Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, August 12, 2010

That's a Mighty Big Dot, Republicans

Posted by on Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:31 PM

I love it when an infographic comes together, especially when it shows how ridiculous the Republican tax cuts for the rich really are. Here's the top of the chart comparing Democrat and Republican tax plans:

Screen_shot_2010-08-12_at_10.32.38_AM.png

And you can find the rest of the chart at the Washington Post. It's kind of mind-blowing. (Via StopBeck on Twitter.)

 

Comments (19) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Max Solomon 1
why are the dems even offering a tax-cut plan? just let the fucking thing expire and don't play the GOP's game.
Posted by Max Solomon on August 12, 2010 at 12:34 PM
Will in Seattle 2
Well, considering the Gov just announced 7 percent cutbacks ... all to build a Billionaires Tunnel we don't want and don't need and can't afford ...

Hey, what's a few starving people amongst friends?

I'm sure the foreign firms doing the tunnel work appreciate the bribes.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on August 12, 2010 at 12:38 PM
Will in Seattle 3
But @1 is correct, mind you.

Meanwhile Gibbs is railing at Dems who got him his job for telling him to stop being a pushover for the extremist America-hating Right.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on August 12, 2010 at 12:39 PM
balderdash 4
Like everything else cultural conservatives advocate, it makes perfect sense once you've bought into the basic postulates. Remember, rich people are good people, because if they weren't good people, they wouldn't work hard and get rich; and prosperity is also proof that Jesus loves you. For these reasons, rich, virtuous people deserve more tax cuts, while poor, lazy, good-for-nothing people should have to pay an equal share even if they can't afford, because it is, after all, their own lazy despicable fault that they're poor.
Posted by balderdash http://introverse.blogspot.com on August 12, 2010 at 12:42 PM
Kinison 5
@Will In Seattle

Every time you mention "Billionaires Tunnel" an monkey rapes a frog.

Seriously dude, if we reject the tunnel and build another viaduct, then it goes from Billionaires Tunnel to Billionaires Road. Followed by a Billionaires 520 Bridge, and a Billionaires Light Rail.

Posted by Kinison http://www.holgatehawks.com on August 12, 2010 at 12:49 PM
Will in Seattle 6
@5 no, not really. We can fully bond either a Rebuilt Viaduct or a Surface Plus Transit option without exceeding state, county, port, or city debt limits.

We can't do that with a Billionaires Tunnel and the resulting citywide tax on all households - as council admitted this week - can run up to $10,000 per household, renter or owner.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on August 12, 2010 at 12:59 PM
Fnarf 7
I think I speak for all of humanity when I say WILL IN SEATTLE, SHUT THE FUCK UP.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on August 12, 2010 at 1:11 PM
8
Um... I think you posted the wrong section of the chart. The part that's up there shows only one dollar difference between plans for those income levels.
Posted by Catbot on August 12, 2010 at 1:25 PM
venomlash 9
Wow...
If I should be so lucky as to be filthy rich, I'd still oppose this bullshit for the sake of those who aren't so lucky.

@7: Amen, my brutha from anotha mutha!
Posted by venomlash on August 12, 2010 at 1:25 PM
DOUG. 10
That's Democratic, dummy.
Posted by DOUG. http://www.dougsvotersguide.com on August 12, 2010 at 1:39 PM
11
@1 - Because these cuts were made 10 years ago. If the Dems did not offer a plan, those dots on the charts would represent the hole they just shot into your household budget.

I am a big fan of taxes, or at least many of the things they should secure for us, especially less regressive one's like income tax, but we should be spending our way out of a recession, and then skimming off the top of a humming economy.

@2 - Wrong government.

@Paul - I think the important critique here is that the Republican cuts for the rich are so out of scale, and the Washington Post did not properly compensate, that one can't simply look at the infographic and see that the Democratic plan is better for pretty much everybody.
Posted by Won't In Seattle on August 12, 2010 at 1:45 PM
Will in Seattle 12
@7 I speak for the trees.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on August 12, 2010 at 1:46 PM
Max Solomon 13
fnarf and will are the same person
Posted by Max Solomon on August 12, 2010 at 2:01 PM
Karlheinz Arschbomber 14
Fnarf is the Billionaires' WiS.
Posted by Karlheinz Arschbomber http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arschbombe on August 12, 2010 at 2:04 PM
JF 15
@13 Very funny stuff.
Posted by JF on August 12, 2010 at 2:18 PM
venomlash 16
@13: Not samefag. Look at the timestamps!

@12: If I see that fucking Lorax one more time...
Posted by venomlash on August 12, 2010 at 2:19 PM
Will in Seattle 17
ooh, i know one of 13 and 14 is correct, but i can't make up my mind. we need a poll.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on August 12, 2010 at 2:22 PM
18
So basically the Democratic tax cuts are slightly less fiscally irresponsible than the Republican tax cuts?
Posted by Proteus on August 12, 2010 at 2:25 PM
19
So, what'll it be America? Will the fruits of our economic production be broadly shared, or will they go to only a small elite group of rich people? Will we, as regular people, work to produce stuff for ourselves to enjoy, or slave away to make things for rich people in exchange for barely enough money to get by?

Will we be exploited, or will we be free?
Posted by I have always been... east coaster on August 15, 2010 at 6:33 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy