Slog
News & ArtsThursday, November 4, 2010
City Teachers Union Says Teach For America Is Not Welcome In Seattle
Posted by Riya Bhattacharjee on Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:27 PM
Will Teach For America be good or bad for Seattle's public schools? Depending on who you listened to at last night's school board meeting, it could be either. Members of the Seattle teachers union, the Seattle Education Association, lambasted the Seattle school district for their plans to contract with TFA, which would allow their recruits to apply to Seattle schools next spring.
The SEA's qualms? They feel there's no dearth of qualified teachers right here in Seattle. "A five-week crash course with emergency certification is not a way to ensure quality education," said SEA President Olga Addae, attacking TFA's training process.
Addae stressed that 83 percent of TFA members go on to pursue professions outside classrooms after their two-year commitment to teach at a high-poverty school is over, which she said puts a big question mark on their longevity.
But the district's Chief Academic Officer, Dr. Susan Enfield, said that TFA members would create a more diverse pool of applicants.
Calling TFA an employment agency for private colleges, some SEA members recited studies and statistics skeptical of TFA's track record on improving student achievement. "To assign underqualified teachers to low-income schools is discrimination," said Dora Taylor, who co-edits the Seattle Education 2010 blog.
TFA alumni, who now teach in Seattle Public Schools and are SEA members (TFA recruits are treated exactly the same as any other teacher when they join a school), vociferously praised the program. Many stressed the need to close the achievement gap in Seattle. "We don't believe that [TFA] is a single solution, but hope it can be a powerful tool in the fight," said TFA alum Stephanie Foreman.
"I am really taken aback," said school board director Harium Martin-Morris. "We are looking at America's best and brightest and saying don't come here?" But board director Betty Patu said that many district teachers were "working in fear of their jobs," given all the budget cuts. "Bringing in other teachers into the district is almost a slap on the face of our teaching professionals," she said.
Other school board members were concerned about how TFA would be handling confidential student data to drive teacher development and asked TFA to clarify that further.
3
If they're so under-qualified, won't they just not be hired? Or is the union saying that the people who review applications for open positions are easily distracted by sparkly young people?
4
Teach For American is essentially another of those covert organizations with a back agenda, namely the privatizing of American education (which is heavily privatized to begin with, 'natch).
They tend to recruit those students from the richest families for a variety of reasons -- but foremost to forward the privatization agenda.
Barbara Miner, roving journalist, did a piece on them awhile back (short synopsis of article below, unfortunately have to subscribe for the full article -- her blogspot below the article site -- an expanded article at the very bottom of the listed sites).
From the last site an interesting quote:
Its employer partners, which actively recruit TFA alumni, are equally prestigious and include Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, KPMG, Credit Suisse, McKinsey and Company, and Google. TFA partners in its School Leadership Initiative for alumni, meanwhile, include the for-profit Edison Schools. (TFA founder Kopp has nothing but praise for Edison in her memoir. She is also open to the idea of vouchers.)
http://www.rethinkingschools.org/restric…
http://barbarajminer.blogspot.com/
http://eduratireview.com/2010/04/looking…
They tend to recruit those students from the richest families for a variety of reasons -- but foremost to forward the privatization agenda.
Barbara Miner, roving journalist, did a piece on them awhile back (short synopsis of article below, unfortunately have to subscribe for the full article -- her blogspot below the article site -- an expanded article at the very bottom of the listed sites).
From the last site an interesting quote:
Its employer partners, which actively recruit TFA alumni, are equally prestigious and include Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, KPMG, Credit Suisse, McKinsey and Company, and Google. TFA partners in its School Leadership Initiative for alumni, meanwhile, include the for-profit Edison Schools. (TFA founder Kopp has nothing but praise for Edison in her memoir. She is also open to the idea of vouchers.)
http://www.rethinkingschools.org/restric…
http://barbarajminer.blogspot.com/
http://eduratireview.com/2010/04/looking…
7
TFA teachers are MORE qualified, not less qualified. The union is wrong on this one. The threat is that their own lack of qualifications will be exposed by bringing in serious, committed teachers over their all-too-often stupid and lazy ones. The only way to bring low-income schools up to snuff is to get some decent teachers into them. What we have isn't working.
8
Um...who would I rather want my children taught by: a recent college graduate with only five weeks of training (by TFA), or someone who has spent years in an accredited program learning how to be a teacher, including time as a student teacher under the guise of an experienced teacher? No contest. Give me the teacher who is a teacher, not someone who is learning on the job. I don't care if the TFA person is a future Nobel prize winner with 3 degrees from Harvard, it takes more than brainpower to effectively teach a classroom of 28 2nd graders. It takes experience and dedication, and a two-year commitment from a recent college grad with very little training just doesn't cut it.
TFA was originally about providing teachers in schools for which no one wanted to teach (the "bad" schools in "bad" neighborhoods we've all heard about). It addressed a real shortage in teachers willing to work in those schools. There is no shortage of qualified, experienced teachers who want to teach in Seattle Public Schools.
Seattle Public Schools is ready to throw money at a program to "solve" a non-existent problem (shortage of teachers), but routinely seems unwilling to spend money on actual, real problems.
TFA was originally about providing teachers in schools for which no one wanted to teach (the "bad" schools in "bad" neighborhoods we've all heard about). It addressed a real shortage in teachers willing to work in those schools. There is no shortage of qualified, experienced teachers who want to teach in Seattle Public Schools.
Seattle Public Schools is ready to throw money at a program to "solve" a non-existent problem (shortage of teachers), but routinely seems unwilling to spend money on actual, real problems.
10
"There is no shortage of qualified, experienced teachers.."
should read
"There is no shortage of expensive, overpaid teachers..."
should read
"There is no shortage of expensive, overpaid teachers..."
11
If the TFA applicant is not as qualified as another applicant, they will not be hired. I know several people from low- to middle- income families that went into TFA. It is most definitely not a ploy by the rich to privatize education. And even if they don't have a specialized education degree, they still have ACTUAL experience. They deserve an equal chance.
13
Also, while there might not be a shortage of teachers, we should still be getting the best teachers available. If that means mining every quarry until we hit gold, so be it. And, like mining, a lot of what is found is crap.
14
Of course, the only thing keeping low-income schools from catching up is lack of decent teachers. That's it. Problem solved.
15
Education majors are hands down the dumbest kids in school, guess they don't want to compete with people who actually know their subjects
16
@7 A five week training course does not make you a qualified teacher. Years of training and experience in the classroom make you a qualified teacher. Hell, I was on the job for about 3 or 4 years before I considered myself a decent teacher.
"The only way to bring low-income schools up to snuff is to get some decent teachers into them. What we have isn't working."
This is a gross oversimplification of the problems plaguing low-income and inner city schools. And you know it.
"The only way to bring low-income schools up to snuff is to get some decent teachers into them. What we have isn't working."
This is a gross oversimplification of the problems plaguing low-income and inner city schools. And you know it.
17
There have been problems in NYC schools and in other places around the country where administrators have simply fired or forced out experienced (more expensive) teachers because they know they can get a TFA teacher to fill their place.
This leads to a revolving door of teachers, either because the TFA kids get forced out when they finish the program, or they move on to teaching at nice schools in the suburbs.
This leads to a revolving door of teachers, either because the TFA kids get forced out when they finish the program, or they move on to teaching at nice schools in the suburbs.
18
@ 7 Exactly how are they more qualified? The whole program is based around them having ZERO qualifications. They just take a bunch of private school kids, and assume that their liberal arts degrees will magically make them brilliant teachers. They take a 5 week crash course in the summer, that's it. Then they are thrown into the toughest schools in America and expected to magically fix it. It's usually a disaster, and a significant percentage of TEA members quit before the end of their two year term.
@11 TEA people don't go into the normal job applicant pool. They are automatically jumped to the head of the line, and don't have to compete with other applicants.
@11 TEA people don't go into the normal job applicant pool. They are automatically jumped to the head of the line, and don't have to compete with other applicants.
19
Fuck black kids, they deserve the shitty education the SPS gives them now,
why do anything to fix that if its means upsetting the union? Up here on the
Northside, we'll take the TFA's, thanks.....
why do anything to fix that if its means upsetting the union? Up here on the
Northside, we'll take the TFA's, thanks.....
20
@7 - Most public schools require a Master's in Education, preferably in a specific field and age group, plus credentials—how are TFA corp members better qualified? Why invest in (not necessarily, but by definition probably) less-educated, inexperienced, short-term employees? I'd be all for it if it were impossible to put teachers in certain Seattle schools, but that's not the case.
While the union needs to address its tenure process and lack of ability to get rid of bad teachers, those really aren't what's underlying the reason for under-performing schools.
While the union needs to address its tenure process and lack of ability to get rid of bad teachers, those really aren't what's underlying the reason for under-performing schools.
21
@3 - Even with a headhunting fee of $4000, a non-certificated, Bachelor's level degree holder costs less than a certificated, Master's level teacher (which is what exists in Washington due to the legislature). The people who review applications know this and it DOES influence their decisions.
@7- Sorry, Fnarf, you are wrong on this one. TFA people have ZERO classroom experience when they walk in the door.
@7- Sorry, Fnarf, you are wrong on this one. TFA people have ZERO classroom experience when they walk in the door.
22
It should be acknowledged that there is mixed evidence as to the effectiveness of TFA teachers. And "mixed evidence" really does mean just that -- some studies have shown that they are better (particularly in math) and some have shown no difference between TFA teachers and other teachers.
The evidence is quite clear, however, that on average, teachers with 3-4 years of experience are much more effective than teachers in their first 1-2 years. Part of that is undeniably due to the fact that the teacher preparation programs in this country are generally pretty terrible (and that includes MEd programs @20).
So, anyways, when you're talking about comparing two fresh-out-of-college teachers (one TFA, one with an Education degree), I might be inclined to choose the TFA teacher. But, if you're talking about comparing a TFA teacher vs. a teacher with 3-4 years under their belt, I'd go with the 3-4 year teacher.
The evidence is quite clear, however, that on average, teachers with 3-4 years of experience are much more effective than teachers in their first 1-2 years. Part of that is undeniably due to the fact that the teacher preparation programs in this country are generally pretty terrible (and that includes MEd programs @20).
So, anyways, when you're talking about comparing two fresh-out-of-college teachers (one TFA, one with an Education degree), I might be inclined to choose the TFA teacher. But, if you're talking about comparing a TFA teacher vs. a teacher with 3-4 years under their belt, I'd go with the 3-4 year teacher.
23
The union doesn't give a shit if they're qualified or not. They're just picking every possible argument to take down TFA believing that it potentially threatens the union and its jobs.
24
@22 - Could be. I do know a lot of districts initially excited about the TFA program have dropped them all together because of high turnover—(Houston, in this case, who discovered, like many school districts, the "combat pay" method has been much more effective in attracting experienced teachers to tougher schools) which makes sense as they've got less invested.
Which is also not to say there isn't some totally qualified teachers involved in TFA as well.
I probably should'a just stopped typing after my shitty analogy.
Which is also not to say there isn't some totally qualified teachers involved in TFA as well.
I probably should'a just stopped typing after my shitty analogy.
25
An ivy league education, does not make a person necessarly smarter. I am dissapointed at the knee jerk, kow towing attitude towards elitist institutions and their offal.
The TFA guy I worked with was easily one of the worst teachers in the building but he did: 1) name drop his Harvard degree all the time 2) wear a tie and 3) got the fuck out as soon as he could.
Best and brightest, my ass.
TFA is mostly a rich kid tourist agency.
The TFA guy I worked with was easily one of the worst teachers in the building but he did: 1) name drop his Harvard degree all the time 2) wear a tie and 3) got the fuck out as soon as he could.
Best and brightest, my ass.
TFA is mostly a rich kid tourist agency.
27
@24 I'm sure it varies by district in terms of their experience with TFA teachers, but, on average TFA turnover is only slightly higher than that of young traditional teachers. And I was pretty surprised to learn that a decent percentage of TFA teachers choose to stay in teaching for more than the 2 year commitment (I think it was something like 45%). [BTW, I would cite studies for all of this, but I'm feeling lazy today. Sorry about that.]
Leaving the realm of research... For underserved areas (i.e., probably not Seattle) I also personally think that there's an intangible aspect to having someone in a school who went to a top tier college, and has career ambitions that may be outside the norm for the area. I had some friends do a TFA-type program after college -- they were from a top 20 college & were given assignments in middle-of-nowhere in the deep south. And, there was something to be said for having that type of role model in a school, at least in the schools they were in (again, this isn't really relevant for Seattle). I might be talking out of my ass on this one, but as someone who grew up in a small town where very few kids ever think to go to anywhere other than an in-state school, it might have been nice to have a TFA teacher around.
Leaving the realm of research... For underserved areas (i.e., probably not Seattle) I also personally think that there's an intangible aspect to having someone in a school who went to a top tier college, and has career ambitions that may be outside the norm for the area. I had some friends do a TFA-type program after college -- they were from a top 20 college & were given assignments in middle-of-nowhere in the deep south. And, there was something to be said for having that type of role model in a school, at least in the schools they were in (again, this isn't really relevant for Seattle). I might be talking out of my ass on this one, but as someone who grew up in a small town where very few kids ever think to go to anywhere other than an in-state school, it might have been nice to have a TFA teacher around.
28
@25,
They're not necessarily from the Ivy Leagues, they just meet the same standards as the Ivy Leagues (i.e. they were extremely good students and graduated toward the top of their classes). I wanted to try TFA; my grades weren't good enough, and I was a good student from an elite university.
They're not necessarily from the Ivy Leagues, they just meet the same standards as the Ivy Leagues (i.e. they were extremely good students and graduated toward the top of their classes). I wanted to try TFA; my grades weren't good enough, and I was a good student from an elite university.
29
@ All Y'all Haterzzz...
Just kidding. My name is Tom, I graduated from Seattle's University of Washington and now I'm a teacher in Greenville, Mississippi. I was selected by TFA and trained by TFA, but I do not consider myself a "TFA" teacher-- none of us do. I am an employee of the Greenville Public School District, just like everyone else.
In failing schools, two things are needed.
The first is energy. Dealing with parents, administrators, students-- that shit is exhausting. As a 22-year-old with no wife or children, I have the time and energy necessary to be an effective teacher. My more experienced colleagues do an EXCELLENT job as instructors, but they don't have the time or ability to coach/tutor/lead clubs/direct plays/etc. My fellow TFA'ers and I provide a hugely beneficial extracurricular boost.
Second, to be an effective teacher, you need to work hard. Really fucking hard. All day long, and usually into the night. I work 90 hours a week, not including the weekends. TFA didn't select me because I had rich parents or an Ivy League education-- I paid for my state school with Pell Grants and loans. TFA picked me because I am the kind of person who will refuse to let children give up on themselves.
Will I have a career as an educator? Who knows. But I'll tell you what:
I gave up an amazing opportunity to work at a sweet software company in Bellevue so that I could come do this shit. It's hard, and I have way more bad days than good days. In spite of all that, there are a few dozen kids that have a good role model and a teacher who pushes them to excel every day.
So if you think Seattle Public Schools will suffer harm because of an infusion of young, devoted, hardworking teachers, so be it.
All I know is that my school district in Mississippi is a hell of a lot better off with the support of TFA teachers.
More...
Just kidding. My name is Tom, I graduated from Seattle's University of Washington and now I'm a teacher in Greenville, Mississippi. I was selected by TFA and trained by TFA, but I do not consider myself a "TFA" teacher-- none of us do. I am an employee of the Greenville Public School District, just like everyone else.
In failing schools, two things are needed.
The first is energy. Dealing with parents, administrators, students-- that shit is exhausting. As a 22-year-old with no wife or children, I have the time and energy necessary to be an effective teacher. My more experienced colleagues do an EXCELLENT job as instructors, but they don't have the time or ability to coach/tutor/lead clubs/direct plays/etc. My fellow TFA'ers and I provide a hugely beneficial extracurricular boost.
Second, to be an effective teacher, you need to work hard. Really fucking hard. All day long, and usually into the night. I work 90 hours a week, not including the weekends. TFA didn't select me because I had rich parents or an Ivy League education-- I paid for my state school with Pell Grants and loans. TFA picked me because I am the kind of person who will refuse to let children give up on themselves.
Will I have a career as an educator? Who knows. But I'll tell you what:
I gave up an amazing opportunity to work at a sweet software company in Bellevue so that I could come do this shit. It's hard, and I have way more bad days than good days. In spite of all that, there are a few dozen kids that have a good role model and a teacher who pushes them to excel every day.
So if you think Seattle Public Schools will suffer harm because of an infusion of young, devoted, hardworking teachers, so be it.
All I know is that my school district in Mississippi is a hell of a lot better off with the support of TFA teachers.
30
The union is RIDICULOUS. Who will pay the price? Children who currently have little hope of graduating high school - let alone going to college. Why? So union members don't feel bad.
This is selfish and disgusting. I have to give the union a little credit - at least they are honest about not giving a shit about kids. Our schools are suffering - kids are paying the price. They won't take a hit to their ego to help students succeed - when they don't have ANY ideas other than a 2% cost of living increase to a system that continues to fail our kids.
I say, screw you union. Real teachers will love having the additional help and support TFA will bring.
This is selfish and disgusting. I have to give the union a little credit - at least they are honest about not giving a shit about kids. Our schools are suffering - kids are paying the price. They won't take a hit to their ego to help students succeed - when they don't have ANY ideas other than a 2% cost of living increase to a system that continues to fail our kids.
I say, screw you union. Real teachers will love having the additional help and support TFA will bring.
31
@20, they're more qualified BECAUSE they haven't got Masters Degrees in Education. I've seen the kind of gunk they teach in ed school.
32
Okay understand the logistics issue.
TFA can join be in the applicants in Phase III (which basically after internal hiring). Yes, they do have a minimal amount of classwork (basically experimenting on summer school students). But they also get to teach special ed with no special training and as a mother of a special needs child, no way in hell.
"I am really taken aback," said school board director Harium Martin-Morris. "We are looking at America's best and brightest and saying don't come here?"
I have lost a lot of respect for Director Martin-Morris with that statement. There is NO proof (except TFA's vetting process) that these are truly the best and the brightest.
What he isn't saying is that TFA teachers each cost $4k a year more (their Foundation gets the money). A private donor will pay for a year or two and then what? We don't have a dedicated funding stream for this and so what then? What would you cut so we can have inexperienced (but hey oh so bright!) teachers in with the most challenging students there are? I say nothing is worth it.
They are FULL teachers, not aides so it's not that they are helping other teachers.
Also, this effort has had zero, zilch, nada public engagement. Parents deserve to know this is coming and not AFTER it passes. Parents deserve to know this agreement would allow student identifiable information to flow to TFA AND outside sources. That is just ridiculous especially when many of the students concerned would come from families of immigrants or low-income who might not know their rights to opt-out of information going that way.
Is this really one of the top five things our district needs to do? After one terrible audit (and another one on the horizon- wait for it) , a no-confidence vote by teachers in the Superintendent, more budget cuts coming, this is what staff and the Board are concentrating on?
Bullshit.
More...
TFA can join be in the applicants in Phase III (which basically after internal hiring). Yes, they do have a minimal amount of classwork (basically experimenting on summer school students). But they also get to teach special ed with no special training and as a mother of a special needs child, no way in hell.
"I am really taken aback," said school board director Harium Martin-Morris. "We are looking at America's best and brightest and saying don't come here?"
I have lost a lot of respect for Director Martin-Morris with that statement. There is NO proof (except TFA's vetting process) that these are truly the best and the brightest.
What he isn't saying is that TFA teachers each cost $4k a year more (their Foundation gets the money). A private donor will pay for a year or two and then what? We don't have a dedicated funding stream for this and so what then? What would you cut so we can have inexperienced (but hey oh so bright!) teachers in with the most challenging students there are? I say nothing is worth it.
They are FULL teachers, not aides so it's not that they are helping other teachers.
Also, this effort has had zero, zilch, nada public engagement. Parents deserve to know this is coming and not AFTER it passes. Parents deserve to know this agreement would allow student identifiable information to flow to TFA AND outside sources. That is just ridiculous especially when many of the students concerned would come from families of immigrants or low-income who might not know their rights to opt-out of information going that way.
Is this really one of the top five things our district needs to do? After one terrible audit (and another one on the horizon- wait for it) , a no-confidence vote by teachers in the Superintendent, more budget cuts coming, this is what staff and the Board are concentrating on?
Bullshit.
33
"To assign underqualified teachers to low-income schools is discrimination"
...and this differs from the status quo how exactly?
...and this differs from the status quo how exactly?
34
@30- That's a whole lot of insults without addressing the main issue. TFA won't save money and does not necessarily bring in more qualified candidates. So why bother?
35
@31 Using your logic I would make a great dentist because I've never been to dental school.
"I've seen the kind of gunk they teach in ed school. "
Uh..sure you have Fnarf. Sure you have.
"I've seen the kind of gunk they teach in ed school. "
Uh..sure you have Fnarf. Sure you have.
36
Teach for America is a solution looking for a problem. In much of the country schools don't have applicants for the teacher jobs. That's where Teach for America should go and provide a needed resource. Here in Seattle there is no teacher shortage. There were 800 applicants for teacher jobs at West Seattle Elementary this year. Do we really need more than that?
37
Education right now has a real focus on testing, measuring, "data-driven" outcomes, credentials, etc. What's lost in this is that teaching is also, perhaps mostly, an art. The brightest, best credentialed kid out of college may become a great teacher, but it takes experience and mentorship to develop the art. Tossing these brand new teachers into the most challenging environments may have some successes, but it's unrealistic to think, on its own, this will close the achievement gap.
TFA just seems to be yet another attempt to find a silver bullet to solve a systematic problem which has social, cultural, economic and class as well as professional issues.
TFA just seems to be yet another attempt to find a silver bullet to solve a systematic problem which has social, cultural, economic and class as well as professional issues.
38
To those who say why not give TFA a chance, it's because TFA'ers have very high attrition, which is costly for the district and costly for student learning. It is also not fair for the district to commit to a $4K reimbursement to TFA (even if private donors are being sought initially) to help pay for TFAers 5 week training. Other teachers don't get this.
Also, the data only show that TFA recruits are only marginally better than other new uncredentialed, underprepared teachers, NOT credentialed new ones and especially NOT experienced credentialed ones. The district and TFA like to cherry pick from vendor studies and non-peer reviewed research. Read the peer-reviewed research such as http://greatlakescenter.org/docs/Policy_…
To target high needs schools with such unprepared teachers in discrimination. The district must do better than this.
Also, the data only show that TFA recruits are only marginally better than other new uncredentialed, underprepared teachers, NOT credentialed new ones and especially NOT experienced credentialed ones. The district and TFA like to cherry pick from vendor studies and non-peer reviewed research. Read the peer-reviewed research such as http://greatlakescenter.org/docs/Policy_…
To target high needs schools with such unprepared teachers in discrimination. The district must do better than this.
39
@37 - I completely agree. TFA is just one part of this. There is no silver bullet in education reform.
41
Black Teachers in Chicago won a discrimination lawsuit against Arne Duncan's Mass Firings.
I believe this will happen in Seattle if the TFA people begin to replace certificated teachers.
There are ageism, sexism, racism and a bundle of other isms that could be fought in the court of law.
On another note, I hear many saying 'Teach for America' teachers would be better because they are the best and the brightest having come from "Ivy League" colleges. Well, " It's not where a man is, but the obstacles he has overcome and risen above that is the true measure of the man - or woman for that matter.
Many people who are now graduating from Ivy League colleges had wealth and privilege on their sides. Many, but not all, went right from a home life of privilege to an Ivy League college with their parents pulling strings to get them there. Does a life of privilege prepare one to work in the inner city? Maybe, but; I would think that someone who has had to surmount many obstacles such as poverty, single parenthood, family sickness would be better at helping poor students in the inner cities. These people have walked the path and succeeded. They know
I believe this will happen in Seattle if the TFA people begin to replace certificated teachers.
There are ageism, sexism, racism and a bundle of other isms that could be fought in the court of law.
On another note, I hear many saying 'Teach for America' teachers would be better because they are the best and the brightest having come from "Ivy League" colleges. Well, " It's not where a man is, but the obstacles he has overcome and risen above that is the true measure of the man - or woman for that matter.
Many people who are now graduating from Ivy League colleges had wealth and privilege on their sides. Many, but not all, went right from a home life of privilege to an Ivy League college with their parents pulling strings to get them there. Does a life of privilege prepare one to work in the inner city? Maybe, but; I would think that someone who has had to surmount many obstacles such as poverty, single parenthood, family sickness would be better at helping poor students in the inner cities. These people have walked the path and succeeded. They know
42
I think it's unfair and unjust to require that hopeful teachers spend thousands of dollars and time to get a teaching certificate, return to school to earn a Pro Cert or take National Boards only to give teaching jobs to others who only received a few months of teacher training.
As Martin Luther King said: inequality anywhere is inequality everywhere. In addition, he said 'There are just and unjust laws'. I agree with him.
Also, how are we to get our children to respect education when they see their teachers who have worked hard to graduate from teaching schools and take National Boards and Pro Cert classes be replaced by others who never had to further their educations?
As Martin Luther King said: inequality anywhere is inequality everywhere. In addition, he said 'There are just and unjust laws'. I agree with him.
Also, how are we to get our children to respect education when they see their teachers who have worked hard to graduate from teaching schools and take National Boards and Pro Cert classes be replaced by others who never had to further their educations?
43
The fact is traditional teaching certification programs draw from the bottom third of college students. The top students go into science, engineering, computer science, law, medicine, business, etc. Why would you want your children being taught by the worst students that the profession traditionally attracts? Finland which boasts the highest student achievement in the world draws its teachers from the top third of university students. Do you think there is a connection?
44
I can clearly see that one of the problems produced by Americas current educational system is evidenced by the number of people who will blindly follow along when those with a hidden agenda point the finger and blame the problems of our country and of our educational system on one group of people rather than looking at a broader picture and actually doing some research on it.
Right now, lots of people are upset because the economy is bad and they don't have jobs or their costs are rising. It's easy to take this anger and point it in the direction of a relatively weak group of people. Let's look a little deeper. Comparing America to Finland would require more time and research than you have demonstrated.
In addition, I'd like to see the research showing that the colleges of education in America draw on those whose grades fall in the bottom 1/3 of their class. Who did this research, which colleges did they include, and why did they do this research?
Also, before we blame teachers who are now considered at the bottom of the educational ladder, let's look at the fact that teachers have bosses, follow state guidelines and teach according to a curriculum given to them by their districts. Teachers have become bodies giving lessons supplied by groups like Everyday Math, Pegasus etc.
Finally, teachers have to deal with more student problems today than they have had to deal with in the last 30 years. When I was an elementary student I would never talk back to my teacher. I was taught to respect adults and I never saw another student talk back to or disrespect a teacher in his/her class. Wow, this has changed!
I can clearly see that one of the problems produced by Americas current educational system is evidenced by the number of people who will blindly follow along when those with a hidden agenda point the finger and blame the problems of our country and of our educational system on one group of people rather than looking at a broader picture and actually doing some research on it.
Right now, lots of people are upset because the economy is bad and they don't have jobs or their costs are rising. It's easy to take this anger and point it in the direction of a relatively weak group of people. Let's look a little deeper. Comparing America to Finland would require more time and research than you have demonstrated.
In addition, I'd like to see the research showing that the colleges of education in America draw on those whose grades fall in the bottom 1/3 of their class. Who did this research, which colleges did they include, and why did they do this research?
Also, before we blame teachers who are now considered at the bottom of the educational ladder, let's look at the fact that teachers have bosses, follow state guidelines and teach according to a curriculum given to them by their districts. Teachers have become bodies giving lessons supplied by groups like Everyday Math, Pegasus etc.
Finally, teachers have to deal with more student problems today than they have had to deal with in the last 30 years. When I was an elementary student I would never talk back to my teacher. I was taught to respect adults and I never saw another student talk back to or disrespect a teacher in his/her class. Wow, this has changed!
45
The education system throughout the United States is suffering and programs such as TFA allow schools in lower-income areas to have exposure to have an increased chance at a better future. Though many of the participants in TFA are not certified teachers, many are, and some are grad students, as well. The reason our current systems everywhere are failing is not because programs like TFA place green college grads in the classroom. More than likely, TFA teachers are not replacing successful teachers--on the contrary, TFA teachers' placement urges the communities they go into to question the current educational standards and curriculum.
As for the unfortunate teachers who are displaced by TFA teachers--well, what can really be said? As an English major who studied alongside many hopeful teaching candidates, no one should be so easily duped into thinking that a certification and four years experience is a guarantee that anyone will be a good teacher. Becoming a teacher in the United States has become offensively too easy--which is why education is one of the most over-populated job markets. If anything, placing TFA teachers in schools helps to bolster performance and success. If I had a dollar for every person who I knew that became a teacher because their first, second, third choice didn't pan out, I'd be a rich lady. The positive aspect of TFA is that the applicants not only want to teach, but they're willing to teach in areas most of us would avoid on the drive home.
As for the unfortunate teachers who are displaced by TFA teachers--well, what can really be said? As an English major who studied alongside many hopeful teaching candidates, no one should be so easily duped into thinking that a certification and four years experience is a guarantee that anyone will be a good teacher. Becoming a teacher in the United States has become offensively too easy--which is why education is one of the most over-populated job markets. If anything, placing TFA teachers in schools helps to bolster performance and success. If I had a dollar for every person who I knew that became a teacher because their first, second, third choice didn't pan out, I'd be a rich lady. The positive aspect of TFA is that the applicants not only want to teach, but they're willing to teach in areas most of us would avoid on the drive home.
46
I thought TFA could help better the school with what they got qualified in college to do. Like, a science degree teaches a science course. "Good" qualified teachers don't go to these "bad schools." But, these TFA are bright students, which I am confused why they are being looked down upon. IF I got a MATH DEGREE and am a MATH WIZ! then, what did an EDUCATION MAJOR/DEGREE have on me that makes them more "QUALIFIED"! They are just mad and jealous that they are being laid off and fired because the YOUNGER AND MORE ADVANCED college students are trying to BETTER these schools. Right now, I know plenty of teachers that are HORRIBLE and they are still in school because covered by that 10 year policy. That's some bullshit. But, overall, TFA is just trying to help the situation- and they are smart college students and obviously no college drop out.
47
Last week, in Kansas City, Missouri, 115 certified, experienced teachers lost their jobs; the district plans to replace them with 150 uncertified, inexperienced Teach for America teachers.
Advertisement
Most Commented on Slog
-
Hating People Doesn't Make Them Thinner by Jen Graves
-
Los Angeles Gay Bar Bans Bachelorette Parties Until Marriage Equality Is Attained by David Schmader
-
Fill in the Blank by Grant Brissey
-
This Reminds Me of the Great Calculator Scare of the Late '70s/Early '80s by David Schmader
-
Idiot Tries to Defend Bigoted Anti-Gay-Marriage Preacher on Anderson Cooper by Paul Constant
-
Six Moms with Too Much Time on Their Hands and a Shitty Website Decide to Fight Gay Superheroes by Paul Constant
-
What the Hell Is Wrong With Seattle's Pride Parade? by Dominic Holden
-
The Saturday Morning News by Unpaid Intern
-
Why Mayor McGinn's Wife Canceled Her Family's Seattle Times Subscription by Eli Sanders
-
NYC Man Ticketed for Not Riding in the Bike Lane by Jonathan Golob
RSS
Facebook
Twitter
Comments (47) RSS