Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, September 3, 2010

Union Accepts Contract That Evaluates Teachers Based on Student Test Scores, But Votes No Confidence in Superintendent

Posted by on Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:03 AM

The Seattle teachers' union voted Thursday to approve a three-year contract following a much publicized and contentious negotiation process that threatened to delay the start of the new school year next week. At issue was whether student test scores had a bearing on teacher pay, evaluation, and termination. In the end, the union compromised and accepted rules—as they tentatively planned to do—that would allow test scores to play a role in evaluations, but would not jeopardize their jobs.

Almost 100 percent of union members at Seattle Pacific University last night also voted “no confidence” in Seattle Superintendent Maria Goodloe-Johnson, a purely symbolic gesture, citing her inability to lead the district. A flyer distributed before the union meeting at Seattle Pacific University listed eight grievances against Goodloe-Johnson, including a state audit which warned that the district lacked control over its finances.

The union had strongly opposed the Seattle Public School's initial contract proposal, which had wanted student test scores to be part of a teacher’s final evaluation. “They wanted to use it for a high stakes evaluation which could have set up people to end up in probation or termination,” said SEA director Glenn Bafia.

Bafia said that both sides eventually arrived at an understanding at the bargaining table "that we could live with."

Under the new system, student test scores would still be used to evaluate teacher performance, just not to the extent that it could put their jobs in danger. “You can still look at test scores, but if test scores are poor it triggers an evaluation of the teacher,” said Bafia. “The administration and teacher have to sit down and discuss what’s happening in the classroom. The principal will give the teacher the support he or she needs. This is a much better approach and it still allows us to use student academic data.”

If things don’t improve after the evaluation period, teachers could be put on probation. “Of course you could eventually get fired if you don’t improve at all,” Bafia warned.

This battle is a microcosm of a national debate. A report by the LA Times which rated nearly 6,000 elementary school teachers online based on standardized test scores recently created a huge controversy, with the Los Angeles teachers union calling for the paper's boycott.

 

Comments (3) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Max Solomon 1
they just signed their own death warrant. no one can make a silk purse out of a sow's ear - and there's a helluva lot of sow's ears attending seattle public schools.

ITS THE PARENTS.
Posted by Max Solomon on September 3, 2010 at 1:17 PM
2
The headline is bullshit, and so is the thrust of the story. The District is just spouting a lot of spin if it says this is any substantial increase in using student test scores to evaluate teachers, and the Stranger's "reporter" is buying the spin and not the reality.

In the first place, the District is glossing over, if it even admits it in the first place, that this was a change proposed by the UNION.

Teachers had been complaining for years that principals' evaluations were either perfunctory, or slipshod, or arbitrary. Now an anomalous test score, where teachers previously had been evaluated positively, just triggers another evaluation. The principals will be forced to evaluate a teacher in depth, which is what the teachers were after all the time.

A more in-depth interview, more often than not, will reveal that low test scores might be caused by all kinds of extenuating factors, other than teacher incompetence.

These dumb fucking "reformers" will be the last to understand that they have thrown Brer Rabbit (the teachers) right into the briar patch. If their goal was to weaken the union, they have strengthened it. If their goal was to make firing teachers easier, they have made it harder.

In other words, the District has FAILED, Goodloe-Johnson has FAILED, and the "reformers" have FAILED. Death warrant, my ass.
Posted by Reform, my ass on September 3, 2010 at 2:39 PM
rara avis 3
@2 is right. this was huge defeat for Goodloe-Johnson and her rubber-stamping board and for the current big-business education "reform" movement. it's an even bigger victory for Labor, teachers, schools and kids.

no newspaper in town seems to be willing to look into district leadership. the Seattle Times is in G-J's pocket. i'm shocked that the fact that G-J is on the board of the company that makes the MAP test (instituted across the district and one the exams they wanted to tie teacher performance to) hasn't gained any traction. uh, conflict of interest maybe?
Posted by rara avis on September 3, 2010 at 3:01 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy