Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, July 9, 2010

You Want to Write? Prove You Can Read

Posted by on Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:25 PM

This has been the kerfluffle flavor of the week on the lit-blogs: Partners West sums it up pretty well:

A few days ago, Tin House came up with a great little idea, called Buy a Book, Save a Bookstore. It required writers who submit unsolicited manuscripts to purchase a book at an independent bookstore and send the receipt along with the submission.

People on litblogs are OUTRAGED, and they are responding with outraged-people-on-the-internet weapons, which is to say, they are employing weird false analogies:

I think it’s ridiculous and offensive. Writers are readers. This is well established. That’s like asking a drug addict to bring a receipt for their last score before selling them more heroin.

I was a reader/volunteer for Tin House a few years ago and am only recently getting over how false, lousy and ridden with middle-brow elitism their entire organization is..
Imagine a wax apple that insists it’s a real apple because it has none of the visible flaws that real apples have. Though it turns out it’s still real enough to be rotten once you bite into it.

Having had a night to sleep on the Tin House policy, I have had a change of heart. What a brilliant concept. We at Dzanc Books will now require a resume and college and grad school transcript — there must of course be grad school — with all unsolicited manuscripts. The submitter will be required to provide a reading list of all the books they’ve read in the last five years. We at Dzanc will also provide a reading list and the submitter will need to have read each book on our list and provide a review. Failure to meet these standards, the submitter will have to bake us a cake. And not just a cake but a poetic cake, and a film of them baking the cake. As we receive thousands of submissions a year at Dzanc, we have every right and reason to limit the folly of would be submitters thinking they can just submit us their work. This is brilliant. Thank you Tin House for blazing this trail.

Here's what I think: The receipt idea is heavy-handed, but it's coming from a good place, and besides,Tin House can do whatever the fuck they want with their own business. Or heroin trade. Or wax apple. Or whatever.

 

Comments (11) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Wow, reading those comments I'm dying to read their unsolicited manuscripts. Not.
Posted by tiktok on July 9, 2010 at 3:34 PM
rob! 2
You're getting your imbroglio/brouhahas mixed up with your fluffers. It's kerfuffle (one L, near the end).
Posted by rob! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZBdUceCL5U on July 9, 2010 at 3:36 PM
Will in Seattle 3
So long as they cut the cover charge, I'm cool with that.

The only people scared off by receipts are those who aren't really participating.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on July 9, 2010 at 3:44 PM
vooodooo84 4
Rotten Wax? consider mind blown
Posted by vooodooo84 on July 9, 2010 at 3:53 PM
5
Yes, they can do whatever the hell they want. But people are entirely justified in criticizing what can only be described as an elitist, asinine policy. The fact that it comes "from a good place" is entirely irrelevant. The UK is a good place, but the Vegemite that comes out of it is still awful, and I wouldn't get defensive if someone complained about it.
Posted by thursdaydynamo on July 9, 2010 at 3:56 PM
Estey 6
Tin House is a good magazine. This shows their intelligence and awareness of people who want to be writers, but don't stay current with the great stuff that's out there being published all the time. And you need to be. There's no argument. When I run into someone who wants to be a writer and they don't have any books or articles they've read recently that they feel passionately about one way or another, or can't name some of the better, less well known authors in their attempted field, I don't have much hope for their work. I'm occasionally surprised otherwise, but usually not.
Posted by Estey on July 9, 2010 at 4:03 PM
Fnarf 7
@5, them's fighting words. Not "Vegemite is awful" but "Vegemite comes from the UK". Vegemite comes from Australia, and people in the UK are bitterly partisan about their own yeast extract, which is called Marmite.

Both are delicious, by the way. I have jars of both at home, and enjoy them equally.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on July 9, 2010 at 4:10 PM
Will in Seattle 8
I prefer Occucite.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on July 9, 2010 at 4:52 PM
care bear 9
@7 How are they different?
Posted by care bear on July 9, 2010 at 4:57 PM
Fnarf 10
@9, a Brit or an Aussie would punch me in the face for saying this, but they're not hugely different. Marmite's a little darker, a little thicker, and a little bitterer. Vegemite's a lighter brown and a little easier to spread.

I once ordered a commemorative jar of special Guinness Marmite from the UK, and when it arrived, the pressure in the cargo plane or something had caused a good half of the contents to ooze out past the still-intact seal, rendering the entire package a squishy, sticky dark brown mess that the mailman was really not happy about delivering.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on July 9, 2010 at 5:09 PM
venomlash 11
QQ MOAR. Seriously, people, it's their fucking bookstore.
Posted by venomlash on July 9, 2010 at 7:13 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy