businesses during the day and residents at night.

The SHA hopes to have a final development plan ready for the organization's board of commissioners to approve during their May 15 meeting. After that, the group will work with the Department of Planning Development and the city council to draft legislation that would address zoning upgrades and land use amendments for the site. The 20-year project isn't slated to break ground until the fall of 2012. Current Yesler Terrace residents will receive relocation notification and assistance 18 months before the current buildings are razed.

 

Comments (14) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
michaelp 1
This is excellent news! Maintaining the current number of housing units for the poorest of the poor, while also recognizing that, as they call it, "workforce housing" is also a need in Seattle.

I'm sure John Fox will have something to complain about (those "extremely poor" units should all be top floor penthouses!!!), but overall, sounds like they're moving forward with a great plan!
Posted by michaelp on April 12, 2011 at 11:40 AM
Catalina Vel-DuRay 2
I'm the electrical hostess for this project. They are proposing all sorts of interesting renewable and efficiency stuff.
Posted by Catalina Vel-DuRay http://www.danlangdon.com on April 12, 2011 at 11:46 AM
Fnarf 3
The reasoning, whether you agree with it or not, is to avoid solid blocks of the poorest of the poor, or ghettoes, in other words. It's enforced mixed housing -- which is a good idea in theory. It's not clear to me that it's really the best way to accomplish this, but the principle is sound.

What worries me most is the provisions for the thing that low-income neighborhoods are really short of -- businesses. They give square footage, but without addressing the nature of the problem: how do you encourage real businesses that serve the community? City governments, by and large, have proven to be spectacularly terrible at this. The city, even in ordinary (not low-income) neighborhoods, is FULL of mandated retail spaces that will forever be empty or underutilized because we don't know how to fill them.

But overall it's a good solution. Yesler Terrace as it now stands is not a sustainable idea. What would really be awesome would be to have the old Japanese- and African-American tenement neighborhood it replaced back again, with a fair mix of those units ripe for gentrification, and the kind of natural piecemeal development that really works in a city. But hey, it's better than nothing. I hope it's a success.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on April 12, 2011 at 12:41 PM
4
What us market rate to live with gang bangers as neighbors in a shitty 'hood?
Posted by Hood rats on April 12, 2011 at 12:59 PM
gloomy gus 5
This makes me pretty happy. I don't remember the original plans being so good on the relocation assistance. It's staggering to me that the median city income is 85 grand, though. And I didn't realize this was going to be a twenty-year project. Mercy me.
Posted by gloomy gus on April 12, 2011 at 1:04 PM
HOT PUSSY 6
The area just west of downtown Seattle is Elliott Bay. I think you mean the area just east of downtown Seattle.
Posted by HOT PUSSY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4QKiYar9pI on April 12, 2011 at 1:17 PM
7
One for one replacement on site would be great. This is important because no one else is building housing affordable to the very very poor. This is the mission of the housing authority and it is important that they keep doing this.

That being said, folks need to understand that there is no longer federal money from HUD for building the housing projects of yesteryear, which is both a good and bad thing. Good because concentrated pockets of extreme poverty are generally not the best for any neighborhood or community. Bad because there will always be folks living on less than 10k a year (Yesler's average household income) due to disability, age or other life circumstances. In the era of the eroding social safety net, where will these folks live? Likely on the street if there weren't public housing or Section 8 vouchers. So I applaud SHA for getting creative here and trying to find a way to generate income (market rate and commercial development) to offset the cost of building subsidized housing. I just hope that we get a mix of scales - low to high density - and that some of the public housing remains in townhomes and NC65 (6 stories) or below. One of the beautiful things about Yesler is the low-scale of it, and that people felt a great sense of ownership given their yard and ability to garden and watch their kids play. I hope this isn't lost all together, even though I wholeheartedly believe that this site warrants increased density more than any other in the City.
Posted by kgdlg on April 12, 2011 at 2:21 PM
8
Thanks Cienna for your on-going coverage of this important issue. The most important item in your story - new news if you will - was the statement from Virginia Felton, SHA's PR person, telling you that as many as 187 or one-third of the current 561 public housing units are likely to be built off-site. For months, they've repeatedly told the press and City Council it was their intent to replace all but 61 on site.

We fear that by the time they get their permits, over half will be replaced off-site. That's what happened at their four HOPE VI sites (Holly Park, High Point, Roxbury Village, and Rainier Vista). 2000 public housing units were removed and only half replaced on site. And all for the low price of about 1 billion in state, fed. and local housing dollars - all to come out at the other end with fewer units that we most desperately need in our city serving the poorest of the poor.

The claim by SHA that they will build replacement units off-site is simply a case of robbing Peter to Pay Paul. To build off-site, SHA must spend millions more to buy land and build the units - and as was the case at their HOPE VI sites - they'll raid existing sources like our housing levy and state trust fund dollars for those off-site units. Monies we need to expand our stock instead go towards replacing units SHA destroys. What a colossal waste. By contrast when they're all replaced "on-site" you don't have pay the price of land offsite and you can internally subsidize the public housing from extra revenue coming from the added density, and commerical and condo uses in the new development.

According to the 2008 King County Housing Benchmarks report, there is a shortage of 40,000 rentals affordable to those with incomes at or below 40 percent of median. The current residents at Yesler Terrace earn on average 18 percent of median. This is where the need is. By contrast, that same report shows a surplus of rental units in King Co. priced at rents affordable to those between 50-80 percent of median.

It's not too much to expect of SHA to replace all 561 public housing units on site. That'd be only 1 out of 10 of the 5000 roughly on site serving the people SHA is mandated to serve. We believe at least 1000 or 20 percent should serve public housing residents. Then we have a project that actually expands the stock of housing we so need in our city.

Yesler Terrace for 70 years has been the most fully integrated neighborhood in our city and one of the most integrated in the nation. It's helped generation after generation of low income people, working people, communities of color, and first generation immigrants (such as Gary Locke's and his family) get on their feet from hard times. It is needed now more than ever and must continue to perform these functions. The loss of Yesler Terrace turned over to high priced condos and expensive office space and gentrified is symptomatic of what's happening all over this city. It represents the loss of our city's soul if we let it happen.

- John V. Fox for the Coalition
More...
Posted by John V. Fox on April 12, 2011 at 5:32 PM
9
Where do your median numbers come from? Is that individual or household? i know it says individual in the piece, but the number I last saw for that was somewhere in the mid 50K range.
Posted by syd at home on April 12, 2011 at 6:11 PM
Captain Wiggette 10
@6 My thought also.
Posted by Captain Wiggette on April 12, 2011 at 7:51 PM
11
For 2008, the last year for which I can find data on,
median household income in Seattle is 61,786. Source: U.S. Census Bureau.

Posted by syd at home on April 12, 2011 at 8:34 PM
angelallwayz206 12
I Know they have to do something soon over 100 units near Harborview have a Failing Sewer System. I am a resident here.
I never thought I would live in Public Housing but a DV made it my Fate. I have great neighbors and a safe place to raise my daughter. This is going to be an Uphill Battle for sure. What I want is an archeological dig first because this is sacred land of the Indigenous 1st PEOPLE. Trust and believe my neighbors and I will not go until we are ready and we are assured that they will replace 1 for 1 the units they destroy..............
Posted by angelallwayz206 on April 13, 2011 at 9:57 AM
13
It'll be floating in the sound?
Posted by vamos on April 13, 2011 at 10:01 AM
14
I don't really get this idea of dual-duty parking lots. If residents are only able to use them at night, that means they are forced to use their cars during the day or find some other place to park. What if someone wants to own a car for occasional or at least not-daily use? They should really get down to at least a .5 or lower parking ratio and have lots of zipcars and transit access instead.
Posted by zef81 on April 14, 2011 at 12:05 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy