In the new Artforum, Rem Koolhaas talks about what he's doing to the Hermitage in St. Petersburg (he says it's not curatorial, but it sounds curatorial to me), and he talks about the Bilbao Effect. Bilbao is the city in the Basque region of Spain that became a tourist attraction because of Frank Gehry's Guggenheim building, which is all swoopy and sparkling.
I remember when starting the competition for the MAXXI museum in Rome, the director told us, "We want the museum to do for Rome what Gehry did for Bilbao." The city with Saint Peter's and the Pantheon needs a Bilbao? I think that this is really the danger of Bilbao: It works in a city that had nothing, less in one that has everything. It threatens to provincialize major cities with massive histories, because by seemingly answering the need for an identity in cities that already have an abundance of identity, you in fact diminish it all.
Meanwhile he defends his CCTV building as "modest" and distances himself from "anti-Bilbao discourse":
And the effect of this is really quite sinister, because it's also become the basis of an anti-Bilbao discourse that is now so strong—for instance, I have people telling me that the CCTV building, this new icon, has ruined the entire city of Beijing. But Beijing's a city that already has thousands of icons, and this is only one of them. CCTV is therefore much more modest than this kind of critique acknowledges.
Editor Tim Griffin asks Koolhaas:
So basically what you're saying is that you see CCTV fitting with the syntax of the city?
Rem:
It's not only a syntactical thing but a statistical thing. A city with the history and urban richness of Beijing just cannot be ruined by one building.
Rem, you're killing me.
2
6
10
Comments (12) RSS