Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

State Auditor Says Wine Commission Misused Public Funds

Posted by on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 2:52 PM

Looks like the Washington State Wine Commission is drinking its way to trouble. A report released this week by State Auditor Brian Sonntag's office found questionable spending on meals, drinks, and other expenses at the state agency, including splurging $4,922 on a commissioner's going away party.

The wine commission represents licensed wineries and wine grape growers in our state and is funded almost entirely by the wine industry, through assessments based on wine and grape sales. The commission's revenue for June 2008-July 2009 was $3.9 million.

The party for the unnamed commissioner was just one of several payments that "did not appear to be for valid business purposes," the report said. Other questionable expenses include $1,080 for wine during a dinner with 12 employees, 13 commissioners and four non employees at the annual board retreat. The commission also spent $778 on ordering dinner during a board retreat which lacked itemized receipts, and $696 on wine during staff meals which were unrelated to promotional hosting.

The audit was not able to determine whether the commission had permission to spend an additional $4,465 for meals during meetings and travel. The commission says that is has already taken steps to ensure review and approval of all expenditures and has established a Finance Committee to improve accountability and oversight.

The wine commission could not be reached for comment on the audit.

The state's beer and wine industries are spending a lot of money on overturning the two liquor privatization initiatives that will be on the November ballot for fear of competition. Individual state winemakers are split on the initiatives, however. Wine commission spokesman Ryan Pennington told The Stranger that as a state agency the wine commission cannot support initiatives, but it is working closely with the Washington Wine Institute, which opposes I-1100, the initiative supported by Costco.

 

Comments (15) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Fnarf 1
Christ, how do I get that job? I can bullshit about wine better than most folks, and I can guzzle it like a champion. Of course, they probably wouldn't want me, because I'd be constantly talking shit about Washington wine's irrigation practices (i.e., using irrigation at all).
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on September 22, 2010 at 2:58 PM
Max Solomon 2
you can't sell wine without opening some bottles. if they can't expense alcohol, they shouldn't be a state commission.
Posted by Max Solomon on September 22, 2010 at 3:05 PM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 3

We will sell no wine...until we're good and drunk ourselves.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBayVvFA6…
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://yrihf.com on September 22, 2010 at 3:09 PM
Will in Seattle 4
Drink up!
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on September 22, 2010 at 3:19 PM
Fnarf 5
Will and Bailo: Slog dream team. You guys should get married and move in together. Someplace with no internet access.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on September 22, 2010 at 3:21 PM
6
So they're wining and dining themselves, but when Washington based charities approach them for wine donations, we're told no. This year, any charity that has anything to do with children was told that they decided they could no longer give wine to charities that provide services to children. Huh? See, we're the adults running the charities, selling wine to other adults, so we can serve the children. Obviously they were drunk when they made that decision.
Posted by ScreenName on September 22, 2010 at 3:31 PM
Fnarf 7
Shh, ScreenName. Even discussing the existence of alcohol threatens The Children.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on September 22, 2010 at 3:38 PM
giffy 8
Only in Washington would an agency spending a few grand more than it should on a couple parties be huge news. I mean on one hand I like that our State is relatively so corruption free that this is a scandal, but on the other hand I just can't get that worked up on such minor malfeasance.
Posted by giffy on September 22, 2010 at 3:42 PM
9
"Other questionable expenses include $1,080 for wine during a dinner with 12 employees, 13 commissioners and four non employees at the annual board retreat."

How is spending an average of $37.24 per person on wine questionable - especially considering that wine is their job?
Posted by SuperSteve on September 22, 2010 at 4:31 PM
10
I can beat this. Maria Goodloe-Johnson, the Superintendent of Seattle Public Schools, spent nearly $7,000 for 70 people (you do the per person math) including a carving station, live music and $100 gift certificates. This is yet another audit that our State Auditor churns out and NO ONE listens to.

The Auditor asked the Attorney General's office for their opinion and the AG's office said without any district policies on banquets/parties, it would be considered "gifting of public money." And no, the district has no such policies.

Your tax dollars at work and hey, consider this when they come to you in November for a school levy "for the kids."
Posted by westello on September 22, 2010 at 4:38 PM
Will in Seattle 11
@5 I told you to get off my Internet.

We never intended it for you.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on September 22, 2010 at 4:49 PM
12
Sheesh! If the State Wine Commission can't eat, drink, and be inappropriately merry, what state agencies can?
Posted by RonK, Seattle on September 22, 2010 at 5:08 PM
kk in seattle 13
The State Auditor is an attention whoring blowhard who has--thanks to Tim Eyman, cheered on by the Blethens--an infinite supply of taxpayer money to publicize his 2012 gubernatorial campaign. Who gives a fuck about a party?

How much does it cost to hire enough bean-counters to review every one of those receipts (and hundreds of thousands of others). And how soul-killing must that job be.
Posted by kk in seattle on September 22, 2010 at 5:19 PM
Fnarf 14
@11, it's not your internet. You had nothing to do with it. You don't even have the first clue how it works.

Go jerk off into your mother's bra.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on September 22, 2010 at 5:24 PM
Will in Seattle 15
kk is right.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on September 22, 2010 at 5:25 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy