Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, June 3, 2010

Unsettling

Posted by on Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:21 PM

rotator-4.jpg
  • Matt Logue
Matt Logue's photos of empty Los Angeles streets (and other locations) are creepy and beautiful post-apocalyptic landscapes.

 

Comments (26) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
i think they are cool but not really unsettling. maybe i'm not that nervous about early morning photos of pavement. :)
Posted by beef on June 3, 2010 at 5:27 PM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 2
Betcha they weren't really empty. It's probably a l-o-n-g time exposure.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on June 3, 2010 at 5:36 PM
Fnarf 3
@2, when did you turn into Will in Seattle? Look at the clouds.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on June 3, 2010 at 5:47 PM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 4
And your point is?

I'll bet I've shot a whole hell of a lot more long time exposures than you have, Fnarf. In the early morning, a two- or three-minute time exposure through a neutral density filter would certainly be enough to "erase" cars whizzing by at 60 miles an hour, while still making everything else (including the clouds) look quite normal.

Don't try to teach your grandmother to suck eggs.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on June 3, 2010 at 5:54 PM
w7ngman 5
Nice shots.

I find it hard to believe those freeways are ever naturally empty.

He's being cryptic about his methodology: "I will say that it required a bit of patience..." -http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/77…

Long time exposure doesn't exactly require patience, nor does going there when the roads are closed.

I'm guessing he took a hundred or so photos over the course of a few minutes, then shopped all of the "empty" shadowless pieces together and normalized the lighting (if he even needed to).
Posted by w7ngman http://userscripts.org/users/89370 on June 3, 2010 at 6:10 PM
Fnarf 6
@4, I have no doubt as to your ability to suck eggs.

If you click on the link you will see birds in some of them. Perhaps they have magic birds in Denver that can hang motionless in the air for two or three minutes. Clouds and shadows, also: sharp as a tack. You're wrong.

W7ngman might be right, but I think the patience is about waiting for the moment. (At dawn, he would have had a lot of trouble "normalizing" the light, as it changes so rapidly).
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on June 3, 2010 at 6:15 PM
Reverse Polarity 7
I'm with w7ngman.

Tripod. 100 pics snapped in a minute or two. Photoshop.

Done.

Cool and weird looking. But not especially difficult. And yes, I expect it would take hours and hours of Photoshop to accomplish.
Posted by Reverse Polarity on June 3, 2010 at 6:35 PM
pissy mcslogbot 8
needs more Weinermobile...

http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archive…
Posted by pissy mcslogbot on June 3, 2010 at 6:43 PM
9
That process is how they did one of the first shots in this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tpx6o4gvm…
Posted by doceb on June 3, 2010 at 7:23 PM
seandr 10
If you wait long enough at the right time of day, I'm sure you can catch these places empty.
Posted by seandr on June 3, 2010 at 7:53 PM
giffy 11
@6 Photoshop is real.

I was intrigued, but I sure as hell am not paying 80 bucks for a book of pictures.
Posted by giffy on June 3, 2010 at 7:57 PM
Unregistered User 12
I guess, I don't know-I've spent lots of time walking/driving around LA at all times of the day and night and ended up in relatively empty parts of town. I usually spend part of thanksgiving day driving around LA, it's a good time for empty streets & places.

I'd wager empty freeway shots wouldn't be too hard if you took the right stretch of freeway at the right angle and waited at the right time of day. Empty downtown shots is like shooting fish in a freaking barrel. Empty street shots would only be tough because of the prevalence of street parking-I still see parked cars in several of those shots (not complaining, just saying it'd be nigh impossible to avoid in some places).

I like the photos, but I feel like they're not inspiring in me the right sense of awe or the feelings that they're meant to.
Posted by Unregistered User on June 3, 2010 at 8:41 PM
13
Freeways without cars are post-apocalyptic.

Freeways with cars are pre-apocalyptic.
Posted by Marsh on June 3, 2010 at 8:45 PM
Mahtli69 14
@10,@12 - That's the 405 right by LAX. There are always cars there. Always.
Posted by Mahtli69 on June 3, 2010 at 9:32 PM
15
yep listen to 14 -- there is never a time when there aren't lots of cars there, ever
Posted by LASAFUCKINNIGHTMARE on June 3, 2010 at 9:50 PM
16
Here's a similar concept, but with time-lapse.

http://vimeo.com/11986171
Posted by emor on June 3, 2010 at 9:52 PM
18
My very first day in America was a July 4th, spent in downtown LA. It looked just like that. And this was before photoshop was invented.
Posted by boyd main on June 3, 2010 at 10:54 PM
TVDinner 19
Looks like "Night of the Comet."
Posted by TVDinner http:// on June 3, 2010 at 11:27 PM
20
Hey Fnarf, here's how it was done- and yup, it's photoshop, though it's not nearly as cool (or hard) as the artist would have you believe. (and the clouds and birds are easily expained in the example)

Sorry to burst your bubble...

http://lifehacker.com/5549135/take-a-peo…
Posted by UNPAID COMMENTER on June 3, 2010 at 11:45 PM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 21

Given the 20 percent unemployment rate in CA, it's not unthinkable.
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://yrihf.com on June 4, 2010 at 12:28 AM
22
this is pretty much exactly what masataka nakano was doing in tokyo about 10 years ago.... http://www.artunlimited.co.jp/nakano/tn.…

really cool stuff. he didn't photoshop anything. rather, he got up and went to shoot at times where places were likely to be empty - like 5 am on a Sunday in the business district. Maybe this guy did the same?
Posted by lucheech on June 4, 2010 at 12:49 AM
cowmonger 23
This is one technique using extremely long exposures (over 20 minutes, generally)
http://photos.bahneman.com/tricks/articl…

Also, you can get the same result using a pinhole camera, also with very long exposures:

http://www.nyclondon.com/blog/archives/2…
Posted by cowmonger on June 4, 2010 at 3:14 AM
Telsa Grills 24
5280, sorry. Fnarf edges this one. This is, at a minimum, a tripod-mounted composite of several shots over a short period and blended in Photoshop to exclude any content where, say, a car obstructed the road. Others in Logue's series shows parked cars on urban streets are still there, which makes sense because they'd be there through every exposure in the production series.

Having done plenty of very long, 15+ minute time exposures using ISO1 (yes, 1) infrared film at midday, Fnarf is right when one considers that over time, there is still evidence of some motion blur of fast-moving objects, however faint, and clouds would look smudged and unnaturally smooth.

It's basically, as W7ngman said, a frankenshot. But this is hardly post-apocalyptic. Having people camped out on the freeway and looking ragged like those a few months after WWIII in the 1983 film The Day After? That would be eerie. This just looks austere.
Posted by Telsa Grills on June 4, 2010 at 5:48 AM
TheFang 25
Further proof that photoshop is totally cheating.
Posted by TheFang on June 4, 2010 at 8:26 AM
welcometothemurk22 26
Here's a guy who took the idea and made a very cool (and unsettling) video:

http://rossching.com/running-on-empty/
Posted by welcometothemurk22 on June 6, 2010 at 4:26 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy