Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, June 4, 2010

SPD Restricts Access to Incident Reports

Posted by on Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 1:06 PM

Under its new online system fully implemented this week for publishing police records, the Seattle Police Department is restricting media access to most of the incident reports that used to be available at precinct headquarters. Getting the remaining police records will now require records requests that could take up to a month or more to fulfill, and could cost media outlets around $50 per day.

The new system is intended to "be more convenient and easier for the public," according to an email from SPD spokeswoman Renee Witt yesterday afternoon. The new system allows the public, bloggers, and reporters alike to quickly access police reports on the SPD website.

Reports used to be kept at precincts on CDs—which contained about 60 to 100 reports per day—and the new system lives entirely online. But of those online records, only about 15 reports were provided per day on average this week, about a quarter of the records previously available.

Casey McNerthey, a crime reporter at Seattlepi.com, says, "I do have concerns about it." The online records "provide information to more poeple," he says, but reporters "certainly did get more information when there were copies on CDs at precincts. I think it makes it more difficult."


Online reports include only homicides, assaults, burglaries, and robberies. An assortment of other crimes, such as car prowls and miscellaneous police calls, are no longer available online—nor will the available on on CDs.

"This is actually trying to help you guys out in making it easier to obtain this information," says Detective Mark Jamieson, a spokesman for the SPD. The four categories chosen by the police are generally the crimes that make the biggest headlines, and this system ensures that none of those major crimes fall through the cracks in the reports. Jamieson says police may add more categories of crime if the departments increases its staff.

"You can still get the information," Jamieson continues, however "we can't post everything online. You are going to have to make a request for the reports that aren't posted."

But requesting the records presents significant delay and challenge. Dhea Holland, who works in the department's public record request unit, says police have five days to tell the person requesting documents how long it will take. Generally, she says, the records department would need press to "be as specific as possible requesting case numbers, names, addresses, and be specific to a certain area. They may be able to fulfill the request, but they may contact you and ask for additional information." If someone doesn't have all the specifics—if he or she simply asks for all the records from a given day— Holland says fulfilling the request "might take a little longer."

There is also a cost. After the first 20 pages, records cost 15 cents each. Reports average four to six pages each, Holland says. So if there are 80 reports in a day (about 400 pages), paying the fee for the reports would cost $57.75.

To be clear, we are not necessarily talking about huge cases (although it's unclear what cases could be omitted). But we are talking about a obscurity of police records, some of which may not fall under the categories posted online but have significance nonetheless. Creating a major obstacle for the media obtaining those records—and thereby an obstacle for the public learning about police activity—is problematic.

 

Comments (12) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
TVDinner 1
Three cheers for transparency, huh?
Posted by TVDinner http:// on June 4, 2010 at 1:16 PM
Joe Szilagyi 2
This makes zero sense from any kind of rational IT perspective. What Mickey Mouse developer sold them a hobbled system?
Posted by Joe Szilagyi http://www.joeszilagyi.com on June 4, 2010 at 1:20 PM
ROAG 3
Back in the day each precinct photocopied all the reports same day and put them in a notebook for reporters. There was an element of trust involved. (imagine!) Eventually they started redacting information (with a black marker), but apparently every report was still there. Now...
Posted by ROAG on June 4, 2010 at 1:27 PM
4
"nor will the available on on CDs"

Nice one, dickhead.
Posted by derp on June 4, 2010 at 1:30 PM
5
I don't get it. Why can't everything be posted online? Online storage is cheap, and if the reports could be put on a CD, they can just as easily be posted to a web site. Since it's not a technical issue or a cost issue, I'm going to assume that the "more convenient and easier for the public" line is BS and that it's actually an access issue. Hey, SPD! Don't piss on my leg and tell me it's raining!
Posted by Kalakalot on June 4, 2010 at 1:47 PM
stinkbug 6
Ugh, that interface needs to be improved.

As far as I can tell you can't look at a list of all the individual incidents for that day. You have to expand each specific category. Why can't I just Expand All?

Why can't they provide a map showing the general location of the incident so that I can browse incidents that way?
Posted by stinkbug on June 4, 2010 at 1:56 PM
rob! 7
Well, there's an issue that all the current candidates for police chief should address in public.

Is this being done now so the next chief, whoever he is, doesn't catch the blame for implementing it?
Posted by rob! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZBdUceCL5U on June 4, 2010 at 2:04 PM
Will in Seattle 8
It's all because some overly wacko parents are creating websites that show 'molesters' (and include every teen boy who slept with his girlfriend and got caught).
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on June 4, 2010 at 2:20 PM
welcometothemurk22 9
Planned obfuscation--- it's the new black.
Posted by welcometothemurk22 on June 4, 2010 at 2:25 PM
NaFun 10
So Police Beat just got a lot more expensive, hunh?
Posted by NaFun http://www.dancesafe.org on June 4, 2010 at 3:27 PM
Will in Seattle 11
correct, NaFun. Makes you wonder about the newsfeeds in the UW Daily and the neighborhood weeklies as well ...
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on June 4, 2010 at 4:00 PM
Cracker Jack 12
No, no really! The internet is almost full and the storage of records of the rampant crime in Seattle would mean less room for porn. We're doing YOU a favor!
Posted by Cracker Jack on June 4, 2010 at 9:45 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy