Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, December 9, 2010

The Mystery of King County's Excess Jail Space

Posted by on Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:24 AM

As noted in the morning news, King County now has more jail beds than it knows what to do with.

After years of worrying that King County jails would become packed beyond capacity — and telling cities they must send their misdemeanor inmates elsewhere — county officials now say they're facing a regional glut of jail space.

Why?

The piece only offers one theory:

One reason the county's inmate population has slid while many cities' numbers have not is the county has invested in drug and mental-health courts that emphasize treatment over incarceration, and in housing homeless people who are otherwise frequently jailed, County Council legislative analyst Clifton Curry said.

Interesting. Here's another theory to add to the mix: Initiative 75, which made small-time marijuana busts Seattle's lowest law enforcement priority.

Also: There is something very perverse about the county viewing this glut of jail beds as a revenue problem, instead of viewing it as great news:

Claudia Balducci, director designee of the King County Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention, quipped to a Metropolitan King County Council committee Tuesday, "We will not be undersold. We really need to fill our beds."

 

Comments (18) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
gloomy gus 1
Isn't it marvelous. But the County doesn't view it as *just* a revenue problem, for Pete's sake. It's a great thing to have fewer inmates, and they know it; however, it does put a hole in a budget. It just does. I'm sure they'd rather have this revenue problem than the one overcrowding used to cause. I really loved the details the reporting added about the competition among jails for inmates that gave rise to Claudia Balducci's joke.

But without the context the writer gathered, it sure does make the joke easy to mock, so well done there. You don't like reporter Keith Ervin's work or something?
Posted by gloomy gus on December 9, 2010 at 9:44 AM
Eli Sanders 2
@1: Maybe I read the piece too fast, but I didn't see anything in there from county officials saying this is a great problem to have.
Posted by Eli Sanders http://elisanders.net/ on December 9, 2010 at 9:47 AM
3
How about they convert the prison space to a treatment facility? You'd have to do some possibly extensive remodels, but it seems like a reasonable retrofit of existing space. Only 1 room per person, no locking doors, a communal area that has dining facilities...

...or maybe this would just turn out like Once Flew Over the Cuckoo's nest.
Posted by eys on December 9, 2010 at 9:53 AM
Matt the Engineer 4
What ever happened to the new jail they were going to force upon Seattle? That has to be a lot of saved money there, if it doesn't need to be built. Tell me they aren't still building it.
Posted by Matt the Engineer on December 9, 2010 at 10:08 AM
Charles Mudede 5
this is the biggest story of the year!
Posted by Charles Mudede on December 9, 2010 at 10:09 AM
Matt the Engineer 6
And a question: Who pays the jail fees? If they're concerned about loss in revenue, who does this revenue come from? Isn't it us?
Posted by Matt the Engineer on December 9, 2010 at 10:10 AM
7
Eli, I think your theory on I-75 doesn't really hold up. The article focuses on the decrease of county-responsible inmates--inmates who are there for felonies or for misdemeanors in which KCSO or WSP was the arresting agency. Although I-75 probably has a small secondary affect on those numbers, it doesn't directly affect those numbers. I-75 doesn't apply to KCSO or WSP officers. And to the extent that SPD follows it, it only to misdemeanor possession.

I think one of the big reasons for the drop is the County's response to the past budget cuts. The tightening of filing standards and making fewer drug and property crimes qualify for felonies must have had an impact on jail occupancy.
Posted by Gidge on December 9, 2010 at 10:12 AM
8
Because of budget cutbacks, the prosecutorhas laid off lawyers and stopped filing possession of drug cases involving small amounts of drugs and stopped filing theft cases that are somewhat above the felony threshold. Those cases are now filed in municipal and district court as misdemeanors and the great majority of these cases don't result in sentences that include jail time. Under the felony sentencing laws, many of these would have to be sentenced to jail. Now in superior court mostof the cases are much more serious and when there is a conviction, the judge must sentence to prison, not jail.
Posted by Algernon on December 9, 2010 at 10:16 AM
Eli Sanders 9
@5: I totally agree.
Posted by Eli Sanders http://elisanders.net/ on December 9, 2010 at 10:22 AM
gloomy gus 10
@2, Eli, the reporter didn't cover the angle you're drawing conclusions about at all, though. He wrote about the revenue hole, not about the County's overall view. You assume that means the County doesn't value arrest reductions as highly as jail beds. For my part, I assume they're not that shortsighted, based not on reporting, but on their usually not being that shortsighted.

But I'm not a professional writer, just an avid reader. Look, maybe you could just pick up your phone and press "call" next to Dow's name. But I kind of think you know what he'll confirm for you, don't you?
Posted by gloomy gus on December 9, 2010 at 10:30 AM
Will in Seattle 11
Governator!

Governator.

SET MY PEOPLE FREE!

You have no choice.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on December 9, 2010 at 10:46 AM
raku 12
#10: Departments of corrections thrive off full jail beds. They want nothing more. In California, the prison union was by far the top financier to oppose Prop 5, which would have replaced nonviolent drug-related prison terms with treatment. They spend millions lobbying for prison sentences for drug crimes and longer prison sentences overall.

It sounds like urban legend, but it's not. These people get rich off of taking away as many people's freedom as possible.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_…
Posted by raku on December 9, 2010 at 10:50 AM
gloomy gus 13
@12, of course, but the question here isn't about the County DOC's view, it's about the County's overall.
Posted by gloomy gus on December 9, 2010 at 10:52 AM
Will in Seattle 14
@12 is correct.

Basically, we provide cheap prison labor from the cities to the welfare queen Republics in the suburbs.

SET MY PEOPLE FREE!
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on December 9, 2010 at 11:01 AM
15
@12,

Thanks for reminding me of at least one reason why I'm wary of unions.
Posted by keshmeshi on December 9, 2010 at 2:51 PM
prompt 16
Cause you don't have to jail someone if you shoot and kill him?
Posted by prompt on December 9, 2010 at 3:31 PM
kk in seattle 17
The County complains there aren't enough prisoners. Meanwhile, the Seattle School District is freaking out because there are too many students. I'm having a double bourbon on the rocks and rereading my George Orwell.
Posted by kk in seattle on December 9, 2010 at 9:15 PM
Cynic Romantic 18
Maybe they could ask for volunteers?
Posted by Cynic Romantic on December 9, 2010 at 11:19 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy