Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

Article Asking for More Comprehensive Sex Education Cut from Catholic-School Newspaper

Posted by on Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:04 AM

Ryan Dunn, a senior at Bishop Blanchet High School, just spent four months researching and writing an editorial for his school newspaper arguing that more comprehensive sex education should be available on campus. The research included a survey of 100 fellow students which revealed, among other findings:

58% of students do not feel satisfied with the amount and quality of sex education they have received at Blanchet... Perhaps most shockingly, the survey indicates that 58% of Blanchet students have had sex, and 39% of those students have had unprotected sex. Sadly, 42% of all students describe their sex education as abstinence-only, and 16% say they have received no sex education at all.

Bishop Blanchet's newspaper is called the Miter*, and its homepage claims: "The Bishop Blanchet Miter offers all students a public forum to exercise their freedom of speech. In each issue, students from all classes are encouraged to sound off on topics that matter most to them."

In a move that seems a little psychologically sadistic, Dunn was pressured to cut the article himself after his principal said it might cost some of his favorite teachers their jobs.

Dunn was encouraged not to run the story by his principal (Tom Lord) and his journalism teacher (Chris Grasseschi) because Blanchet is already under scrutiny from the archdiocese for being too liberal. "They were afraid of the archdiocese seeing a student who had views that might be seen as radical," Dunn says, "and they might think the religion department isn’t teaching kids what they’re supposed to believe."

"Blanchet’s had a lot of issues about how we teach certain things," Lord says, "and not meeting some of the newly designed standards the Catholic bishops have come up with. We don’t need an additional controversy at this time. The National Council of Bishops is really bringing the church back to pre-Vatican II structure and mentality and the archdiocese of Seattle is becoming a lot more conservative. Blanchet has a lot of social-justice issues in the religion curriculum and there's a big move to get back to Catholic theology and prayer and liturgy and that kind of thing."

Dunn's piece, titled "Let's Talk About Sex," is a well-researched and well-written piece of persuasive writing about sex ed at Blanchet as well as a history of contraception in the church (including the controversial papal encyclical from 1968 that declared contraception immoral—a doctrine overwhelmingly opposed by the Vatican II council but overturned by the pope). In it, Dunn asks for more comprehensive sex ed at the high school and cites the overwhelming evidence that abstinence-only education is dangerous. (Blanchet is not a strictly abstinence-only school, but its discussion of contraception is so cursory, even one of the longtime Blanchet teachers quoted in the piece describes the program as "abstinence-only.") Dunn points out:

Studies by Columbia University found that recipients of abstinence-only sex education are at higher risk for STDs and unwanted pregnancies, and studies by Advocates For Youth concluded that abstinence programs have absolutely no effect in delaying first sex of students. Columbia University also conducted a study of teenagers who pledge virginity until marriage, and found that 88 percent did not keep that pledge, and those teens were less likely to use contraception or seek STD testing and were therefore at a much higher risk for sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancies. The Society for Adolescent Medicine went so far as to say that “abstinence-only programs threaten fundamental human rights to health, information, and life.”

Thanks to the wonders of the internet, censoring high-school newspapers ain't what it used to be. After being pressured not to run the story, Dunn self-published the article that made school administrators so nervous on a blog. You can read it right here.

Dunn said both Lord and Grasseschi told him his—well-researched, well-written—article might lead to the shuttering of the school paper and result in teachers being fired.

"I’m in an awkward position because I teach journalism and I believe in the freedom of the press and yet we write articles with our hands tied," Grasseschi says. "There are things we don’t touch." Among those things: Planned Parenthood, which Grasseschi says "doesn't exist" as far as the Miter is concerned.

Apparently, the Miter's mission to allow students to "sound off on topics that matter most to them" stops at those topics that happen to cross the bishops who've recently decided the church needs to take a few giant steps backwards.

"Ultimately it was my decision," Dunn says about pulling his own article. "Mr. Lord really didn’t want to be the bad guy. He wouldn’t give me a no, but made it very clear that he didn’t want it to run and that he was worried that teachers would lose their jobs. I didn’t want to put anyone’s job in danger."

That's a lousy, cowardly example to set for students. School officials are afraid of the archdiocese (which is, presumably, afraid of the National Council of Bishops), so it teaches its students capitulation and silence instead of taking a principled stand. Seeing as how capitulation and silence have served the church in the past, that's not just a cowardly example to set—it's a colossally foolish one, too.

Bishop Joseph Tyson, the superintendent of Catholic schools in the area and the local liaison for the new conservatism in education, has not yet returned a request for comment. I'm not holding my breath—Dunn asked to interview Bishop Tyson for his story on Catholic sex-ed months ago. He never heard back.

All the Christians out there who claim your atavistic, oppressive brethren don't represent the true spirit of your faith? Now would be a good time to make your feelings known. I'm sure many of you Blanchet parents claim to be liberal Catholics—how about contacting your Catholic-school principals and the education office of the archdiocese? Let them know you are not pleased with the religious-education curriculum taking a giant leap backwards and high-school sex-ed programs that result in more unwanted pregnancies and STDs. Here are the people to get in touch with:

The Archdiocese of Seattle Public Schools (CSDOffice@seattlearch.org and 382-4861).

Bishop Blanchet Principal Tom Lord (principal@bishopblanchet.org).

And superintendent of the Catholic schools in the Archdiocese of Seattle, Bishop Joseph Tyson (joseph.tyon@seattlearch.org).

* For the heathens out there: a miter (also spelled "mitre") is the pointed hat worn by popes, bishops, some abbots, etc.

 

Comments (30) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Catalina Vel-DuRay 1
The Catholic schools have a very important mission: They are the ones responsible for making sure Catholic children grow up and never, ever want to set foot in a Catholic church again. Let them be. Their job is too important.
Posted by Catalina Vel-DuRay http://www.danlangdon.com on May 18, 2010 at 6:30 AM
Arkham 2
@1 That was my reaction to my 12 years of Catholic schooling.

Poor Blanchet, though. I feel sorry for them. When I went there they were still called Blanchet, not Bishop Blanchet, and yeah it was a Catholic school and you had to take a religion class and occasionally attend mass, but mostly it was just a school. By my senior year it had started getting more conservative and then shortly after I graduated there was the name change to "Bishop Blanchet High School" and I took that as a sign that they were too conservative for me. So I'm both heartened to hear that they're still too liberal for the archdiocese and sad to think that can't last in this new, nazi-pope era.
Posted by Arkham http://amaranta20.deviantart.com/gallery/ on May 18, 2010 at 6:43 AM
3
What "capitulation and silence"?

The kid posted his article.
He expressed his views.

Freedom of Speech does not mean you get to say whatever you want in someone else's newspaper.

If The Stranger refuses to give the troll a two page spread to print whatever we want have we been denied our Freedom of Speech?
Posted by don't be a moron all your life on May 18, 2010 at 6:49 AM
4
Damn Brendan, don't you even read Slog?
In Feb Dan posted an article from the Washington Post that stated "Sex education classes that focus on encouraging children to remain abstinent can persuade a significant proportion to delay sexual activity, researchers reported Monday in a landmark study... "

http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archive…
Posted by . on May 18, 2010 at 6:55 AM
5
Hey kids! Just post your articles on FB or a blog. School newspapers? You mean they still do that? How very last century. Of course the old farts running the school and the chancery probably have no clue what a blog is.
Posted by Bostonian.queer.in.Dallas on May 18, 2010 at 6:56 AM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 6
I love this quote: "[T]hey might think the religion department isn’t teaching kids what they’re supposed to believe."

Geez, that sounds a lot more like "indoctrination" than "teaching."

Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on May 18, 2010 at 7:01 AM
7
Newsweek on the same study:

"The New Abstinence-Education Study Is Good News. So Why Are Liberals Freaking Out?
Sarah Kliff

"The first peer-reviewed study to show abstinence education to be successful was published yesterday in the Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. And, to put it succinctly, the liberal blogosphere is not thrilled.

"The study authors looked at African-American middle-school students in the Northeast who enrolled in an abstinence-only program (no instruction on contraceptives) and were taught that they should delay sex until they were ready.

"The students in this program were more likely to delay sex in the two years after the program, as opposed to those who enrolled in no program or those who were instructed in safe sex."

Posted by the truth will set you free on May 18, 2010 at 7:01 AM
8
What makes you think the Archdiocese, the principal of Blanchet or the superintendant of catholic schools give a crap what SLOG readers think? The are private schools run on private dollars. They have no responsibility to the public at large. That's why people run private schools, so they can do what they want.
So...click on the links and write angry missives to your hearts content. But, if you're not a donor to their funds or a parent of a student who pays high tuition, why should they care?
Posted by tacomagirl on May 18, 2010 at 7:02 AM
9
"58% of students do not feel satisfied with the amount and quality of sex they have received at Blanchet... "
Posted by what high school student does?..... on May 18, 2010 at 7:03 AM
Vince 10
Ignorance is the Catholic Church's greatest ally.
Freedom is it's greatest enemy. Truth is it's destruction.
Posted by Vince on May 18, 2010 at 7:12 AM
Original Andrew 11
Jesus Christ, what is this, the 1870s?
Posted by Original Andrew on May 18, 2010 at 7:19 AM
Cato the Younger Younger 12
And how is a Catholic school pushing a Catholic agenda no matter what newsworthy? I mean what were you expecting? Blanchet HS to start teaching real sex ed?
Posted by Cato the Younger Younger on May 18, 2010 at 7:21 AM
Mike in MO 13
"Columbia University also conducted a study of teenagers who pledge virginity until marriage, and found that 88 percent did not keep that pledge"

88%? That is AWESOME!
Posted by Mike in MO on May 18, 2010 at 7:24 AM
Original Andrew 14
@ 13,

An additional 100% went on to major in Sucking and Fucking at Cathoholic U.
Posted by Original Andrew on May 18, 2010 at 7:46 AM
giffy 15
How about running his piece in The Stranger?

@4 Because there is nothing wrong with teens having sex so long as they are safe. Plus any good curriculum is going to tell kids to wait until they are ready (not marriage as the fundies want). The problem with that study if I recall was that they did not compare it to a program that said no sex till you're ready and here is how to do it safely.
Posted by giffy on May 18, 2010 at 7:46 AM
16
@5, @7, You might try reading the rest of the words in the study. The goal of the program in the study wasn't abstinence in the Christian model (until married). It was much more modestly targeted at getting middle school students to delay initiating sex from 12 to 14, and was accompanied with scientific information about adolescent development, not a bunch of moral claptrap.
Posted by Brooklyn Reader on May 18, 2010 at 8:06 AM
17
15
16
We're glad you agree.
Posted by Abstinence Rocks on May 18, 2010 at 8:20 AM
gloomy gus 18
@1, perfect! Win this battle to lose the war. I have no interest in following this post's suggestion to reform the church so that it may survive.
Posted by gloomy gus on May 18, 2010 at 8:23 AM
rtm 19
@8 - your implicit assumption is that Slog readers will never be parents of catholic schoolkids. as the parent of three catholic schoolkids, one of whom is in 7th grade and seriously considering Blanchet, and as a former high school journalist, i very mush appreciate hearing about this situation. Blanchet will be hearing from me, and is unlikely to be receiving my tuition dollars.
Posted by rtm on May 18, 2010 at 8:26 AM
20
Bishop Blanchet HS is a joke among the Catholic HS community. It is basically public school with a mediocre dress code (no frayed jeans) and required religion class, and the kids who choose that school over the other Catholic high schools are either not smart enough to get admitted into the better private schools, or really would like to go to public school and Blanchet is the closest thing they can get.

Parents, talk to - and then LISTEN to your kids. At Blanchet, like public schools, you get out of it what you are looking to get out of it. Doing the bare minimum is acceptable and will produce a diploma.

IMHO.
Posted by sammielu on May 18, 2010 at 8:38 AM
21
I always liked the Blanchet kids actually. They definitely partied way harder than the Sea Prep and O'Dea/HNA crowds and the girls put out more...

On topic though, sounds like this Dunn kid had the right idea. Instead of blindly fighting against a system with so much power at so many levels as the Catholic Church, he said fuck it and went someplace where he could post his article uncensored. Bravo young sir, way to rise above it.
Posted by SouthEndMike on May 18, 2010 at 8:56 AM
22
If only there were some larger publication that still bought ink by the barrel that could publish Dunn's piece on the front page and give it the distribution it (sounds like it) deserves. Say, what's the cover story on next week's Stranger. . . . ?
Posted by digittante on May 18, 2010 at 9:05 AM
Fenrox 23
UGH, High School. Everything seems SOOOOO important.
Posted by Fenrox on May 18, 2010 at 9:32 AM
treacle 24
Now that Dunn has discovered how media controversy and attention is created, he ought give the article to a friend to photocopy and distribute samizdat style.
ˇVive la underground press!
Posted by treacle on May 18, 2010 at 10:16 AM
25
I went to Catholic School, in Seattle, for 15 years. I started at Blanchet the year after the name change, Principal Hickey (newly from Michigan) didn't think it sounded Catholic enough.

In Health, yeah they emphasized that abstinence was the only way to prevent pregnancy and std's 100%. But they still went over every other method of contraception, and debunked several contraception myths. True, they didn't hand out condoms at the end of class. Unless things have dramatically changed in the 6 years since I graduated- I don't know what the 16% of kids who haven't received any sort of sex ed are talking about.

We had this one (not Catholic) abstinence/until marriage speaker come and talk to the Junior (?) class. But no one took him seriously. And I remember an editorial that ran in The Miter that tore his presentation apart, railing against the sex-negative message, and implicit misogyny in his argument, among other things. I know Grasseschi took some heat, but went to bat for the writer.

Blanchet was a good school, and I took some great classes there. We used Brown University's program for my Foreign Relations course; my Scripture class was taught contextually by an awesome feminist; Ethics and Social Justice classes were both rigorous, (Ethics qualified for AP status), as was the LA Honors program; and my science classes were top notch.

It makes me sad to think that the archdiocese would rather Blanchet offer a substandard curriculum in strict keeping with Church doctrine, than an objectively challenging one that actively promotes engagement with 'the living Church.'
Posted by Lostnsupermket on May 18, 2010 at 11:09 AM
26
Does this damage our strategy of playing nice with the medieval-era Church in the hopes that one day they will stop actively sabotaging any attempt to inject rational thought into the conversation that informs policy making on a global scale? Maybe if we pretend that the wafer really does turn into the flesh of Jesus when you eat it they'll return the favor and allow their followers to openly discuss the only proven preventive measures shown to reduce unwanted pregnancies and prevent the spread of HIV.

I personally can't think of any other option. Can you?
Posted by Pope Leprechaun on May 18, 2010 at 12:01 PM
27
As a recent graduate of blanchet, I can vouch for the fact that they do not teach an abstinence only education. I remember my health/sex-ed teacher in particular clearly stating that as a catholic school, they must encourage abstinence but in no way did they try to indoctrinate students. They provided statistics about contraceptives, and left the option up to the students. It might not have been a comprehensive sex ed program, but it definitely wasn't totally discouraging sex.
Like other commenters have said, blanchet is a private catholic school but the "catholic" aspect is hardly more than a couple of all school services and a religion class or two. I know many non christians that atteneded blanchet that did not feel uncomfortable. These are not the fundy whack jobs that people might think they are.
As far as the freedom of speech aspect, i know for a fact that blanchet's student paper considers tackling this topic every year but typically decides otherwise. In the end the story just isn't newsworthy and does little more than stir the pot. I have trouble believing that this piece was written for anything more than shock value. I doubt it's as big of a problem at Blanchet as some people might want to think.
Posted by emanresu on May 18, 2010 at 12:30 PM
28
Oh, I see Joe Tyson has been at it again way across the country in Seattle. As I have said in a couple of other blogs, I was a close friend of Joe's in the seminary in Washington DC about twenty five years ago. I am speaking out about this for one reason. His activities against gay people recently were a total surprise to me. And now he is taking a really short-sighted position vis-a-vis these kids. There is a public health matter here. But I will let people more into that particular issue fight it out.

What I can say is that the person I knew twenty five years ago was nothing like this. A kind liberal would have described now Bishop Tyson then. I care for one reason. Joe Tyson can serve as an almost archetypal exemplar of what is happening in the Roman Catholic Church. It is a self-destructive turn around. But even having said that I want to make one specific observation about the guy I knew. To have such a profound change can only speak of having speak of having undergone some awful trauma in his later adult life. Joe must have been rejected by someone or some-thing to produce such a traumatic change. People do not change this much without trauma being part of the etiology. There seems to be little left of the sweet human being I knew.
Posted by Peter Paul Fuchs on May 22, 2010 at 5:12 PM
29
I attended Catholic school, Blanchet in fact. Now, for the past four years have been attending a extremely liberal, state funded art school. I understand the extremes of the spectrum.
While I think this article brought up some very important issues about the Catholic church, I was extremely disappointed to read the blanket statements about the teachers. Mr. Lord, I have no experience with so I cannot speak for. Mr. Grasseschi is one of the most dedicated educators I have had the pleasure of coming across. He is extremely dedicated to his students and constantly reaches beyond what is asked of him to benefit the education of those who are students at Blanchet.

The following seemed to push too far:
"That's a lousy, cowardly example to set for students. School officials are afraid of the archdiocese (which is, presumably, afraid of the National Council of Bishops), so it teaches its students capitulation and silence instead of taking a principled stand."

I was left with a sour taste in my mouth. I avidly read the Stranger and this was such a disappointment. I understand the statement that is being made. I do. But to suggest Mr. Grasseschi is a cowardly example of an educator is far from the truth.
Posted by letstalkaboutit on September 23, 2010 at 8:56 PM
30
I attended Catholic school, Blanchet in fact. Now, for the past four years have been attending a extremely liberal, state funded art school. I understand the extremes of the spectrum.
While I think this article brought up some very important issues about the Catholic church, I was extremely disappointed to read the blanket statements about the teachers. Mr. Lord, I have no experience with so I cannot speak for. Mr. Grasseschi is one of the most dedicated educators I have had the pleasure of coming across. He is extremely dedicated to his students and constantly reaches beyond what is asked of him to benefit the education of those who are students at Blanchet.

The following seemed to push too far:
"That's a lousy, cowardly example to set for students. School officials are afraid of the archdiocese (which is, presumably, afraid of the National Council of Bishops), so it teaches its students capitulation and silence instead of taking a principled stand."

I was left with a sour taste in my mouth. I avidly read the Stranger and this was such a disappointment. I understand the statement that is being made. I do. But to suggest Mr. Grasseschi is a cowardly example of an educator is far from the truth.
Posted by letstalkaboutit on September 23, 2010 at 8:59 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy