Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, July 26, 2010

Vitaminwater ≠ Vitamins + Water

Posted by on Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:59 AM

...and there's a lawsuit going forward against Vitaminwater's parent company—good ol' Coca-Cola—that would like to make this perfectly clear.

[U.S. District Court Judge John] Gleeson said Vitaminwater's use of the word "healthy" violates Food and Drug Administration labeling rules. In a 55-page opinion, Gleeson also took issue with the Vitaminwater's name, which fails to identify sugar as a key ingredient in the drink, though it is listed in nutrition information on the bottles.

The product's name and labeling could "reinforce a consumer's mistaken belief that the product is comprised of only vitamins and water," Gleeson wrote.

Coca-Cola tried to get the case dismissed, but no dice. More from the Associated Press over here.

 

Comments (18) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
And those fucks sucked me in to all those killer special shows and parties over at Sole Repair! I been DUPED!
Posted by Those FUCKS! on July 26, 2010 at 11:15 AM
Hernandez 2
Vitaminsugarwater? Or more accurately, Vitamincornsweetenerwater?

Do people really think that if you mix vitamins with water it magically tastes like lemonade, or orange? I would like to meet one of these consumers who cling to such a belief.
Posted by Hernandez http://hernandezlist.blogspot.com on July 26, 2010 at 11:16 AM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 3
Not to be confused with Coke, of course, which is basically Cornsweetenerwater (without the vitamins).
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on July 26, 2010 at 11:23 AM
Will in Seattle 4
I claim prior art in using Water.

Heck, I even wrote a story a few decades ago talking about Vitamin Water, so I guess they owe me royalties.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on July 26, 2010 at 11:25 AM
Josh Bis 5
Vitaminwater Zero, though. Strangely delicious and sugar free. It's my second favorite "zero" miracle drink ever, though it ranks far behind the beautiful elixir of life that is Coke Zero.
Posted by Josh Bis http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Author.html?oid=3815563 on July 26, 2010 at 11:30 AM
biju 6
So whats the deal with that Vitamin Water lounge? Looks um..weird.
Posted by biju on July 26, 2010 at 11:34 AM
Dougsf 7
Gleeson's paper must read like an old Seinfeld bit. "And what's the deal with Vitamin Water?..."
Posted by Dougsf on July 26, 2010 at 11:52 AM
Jason Josephes 8
If you don't read the label, you may as well say it has what plants crave.
Posted by Jason Josephes http://www.myspace.com/bluemoonseattle on July 26, 2010 at 12:05 PM
9
Really? How stupid are people that they don't know there's sweetener in there? The real question is whether those vitamins are in a form our body can digest. Now there would be a worthwhile case.
Posted by Root on July 26, 2010 at 12:12 PM
Will in Seattle 10
I prefer Vitamin K.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on July 26, 2010 at 12:25 PM
Q*bert H. Humphrey 11
@9, it's not that people are so "stupid" that they don't realize there's sweetener in there, it's that if you have an intentionally deceptive name, you're eventually going to get smacked down.
Posted by Q*bert H. Humphrey on July 26, 2010 at 12:44 PM
12
@11 Yes, people are stupid. If you look on the label it clearly says SUGAR 13G in the nutrition segment. If you read the list of ingredients, it has CRYSTALLINE FRUCTOSE CANE SUGAR as the third item. There is nothing deceptive about that. If a person thinks "Vitamin Water" means it only has vitamins and water, that person is stupid. I drink it because I can only drink so much water a day. There's less sugar than in sodas, and there's some health benefit.
Posted by Mr Moon on July 26, 2010 at 1:44 PM
in-frequent 13
grapenuts is next.
Posted by in-frequent on July 26, 2010 at 1:46 PM
14
@11

I don't see how it's deceptive. If it has water, and has vitamins, and has a list of all the ingredients in order, then the consumer can't complain.

I mean, you can't claim that "Corn Flakes" is deceptive because it has some chemical stabilizers in it.

Or, to reference a brilliant movie, that Girl Scout Cookies aren't made from real Girl Scouts.
Posted by Lymis on July 26, 2010 at 1:58 PM
in-frequent 15
the name vitimin water did always rub me the wrong way. it'd be like putting the word "green" in something that wasn't environmentally friendly. like, the hummer green-4. when it's clearly benefiting off the perceived characteristic it ought to actually have it. though the suit seems to be over the use of the word, "healthy," and not merely "vitamin." i agree. vitamin water is misleading. but finding a way to voice that in the form of a rule? good luck. the rule the plaintiffs are proposed seems too broad, that's for sure.
Posted by in-frequent on July 26, 2010 at 2:39 PM
16
@14... Adam's Family Values was brilliant?
Posted by okayokay on July 26, 2010 at 2:42 PM
treacle 17
I've been wondering about that "Vitaminwater Socialclub" that popped up in the previously-named Sole Repair space. What gives? Is it really funded by VitaminWater/CocaCola?
Posted by treacle on July 26, 2010 at 2:46 PM
piojin 18
Ugh. So fucking fed up with hearing about Vitamin Water. Haven't people realized it's just watered down Robitussin?

@17- My guess is it's a way to invade our daily activities and re-brand hipster culture. And it works. Just take a look at all the Facebook profile pics with "Vitaminwater" repeated in the background.
Posted by piojin on July 27, 2010 at 1:24 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy