Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, March 14, 2011

Why the h in "Why" Is Wasting Our Time

Posted by on Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 2:37 PM

9780375423727.jpeg
Language is a painfully imperfect way to communicate information. Besides the various errors of semantics and translation that take so much of our time to untangle, the actual construction of words wastes our time, too. While helping Alan Turing decipher the Enigma code, cryptographer Claude Shannon theorized that English "has redundancy of about 50 percent," such as the u that always follows after q and the frequency of h following t. With all those extra letters, it's a miracle that we even have time to read at all.

And considering all those barriers, it's a rare joy when an author can manage to put out a book that's so informative it changes the way the reader views the world. James Gleick's The Information details the history of humanity's relationship to information and the communication of information, from African talking drums to quantum computing. Gleick, whose book Chaos inspired ten thousand posters of fractals on dorm-room walls in the 1990s, and whose Genius was an ambitious biography of Richard Feynman that intertwined the story of the man with a cogent, clear explanation of his life's work, is the perfect writer to take on this kind of responsibility.

Gleick measures, ridicules, extols, and examines information in all its forms. He keeps the book moving in rough chronological order, stopping only to provide brief, snappy explanations of relevant topics. He's a chatty, amiable professor who's hell-bent on covering four years' worth of education in a single semester, and so he introduces us to Gödel, Donne, Morse, and hundreds of the sharpest minds the world has ever known at a brutally fast pace. The Information isn't a skimmable book. It demands your full attention, and Gleick is so excited about the topic that giving him your attention never feels like a chore, even when you have to reread a passage two or three times to really understand it. The book gets more and more difficult as we move into the present and science begins to examine the information we've got locked inside our DNA—the information that makes us who we are—but it gets more rewarding, too. You'll marvel at how much information Gleick managed to pack inside this book, inefficiencies of the language be damned.

(Gleick reads at Town Hall tonight, and if you're on the fence about this book, I'd urge you to go listen to him speak.)

 

Comments (11) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Will in Seattle 1
I'll wait till the eBook comes out for the Zune.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on March 14, 2011 at 2:43 PM
starsandgarters 2
Bring back the thorn! I mean Žorn!
Posted by starsandgarters on March 14, 2011 at 3:03 PM
Enigma 3
Tonight's Town Hall was already on my calendar, but now I'm even more excited and have added the book to my library list.
Posted by Enigma http://approvereferendum71.org/ on March 14, 2011 at 3:20 PM
4
I have a very well-spoken English friend who pronounces "why" and "which" differently from "Y" and "witch". It may be headed for obsolescence, but there is/was an aspirated "wh" sound in English.

He also says "nyude" and "dyew", which sound funny!
Posted by FeralTurnip on March 14, 2011 at 3:38 PM
OuterCow 5
U all malign textspeak, but it's efficient, baby. & anything that helps bring about the death of fucking SILENT LETTERS is a good thing.
Posted by OuterCow on March 14, 2011 at 3:57 PM
Josh Bis 6
nothing demands full attention like a few bolded phrases.
Posted by Josh Bis http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Author.html?oid=3815563 on March 14, 2011 at 4:31 PM
7
It really isn't so bloody complicated. Every language is filled with idiosyncrasies. The real failing of English, and most other merely covertly inflected languages is the heavy need for punctuation--characters not pronounced, merely sitting on a page. A heavily inflected language, owing to the clear relationship between terms, regardless of word order, can be read, and well, without punctuation.

Classical Sanskrit, most frequently written in Devanagari, has no need for punctuation. Add to that, the Devanagari writing system is very clear as to the precise pronunciation of sounds, not merely according to their piece-meal sound, but also according to the grouping of sounds to form a syllable.
Posted by Central Scrutinizer on March 14, 2011 at 4:55 PM
8
Please stop encouraging lazy spellers.
Posted by suddenlyorcas on March 14, 2011 at 5:57 PM
9
@7: Sounds like you would fit in at Youtube.
Posted by suddenlyorcas on March 14, 2011 at 5:58 PM
starsandgarters 10
@7 Eats shoots and leaves.

Now tell me what I just said.
Posted by starsandgarters on March 14, 2011 at 6:01 PM
11
Did Gleick actually say "has redundancy of about 50 percent" in the book? Someone go call him on it! Cause what Shannon actually estimated is that you could guess the next letter half the time on average, which would imply a redundancy of about 80% (you're using log(26)=4.7 bits of information to encode just a single bit).
Posted by zwartepiet on March 14, 2011 at 7:54 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy