Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

What's on Fire at the Fukushima Reactor?

Posted by on Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:20 PM

As Goldy posted below, the day has not gone well at the Fukushima reactor.

(For the record: Goldy has done a fine job keeping Slog up on the latest developments in this crisis—closely following the available news sources, and accurately relaying what's being told to the public. If you're looking for a true hysteric, I'd suggest the EU energy chief declaring this situation the 'apocalypse'. No horsemen in sight, from where I sit.)

Earlier today, a fire was reported to be burning in Reactor 4—the second fire at this site. At the time of the earthquake, this reactor was shut down for maintenance, with all of its fuel stored in a nearby pool of water.

Let's talk about these pools of water. The fuel rods at nuclear power plants—both fresh and 'used' fuel rods—produce large amounts of gamma radiation. Water is an excellent shield for gamma radiation. In order to protect the workers at the plant as they load and unload the fuel from the reactor, the rods are always (supposed) to be bathed in a deep pool of water. Think of a really deep swimming pool, open to the air above. The workers can operate cranes and other machinery safe from the radiation produced from the rods below—thanks to the shielding provided by the water. The water can also double as coolant for the heat generated by the decay of the unstable atoms within the fuel rods. It's an elegant solution to the problem: Water is clear, plentiful, not-too-viscous, with high-thermal density and non-toxic.

StoragePoolSchematic.gif

The pools were initially designed to have enough water in them to be able to dissipate the heat generated the by the rods with no need for active cooling. Enough heat could be radiated off the top of the pool to keep the water from every boiling away.

The problem starts with the lack of any sort of permanent nuclear waste repository. The initial plan for plants like these were to ship off the spent fuel rods to this (now mythical) waste site, freeing up space for new fuel and freshly spent rods. With nowhere to send the waste, the backup plan was to store more fuel on site, in these pools, by packing them tighter with the fuel rods. By this point—with the increased number of rods stored in the pool—the heat generated by the rods cannot be completely eliminated by passive cooling. If the cooling pumps—that replace the water warmed by the rods with cold water—fail, the water in the pool gradually heats up, eventually boiling away.

This is what has happened at Fukushima over the past day or so—almost certainly in the storage pool for Reactor 4 (stuffed with all of the waste fuel, plus fuel that normally is within the reactor), and possibly the waste pools for the other reactors. These pools were within the (now destroyed) 'secondary containment' building, now are exposed to the air.

As the water boils off, the gamma radiation from the fuel rods is no longer being shielded—making the plant deadly to work in for any length of time. Further, the steam from the boiling water is (partially) broken into oxygen and (explosive) hydrogen, leading to further chemical explosions that have damaged the plant. Finally, these storage pools—once the roof of the buildings were blown off—are exposed to the environment. Any steam (to hydrogen) explosion will result in radioactive waste being propelled into the air—and spread. The waste fuel stored in these pools contains the most worrisome environmental contaminants—radioactive Iodine, Cesium and Strontium that can replace non-radioactive Iodine, Potassium and Calcium respectively.

Arguably, this is a worse situation than a reactor meltdown. At least in a reactor meltdown (in which the fuel rods within the reactor melt and lose their shape) the radioactive slag heap is within the heavily reenforced reactor vessel. The unshielded radiation limits approach to the pools—to repair cooling systems or to refill them with water. The plan now (apparently) is to use shielded military helicopters to drop water onto the pools. It's a grim situation—without a clear, clean solution.

 

Comments (19) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Unregistered User 1
So if I read this correctly at this point the worst potential impact right now is expected not from a reactor core "MELTING THE FUCK DOWN," but from excess spent fuel rods stored on site that required active cooling that no longer exists "MELTING THE FUCK DOWN."
Posted by Unregistered User on March 15, 2011 at 6:37 PM
aardvark 2
Thank you Jonathan, you're the best.
Posted by aardvark on March 15, 2011 at 6:42 PM
Teslick 3
Thank you for that analysis!
Posted by Teslick on March 15, 2011 at 6:45 PM
4
Reactor 4 is also where the plutonium is stored. Several foreign nationals are fleeing or have fled. The US State Dept hasn't recalled anyone, but Americans contaminated with radiation aren't allowed in the contiguous 48 states. My brother is still in Osaka and is not panicking yet but I have contacted our Foreign Affairs department.
Posted by oh shiitake on March 15, 2011 at 6:56 PM
Jonathan Golob 5
Now, a favor to all of you: Does anyone own a Geiger counter that I could use / buy / borrow? Shockingly, all are sold out.
Posted by Jonathan Golob http://dearscience.org on March 15, 2011 at 7:03 PM
The Wretched Harmony 6
We've also learned that our ability to predict the magnitude of earthquakes is abysmally inadequate. I wonder how that bodes for our permanent nuclear waste repository.
Posted by The Wretched Harmony on March 15, 2011 at 7:26 PM
Captain Wiggette 7
@6: at this point, I advocate just depositing it all onto Arizona. Seems like a state that deserves it...
Posted by Captain Wiggette on March 15, 2011 at 7:37 PM
8 Comment Pulled (Spam) Comment Policy
svensken 9
@8

After a quick look into your comment history. I declare thee a stalker.
Posted by svensken on March 15, 2011 at 8:01 PM
attitude devant 10
Goldy and Golob are doing a remarkably good job with this series. Because my daughter lived in Tokyo (until we made her leave for Kyoto Monday) I have been following it closely. 4, if your bro wants to leave he'd better get on Expedia soon. When I got a ticket from Osaka to Seattle this afternoon (for Friday) the one-way fare was $3000, and one hour later the same flight was priced at $7000.

(Good old American free enterprise.....)
Posted by attitude devant on March 15, 2011 at 8:10 PM
WFM 11
Given the magnitude of the initial H2 detonations I really have to wonder what kind of damage those pools (and the fuel rods in them) incurred. The initial blasts were no Hindenburg type of burn-off, they were high-velocity detonation shockwaves that must have generated enormous overpressure. The orderly spacing of the rods could have become a jumble, debris must have displaced water, and who-knows-how-much water must have simply been, well, blown out of the water. Hell, it could have blown fuel rods into the ocean. The video showed debris going 500 meters into the air. So I suspect there's much more to the solution than just pouring more water in to refill the pools. When they talk of using helicopters I presume they mean using cargo helos to dump in boron from fire buckets, a-la Chernobyl. Each Red Army chopper & crew there got one pass then had to be decontaminated.
Posted by WFM on March 15, 2011 at 8:42 PM
12
@11 - that is actually a reasonable concern. I've toured several of the storage pools out at Hanford and depending on the age of the fuel rods/containment within the pool they can be fairly fragile. The high energy environment that the container metals are exposed to eventually makes them brittle and prone to fracture.
Posted by Action Slacks on March 15, 2011 at 8:47 PM
rob! 13
@5, this is what we used to use in the lab. They may sell direct. Took me awhile to remember the company name.

http://www.tech-associates.com/product-i…
Posted by rob! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZBdUceCL5U on March 15, 2011 at 9:13 PM
WFM 14
Look at this image from NHK and tell me that those pools are intact...

http://media.komonews.com/images/110315_…
Posted by WFM on March 15, 2011 at 9:14 PM
Captain Wiggette 15
@11. Clearly. The outer containment buildings that blew out in #1 and #3 is several feet thick of solid concrete and steel.

It's probably safe to say that it is inaccurate to call this a nuclear "plant" anymore. It hasn't been that for quite some time.

It's kind of like calling the pile of rubble at ground zero a "skyscraper."
Posted by Captain Wiggette on March 15, 2011 at 10:04 PM
Captain Wiggette 16
@14: EVERYTHING IS UNDER CONTROL.

YOU ARE JUST LOOKING AT A DESIGN FEATURE.

THE BUILDING IS DESIGNED TO DO THAT.
Posted by Captain Wiggette on March 15, 2011 at 10:10 PM
More, I Say! 17
@8, 9, not just a stalking problem, but clear proclivity for alliteration (cute nicknames!), as well as a troubling tendency to repeat key phrases, such as "insufferable windbag."
Posted by More, I Say! on March 16, 2011 at 12:41 PM
More, I Say! 18
Also, OLD PEOPLE JOKES!! Hahaaa! >.
Posted by More, I Say! on March 16, 2011 at 12:43 PM
19
Thanks for more information than all the talking heads have provided in a week. One small correction...I believe the fresh fuel rods are just barely radioactive (definitely not true after they have been in the high neutron flux of the reactor core)
Posted by hutchphd on March 17, 2011 at 7:33 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy