Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, July 16, 2010

The Ground of Sperm

Posted by on Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 8:28 AM

Boule, a gene that makes sperm, is found to be almost universal in the production of animal life. It's found in flies, fish, birds, dogs, and us.

"This is the first clear evidence that suggests our ability to produce sperm is very ancient, probably originating at the dawn of animal evolution 600 million years ago," said Eugene Xu, assistant professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Feinberg. "This finding suggests that all animal sperm production likely comes from a common prototype."
What might be a practical application of this good piece of information? A male contraceptive with mild or no side effects.
When Xu's research group knocked out the Boule gene from a mouse, the animal appeared to be healthy but did not produce sperm.
Life on earth is so old.

 

Comments (17) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Vince 1
I wonder what that prototype was. Sponge like? Lived in the sea alright. Sponges release sperm and eggs. But what necessitated it's evolution? Bio diversity?
Posted by Vince on July 16, 2010 at 8:45 AM
2
a) This is awesome news.

b) Your link is broken.
Posted by justaguybutnotthesameastheregisteredjustaguy on July 16, 2010 at 8:46 AM
3
Awesome news ... if you want a treatment that leaves some large fraction of your male progeny permanently sterile, while having relatively little practical effect on your own fertility.

It's got some potential, though, as a sci-fi genocide premise.
Posted by RonK, Seattle on July 16, 2010 at 8:51 AM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 4
600 million years? Nah. Betcha it goes back a lot farther than that.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on July 16, 2010 at 8:58 AM
5
Have a little faith, RonK. It's a starting point. Nobody is saying that the best male contraceptive would be genetically engineering our children not to produce sperm. In the search for a male contraceptive, it is surely helpful to know the exact mechanism that causes sperm production, even if we don't know how to *temporarily* shut it off yet.
Posted by theguywhowrotecomment2 on July 16, 2010 at 9:00 AM
6
They don't have to knock the gene out forever, just halt its expression. Basically, trigger it to lie dormant until the owner wishes to take advantage of it. In either case, new progeny would have the gene by sheer nature of the fact they were created.
Posted by diggum on July 16, 2010 at 9:08 AM
Roma 7
That explains that huge Spermfest, the Super Boule.
Posted by Roma on July 16, 2010 at 9:27 AM
8
I can't find anything about 600 million years ago in the bible... So, you are probably incorrect.
Posted by SeattleSeven on July 16, 2010 at 9:39 AM
9
Unless you consider missing a gene to be "mild or no side effects".

Sorry ladies, genes before hos.
Posted by madcap on July 16, 2010 at 9:57 AM
thatsnotright 10
@7 That's clever. All organisms alive today carry genes that were present in the first life-forms to have DNA and RNA which pre-date this gene by many millions of years. We carry remnants of primordia.
Posted by thatsnotright on July 16, 2010 at 10:19 AM
Will in Seattle 11
@4 is right.

And actually, most of the things you think of as genes have various RNA and DNA segments that turn them on and off and make them do various other things, so even if we use one set of pathways, doesn't mean there aren't other prior pathways still encoded that you only have to trigger back on - sometimes it's 2 or 3 key genes to do that, but the coding is still there - usually in the "nonsense" regions people think don't do anything (but do).
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on July 16, 2010 at 10:25 AM
sirkowski 12
Mesozoic bukkake!
Posted by sirkowski http://www.missdynamite.com on July 16, 2010 at 10:47 AM
13
@6 - Read the effin' paper.

It's an interesting finding mostly due to its universality - which has no relation to its practical value in developing a male contraceptive.
Posted by RonK, Seattle on July 16, 2010 at 1:24 PM
venomlash 14
@6,11: Methylation FTW!

@12: I believe you mean "Paleozoic". Maybe even Precambrian.
Posted by venomlash on July 16, 2010 at 1:25 PM
sirkowski 15
But dinosaurs are probably better squirters than sponges.
Posted by sirkowski http://www.missdynamite.com on July 16, 2010 at 3:20 PM
Posted by venomlash on July 16, 2010 at 5:01 PM
sirkowski 17
Sea testicles?
Posted by sirkowski http://www.missdynamite.com on July 16, 2010 at 5:51 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy