Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, March 14, 2011

E-Books Are Like Paperbacks

Posted by on Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:50 PM

Idealog has a great essay comparing the birth of e-books to the birth and proliferation of mass-market paperbacks. We're already seeing the same kind of interest in the classics (which were incredibly cheap in paperback form and are free in e-book form), and if this analogy holds up, we're about to see an enormous genre explosion:

The paperbacks were typically priced at 25 cents when hardcover books were $2 or $3. (Compare that 8-to-1 or 12-to-1 pricing ratio to what exists today. It doesn’t.) And mass-markets were available in tens of thousands of locations nationwide, perhaps more than a hundred thousand, when bookstores were few, department stores tended to have only one location, and trade books were typically available in hundreds of locations, or at most a couple of thousand.

The much more widespread availability of these titles combined with their much lower prices created legions of new readers. And, in the beginning, most mass-markets titles tended to fit into “genres”. Westerns were a really big one fifty years ago. Bantam’s perennial bestselling author of westerns, Louis L’Amour, may still be the biggest-selling author in unit sales in (what is now) Random House history. Crime and science fiction lines were also popular as were raunchy books.

Is Amanda Hocking the very beginning of a flood of cheap genre fiction? I think so. The only question is going to be whether publishers realize too late that this is the wave of the future.

 

Comments (5) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Will in Seattle 1
eBooks aren't at all like paperbacks.

you can't throw them at cats, if you read them in the tub bad stuff happens to them, and you can't just replace them if you forget them on a park bench or a bus seat.

Next fallacious right-wing argument?
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on March 14, 2011 at 2:00 PM
Some Old Nobodaddy Logged In 2
It's so precious how he calls wanking material "raunchy books."
Posted by Some Old Nobodaddy Logged In on March 14, 2011 at 2:06 PM
treacle 3
Wow, I thought it was totally obvious that e-books were going to be like genre pulp fiction... bodice-rippers, noir cyberpunk detective stories, speculative fiction, anything by Cory Doctorow, awesome amateur slash sci-fi (Kirk + Spock hawtness! The XXX-Files!).

While bound-books are going the way of artisan work: McSweeney's interesting book designs, gorgeous reprints of J.L. Borges collected works, the OED, etc. etc.
Posted by treacle on March 14, 2011 at 2:18 PM
giffy 4
I've certainly been reading more since getting a Nook. Not necessarily always better things, but mostly just random novels that I get a hankering to read after a friend/internet sparks my interest. Its also nice to be able to get a book right away when say its 1am and you can't sleep.

I've also started working my way through the Complete Mark Twain collection as thanks to them being in the public domain the whole thing only set me back a couple bucks.
Posted by giffy on March 14, 2011 at 2:20 PM
Free Lunch 5
I read the first Sherlock Holmes caper, "A Study in Scarlet," only because it was free on my phone's Kindle app. That is one weird tale. BrIgham Young shows up halfway through, as a villain.
Posted by Free Lunch on March 14, 2011 at 6:14 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy