Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Google Has a Flawed Subscription Platform, Too!

Posted by on Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:55 AM

The day after Apple finally made their in-app subscription plan official, Google announced their new One Pass program, which is their own subscription plan. Apple requires a 30% cut of all subscription and in-app revenues. Google asks for 10%. But TechCrunch points out that Google is offering publishers a whole lot more:

Here’s the key nugget that everyone seems to be overlooking:

With Google One Pass, publishers can maintain direct relationships with their customers and give readers access to digital content across websites and mobile apps.

I’ve confirmed that this means that customer information collected by Google will be shared with publishers. What kind of information? Name, zip code, and most importantly, email addresses. Billing information will not be shared, we’re told. Users can choose to opt-out of sharing this information, but they’ll have to explicitly do so. By default, the information is shared.

What this means is that as far as subscriptions go, the choice between Apple and Google is basically the same as it's always been: Apple offers a highly controlled (publishers and other critics would say too-controlled) experience. Google offers a less-tame array of options, but in return it makes your personal information into a commodity.

 

Comments (10) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Will in Seattle 1
The only good thing is that buying the extremist-right-wing-supporting iPad sub to The Daily will mean that Apple gets 30 percent of the take.

Torrent is looking keener and keener ...
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on February 16, 2011 at 12:03 PM
Fnarf 2
@1, I'm sorry, Will -- are you suggesting that you will be getting "The Daily" on torrent? Or any news? I don't think torrents do what you think they do.

You know, when you subscribe to a paper magazine, they flog your name and address and income level and email address and make and model of car you own and how much you paid for your house and when and everything else they can think of. You don't think they know those things about you? They do; they aggregate your data, or buy if from someone else who does.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on February 16, 2011 at 12:23 PM
Will in Seattle 3
Sadly, Fnarf fails to realize that all your information just wants to be free.

if it's an image, it's recordable. if it's data, it's even easier.

You'd don't actually pay for the stuff you read on your Kindle, do you?

After all, if Amazon doesn't pay state, county, and local taxes, why should you pay fees to the publisher/writer/etc?
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on February 16, 2011 at 12:33 PM
Will in Seattle 4
Also, if you care about the data on you, you can always use anonymizer and disposable accounts.

We used to do that all the times with NYT and WSJ accounts.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on February 16, 2011 at 12:36 PM
care bear 5
Will in Seattle vs. Fnarf is so much better than Dan vs. Lindy. Dan vs. Lindy makes me sad; Will vs. Fnarf makes me laugh.
Posted by care bear on February 16, 2011 at 12:42 PM
Will in Seattle 6
I prefer Dan vs Lindy - they're both way sexier and better looking than either of us.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on February 16, 2011 at 12:52 PM
7
Wait, you mean someone I have a business relationship with -- they sell a product and I use my credit card to pay for it -- will know my name and address? I'm shocked!
Posted by bigyaz on February 16, 2011 at 1:54 PM
Fnarf 8
@4, I just love that "we" there.

Will thinks he's a hacker because he knows someone who used to log into the NYT with an anonymous account.

Was it tinlc by any chance? I still log into the NYT with that one. If anyone was ever qualified to belong to the Lumber Cartel, it's you, Will. It's your internet; we're just passing through.

Will wouldn't know a torrent from a stream of piss. Will IS a stream of piss.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on February 16, 2011 at 2:24 PM
care bear 9
@8 Thanks for bringing the warm and fuzzy back to Slog :)
Posted by care bear on February 16, 2011 at 6:17 PM
Free Lunch 10
While 30% seems like a reasonable amount for a publisher to pay for distribution/collection (I'm sure physical, paper distribution is far spendier), it's a pretty big fee for those whose business models are already 100% online.

Music subscription services, like Rdio, Rhapsody, Spotify (one day), are dealing with razor-thin profits as it is due to the licensing fees they pay to the rights holders. There's no way they can support a 30% fee.

If you have an iPhone, expect to see these services disappear from it. I'm sure Apple will be happy to see these iTunes-store competitors go anyway.
Posted by Free Lunch on February 16, 2011 at 7:20 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy