Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

"Don't Tell When Asked": How Catholic Hospices Are Denying Patients' Rights to Death With Dignity

Posted by on Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:20 AM

In 2008, nearly 58 percent of Whatcom County voters approved I-1000, the exact same margin by which the Death with Dignity initiative passed statewide. Yet two years later, terminally ill patients in Whatcom and other counties served solely by Catholic hospices, are still being denied access to information about their lawful, end of life options.

This growing conflict between the rights and wishes of patients, and the ethical and moral directives of our state's expansive, Catholic run health systems was illustrated recently by the slow, painful death of Norman Shapiro, a patient in the care of Whatcom Hospice, a program of Bellingham's PeaceHealth St. Joseph Medical Center, and the only home hospice provider in the county. It was only after Shapiro died from esophageal cancer in April, that his wife, Audrey Roll-Shapiro learned that our state's Death with Dignity law would have allowed him to hasten his agonizing death by obtaining a lethal dose of medication.

Outraged, the Bellingham resident sent a letter to Whatcom Hospice — the agency had come to their home in March to care for Norman Shapiro in his final days — asking why information about the law, called Death With Dignity, was not mentioned to them.

"The efforts of the very attentive, loving hospice staff did not alter his extreme discomfort and pain as he died. It simply went on too long," she wrote in her April 29 letter to Richard Hammond, manager of Whatcom Hospice. "Why were we never made aware that we/he had a choice of a more mercifully quickened ending? ... He was unquestionably in pain, severe discomfort, ready to leave, fighting to leave."

The law permits health care providers to opt-out of participation based on ethical, moral and religious grounds, but PeaceHealth and other Catholic health care systems have adopted a rather broad interpretation of what participation means. Few argue that doctors should be required to write a lethal prescription, or that pharmacists should be required to fill one, but PeaceHealth forbids its doctors, nurses, counselors, social workers and chaplains from talking about the option with patients, even if directly asked.

In response to Roll-Shapiro's complaint, PeaceHealth recently added the following single paragraph to its admissions packet:

Patients wishing more information on Washington Death with Dignity Act, Initiative 1000, codified as RCW 70.245 should contact their individual physician, the Whatcom County Medical Society (360-676-7630, www.whatcom-medical.org), the Washington State Department of Health (www.doh.wa.gov/dwda), or the Washington State Hospital Association (www.wsha.org). In accordance with the opt-out provision of the law, PeaceHealth St. Joseph Medical Center does not participate in the Washington Death with Dignity Act.

And by "not participate" they mean not participate beyond including that single paragraph, which doesn't actually explain what the Death with Dignity Act is, and doesn't even include a referral to Compassion and Choices, the only organization in the state to compile a list of doctors and pharmacies willing to participate in the law, and the only organization whose purpose is to advise patients on how to exercise their rights. Terminally ill patients seeking a say in their own death routinely find their path filled with obstacles, and would never manage to obtain their prescription without outside help.

When patients do ask a Whatcom Hospice care provider for more information on Death with Dignity, they are simply advised to talk to their doctor. And if the doctor is affiliated with PeaceHealth St. Joseph Medical Center — as many physicians in the area are, it being Bellingham's only hospitalthey too are barred from discussing the option.

“Our belief is that life is sacred and that intentionally ending one’s life is not something that we would support. It’s being consistent with Catholic teaching,” Ross Fewing, director of ethics at PeaceHealth told the Bellingham Herald. When asked why PeaceHealth refuses to refer to Compassion and Choices, Fewing emphasized that "under Catholic moral theology, it would be direct participation in the act.”

Get that...? Answering a patient's question truthfully would be equivalent to participating in the act, and thus a violation of Catholic moral theology. Huh. Perhaps there's some subtlety in the New Testament I just don't get, but I was always led to believe that honesty is supposed to be a Christian virtue.

Rob Miller of Compassion and Choices agrees, if in a snark-free manner. "Patients have a right to information," Miller told me, "and all medical providers should honor the principle of informed consent by answering questions honestly, and providing referrals when necessary." Miller isn't advocating the elimination of the opt-out provision, but when pushed on what might be a reasonable legislative remedy, he suggested something on the lines of a "Right to Know" law that would at least require health care providers to give direct answers to direct questions.

Barring that, access to information about end of life options could become even less available over time. Just like in Whatcom County, home hospice services throughout much of the state are available through a single provider, and many of these are run by Catholic health care systems... systems that have been expanding in recent years through mergers and affiliations that are subjecting more and more medical providers to Catholic Ethical and Religious Directives.

These Catholic hospitals and health care systems deserve praise for delivering high-quality care throughout much of the state, but with their expansion comes a constriction in access to legal medical services including birth control, abortion and yes, aid in dying, especially in the growing number of areas like Bellingham where these systems hold a health care monopoly. Indeed, should you find yourself terminally injured or ill in a Catholic hospital emergency room, your own personal medical directives, including Do Not Resuscitate instructions, will be ignored, if they are found to conflict with church teachings.

It's a troubling issue few patients talk or even know about... especially when under the medical care of one of our state's many Catholic run health care systems.

 

Comments (20) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
attitude devant 1
What's truly weird about PeaceHealth's stance is that it's not really a Catholic system. It's a for-profit system masquerading as a Catholic charity. The sisters who nominally own the hospitals are elderly and few in number. The hospitals are run by suits, but the organization has the same top-down, don't-ask-questions structure the Catholics know from parochial school.
Posted by attitude devant on October 13, 2010 at 10:30 AM
gember 2
This is unfortunate and I don't like that so many health and insurance companies take irrelevant religious stances.

Still: doctors, nurses, hospital administrators, insurance companies are NOT your advocate. Despite certain legal and ethical obligations, they will not always act in your interests. I'm not thrilled that this is the case, but in just about any medical situation you need to inform yourself and act as your own advocate.
Posted by gember on October 13, 2010 at 10:38 AM
3
Roman Catholicism: Helping put people to a prolonged, agonizing death since the 13th century.
Posted by TechBear on October 13, 2010 at 10:46 AM
Soupytwist 4
This makes me physically ill - just another example of how patients are the lowest priority in our healthcare system.
Posted by Soupytwist http://twitter.com/katherinesmith on October 13, 2010 at 10:47 AM
5
Few would argue that...pharmacists should be required to fill a legal prescription written by a doctor? Really?

First "[f]ew would argue that" is a content-free rhetorical trick; and second, no matter how many people would argue the other side, "conscience" exceptions for pharmacists are moronic and dangerous.

While it may be legal, pharmacists do not have the ethical right to refuse to fill legal prescriptions based on their personal religious or philosophical views. Not when it's RU-486 being prescribed; not when it's birth control pills being prescribed; and not in this case, either.

Here are your two choices. You can have pharmacists who fill every legal prescription, while checking only for doctor mistakes and drug contraindications.

Or, you can have a situation in which the prescription drug distribution system in the hands of people who can arbitrarily refuse treatment for any reason at all, without consequence or recourse. Including: they can refuse to fill your prescription for birth control because the Catholic Church says it's bad. Including: they can refuse to fill a prescription for an insulin analog, because they believe that diabetes is god's punishment for the deadly sin of gluttony.

I don't know about you, but I prefer the former.
Posted by Ancient Sumerian on October 13, 2010 at 10:55 AM
6
What a weird mixing of religious doctrine and libertarian capitalism. It's up to the consumer to be the expert, the corporation is under no compulsion to give all the facts.
Posted by Blue John on October 13, 2010 at 11:01 AM
7
Ancient Sumerian @5,

You're absolutely right. So I've deleted the word "would." the sentence now reads: "Few argue that...." Nobody I spoke with argued for removing the opt-out provision, and this revised sentence now better reflects that.

And I also agree that ethical right of pharmacists to opt-out is less clear than that of the doctor.
Posted by Goldy on October 13, 2010 at 11:11 AM
nickster 8
Religious institutions should not be the sole source of basic services anywhere, because they want to "share" their salvation with others, they will use it as a platform to push their world view. People need alternatives.
Posted by nickster on October 13, 2010 at 11:11 AM
9
Can we get rid of religiously-sponsored healthcare institutions (hospitals, clinics, hospice, pharmacies, etc.) altogether? There are just too many cases where their "beliefs" seem to trump truth/patient-rights/medically-accurate-information/reality.

I think religiously affiliated hospitals have a conflict of interest, just as do for-profit insurance companies. Both need to go.
Posted by Justin on October 13, 2010 at 11:23 AM
Geni 10
Here's a question I've always wondered: do religiously-affiliated medical clinics and hospitals pay taxes on any profits? If not, why not?

I'm never going to understand why religious organizations are tax-free to begin with.
Posted by Geni on October 13, 2010 at 11:45 AM
SchmuckyTheCat 11
A legislative solution should allow individuals to opt-out but not institutions. I believe this was the intent to begin with.
Posted by SchmuckyTheCat on October 13, 2010 at 11:57 AM
attitude devant 12
Geni @10, PeaceHealth pays no tax not because of its religious affiliation but because it is incorporated as a not-for-profit entity. Weirdly enough, they actually DO make profits, though. Some divisions are INCREDIBLY profitable---one of their intensive-care nurseries had a profit of $40,000,000 recently.

What fries me is that they use their religious ties to solicit donations for what it actually a very financially healthy entity. That same nursery is the focus of HUGE fund-raising efforts involving large numbers of well-meaning people who donate healthy sums per annum. What can I say? Premie babies sell.
Posted by attitude devant on October 13, 2010 at 12:02 PM
Vince 13
Catholics have a very long history of causing suffering for their moral immorality.
Posted by Vince on October 13, 2010 at 12:11 PM
mandaline 14
Ridding of religiously affiliated healthcare altogether wont happen in this country while we're alive (that just would not pass). The monopoly is unhealthy for society, but I wouldn't say the religious hospitals shouldn't exist at all.
Posted by mandaline on October 13, 2010 at 2:20 PM
15
If you are interested in learning more about end of life choice, please follow Compassion & Choices on Facebook by clicking "like" at: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Compassion…
Also, C&C is hosting a free event on Oct 23 that all sloggers are invited to. It will include a performance of the play, "Demonstrate the Place of My Abode," which is about Lisa Koch's relationship with her father, and his choice to use the Death With Dignity Act. Lisa is a talented local singer, musician and comedian and the play is really eye opening. See our facebook for more info.
If you are pro-choice, this issue should be on your radar because it is another instance where the government and healthcare providers are trying to control what happens to you and your body.
Posted by knotless on October 13, 2010 at 4:30 PM
Free Lunch 16
I don't know, Goldy - sounds like they are "opting out" to me. It's heartless - I agree - but actually participating in a discussion about it with a patient - even when asked - is, well, participating.

I don't know how hard I'd push this. It's this kind of outrage that has churches convinced that they eventually will be sued for not performing gay marriages. ("But you said we could opt out!")
Posted by Free Lunch on October 13, 2010 at 9:08 PM
17
Free Lunch @16,

Well, we disagree. Remember, these are medical professionals. If a patient asks his doctor what his treatment options are, it is reasonable to expect the doctor to honestly answer. And a medically hastened death is one of those options.
Posted by Goldy on October 14, 2010 at 12:06 AM
18
I find it grotesque how the Catholic church thinks it's entitled to force its beliefs on other people. Churches shouldn't be allowed to own and operate hospitals if they are going to pull this kind of patronizing crap. Give me a secular institution any day!
Posted by I have always been... east coaster on October 17, 2010 at 1:44 AM
19
No religion or cult should have the right to prolong horrendous pain by imposing it upon a helpless, dying individual merely in order to support some ancient, mystic philosophy.

We are not -- all of us -- theologians and I would venture to assert that even theologians, when faced with such pain, would choose something better for themselves.

Remember! Each of us will, someday, have to confront a death --- our own.
Posted by Ercillor on November 2, 2010 at 12:53 PM
20
A human being died -- in great agony -- who need not have.

All the rest is pure crap -- I think.
Posted by Ercillor on November 2, 2010 at 1:02 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy