Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, June 16, 2010

How to Ruin A City

Posted by on Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 3:48 PM

In the new Artforum, Rem Koolhaas talks about what he's doing to the Hermitage in St. Petersburg (he says it's not curatorial, but it sounds curatorial to me), and he talks about the Bilbao Effect. Bilbao is the city in the Basque region of Spain that became a tourist attraction because of Frank Gehry's Guggenheim building, which is all swoopy and sparkling.

I remember when starting the competition for the MAXXI museum in Rome, the director told us, "We want the museum to do for Rome what Gehry did for Bilbao." The city with Saint Peter's and the Pantheon needs a Bilbao? I think that this is really the danger of Bilbao: It works in a city that had nothing, less in one that has everything. It threatens to provincialize major cities with massive histories, because by seemingly answering the need for an identity in cities that already have an abundance of identity, you in fact diminish it all.

Meanwhile he defends his CCTV building as "modest" and distances himself from "anti-Bilbao discourse":

And the effect of this is really quite sinister, because it's also become the basis of an anti-Bilbao discourse that is now so strong—for instance, I have people telling me that the CCTV building, this new icon, has ruined the entire city of Beijing. But Beijing's a city that already has thousands of icons, and this is only one of them. CCTV is therefore much more modest than this kind of critique acknowledges.

Editor Tim Griffin asks Koolhaas:

So basically what you're saying is that you see CCTV fitting with the syntax of the city?

Rem:

It's not only a syntactical thing but a statistical thing. A city with the history and urban richness of Beijing just cannot be ruined by one building.

Rem, you're killing me.

 

Comments (12) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
I can just imagine the conversations going on when they decided to build St. Peter's Cathedral:

Architect: It'll be spectacular, one of the highlights of the city!

Reactionary: Rome already has the Colosseum, the Pantheon, the Forum! Your modern architecture will destroy the city!
Posted by also on June 16, 2010 at 3:54 PM
Will in Seattle 2
It's Beijing.

Most days you're lucky if you can see 10 blocks away.

How can that "destroy the aesthetic of the city"?

Pollution already did that.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on June 16, 2010 at 4:08 PM
Fnarf 3
It takes a bold architect to admit that not even his building is bad enough to destroy a city.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on June 16, 2010 at 4:22 PM
Max Solomon 4
starchitects make their own reality.
Posted by Max Solomon on June 16, 2010 at 4:22 PM
Will in Seattle 5
@4 yeah, but try to get them to make their own coffee ...
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on June 16, 2010 at 5:03 PM
Max Solomon 6
true that will - at my office, it's the stars who go out to starbucks, etc., and the plebes who pull their own. espresso.
Posted by Max Solomon on June 16, 2010 at 5:06 PM
7
The man designed a fucking giant pooper.
Posted by dirge on June 16, 2010 at 6:10 PM
Unregistered User 8
NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
NO
НЕТ!
ЧЕГО?

Don't ruin St. Petersburg. Raskolnikov, please fix this.
Posted by Unregistered User on June 16, 2010 at 6:17 PM
9
Having been to the Hermitage many, many times since the late 80's, I will say that the exhibition diplays could use some updating. It's an amazing building and there is amazing artwork, but the display of many works is grounded in the 60s and 70s - outdated and in some cases dilapidated. They have not asked him to actually replace or update the building, but to reimagine and renovate the displays of art works.
Posted by Byl tam mnogo, mnogo raz on June 16, 2010 at 7:56 PM
elenchos 10
So the Guggenheim destroyed all art and Koolhaus (and Gehry or just Koolhaus?) destroyed all architecture?

What's left? TV? Oh, wait, I bet Season 6 of Lost ruined TV now and forever, didn't it?
Posted by elenchos on June 16, 2010 at 9:47 PM
HuskyQuaker 11
I am Sharkitect, I can haz square doughnut building for you to see through.
Posted by HuskyQuaker on June 17, 2010 at 12:07 AM
12
I don't know about Beijing and other examples, but what he's proposing for the Hermitage sounds spot-on actually: no architectural development, but splitting it up into individual chunks to go with the individual buildings, more public entrances, more individual gallery spaces that align with the feel of the buildings, for temporary exhibitions.
The Hermitage is a thing of wonder but it really could use a bold yet humble architectural/curatorial eye. Judging by his answers, he's thinking about it exactly right.

Speaking as someone born and raised in St Petersburg. I hope he does it, and I hope it works out like I'm imagining.
Posted by gavastik on June 17, 2010 at 1:10 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy