Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

City-Sponsored Homeless Camp Slated to Open in September

Posted by on Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 1:32 PM

We knew it was coming, now the details are in: In early September, up to 100 homeless people will pack their scarce belongings and relocate to Airport Way South and South Adams Street in SODO—the former Sunny Jim Peanut Factory site—for a pilot project designed to transition them to stable housing within a year of their arrival. That is, if Mayor Mike McGinn gets his way.

Today, the mayor transmitted legislation (.pdf) to the city council to prepare the slightly toxic 20,000-square-foot site livable for homeless campers—with a trailer equipped with a kitchen, two showers, laundry facilities, storage lockers, and restrooms.

Within 90 days of arriving, campers will get help looking for stable housing elsewhere (.pdf).

The city's already running on a shoe-string budget, so the mayor proposes paying for capital costs to improve the site using the $621,000 insurance settlement the city received for the Sunny Jim fire last spring, and dipping into the city's general fund to cover operating costs this year (roughly another $86,000). Next year's operating costs would be figured into the 2012 budgeting process. A chunk of the operation expenses will pay an independent contractor to monitor both the site and the progress that residents make to find permanent housing, learn job skills, etc.

In addition, the camp will have to draft a Good Neighbor Agreement with nearby residents, no children will be allowed overnight, and—this will be a relief to some Georgetown residents—the pilot project will end on August 31, 2013.

The mayor's proposal doesn't seem to leave the door open to continue the project in SODO past that date, even in the event that it's wildly successful at transitioning homeless people to permanent housing. "The contractor with the City, the resident governance body and community partners will implement a plan to conclude the program after 24 months."

UPDATE: The mayor's office disagrees with my interpretation of the above quote (even though the meaning seems pretty goddamn clear, doesn't it?). They say that if successful, the pilot project could be continued, maybe, somewhere: "After the conclusion of this pilot program, we will assess the data and determine our next steps," says Aaron Pickus, a spokesman for the mayor*.

"We've said all along that it's going to be a semi-permanent site," explains Pickus. "It's a temporary strategy. We're proposing funding for two years, we're going to track their progress and see what results come out of it."

*A friendly reminder, Aaron: Strong quotes are how you WIN THE FUTURE.

 

Comments (16) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Since the bum-vocates claim many of these folks have jobs, we can assume those employed will be charges nominal rent?
Posted by Hobo Hilton on March 1, 2011 at 1:46 PM
2
We can also assume it'll be a no smoking camp in line with city policies?
Posted by Hobo Hilton on March 1, 2011 at 1:48 PM
3
When that place burned down I had this weird feeling that it was sort of ultra convenient. I figured they'd be getting a settlement out of insurance as well. Definitely cheaper than demolishing it!
Posted by Kyleen on March 1, 2011 at 1:57 PM
Fistique 4
Are their belongings really scarce, or are they few?
Posted by Fistique on March 1, 2011 at 2:11 PM
Will in Seattle 5
Remember, all the area south of Pioneer Square used to be filled with mudflats and homeless tents during the other Republican-cause Great Depression.

This is a lot better ... so far.

(and 11,000 jobs created in WA this past month - 11,600 private created, 600 public sector ended)
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on March 1, 2011 at 2:32 PM
6
Do can I violate city codes to house people in my yard?
Posted by Bum-vocate on March 1, 2011 at 2:32 PM
Will in Seattle 7
@6 only if you lern Gramma soon.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on March 1, 2011 at 2:55 PM
Jaymz 8
I guess I'm a bum-vocate because I like this attempt to ease a societal problem. If the city can create a dry, safe place to sleep at night, with toilets and a place to clean up, some will transition out and that is a good thing, right? I hope it works out and more sites can be explored.
Posted by Jaymz on March 1, 2011 at 3:06 PM
9
Transition out? Been to Dignity Village....virtually zero transitioning to housing because, you know, all the 'rules' that come with being a square.

But this place will be out of sight and out of mind. Nickelsville was little more than political theater with the added fun of forcing members to protest or be kicked out. In sodo they're invisible. Expect the hobos to flutter away.
Posted by Hobo Hilton on March 1, 2011 at 3:14 PM
10
This place will be organized and run by a City-hired contractor. Hardly out of sight or out of mind.
Posted by sarah68 on March 1, 2011 at 4:44 PM
11
Damn those republicans!
Posted by DocSeattle http://thiswayupseattle.wordpress.com/ on March 1, 2011 at 5:29 PM
12
"10
This place will be organized and run by a City-hired contractor. Hardly out of sight or out of mind."

Silas Potter got hired back?

Yes, it is out of sight. Nickelsville needs to be somewhere to piss people off. Think Magnolia or Ballard. Down there by the tracks, they'll only be bothering bums in the Jungle.
Posted by Happy Hobos on March 1, 2011 at 5:34 PM
13
Just an idea but in this levy-happy city I'm wondering why no one (that I'm aware of anyway) has ever proposed a levy to fund homeless services. Seems likely it would succeed in uber liberal Seattle and likely drastically increase the pittance that is usually allocated.
Posted by Rhizome on March 1, 2011 at 6:03 PM
14
A bum levy? I doubt it, we already fund the parks they piss and drink in.
Posted by Parks levy = bum levy on March 1, 2011 at 6:07 PM
15
The legislation says that the city owns five locations that are zoned IG2 within the Duwamish MIC. Sunny Jim site is one. What and where are the other four sites?
Posted by Louis on March 1, 2011 at 8:10 PM
16
Even a "Fucking Idiot" knows that the very definition of a pilot project is a test or trial that is the precursor to an actual project. A pilot project should have an end date and success targets.

What this Georgetown resident sees in the proposal is "WHEREAS, the City of Seattle owns five different properties that are zoned IG2 and are located
within the Greater Duwamish Manufacturing/Industrial Center that could, under the
proposed Comprehensive Plan and zoning code legislation, be used as transitional
encampment sites..."

This says to me that the real plan is to run a pilot at the Sunny Jim site for 2 years with weak success targets, claim quick victory and then open five homeless camps in the neighborhood as an actual project based on the "success" of the pilot. My questions are:

1) If this approach is so successful, why were homeless camps removed from this very area? Are we not able to learn from history?

2) If the mayor and deputy mayor think this is such a great idea, why aren't there 5 sites being targeted near their neighborhoods?
Posted by clint on March 2, 2011 at 10:53 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy