Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, September 2, 2010

County Prosecutor Seeks Death Penalty for Monfort

Posted by on Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 9:09 AM

King County Prosecuting Attorney Dan Satterberg announced that he would seek the death penalty for accused cop-killer Christopher Monfort in a very brief notice filed this morning in King County Superior Couty (.pdf).

"[T]here are not sufficient mitigating circumstances to merit leniency," he wrote.

The decision to pursue capital punishment for the killing of SPD Officer Timothy Brenton last Halloween was expected. "The death penalty is reserved for the worst of the worst,” Satterberg said last November. “Killing a police officer falls within my definition of the worst of the worst crimes.”

 

Comments (10) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Max Solomon 1
i've never understood this. why is killing a cop worse than killing, say, the tuba man?
Posted by Max Solomon on September 2, 2010 at 9:33 AM
Akbar Fazil 2
I was just coming to say the same thing Max. It is ridiculous that cops get held to a higher standard of human life.
Posted by Akbar Fazil on September 2, 2010 at 9:34 AM
aardvark 3
cops are not a higher form of life
Posted by aardvark on September 2, 2010 at 9:37 AM
Fnarf 4
Because cops represent the state, and thus an attack on a cop is an attack on all of us. A cop is a symbolic figure in addition to being a person. In this instance, Monfort wasn't after any particular officer; he just wanted to kill a policeman, because of what he represented.

I think it's ridiculous, though, that Satterberg has decided to inflate his resume with a mega-million-dollar death case when all levels of government are hurting so bad for dollars. Pursuing death for Monfort is going to adversely affect all county services, including policing. Life in a wheelchair in prison seems harsh enough to me.

Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on September 2, 2010 at 9:50 AM
Akbar Fazil 5
Bullshit Fnarf. Bull.Shit.

Human life is precious. We only have one go at it. Taking of any human life be it a normal person or an officer of the state holds the same level of evil. Killing of anyone is barbaric and unacceptable.
Posted by Akbar Fazil on September 2, 2010 at 9:58 AM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 6
Killing anyone isso barbaric that they have no problem with killing a well-trained, armed cop is not the kind of guy you ever want seeing the light of day again.

It's not so much that cops are above everyone else; more like these vermin are below everyone else.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on September 2, 2010 at 10:09 AM
lark 7
Good Morning Dominic,
I agree that a police officer's life is not more or less important than any other human life even Montfort's. The problem I see is Monfort himself. He targeted the police ie. a representative of the State. He used dubious reasoning (Butler's theories), has shown no remorse and still considers himself a victim. I do support Capital Punishment but in this rare high profile case I would support mandatory life imprisonment for him. Monfort is paralyzed. He's not going anywhere and will never kill again.
Posted by lark on September 2, 2010 at 10:25 AM
Tingleyfeeln 8
The real bullshit of the death penalty is that it supposedly requires even more proof to sentence someone to this, yet they are still entitled to appeals, then they sit on death row for 20 years. If there is enough evidence to sentence someone to death (a practice I do not support due to lack of trust in humans to dish this sentence out consistently without prejudice), then it should be strait to the execution.

You know what else I think is bullshit about the death penalty? That it is not a victims family member who pulls the levers. Fuck that clinical, trained professional bullshit, if someone deserves to die for a crime, these are the people who should be taking the criminals life away, not a representative of the state! If noone from the victims family is willing to do it, then life without parole, no appeals.
Posted by Tingleyfeeln on September 2, 2010 at 10:39 AM
elenchos 9
Let met try to keep up.

A crime against someone because they are black, gay, Muslim or whatever is a hate crime deserving additional punishment, because it is an attack against the entire group that doesn't only harm the victim. It serves to spread terror and intimidate all members of the group that was attacked.

But it just strikes you as completely off the wall to say targeting a cop because they are a cop also merits greater punishment? And extraordinary efforts to deter crimes against those who volunteer to put themselves in extraordinary danger just fucking blows your mind? Perhaps even raises the specter of some kind of fascist police state out to cow the populace?

Is that how it is?
Posted by elenchos on September 2, 2010 at 1:58 PM
elenchos 10
And...

AND if someone murdered a gay man who was a complete stranger, who was targeted for no reason at all except that he was gay, it would be totally fine and dandy if Satterberg said, "Yeah, we could seek the death penalty here but money is tight so we're going to go easy on this one..."
Posted by elenchos on September 2, 2010 at 2:06 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy