Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, June 3, 2010

Mayor Won't Sign Loyalty Oath on Tunnel

Posted by on Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 1:46 PM

There are nine blank spaces at the end of a letter that's being circulated and is supposed to be signed later today by the governor, state legislators, the port CEO, the county executive, city council member Tom Rasmussen, Mayor Mike McGinn, and others. It's a "Letter of Commitment" to complete the deep-bore tunnel, which concludes, "We fully endorse this partnership and are each personally committed to invest the time and resources needed to ensure this program reaches a successful conclusion."

But Mayor Mike McGinn isn't going to sign it at the first meeting of the Alaskan Way Viaduct Program Oversight Committee today, convened by Governor Chris Gregoire.

His office says that the letter, in essence, is a pledge to complete the deep-bore tunnel no matter the costs. No matter the engineering problems, no matter the cost overruns, no matter the unresolved issues of who would pay for those cost overruns. That's unacceptable, the mayor's office says. Seattle taxpayers shouldn't pay cost overruns on the tunnel—a state highway—when the state has already insisted that it won't pay for overruns.

The pledge of commitment seems to deliberately obfuscate who will supply the "resources needed to ensure this program reaches a successful conclusion." In its first sentence, the letter (which appears in full below the jump) outlines one aspect of how the tunnel came to be. "The State of Washington, City of Seattle, Port of Seattle, and King County reached agreement in January 2009" that commits each government body to cover its part of the project. The city, McGinn argues, would be responsible for paying cost overruns on replacing the downtown seawall; the state, therefore, would pay for cost overruns on the tunnel.

But the oath elected leaders are supposed to sign today says nothing about the state cap on spending ($2.8 billion) and what would happen if the budget exceeds that cap. While the governor's signature suggests that she would, as part of her end of the deal, commit the state to spend as much money as required to pay for the project, she can't make that commitment. The legislature—not the governor—controls the state cap on spending. And while the letter commits to proactively secure funding, if need be, it doesn't explain where that money would come from.

The committee is also starting off on an ironic foot. It is—according to the pledge headline—"A Collaborative Approach to Ensure Transparency and Accountability." But the meeting, which begins at 1:00 p.m. at Union Station 401 S. Jackson St., will only allow the public for a few minutes of remarks from the governor and a 30-minute project overview. Then the public is kicked out of the meat of the meeting, which again, is designed to "Ensure Transparency and Accountability."

A Letter of Commitment Between the State of Washington, City of Seattle, Port of Seattle and King County

A Collaborative Approach to Ensure Transparency and Accountability in the Delivery of the Alaskan Way Viaduct and Seawall Replacement Program

The State of Washington, City of Seattle, Port of Seattle, and King County reached agreement in January 2009 to replace the seismically vulnerable and aging Alaskan Way Viaduct and Seawall through a series of investments in transit, city streets, a new central seawall, waterfront open space, and SR 99 improvements including the construction of a proposed bored tunnel.

The parties are committed to implementing this program on schedule and on budget and achieving our critical transportation, safety, environmental and community goals. To this end, we are establishing a program oversight committee made up of representatives from the executive and legislative branches of each of the four agencies responsible for implementing the program. This committee will facilitate discussion and information sharing related to cost, financing, schedule, contracts, project delivery, and risk management. The committee will address issues proactively that may affect delivery of the program, such as securing funding and permits.

The oversight committee will meet quarterly to receive updates from the Washington State Department of Transportation, Port of Seattle, and the implementing the following projects as agreed to in January 2009.

Proposed SR 99 Bored Tunnel Project (including Alaskan Way city street, connections to city street grid, and utility relocations)
S. Holgate to S. King Street Viaduct Replacement Project
Seawall Replacement Project
Mercer Street Project (Elliot Avenue to I-5)
Spokane Street Viaduct Widening Project
First Avenue Streetcar (under evaluation)
Central Waterfront Plan
East Marginal Way Grade Separation Project
Investments in Bus Service to Downtown and Related City Street Improvements for Bus Operations
SR 99 and Arterial Intelligent Transportation System

Agendas will be4 developed by staff from the four jurisdictions. Presentation information provided to the committee will be made available to the public. We may at time elect to meet in a closed session, after public briefings from the transportation agencies.

We fully endorse this partnership and are each personally committed to invest the time and resources needed to ensure this program reaches a successful conclusion.

Christine O. Gregoire
Governor

Judy Clibborn
State Representative

Mary Margaret Haugen
State Senator

Mike McGuinn
Seattle Mayor

Tom Rasmussen
Seattle Councilmember

Bill Bryant
Port Commissioner

Tay Yoshitani
Port CEO

Dow Constantine
King County Executive

Larry Phillips
King County Councilmember

 

Comments (11) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Betsy Ross 1
Who wrote the letter? Whose idea was it? I applaud Mayor McGinn for not signing it if he's not comfortable with it.
Posted by Betsy Ross on June 3, 2010 at 1:56 PM
gloomy gus 2
I like that they invited him knowing full well he'd take it as another opportunity to tell them to fuck off as loud as he can, starting with this bit of PR. Using "loyalty oath" here strikes me as something that would make Lee Atwater smile if he weren't so dead.
Posted by gloomy gus on June 3, 2010 at 2:08 PM
Joe Szilagyi 3
A better question is why is this meeting closed to the public. Hello, doesn't this conflict with the sunshine law?
Posted by Joe Szilagyi http://www.joeszilagyi.com on June 3, 2010 at 2:10 PM
4
Cities near subduction zones should not build tunnels. Whoever came up with the idea should be committed to an asylum.
Posted by I have always been... east coaster on June 3, 2010 at 2:19 PM
playswithknives 5
I like McGinn. He pisses people off.
Posted by playswithknives on June 3, 2010 at 2:21 PM
6
The state legislature has already refused to "invest the resources" needed to ensure the tunnel is completed. Getting the various public officials to sign this is a political move that does nothing to pay for cost overuns if/when they occur.
Posted by wlodekb on June 3, 2010 at 2:33 PM
Martin H. Duke 7
Gregoire promises aren't worth the paper they're printed on. She "promised" to tear the viaduct by 2012. It's going to be there (Earth permitting) till 2016. She "promised" a dollop of new revenue for Metro as part of the original tunnel deal. We're still waiting.
Posted by Martin H. Duke http://seattletransitblog.com on June 3, 2010 at 3:42 PM
Will in Seattle 8
Where's the Public Vote of Seattle Voters who have to pay for this?

Cause if there is one, it won't pass.

Ever.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on June 3, 2010 at 5:14 PM
Will in Seattle 9
@7 - and she promised she wouldn't change the design of the 520 bridge or the western approach to it - and after we pushed back - HARD - she caved.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on June 3, 2010 at 5:15 PM
10
The 1:00 p.m. meeting last Thursday at Union Station began late and went for well over an hour with the public and media reporters in the room. Governor Gregoire and Councilman Rasmussen were eyeball-to-eyeball with Mayor McGinn on the potential for cost overruns in tunnel construction and who would pay for them. The Mayor stood his ground calmly on behalf of Seattle taxpayers and did us proud. It was an interesting, even exciting meeting, well documented by the Times, P-I and other media in the stories indexed by Google at http://tinyurl.com/2bf6pq3.

The Governor declared that the cost overrun assignment made by the Legislature was merely an expression of intent. Seems to me it's time for Seattle City Council to pass a counter-expression of intent that benefits City residents.
Posted by Jniles on June 5, 2010 at 11:16 AM
11
Will, listen, WSDOT presented final SR520 plans with huge impact and lacked transit connectivity, yet was able to revise immediately. This is the equivalent of a new or used car salesman being forced to upgrade to a better model and lower the price. And it's a serious breach of the agency's responsibility to serve the public.

The key clause in the Letter of Agreement appears to be: "This committee will facilitate discussion and information sharing related to cost, financing, schedule, contracts, project delivery, and risk management. The committee will address issues proactively that may affect delivery of the program, such as securing funding and permits."

In other words, the committee is not commissioned to discuss or share information related to engineering and environmental impact, nor informing the public on those regards, as if they aren't important, as if the only important matters are cost and delivery.

Basicly, Seattle City Council is incompetent, corrupt or some percentage of both regarding the AWV replacement and related surface street re-arrangement projects. The basic engineering of the DBT, Alsakan Way and Mercer West is plainly atrocious, and the public is intentionally left uniformed. This Letter of Commitment is evidence of criminal wrongdoing. WSDOT and SDOT Directors who've overseen this project should face an independent investigation that would lead to criminal charges. And it's in the good people of Seattle's best interests to take the matter to this level. The DBT is a crime.

Posted by Wells on June 6, 2010 at 12:03 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy