Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, May 20, 2010

Forty Protesters Downtown Are Trying to Be Arrested to Draw Support for Immigration Reform

Posted by on Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:07 PM

Walking through the middle of downtown streets and blocking traffic at intersections, 40 protesters—including several local leaders wearing "Immigration Reform Now!" shirts—are trying to be arrested. Hundreds of supporters are rallying around them:

immigration_protest2.jpg

Earlier today, the Washington Immigration Reform Coalition was teaching the group the best techniques for being arrested. At noon, the protesters—including Estela Ortega, Executive Director of El Centro de la Raza, King County Council Member Larry Gossett, Hilary Stern, Executive Director of Casa Latina, and Jeff Johnson, representing the Washington State Labor Council—began their civil disobedience.

They formed a human chain in front of the office building elevators to the located at 1000 2nd Avenue, blocking access to all offices within the building, including blocking access to office for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which deports undocumented workers.

Lorena Gonzalez, Vice President of One America, which organized the rally, says it's part of an orchestrated national movement that kicked off this week. Their goal is to draw attention to president Barack Obama's failed campaign promise to introduce comprehensive immigration reform within his first year in office.

"He broke his promise," says Gonzalez. "What's worse, we're seeing 1,000 deportations a day under the Obama Administration. That's much higher than what we were seeing under the Bush Administration."

More after the jump.

Gonzalez explains that with Arizona's new racial profiling law—which gives law enforcement the authority to stop anyone and request to see their immigration papers and other states considering similar legislation—creates a pressing need for federal immigration reform. "We're fighting the clock," she says. "The only way to prevent escalating racial profiling on a state level is to get comprehensive federal reform now. This isn't just something we're demanding, it's something that Obama's already promised to us."

Behind Gonzalez, hundreds of protesters blocked easy access to the building on 2nd Avenue, holding homemade signs in Spanish and English chanted, "Yes We Can!" and, "Immigration Reform Now!"

Seattle City Council Member Nick Licata attended the rally as a supporter. Earlier this week, the city council passed an Arizona boycott resolution that called for comprehensive immigration reform while denouncing the AZ law. City council members have been inundated by angry emails and phone calls regarding the amendment. "We've been getting a lot of heat for it," confirms Licata, "my theory is there's a national right wing campaign to blast local electeds with negative feedback where resolutions like ours are passed." That's why rallies like this are so necessary, says Licata. With anti-immigration advocates so well organized, "the only way we're going to see change in this country is to lay on the pressure."

Gonzalez says pressure is mounting: On Monday, a group of students were arrested for civil disobedience in Arizona for blocking the doorway to John McCain's office. On Tuesday, city council members in New York were arrested.

"As far as we know, this is the largest display of civil disobedience to date," says One America spokesman Charlie McAteer. "But it won't be the largest and it won't be the last."

 

Comments (25) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
yes you can what?
Posted by mikeyg on May 20, 2010 at 1:12 PM
2
"Gonzalez explains that with Arizona's new racial profiling law, which gives law enforcement the authority to stop anyone and request to see their immigration papers. "

This is not a sentence.

Also it is factually incorrect.

You Stupid Lying Cunt.
Posted by didn't your momma teach you that liars go to hell? on May 20, 2010 at 1:13 PM
I'm 85 Years Old 3
@2 - Classy
Posted by I'm 85 Years Old on May 20, 2010 at 1:19 PM
4
Yes, you can miss the point entirely through wilfull (or just regular 'ol) ignorance
Posted by Daily on May 20, 2010 at 1:19 PM
5
One-thousand deportations a day sounds like a good first step toward immigration reform.....
Posted by Law&Order on May 20, 2010 at 1:20 PM
Baconcat 6
13-1509. Trespassing by illegal aliens; assessment; exception;
41 classification
42 A. IN ADDITION TO ANY VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAW, A PERSON IS GUILTY OF
43 TRESPASSING IF THE PERSON IS BOTH:
44 1. PRESENT ON ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE LAND IN THIS STATE.
45 2. IN VIOLATION OF 8 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1304(e) OR 1306(a).

http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/bi…
Posted by Baconcat on May 20, 2010 at 1:21 PM
7
2 Gracias!
Posted by speakingtruthtopower,baby! on May 20, 2010 at 1:23 PM
8
7 was @3
Posted by damndoieverfeellikeanidiotnow... on May 20, 2010 at 1:26 PM
notyoursweetie 9
Where is your "Everybody draws Muhammed Day" entry? I had mine publish at I PM exactly
http://edgeoforever.wordpress.com/2010/0…
Posted by notyoursweetie http://edgeoforever.wordpress.com/ on May 20, 2010 at 1:28 PM
10
@9
Please try to keep your comments respectful and on topic.
You Stupid Cunt.
Posted by Slog Administrator on May 20, 2010 at 1:34 PM
11
*sigh* ...
Posted by ddecounter on May 20, 2010 at 1:35 PM
Hernandez 12
The caveat is that *criminal* deportations under Obama have seen the biggest increase. Are they losing any sleep over that? I'm not. In my mind, sound immigration policy means that if someone enters this country illegally and commmits crimes, they need to leave. There is no reason why we should tolerate that.

I'm kind of disappointed that these folks are treating "deportation" like its a four-letter word. It's not, and even after we do get comprehensive reform, we are still going to be deporting illegal residents. Getting hysterical about deportation obscures focus on other needed aspects of reform.
Posted by Hernandez http://hernandezlist.blogspot.com on May 20, 2010 at 1:44 PM
13
Ha ha! Nothing makes me laff harder than retardedly earnest white fat college lesbian "activists" getting arrested! Please get arrested more! Move to a Latino or black-majority city or country while you are at it you embarrasingly naive whiteys. You are in for a terrible wake-up call in the fast-approaching future.
Posted by Thousands of fat macho catholic Mexican rednecks! on May 20, 2010 at 1:46 PM
I'm 85 Years Old 14
@8 It's okay. We all know everyone makes mistakes!
Posted by I'm 85 Years Old on May 20, 2010 at 1:55 PM
JF 15
Cienna has consistently misrepresented the law in Arizona. I fully believe she thinks the AZ police have the right to walk up to anyone and ask them for proof of citizenship. I also imagine she thinks an AZDL won't provide sufficient evidence. Of course, nothing could be further from the truth. Police have to come into legal contact with all individuals before asking about immigration status, the law specifically forbids racial profiling, and an AZDL ends all immigration conversation. None of that is very sensational so I understand why she has to fabricate.

When it comes down to it: just bad reporting.
Posted by JF on May 20, 2010 at 2:02 PM
Will in Seattle 16
Good thing they don't know it's Opening Night at SIFF and there will be media coverage at Benaroya Hall ...

Wake me up when the cops arrest some employers.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on May 20, 2010 at 2:11 PM
Will in Seattle 17
@5 - I agree, but don't you think deporting 1000 CEOs and COOs a day might shut down American businesses that hire illegal workers?
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on May 20, 2010 at 2:12 PM
Medina 18
I think the link Baconcat gave was incorrect as it was only the Senate Bill, not the final law. I believe the proper link for the law is this: http://www.azleg.gov/FormatDocument.asp?…

It appears that JF is right on the facts. The law specifically states that,

"A law enforcement official or agency of this state …. may not solely consider race, color or national origin in implementing the requirements of this subsection except to the extent permitted by the United States or Arizona constitution."

It is a bit disingenuous to say it is a "racial profiling" law since it incorporates the US Constitution, as interpreted by the US supreme Court prohibition of racial profiling.

Not to say an officer can't push the envelope or that there are other concerning aspects of the law (what is "contact" or the presumption of citizenship for those that possess a drivers license), but technically, this law comports with current racial profiling prohibitions.

Posted by Medina on May 20, 2010 at 2:20 PM
19
#15: Are you insane? Everyone understands the law. It is very sensational. I'm quite sure you'd feel the same way if you were in the situation where if you had any contact with the police, you would be charged with a crime, torn away from your job, friends, family, and property, and deported.
Posted by meanie99 on May 20, 2010 at 2:22 PM
20
Those fat chicks look tough to even lift let alone arrest.

LMAO, it's tough being a spoiled white kid these days, you can't get arrested at a Critical Masshole ride and now you can't get arrested at a protest!

What's a kid gonna do with their Evergreen State degree? It's not like it's good for anything else. Post on Slog all day like Will?

BTW I love illegals, they do a great job cutting my grass, work hard and work cheap. Fuck our AMerican bums, let's send THEM back to Mexico. Of course, like these protestors, I live in lilly white Seattle so there's no worries illegals can afford to live in my neighborhood.
Posted by Homey the Clown on May 20, 2010 at 2:45 PM
JF 21
@19 All that may be true but what you are saying differs from what Cienna is saying. I said Cienna is misreporting the law. If she wanted to take the angle you describe, she'd at least have some kind of point but it would be a very dull one. You're trying to make me feel sympathy for criminals/law breakers/illegals/people who took the easy way (whatever you want to describe individuals who are breaking our countries laws) and I just won't do it. I do not care about people who do not respect how we do things.

And Will @17 is dead on. We need to start punishing employers for creating this incentive. It shocks me that we allow people to employ illegals on a daily basis. I hate the fact that we have a country full of greedy consumers who aren't willing to pay the fair market value for our countries products. There is a lot of blame to go around for this mess but I'm not going to sit here and worry about the emotions of individuals who are contributing to the problem.
Posted by JF on May 20, 2010 at 2:48 PM
Just Blue 22
@18, it's been revised since then. Here's the most recent version I found: http://www.azleg.gov/alispdfs/council/SB…

"Lawful contact" was so broad and open to overzealous interpretation that it was changed to "lawful stop, detention, or arrest." However, wording was added making it acceptable to check the status of people in violation of town ordinances, so in some places having tall grass would be sufficient reason to demand someone's proof of citizenship.

Also, "solely" has been removed. It now reads "may not consider race, color or national origin in implementing the requirements of this subsection except to the extent permitted by the United States or Arizona Constitution."
Posted by Just Blue on May 20, 2010 at 2:53 PM
Baconcat 23
@18: Given the clause I posted that existed in the original Senate version, I think it's disingenuous to say they weren't fishing for an easy way around "lawful contact" and federal law. More than that, just because a prohibition against racial profiling exists, there's no way to enforce it, period.

But I'm sure the AZ legislature appreciates your faith in their intent.
Posted by Baconcat on May 20, 2010 at 2:57 PM
JF 24
@23 You're 100% correct, there is no way to enforce it. As with all laws the people will have to trust that those who enforce the law will do so legally. One of the pillars of our judicial system is legal enforcement of our laws. AZ police already carry guns, administer first aide, respond to dangerous situations and perform a host of other duties. If the citizens of AZ trust them to perform those tasks lawfully, which are of VERY high responsibility, they should be able to trust them in this area as well.

(and yes, I am completely aware that there are bad cops - it doesn't make what I'm saying any less true).
Posted by JF on May 20, 2010 at 3:17 PM
25
@2

"Gonzalez explains that with Arizona's new racial profiling law—which gives law enforcement the authority to stop anyone and request to see their immigration papers and other states considering similar legislation—creates a pressing need for federal immigration reform."

This is still not a grammatically correct sentence.

And it is still factually incorrect.

YOU FUCKING STUPID LYING CUNT.
Posted by the Stupid is strong in this one, ObiWan on May 21, 2010 at 5:50 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy