Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, June 10, 2010

Our National Discussion About Homosexuality

Posted by on Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:58 PM

We're having "a national discussion about homosexuality"—and we will continue to have that national discussion—because of DADT and because of employment discrimination and because of marriage inequality. If members of Congress want to end this "national discussion," if they want to protect seven-year-olds from hearing about gay people, then they should scrap DADT, pass ENDA, repeal DOMA, and allow gay people to marry. Poof! No more national discussion of homosexuality!

But our national discussion about homosexuality will continue so long as it's legal to discriminate against gay people. Stop discriminating against us and there won't be much to discuss.

 

Comments (13) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
w7ngman 1
Uh, no.
Posted by w7ngman http://userscripts.org/users/89370 on June 10, 2010 at 5:15 PM
kim in portland 2
Finally some flippin' honesty. As much as I hate this delay. As much as it irks me that Rep. Ike Skelton should think he needs to determine what is and isn't okay for us to discuss with our children. I appreciate the honesty.

Personal anecdote, but my dad voted in favor of Prop 8 and one of his reasons was that he feared for his grandchildren to learn about gays and "gay sex". Needless to say he had his mind blown by all of his grandchildren, when they told them that comprehensive sex education had already taught them about "gay sex" and that having family members and classmates who were openly gay meant that they already knew that "gays" existed. A bit of a shock for grandpa to learn that ignorance doesn't protect innocence. I suspect that he really wasn't surprised by his grandchildren, he was allowing his fear to find a "legitimate" reason to justify his position, especially as his grandchildren live in Washington and Oregon. I could be wrong, though.

I hope Rep. Ike Skelton comes around, like my dad finally did.
Posted by kim in portland http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2010/11/fast-paced_video_provides_a_fu.html on June 10, 2010 at 5:19 PM
very bad homo 3
I am pretty sure they will never stop obsessing over us.
Posted by very bad homo on June 10, 2010 at 5:31 PM
Will in Seattle 4
Wake me when you guys actually do something.

Canada got rid of the equivalent of DADT more than 22 years ago and many of the honoured dead soldiers that died fighting in Afghanistan were openly gay. Buried with full military honours, parades on national TV ... and here?

Nothing.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on June 10, 2010 at 5:36 PM
raindrop 5
Maddow needs neckware. That vast V of flesh is so distracting.
Posted by raindrop on June 10, 2010 at 5:50 PM
Reverse Polarity 6
Yes of course. Because if we don't talk about gays, we can pretend they don't exist. If we pretend they don't exist, little impressionable kiddies won't hear about them, and won't be converted.

What a dumbass.
Posted by Reverse Polarity on June 10, 2010 at 6:12 PM
7
Crazy, pandering re-election talk. Iowa is serving up gay married cooties right next door to Missouri, Rep. Skelton's state.
Posted by cgd on June 10, 2010 at 6:57 PM
Cory 8
I'm tempted to accuse Ike of hanging around in airport bathrooms while his friend is waiting outside holding his bags.
Posted by Cory on June 10, 2010 at 8:05 PM
Anne in MA 9
You know, I take this nonsense as a compliment, really. Apparently, as far as the theocons are concerned, being gay is so damn appealing that the mere mention of it to impressionable young minds will sends hordes of them flocking to the (in)fertile lands of Sodom and Gomorrah. Gosh, if I'd known it was so easy, I would have started corrupting my fellow ladies long ago in hopes of increasing my dating pool.

It's all quite flattering, really.
Posted by Anne in MA on June 10, 2010 at 8:07 PM
10
On the subject of DADT, anybody see Tom the Dancing Bug this week? http://wpcomics.washingtonpost.com/clien…
Posted by agony on June 10, 2010 at 10:21 PM
venomlash 11
Should we also not discuss issues of religious freedom and tolerance so that parents don't have to tell their 7-year-olds that some people don't believe in Jesus? Or how about race relations; should we not bring up that subject so that little kids don't have to hear about how some people look different from others?
Posted by venomlash on June 10, 2010 at 10:44 PM
Cato the Younger Younger 12
Dino Rossi says he will take orders directly from the Pope if elected to the US Senate.
Posted by Cato the Younger Younger on June 11, 2010 at 6:51 AM
13
Oh good flipping grief. I'm a straight woman and my husband and I have a seven year old. The conversation goes like this: Kiddo, most men want to hug and kiss and marry a woman, and most women want to hug and kiss and marry a man, like mama and daddy. But some women want to hug and kiss and marry a woman, and some men want to hug and kiss and marry a man. Like, you know, these examples of our friends of one persuasion or another. Just like you and dad like root beer but mama doesn't, people sometimes like different things in life. And that's cool, either way.

His response? "Oh. Okay."

It's harder to talk about why he had an argument with the kid down the block or why I won't buy more Legos when Legos are clearly the best thing on the planet. Tough parenting conversations? Try the time the hermit crab died.

I look forward to the day--within my lifetime, please!--when we as a nation can get the hell over this already.
Posted by MN on June 11, 2010 at 1:00 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy