Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, August 31, 2010

SL Letter of the Day: Predator and Prey

Posted by on Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:00 PM

A few nights ago I got drunk and knocked on my roommate's door and confessed my attraction to him while he was lying in bed in nothing more than his skivvies. (It was dark and I stayed at the door so I didn't know that until after the fact.) And then I asked him if I could sleep in his room because our other roommate—whose bedroom is directly above mine—was having sex so loudly that I couldn't sleep. Which was true but it clearly didn't not make the roommate I was drunkenly confessing to's bed the appropriate alternative and makes me an asshole to the roommate who actually has a sex life. Not being able to sleep on work nights is sometimes a real problem, but one to be addressed with her, not used as drunken fodder to get into someone else's bed.

I feel pathetic and embarrassed for having thrown myself at my roommate, completely freaked out that I got wasted enough to do something I have daydreamed about but wouldn't do sober, but much more importantly, I think my behavior did not reflect active consent, trashed my roommate's boundaries and was generally creepy—all characteristics of sexual assaulters.

I am biologically female and if the situation were reversed I would commit a huge double standard because I would back any woman who did not feel safe continuing to live with a dude who did what I did. I feel like I should be held accountable and move out immediately though my housemate has told me he doesn't feel threatened and that I should stay.

Help. I feel like a total piece of shit for having done this and can't stop wondering,

Am I A Sexual Predator?

My response after the jump...

•••••••••••••

Calm the fuck down.

You didn't assault anyone, you're not a predator, you shouldn't have to move out. You made a drunken, ill-advised pass at a roommate. If that makes someone a "sexual predator," AIASP, then we're going to need to build walls around college campuses and declare 'em all penitentiaries.

As for that double standard: in light of your recent experience—you made a drunken pass at someone—you might want to revisit the assumptions you've made about men who make passes, drunken and otherwise, at women who aren't interested in them. Making a pass at someone is not grounds for eviction or conviction. It's how a person makes a pass—did you pounce or did you ask?—and how a person react if the pass is rebuffed—did you graciously take "no" for an answer or were you a complete asshole about it?—that matters.

Of course the passes that men make at women—roommates and otherwise—exist in a context of male sexual violence. So it's understandable that a woman might feel uncomfortable living with a dude who did what you did. But if the dude wasn't a creep about it, and graciously took "no" for an answer (if the answer was "no"), gee, perhaps he should be judged as an individual and not as someone who bears collective guilt for all the crimes committed by members of his sex.

And even if you were an asshole about that "no," AIASP, that still doesn't make you a sexual predator. You're only a sexual predator—or guilty of sexual assault—if you refuse to take "no" for an answer and force yourself on someone. (Or if you go after people who are incapable of granting their consent or take advantage of people under duress. And even then not all "predation" qualifies as assault. Some people are liars and players and manipulative fucks.) You didn't force yourself on anymore. All you're guilty of, AIASP, is asking someone that you wanted to fuck if he wanted to fuck you. It's a legit question and no one gets fucked without asking it.

And the question doesn't magically become assault when the answer is "no."

 

Comments (45) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
kristinbell 1
haha. so true. like the "calm the fuck down."
This girl is seriously misguided about what is and what isn't sexual coercion/violence.
Posted by kristinbell http://kristinbell.org on August 31, 2010 at 2:09 PM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 2
Seriously, just go watch some porn and mellow out.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on August 31, 2010 at 2:20 PM
3
Thinking A LOT about her women's studies classes, I guess. Excellent answer, Dan.
Posted by Su on August 31, 2010 at 2:21 PM
Will in Seattle 4
exactly.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on August 31, 2010 at 2:23 PM
5
Ditto.
Posted by maxbell on August 31, 2010 at 2:25 PM
rob! 6
It doesn't change the logic of the answer, but the LW saying "I am biologically female" is somewhat confusing--is LW a gay trans man? Otherwise why not just start by saying "I'm a woman who got drunk and knocked on my roommate's door and confessed my attraction to him," etc. Is male roommate gay? Anyway, roommate is cool. Someday maybe we'll all be able to express polite sexual interest as adults in whatever combination, and be politely accepted or declined without further drama, freakouts, or violence. Though I suppose a trans person would not use the term "biological" to describe genetics or present anatomy but rather heartfelt identity. I know... maybe Telsa can help.
Posted by rob! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZBdUceCL5U on August 31, 2010 at 2:26 PM
7
This is the kind of roommate every college guy wants.
Posted by Bhamjason on August 31, 2010 at 2:35 PM
T 8
Wow, "calm the fuck down" indeed.
Posted by T on August 31, 2010 at 2:42 PM
Vince 9
Well what do you know! A woman who lumps all men into the sexual predator catagory finds herself the victim of her own ill advised assumptions. I love it! Good answer Dan.
Posted by Vince on August 31, 2010 at 2:47 PM
Lose-Lose 10
People who ask themselves if they're sexual predators obviously have not spent any time with actual sexual predators. If all sexual predators were as conscientious as you, AIASP, the world would be a much better place.
Posted by Lose-Lose on August 31, 2010 at 2:56 PM
11
you've been a bad girl.

bend over for your spanking....
Posted by not a troll on August 31, 2010 at 3:01 PM
12
@6 I'm guessing her phrasing is a symptom of the general over intellectualization she's submitted the entire chain of events too.
Posted by LukeJoe on August 31, 2010 at 3:03 PM
13
Seriously? AISP, you are why I didn't join any of the feminist groups in college. Really? If your drunk male roommate came to your door and asked to get into bed and then went away when you said no, you'd feel ... unsafe? I hope to hell you ain't that fragile, otherwise the world's gonna throw you some real curveballs when you leave the higher education incubator.

Lighten up. Chill out. You got turned down. Don't make a bigger deal out of it than it is.
Posted by JrzWrld on August 31, 2010 at 3:06 PM
mandaline 14
@7 and @13 Why are we assuming these people are in college?
Posted by mandaline on August 31, 2010 at 3:22 PM
seandr 15
Come on people, the ethics of this situation couldn't be any clearer.

If the guy is attracted to her, then her pass was cool. Otherwise, it was sexual harassment, possibly sexual assault if she didn't slink away quickly enough when he said no.
Posted by seandr on August 31, 2010 at 3:22 PM
16
Eh, just like not all men are not sexual predators, not all feminists are hysterical weirdos like this writer. There's no need for feminist-bashing based on the crazy comments of this one individual.
Posted by Stop clumping feminists together on August 31, 2010 at 3:25 PM
sirkowski 17
Andrea Dworkin is not pleased.
Posted by sirkowski http://www.missdynamite.com on August 31, 2010 at 3:25 PM
18
Oh good, I'm glad I'm not the only one here who thought, even if the situation was reversed, and she was a he and he a she, there wouldn't be a problem.

Actually, @13, it's the feminist in me that make me think that it shouldn't be a problem no matter what the genders. What's fair is fair. But maybe feminist groups are not where the typical feminist is? I don't know, having never been in one.
Posted by too lazy to register yet on August 31, 2010 at 3:27 PM
kitschnsync 19
15 nailed it.
Posted by kitschnsync on August 31, 2010 at 3:29 PM
sunjoy 20
So I recently realized that I have never asked anyone out (just responded to others advances), because I am rather afraid of rejection, thus rejecting myself before the other has a chance, you know the story. So these lines...

'All you're guilty of, AIASP, is asking someone that you wanted to fuck if he wanted to fuck you. It's a legit question and no one gets fucked without asking it.

And the question doesn't magically become assault when the answer is "no."'

... are incredibly helpful and amazingly reassuring. Thanks for putting it in perspective Dan!
Posted by sunjoy on August 31, 2010 at 4:27 PM
this guy I know in Spokane 21
AISP, the fact that you're experiencing remorse & embarrassment says "probably not a predator" to me. However, you probably shouldn't oughta drink *that* heavily on a work night.
Posted by this guy I know in Spokane on August 31, 2010 at 4:27 PM
22
@14. Probably because everything she's said is so clearly influenced by Women and Gender Studies classes.
Posted by jade on August 31, 2010 at 4:33 PM
23
@15 Ummm... Harassment occurs when the power dynamics are uneven or the situation is totally inappropriate. Like, in the workplace. Or if one party is rejected and persists in pursuit to the extreme annoyance of the other. Asking someone once, in an appropriate social setting (like shared residential premises), and promptly acquiescing to rejection, is hardly harassment. It may, however, be supremely awkward unless handled in good nature afterwards.
Posted by Brooklyn Reader on August 31, 2010 at 4:41 PM
24
See! SEE! *This* sort of sad, slobbering, jibbering sea mollusk of a young woman is what you get from smoking too much reefer...er, no, actually, taking too many acid blots...nope, not that either.

Oh, she is into gender studies? Well, there you go folks, this is your brain on Catherine MacKinnon.
Posted by ha ha ha, you gender studies loser! on August 31, 2010 at 4:45 PM
Cory 25
@6 That's what I thought... What's the deal with the 'biologically female' comment? Trans person or ultra feminist?

Otherwise, yeah. You sound a little sheltered and that you over-think things, AIASP.
Posted by Cory on August 31, 2010 at 4:51 PM
seandr 26
@23: Ummm, yeah, thanks. Might I suggest sprinkling my comment with a generous helping of irony and reading it again?
Posted by seandr on August 31, 2010 at 5:12 PM
27
Shit, after all these years I still don't know if it is possible for a woman to sexually assault (rape) a man unless the act involves a foreign object or results in some kind of serious physical damage. How can anything else be even remotely compared to sexual assaults on women by male perpetrators?

And when I say a man, I mean over the age of say fourteen.

From the roommate's perspective the young woman is humorously naive.
Posted by Approaching 40 in LA on August 31, 2010 at 5:21 PM
28
This is kind of random, but the title of this letter is also the title of one of my favorite porn wrestling stories. Obviously NSFW, and contains violence, although it's not anything bizarre (not that I don't enjoy some more over-the-top ones!). It's actually pretty well-written.

http://www.seakingsfemfight.com/stories/…
Posted by Brett Alan http://digitaldreamdoor.nutsie.com/pages/best_songs-Power-Pop.html on August 31, 2010 at 5:23 PM
Jaymz 29
The lack of detail on the roommate's response screws this entire letter - it makes a huge difference to me, and changes the context completely. Since we get the little comment that he "doesn't feel threatened and that I should stay" I must conclude with others that she is hysterical and depressed and embarassed that he did not accept her advances, and she wants to use some kind of excuse to slink away: "Please label me a horrible person, so I can leave honorably for your own good". Bull shit - grow up.
Posted by Jaymz on August 31, 2010 at 5:25 PM
30
Indeed, making a pass is not sexual assault.

Not only is it the case that our culture's ambivalent attitude to sex ('it's good but it's bad', 'it's healthy but it's shameful', etc.) leads to this overthinking; but current attitudes about male sexual violence and its importance and/or possible prevention add to this overthinking.

Sex ought to be simple. Do you want it? No? OK, cool. Yes? OH YES!

In our cultural climate, this is not simple. Despite the heroic efforts of people like Dan, this keeps not being simple. And there is no big reason for this lack of simplicity, other than traditional stereotypes, fears, and confusions.

Why can't we make it simple? What's the problem? What keeps us from jumping into simple mode when it comes to sex?
Posted by ankylosaur on August 31, 2010 at 5:49 PM
31
Er... it's sexual assault when the person you are pursuing is the one who is too drunk to say "No." It isn't assault when you, the pursuer, are the one who is too drunk to say "Yes."

I'm guessing that Roomie was in control of his faculties. You don't say whether he sent you away, or let you come in and drunkenly slobber all over him, but in either case he did what he wanted to do. Provided that you didn't physically hold his sober ass down and force yourself on him, anything that he did, he consented to do. If he consented, then it wasn't predation. Seriously, duh. Hell, he is probably more disappointed that you disavowed the whole thing the following morning.

You seem to be squicked by the "active consent" thing. (And yes, I'd say you've been hoist on your own Womyn's Studies petard, in that you now have firsthand experience of being drunk enough to do something that you regret the following morning, but you don't get to wriggle out of your own responsibility by claiming to be too drunk to "consent" to your own bad ideas. ) Why are you worrying about whether you consented? If you have daydreamed about doing this while sober, I'd say your drunkenness wasn't a factor in your consent, merely in your being daring enough to go for it. My question is, why would you never dare to do it while sober?
Posted by avast2006 on August 31, 2010 at 5:55 PM
32
@27: Ever see "40 Days and 40 Nights"? The movie about the college guy who gives up sex for Lent? Spoiler warning - On the last day, he's drugged or sleep-deprived or something, and ends up tied to a bed, and his ex-girlfriend comes in and rides him until he climaxes. He's semi-conscious at the time, and thinks he is having sex with his new girlfriend. Then he spends the last few minutes of the movie apologizing to new girlfriend for betraying her. Granted, this is a slightly unlikely scenario. My point, however, is that it could be possible to perform actions that would cause a restrained or incapacitated male's body to respond against his will. Hell, slip a roofie and a Viagra into his drink at a bar. Would you qualify that as rape?
Posted by jzimbert on August 31, 2010 at 6:23 PM
MLP 33
There are ALL SORTS of details left out of this. For example: How did you later find out that he was in his skivvies? Are you a tranny or just from Olympia? How did he react to your confession of lurrrrve? How did he react to your query about sleeping in his room? WHERE DID YOU ACTUALLY SLEEP? How did the follow-up conversation go? Were you sober when that happened? Did he seem skeeved out? Did he laugh out loud when you asked him if you should move?

You are either a horrible storyteller, or you totally phrased this entire scenario in such a way as to make you less/more of a bad guy then you actually are, OR you overreact to every single thing that has ever happened in your life and your friends are done listening so you turned to Dan Savage.
Posted by MLP on August 31, 2010 at 6:39 PM
34
@32, yeah, your body can respond even when you don't want it to. One thing that isn't well publicized is that women come during rapes (though it's hard to say if it's most or not). That -- in addition to the physical violence, risk of disease, mistreatment, etc -- is why it's such a mindfuck: you didn't want to but even your own body wouldn't do what you wanted to.

Posted by Mel on August 31, 2010 at 7:15 PM
35
RE: the 'men can't get raped' thing: what, is the world filled with attractive, disease-free women? Straight guys, imagine yourself getting drugged, tied up, whacked off, and then fucked by some woman who's totally gross looking and has, I dunno, sores or something. After enough manual stimulation, you would likely get hard, no matter how grossed out or creeped out you were. And if you didn't, there's always your ass. Are you telling me you wouldn't be messed up after that experience? Sheesh, you people have no imagination!

Posted by Mel on August 31, 2010 at 7:18 PM
36
Oh for fuck's sweet sake, let's not turn this into the interminable "is this rape?" discussion about consent, gender reversals, blah blah blah.
Yeah, I know: but not *this" letter.

She didn't rape anyone. It sounds like she didn't get through the doorway.
Can we please save the "what constitutes rape" discussion for a letter that warrants it?
Posted by nocutename on August 31, 2010 at 8:41 PM
37
@35 "Sheesh, you people have no imagination!"

Yes, and until 7:18 PM on Aug 31, 2010, that in fact served me very well.

Posted by Ed the Ed on August 31, 2010 at 10:23 PM
38
Dude i totally hate man-hating pseudo-scientific sex-scared intolerent feminists. nowadays all us super cool gender equality sex positive trans friendly scientific types get lumped in with those jerks, and women who admittedly agree that they should be allowed to vote deny they're feminists to avoid the label of idiot "reverse" bigot. and girls like this get some really dumb ideas in their head listening to those outdated ideas, thinking that's "feminism". it sucks. Maybe we should get a new word?

Posted by HK on September 1, 2010 at 12:05 AM
wockyjockey 39
@33's "Are you a tranny or just from Olympia?" FTW
Posted by wockyjockey on September 1, 2010 at 1:19 AM
40
Aaaand this is why dating undergraduates is a mistake.
Posted by Happy the Homophobe on September 1, 2010 at 1:23 AM
41
@15, If she didn't take no for an answer and stayed in the doorway drunkenly saying "pretty please", I'd say that was closer to annoyance than harrassment.
Posted by ggg on September 1, 2010 at 1:51 AM
42
@38: Ugh, right? I really want to stick to the word and just try and change it, but it's so bogged down. "Gender equalist" sounds idiotic though.
Posted by Gloria on September 1, 2010 at 7:16 AM
LogopolisMike 43
Why did we assume these people are in college?

Because if they aren't, or they aren't at least 18-22, then God help us all.

But for advice: Seriously, with the calm the fuck down. But also, if you want to feel better, tell your roommate that you feel like a shit for doing what you did. Don't make a big deal about it, because I guarantee that's going to make him more uncomfortable. But mention it casually without an expectation of him saying anything and you'll go a long way towards better communal living.
Posted by LogopolisMike http://logopolis.typepad.com on September 1, 2010 at 7:18 AM
44
In response to responses to me:) Feminist groups at my college in the 90s tended to interpret any unwanted advance as a sign of male aggression or sexual harassment. It was a bit ridiculous. I didn't think this represented feminism at all. I kind of assumed the LW was a college student based on the flashback caused by this letter...
Posted by JrzWrld on September 1, 2010 at 9:32 AM
Mittens Schrodinger 45
@ sirkowski...Has Andrea Dworkin EVER been pleased?
Posted by Mittens Schrodinger on September 1, 2010 at 1:28 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy