Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Saturday, September 4, 2010

Craigslist Blocks Ads for Adult Services

Posted by on Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 11:24 AM

WaPo:

censored_craigslist.jpg
Craigslist, the Internet's iconic ad bazaar, has stopped allowing U.S. users to access its "adult services" ads.

On Saturday morning, the link to those ads - which had been criticized by prosecutors and human-trafficking groups as a tool for pimps and prostitutes - were replaced by a black box with the word "censored" in white letters. News reports indicated that the ads were still visible to users in other countries.

It's unclear, for now, whether the change is a temporary statement or a signal that Craigslist will stop allowing the ads.

 

Comments (30) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Vince 1
Free speech rights are worth fighting for, people.
Posted by Vince on September 4, 2010 at 11:27 AM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 2
Um, they censored themselves, Vince. That's hardly the same thing.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on September 4, 2010 at 11:38 AM
Steven Bradford 3
They also removed the adult category from "Gigs" where it used to sit just below "Talent". No black censor bar, just removed.
Posted by Steven Bradford http://www.seanet.com/~bradford/ on September 4, 2010 at 11:53 AM
4
Will I still be able to offer my gardening services?

I'm really good at whacking shrubbery.
Posted by midwaypete on September 4, 2010 at 11:53 AM
5
Do you imagine that "Adult Service" providers will simply move their posts to "Casual Encounters"?
Posted by cineaste on September 4, 2010 at 12:00 PM
Vince 6
@2 Under threat from some fourteen AG's.
Posted by Vince on September 4, 2010 at 12:01 PM
7
If the "adult services" were truly being offered by adults only, I could see this as a free speech issue. However, as a social worker who works with teens who've been commercially sexually exploited, I know full well that Craigslist (as well as backpage.com, and the Stranger's own Lustlab) are not only used by adults. I have several youth in my care right now who've been sold on all three of these websites. Until Craigslist comes up with a way to guarantee that no children will be exploited on their site, I fully support this move and the legal pressure that prompted it.
Posted by BohemianBoy on September 4, 2010 at 12:18 PM
Doctor Memory 8
#7: yes, and now that craigslist no longer has the adult services section, exploitation of minors is over with forever, right?

Okay, I'm being snarky. There's been a 10% reduction? 5%? 1%? 0.0001%?

Tell me of the useless feel-good measures of your homeworld, Usul.
Posted by Doctor Memory http://blahg.blank.org on September 4, 2010 at 12:22 PM
oh, THAT 9
@6
My thought as well. Craigslist is more a business than an online publication so I sympathize somewhat. They can't afford to take on the government and extreme right wing Moral Majority, hypocrites though they be. Still, it's not a happy situation; it's just consistent with America's Puritan blue nose traditions.
Posted by oh, THAT on September 4, 2010 at 12:22 PM
10
Now where am I going to find my hookers?
Posted by Erok on September 4, 2010 at 12:44 PM
sirkowski 11
@7 Will someone please think of the anecdotal children!?
Posted by sirkowski http://www.missdynamite.com on September 4, 2010 at 12:45 PM
12
You guys clearly don't understand. If we stop prostitution advertising then prostitution will stop. It's common sense.
Posted by SeattleSeven on September 4, 2010 at 12:46 PM
dnt trust me 13
@12 exactly. if i were to provide a link about international sex trade, most people would still ignore blaming the guilty pimps. it's good business. why would we want "to change the attitudes of the public?"
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/03/2…
Posted by dnt trust me on September 4, 2010 at 1:10 PM
14

"Free speech rights are worth fighting for, people."

No one's free speech has been denied here, Craigslist is not owned by the government and taxpayers, they can do whatever they please. You sound like that moron Palin who thinks criticism denies her free speech rights. 

You understand the difference between privately and publicly owned right? Like you have every right to stop me from writing 'Vince is a cock sucking, STD spreader' on your door but you don't have the right to stop me from writing that on my door.
Posted by Free speech, my ass on September 4, 2010 at 1:14 PM
Greenwood 15
@14: But they are doing this because of fear of government prosecution, right? So yes, it's a free speech issue.
Posted by Greenwood on September 4, 2010 at 1:30 PM
16
@14 - and I think you may be unclear on the difference between free speech and libel. "Cock-sucking, STD-spreading" isn't an opinion, it's either a fact or it isn't. If Vince can prove that he is no such thing, then you don't have the right to write it anywhere. You can say he's a jerk, or that you hate him, because those are your OPINIONS. But freedom of speech doesn't give youthe right to make a statement of fact that's demonstrably untrue. The defense for slander or libel would be that what you were saying was true. If you could prove that
both cock sucking and STD spreading had occurred, then you could write it anywhere you want.
Posted by teamcanada on September 4, 2010 at 1:32 PM
17 Comment Pulled (Trolling) Comment Policy
18
Teamcanada, I know for a fact he's a STD spreading cock sucker.

And this is not a free speech issue, the government did not order craigslist go close off their kiddie hooker and STD funhouse section.
Posted by Free speech my ass on September 4, 2010 at 1:40 PM
19
"You may want to look into the concept of libel and slander."

You may want to look into the concept of satire, like posting a not a blog that you think Glen Beck sucks donkey dicks.
Posted by Free speech my ass on September 4, 2010 at 1:54 PM
Vince 20
@14 Nice.
Posted by Vince on September 4, 2010 at 2:22 PM
balderdash 21
Three cheers for our public servants, making the hard choices in order to remove problems from public visibility so we can all go on pretending the biggest issues in our little worlds are weeds in the garden and nothing good on TV. A little intimidation to squelch free speech and enterprise is surely a small price to pay to be able to pretend human trafficking and underage prostitution don't exist, right?
Posted by balderdash http://introverse.blogspot.com on September 4, 2010 at 2:26 PM
Vince 22
@21 I love all the pious bullshit about prostitution. For starters, forcing women back to the streets gets them assaulted and raped and even murdered. Usually by some "good Christian family man". It is consenting adults that should be able to advertise. And it is a free speech issue.
Posted by Vince on September 4, 2010 at 2:33 PM
Roma 23
7/Bohemian Boy: Until Craigslist comes up with a way to guarantee that no children will be exploited on their site, I fully support this move and the legal pressure that prompted it.

People (like me) who are in favor of legalized prostitution don't want children being exploited, in the same way that people who think alcohol should be legal don't want children drinking (or adults driving drunk.) Furthermore, I would also like it if Craigslist had a way to guarantee that no children are exploited on their site.

However, even if Craigslist could guarantee this, that still wouldn't stop the sex cops from wanting to shut down their adult services section. Sex cops think it's wrong for mutually consenting adults to have sex for money. They want to keep prostitution illegal because of their sense of "morality", the same reason that marriage cops want to prevent same-sex marriage.

Posted by Roma on September 4, 2010 at 2:53 PM
24
@5, perhaps all the sporting girls (and sporting gents) should move to the "sporting" section.
Posted by Jk on September 4, 2010 at 3:04 PM
Buttercup 25
@11 FTW: "...Will someone please think of the anecdotal children!?"
Posted by Buttercup on September 4, 2010 at 3:59 PM
Gus 26
Think of the children? SCREW THE CHILDREN!
Posted by Gus on September 4, 2010 at 7:37 PM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 27

The good news is you can still get mugged and robbed when you go to buy from furniture from a vendor in Shoreline.

That's Craiglist Quality!
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://yrihf.com on September 4, 2010 at 8:27 PM
Greg 28
@25: I agree, though I think it should be styled, "Will someone please think of the [anecdotal] children?!"
Posted by Greg on September 4, 2010 at 9:53 PM
venomlash 29
@26: Wut?
Posted by venomlash on September 4, 2010 at 10:51 PM
30
Well that sucks. I guess I will just have to get my hookers from ads in The Stranger now.
Posted by Reg on September 5, 2010 at 7:23 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy