Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, June 14, 2010

Mid-Year Budget Slashes Funding for Cops, Park Maintainence, Wading Pools, Library Staff

Posted by on Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 3:21 PM

The city's budget to hire more cops, maintain parks, and keep certain city jobs is being slashed according to mid-year cuts outlined today by Beth Goldberg, the city's acting finance director. The most contentious item, by far, is the salary for 21 additional police officers that the city council budgeted for last year with $2.1 million.

Jean Godden, chair of the city council's budget committee, issued a statement this afternoon thanking the mayor for the budget proposal, but tacked on a salty note: “I am concerned that the Mayor has slowed the hiring of police officers this year. We remain committed to working with him to implement the Neighborhood Policing Plan as soon as possible."

Owing to declining tax revenues, Mayor Mike McGinn must cut $11.7 million from the city's general fund for the rest of 2010. McGinn maintained funding for firefighters, citing the death of five people in a fire in Fremont over the weekend.

In all, $12.4 million is savings are culled from several departments. Among them: Parks will lose $1.67 million, largely by cutting maintenance of lawns and trash, reducing personnel costs, and shutting down and reducing access to wading pools (only five wading pools will be open seven days a week: Greenlake, Lincoln, Magnuson, Van Asselt, and Volunteer Park); libraries lose $1.17 million, largely by cutting staff but not by reducing any library hours; human services is losing about $246,000 in salary and operating costs. Lots of other programs are being severely cut (full outline in this .pdf).

Godden's criticism about police hiring echoes a letter from the full council to the mayor in April, which said, "We are troubled by the halt in hiring net new officers and that this decision was made without consulting the Council.... We request that you direct the Chief of Police to proceed with the hiring necessary to keep the city on track to achieve a net increase of 20 patrol officers this year."

Goldberg says the cuts to police are justified. "I would say that if we didn't find the cuts in police, we would make more cuts to things like libraries, parks, and things of that nature," she says. "We have heard from communities that they value these services, and we feel that the package we have put forward continues to emphasize public safety, with officers on patrol being at record high levels."

Even at existing police staffing, 911 call response times are improving, with a record 556 sworn officers are able to respond to emergency calls. In 2008, the average response was 7.5 minutes, in 2009 it was 6.5 minutes, and so far this year, it is 6 minutes or less, says Goldberg.

Despite the council's calls to step up the number of officers—in line with the city's neighborhood policing plan, which calls for 20 more officers a year—the plan "made it very clear that if the city found itself in financial stress there would be delay of implementation," Goldebrg says, "and I would say it is clear we are in a time of financial distress."

Godden's office has asked the mayor to issue a plan on how to meet the city's long-range goal of hiring 100 new officers over five years, possibly by delaying the time line.

But even next year, the city is facing a $56 million shortfall. Goldberg has outlined various scenarios for those cuts—which also don't boost the number f officers—which I detail over here.

The mayor is also cutting 13 full-time positions: planning and development specialist, housing ordinance specialist, administrative specialist, administrative specialist, graphics arts designer, strategic advisor, training development & program coordinator, senior personnel analyst, IT specialist/programmer analyst, administrative assistant, training program coordinator, and a technology operations assistant. Those layoffs take effect on July 20.

 

Comments (16) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Cato the Younger Younger 1
Wonder how long it will take before the city starts selling parks to the highest bidder? I mean who needs public parks anyway? You Ron Paul fans would agree with that, right?
Posted by Cato the Younger Younger on June 14, 2010 at 3:25 PM
Telsa 2
It might have to come down to neighbourhood parks and parkettes being commandeered by local residents and maintained by them on a voluntary basis.

That could be controversial and provocative.
Posted by Telsa on June 14, 2010 at 3:44 PM
Reverse Polarity 3
Jean Godden's concerns are noted. But unless she's willing to shit $12 million out of her own pocket, then the cuts have to come from somewhere. The city cannot deficit spend. If the money isn't there, then there is no choice but to cut. The only argument is to balance where the cuts come from.

If Godden wants to insure the continued hiring of new police, then she needs to come up with cuts in other programs to cover the cost.
Posted by Reverse Polarity on June 14, 2010 at 3:53 PM
Will in Seattle 4
If they got rid of overtime, they could afford not to cut police.

Mind you, Godden is trying to rip off Seattle voting citizens by forcing us to pony up for her Billionaires Tunnel for her comrades who know we voted against it and will never approve the $10,000 per Seattle household - renter or owner - that it's going to cost.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on June 14, 2010 at 4:03 PM
Max Solomon 5
@2: would neighbor maintenance committees post the same 'welcome transients - poop anywhere' signs that the city does?
Posted by Max Solomon on June 14, 2010 at 4:04 PM
Dougsf 6
@4 - Police overtime costs cities a lot, but it's a fraction of the money committed to investing in new officers.
Posted by Dougsf on June 14, 2010 at 4:13 PM
elenchos 7
Is 911 response time the only way that you measure policing? What about the crime rate? What about arrests? Convictions? Cases closed?

After all, Seattle is notorious for having police that triage violent crime in progress as their sole priority, while ignoring lesser crimes and not bothering to solve property crimes.

Are they having detectives respond to 911 calls? Is that the plan?
Posted by elenchos on June 14, 2010 at 4:21 PM
Will in Seattle 8
If they got rid of the Aurora Bridge fence for dummies, they could afford to keep the wading pools running.

Once again, it's all a matter of dollars. Council does not share our values, only those of the billionaires that think Seattle citizens are their serfs.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on June 14, 2010 at 4:26 PM
9
@8 Except the City isn't paying for the fence on the Aurora Bridge - the State is.
Posted by allieger on June 14, 2010 at 4:44 PM
Telsa 10
@5: No. They could just execute all transients, which assures they will definitively go away.
Posted by Telsa on June 14, 2010 at 4:48 PM
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://yrihf.com on June 14, 2010 at 5:09 PM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 12

So glad Mike McGoon was able to preserve the salaries of 6 figure "Senior Managers" but yet has the guts to cut teachers and policemen.

What a "Peoples' Mayor" this guy is...
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://yrihf.com on June 14, 2010 at 5:27 PM
NaFun 13
Could the city use volunteers to man the wading pools this summer? I'd love to still be able to take the kid over to use the one near our house....

Posted by NaFun http://www.dancesafe.org on June 14, 2010 at 6:13 PM
MrBaker 14
So much for Walk, Bilk, Wait for the Bus

Where are you getting that 30 million from McSandbag?

He is telling the Cascade Bycycle Club one thing and doing another, oh the backlash . . . will not arrive.
Let them eat sharrows, I guess.
He's a hypocrite, but he's your hypocrete, just sit silently, wait for the next empty promise. . . Did not have to wait long, how is that broadband for all thing going? Oh, wow, look at that budget cut, sorry poor nerds, let them eat dialup.

McSandbag voters, you smelt him, you delt him.
Posted by MrBaker http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ on June 14, 2010 at 7:55 PM
15
Well it didn't take long for McGinn to retaliate against Seattle's toddlers for not voting for him.
Posted by Zander on June 14, 2010 at 8:06 PM
Hernandez 16
@13 That'd be great, but from a liability standpoint I just don't see it happening. Say little Johnny manages to hurt himself at a wading pool supervised by a volunteer with no formal training in water safety - do you think the city wants to expose itself to that lawsuit? My guess is no. Nice idea, though.
Posted by Hernandez http://hernandezlist.blogspot.com on June 15, 2010 at 10:37 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy