Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, January 6, 2011

Seattle School District Says it has a Plan to Tackle Overcrowding

Posted by on Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:09 PM

Remember the crazy overcrowding at Garfield High? Eighteen hundred kids crammed into a building meant for 1600? Parents constantly whining at PTA and school board meetings about how this has got to stop.

Well, if a proposal crafted by Seattle Public Schools gets approved by the school board Jan 19, and IF it is actually successful, then Garfield might get some respite. The proposal is part of the school district's efforts to create a transition plan for the New Student Assignment Plan that kicked in last year, bringing with it some unpleasant surprises such as overcrowding in some schools and underutilized space in others.

The transition plan, which will go into effect next fall, will attempt to fix that, by changing school boundaries, moving or adding programs, and offering popular courses. Specifically, Garfield's geographic boundaries have been reduced, which would take effect for incoming students starting next year. SPS Enrollment and Planning Manager Tracy Libros said that this would lead to an estimated 57 students "fewer than what we would have had for next fall."

The district will also offer an optional Accelerated Progress Program at Ingraham High School to draw more students from Garfield, Libros said at a media briefing today morning. It is also creating a tie-breaker for students applying to Garfield or living in its attendance zone who want to go to another school. This will help them to get assigned to a school other than Garfield.

"We ended up with a lot more students living in Garfield's attendance area," said Libros, when asked what led to the overcrowding in the first place. As to whether any parents falsified their address to enroll their child at Garfield, although district officials couldn't speak to Garfield specifically, they did say that they were investigating 10 to 15 families throughout the district who might have used inaccurate information to get into a school.

More on the transition plan after the jump

A piece of news parents are sure to be upset about: They should no longer assume that their younger child will get into their older sibling's school if they haven't been assigned to that school. Thus confirmed Libros. "We just knew that by looking at the data," she said. "Previously we used every inch of space, but we don't have that kind of space available any more."

Libros said that this year the district had been able to reduce the number of siblings on the waiting list from 150 to 14. But looks like the good ol' days are over folks.

The district will finish making final decisions about the transition plan before open enrollment begins on March 15. Open enrollment allows parents to request schools other than the ones their kids would be automatically assigned to.

And finally some great news. The proposal to put Alternative School #1 in Pinehurst on the chopping block is off the table. The school's executive director will be working with the school to improve dwindling enrollment numbers and programs.

 

Comments (1) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Ms Bhattacharjee, could you please write a story on the ethics complaints that have been made about the superintendent?

The superintendent of Seattle Public Schools, Dr. Maria Goodloe-Johnson, has a seat on the Board of the Alliance for Education. She also has a seat on the Board of the Council of Great City Schools. The District has business dealings with both of these organizations.

State laws on conflicts of interest (RCW 42.23.030, 42.23.040) require the superintendent to disclose her relationship with these outside organizations that contract with the District. The laws also prohibit her from participating in the decision to do business with either of them. The superintendent, however, did not disclose her relationship with either of these organizations nor did she hold herself apart from the District's discussion or decision to contract with them. She broke these laws.

There really isn't any doubt about this. The disclosures had to come in the meetings of the Board meetings and they aren't there. The superintendent filed a disclosure statement which was a part of the minutes of a Board meeting and that disclosure statement - which specifically has a space for board seats for non-profits - did not include these two organizations. At the bottom of the disclosure statement was the superintendent's statement that the list was complete to the best of her knowledge. That was, of course, a false statement and therefore a violation of another state law, RCW 9A.76.175.

These undisclosed conflicts of interest have consequences. Not only are they misdemeanors and gross misdemeanors - crimes - any contracts made in violation of those laws are void. Not voidable at the district's option, but voided by statute. That means that any money the district paid these folks was not a legal obligation but a gift. And, as we all know, it is a violation of the Washington State Constitution for state or local government (such as school districts) to make gifts to private companies.

The ethics complaints are working their way through the system, but they will soon come before the Board. Then it will be up to the Board to decide what consequences to impose. These casual conflicts of interest create significant legal and financial vulnerabilities for the District. The Board needs to take them seriously. If the Board blows this off they will prove that their "everyone accountable" slogan is a lie and they will prove that they aren't really serious about responding to the state audit that scolded them for their lax compliance with laws and policies.

A story in The Stranger about this would be a good start.
More...
Posted by Charlie Mas on January 8, 2011 at 1:14 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy