Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Today in Stupid Comment Wrangling Ideas

Posted by on Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:25 AM

Want to write a comment on The Sun Chronicle's website? Pay The Sun Chronicle.

Apparently the news staff had become so sick of riling commenters that it killed its comments system completely back in April. After months of mulling over his options, publisher Oreste P. D'Arconte has decided that the best way to enforce rules in comments is to rid them of anonymity. The best way to be sure that users are using their real names? Charge them a one-time payment of $0.99 and make them use a valid credit card, of course!

This will not save journalism.

 

Comments (33) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Packeteer 1
Blizzard tried a similar thing and their fanatically loyal fan base freaked out. Who does The Sun Chronicle think they are?
http://www.internetevolution.com/author.…
Posted by Packeteer on July 14, 2010 at 11:33 AM
2
Um... same price as an ap, and if it's a website you go to a lot, and one where you comment constantly, it doesn't seem to dear to me. I think it might be a good idea...
Posted by Dan Savage on July 14, 2010 at 11:39 AM
3
IZ MY RIGHT AS AMERICAN TO SAY MOTHER FUCK U DAN SAVADGE!!! FREE OF CHARGE!!!

Actually, based on the average comment on newspaper websites (slog excluded, of course), I'd like to see them cost something on the order of fifty or sixty bucks...they're all pretty horrible.
Posted by free and loud on July 14, 2010 at 11:44 AM
4
My tiny hometown newspaper just did the same thing a few weeks ago. Now that there is no anonymous commenting, the comments are actually civil (instead of repeated rantings about how the illegals are ruining everything -- California farm town newspaper) but there are about 95% fewer comments.
Posted by Luckier on July 14, 2010 at 11:44 AM
5
good idea--the comments on news sites are the worst we have to offer as a species. the less anonymous sniping the better!
Posted by sunseed on July 14, 2010 at 11:46 AM
Joe Szilagyi 6
@2 Honestly, what you do is charge a fee equal to your credit card transaction fee. $0.30 or so?
Posted by Joe Szilagyi http://twitter.com/joeszi on July 14, 2010 at 11:48 AM
merry 7
What the heck ever happened to Loveschild, anyway?

Posted by merry on July 14, 2010 at 11:54 AM
Fnarf 8
I agree with @3 and @4. Daily newspaper comment sections are home to the lowest forms of human life. You'd have to pay ME a lot more than 99 cents to read the comments at the Seattle Times. 99 bucks an hour, maybe.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on July 14, 2010 at 11:56 AM
gttim 9
My hometown paper started comments years ago, and very briefly it seemed like a good idea. Then the right wing trolls started up. They really made no effort to reign them in, and it is just a cesspool now. I am far less likely to visit the site, and if I do I rarely if ever check the comments. On the bright side, the page view counts have to be up because the trolls keep refreshing the page.

I firmly believe you have to keep a tight grip on the comments, and I support any method of doing so. I like when Slog went to hiding unregistered comments. It made the place a little nicer.

My favorite forum now is one where any mention of politics is immediately deleted and the writer given a warning. A few offenses will get you banned. Insulting people or being a dick will get you banned. The people stay on the forum's topic and we have a great change of ideas. Thousand of posts a day and everybody stays civil.
Posted by gttim on July 14, 2010 at 12:01 PM
10
Geez, in the old days if you wanted to post in the "comments" section you had to write it down on a piece of paper (every time!) and then pay someone (every time!) to carry it to the newspaper's office and then people who worked there would vote on which ones would get posted in the "Letters To The Editor" page.
Posted by tiktok on July 14, 2010 at 12:06 PM
Fistique 11
Charge commenters a million fucking dollars. Awful, awful people, all of them.
Posted by Fistique on July 14, 2010 at 12:07 PM
Julie in Eugene 12
A political blog I read recently went to a commenting system where you have to have a Facebook account to register an account, and your account name is your Facebook account's name (i.e., you have to use your real name). I don't mind it all that much for that site, but it wouldn't work for most other sites I think.

Commenting around here works pretty well these days. We'll see what I think once the mid-terms get closer, but for now it's pretty good...
Posted by Julie in Eugene on July 14, 2010 at 12:08 PM
Matt the Engineer 13
Here's an idea. First, charge somethig small per comment - say a nickel. But with each comment include a "delete" button, and charge $1 per deletion. I can imagine trolls deleting each other's comments left and right, earning serious money for the paper. Ooh, or for $10 let people add a "this commenter is a moron" tag to someone else's name and another $5 to remove it.
Posted by Matt the Engineer on July 14, 2010 at 12:10 PM
Joe Szilagyi 14
Or, Stranger can go all web 2.0. I'm rather fond of the very simple system at Techdirt.com:

http://techdirt.com/articles/20100713/10…

Good sample post. Threading makes it insanely easy to follow discussions; the three buttons allow for modding up/down of comments.
Posted by Joe Szilagyi http://twitter.com/joeszi on July 14, 2010 at 12:11 PM
15
@9:
My favorite forum now is one where any mention of politics is immediately deleted and the writer given a warning. A few offenses will get you banned. Insulting people or being a dick will get you banned. The people stay on the forum's topic and we have a great change of ideas. Thousand of posts a day and everybody stays civil.


What you're supporting here is not polite discussion, but the complete absence of discussion.
Posted by Proteus on July 14, 2010 at 12:12 PM
16
Newspaper should defuse the $.99 charge by letting users choose a charity and then match the donation. You pay $1 to comment, charity of your choice gets a $2 donation.
Posted by Mr John on July 14, 2010 at 12:13 PM
TVDinner 17
@13: Could we have a button to hide a specific user's comments? I'll pay a metric fuckton to hide Will's comments permanently.
Posted by TVDinner http:// on July 14, 2010 at 12:14 PM
Julie in Eugene 18
@15 Depends. If the forum's topic is scrapbooking or something, then all they're doing is keeping it on topic.
Posted by Julie in Eugene on July 14, 2010 at 12:16 PM
Will in Seattle 19
@1 ftw. The funny thing is RealID doesn't work.

@17 use greasemonkey u lazy fuck. I have to read your crap.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on July 14, 2010 at 12:27 PM
Mattini 20
@1 I immediately thought of Blizzard also. One of the Bliz CMs posted his real name in defense of the policy, and within hours fans had posted links to his Facebook and twitter, photos of him, names of his family members, his home address and even a photo thanks to google maps. He deleted his accounts and Blizzard has since reversed their decision to show full names on their forums.
Posted by Mattini on July 14, 2010 at 12:36 PM
Hernandez 21
@19 The difference being that TVDinner does not insist on commenting on every single Slog post ever, regardless of whether he/she has anything useful or relevant to say. That is a significant difference.
Posted by Hernandez http://hernandezlist.blogspot.com on July 14, 2010 at 12:39 PM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 22
The other difference being that TV Dinner isn't a fucking imbecile.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on July 14, 2010 at 12:48 PM
Will in Seattle 23
@21 I just comment on the ones you read. Try reading more of the music threads or most of the foodie stuff that I rarely comment on.

As an experiment, I tried not commenting on some topics for a few days, and noticed that people didn't comment on a lot of local items instead. So I add to the discourse - the existence of a comment tends to cause others to comment.

Fascinating to watch, actually. You're so gullible - all they have to do is throw certain phrases into the title and you react.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on July 14, 2010 at 1:14 PM
TVDinner 24
I always have something useful and relevant to say, Hernandez. Always.
Posted by TVDinner http:// on July 14, 2010 at 1:24 PM
25
Will points out that he doesn't comment on everything, by posting three of 25 comments in this thread alone... I'm sure that number will rise.
Posted by Jeff on July 14, 2010 at 1:34 PM
26
The ability to post comments ruined the internet
Posted by Peter F on July 14, 2010 at 1:34 PM
Leslie N. 27
I love the script jade gave to me the other day (hiding registered commenters). I haven't hidden Will yet, but nothing can be ruled out.

TVDinner, here's what I use: http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/4858…
Posted by Leslie N. on July 14, 2010 at 1:39 PM
TVDinner 28
@27: I fucking love you, and I want to blow Jon Collins.

Thank you.
Posted by TVDinner http:// on July 14, 2010 at 1:43 PM
Hernandez 29
@24 You're one of the good ones, my dear.
Posted by Hernandez http://hernandezlist.blogspot.com on July 14, 2010 at 2:07 PM
Fnarf 30
@23, "I add to the discourse" -- that's the funniest thing you've ever written. The only thing you add to the discourse is excrement.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on July 14, 2010 at 2:31 PM
Joe Szilagyi 31
@27 thank you so much for that. There is one person I've wanted to block from my sight for some time.
Posted by Joe Szilagyi http://twitter.com/joeszi on July 14, 2010 at 2:51 PM
Q*bert H. Humphrey 32
Oh wow, I just installed the greasemonkey script to filter Will and the internet already feels like a better place. Now all I need is something to filter the final unnecessary (usually marxist) last paragraph from Charles's posts.
Posted by Q*bert H. Humphrey on July 15, 2010 at 1:23 AM
Fenrox 33
Yeah I like this. A good news site should moderate the comments, useless comments (Hate and racism, sexism, insults) don't have a place in the discourse of the news.

If I were the editor I too would be FED UP moderating all the racist, sexist, ass-stupid people that frequent my site. SO I would charge money, the thing nobody wants to give the news.

Or I guess you could just get a filter to deny comments with bad words.
Posted by Fenrox on July 15, 2010 at 10:00 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy