Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Putting Our Bodies On The Line

Posted by on Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 11:56 AM

Dan Choi and five other gays and lesbians who were thrown out of the military chained themselves to the White House fence today, demanding that President Obama make good on his promise to end DADT. From GetEQUAL:

"Moments ago, Lt. Dan Choi along with five other lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) discharged veterans—Capt. Jim Pietrangelo II, Petty Officer Larry Whitt, Petty Officer Autumn Sandeen, Cadet Mara Boyd, and Airman Victor Price—handcuffed themselves to the White House gates to demand that President Obama keep his promise to repeal 'Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell' this year. The vets are concerned about mounting signs that the President is wavering on his promise to push for repeal this year."

Said Choi: “We are handcuffing ourselves to the White House gates once again to demand that President Obama show leadership on repealing ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.’ If the President were serious about keeping his promise to repeal this year, he would put the repeal language in his Defense Authorization budget. The President gave us an order at the Human Rights Campaign dinner to keep pressure on him and we will continue to return to the White House, in larger numbers, until the President keeps his promise to repeal ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ this year.”

The first time Choi chained himself to the fence around the White House it was him and one other vet. This time it's Choi and five other vets. A new phase in the gay rights movement—the era serious civil disobedience era—has arrived. It's time. Last June I proposed a campaign of organized civil disobedience by gay couples focused on the White House:

Here's the idea: one gay or lesbian couple—a couple currently denied their rights under DOMA—shows up at the entrance to the White House grounds. A different couple every day. They ask to speak to the president about DOMA. They're refused. They sit down. They refuse to leave. They're arrested, carried away by the police. Couples would be recruited from all over the country, demonstrating that gay marriage isn't just an issue in liberal California or godless New England, and the media in each couple's home city and state would be notified in advance of their arrest. The occasional famous couple—Rosie and Kelli? Ellen and Portia?—would participate to pull in celeb media. But most of the couples who come to D.C. to get arrested would be average folks. The couples would need support, legal and logistical, and we would need someone to organize media outreach and maintain a website. The website would include a photo and profile of each couple that comes to D.C. to get arrested, collect all the press, and be used to recruit couples willing to travel to D.C. and get arrested.

The action would be small scale—it would be human scale—and it would go on and on and on. It would demonstrate better than another gay march just how seriously we take this issue: we take it seriously that we're willing to travel to D.C. and get arrested. It wouldn't be a one-day event that the White House could ignore or bluff its way through with some lame statement about its "commitment" to ending DOMA. The couples would keep coming. Every day an arrest. Drip, drip, drip. Members of the White House press corps would see couples getting arrested every day on their way to work. Gibbs would be forced to address DOMA on a near-daily basis. The president would be asked about the issue again and again.

My boyfriend—who doesn't do demonstrations (or interviews or photos or anything public)—is so upset about the DOMA brief that he's willing to go to D.C. and get arrested. So am I. We can't be the only couple that feels this way.

We have to make ignoring our demands and breaking their promises—on DADT, ENDA, DOMA—more trouble for our "friends" in the Democratic party and the White House than making good on their promises ever could be.

 

Comments (23) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Captundrpants 1
How bout some things we could do in Seattle? I am fed up and frustrated and def. feel like I need to start doing more than posting stories about Lt. Choi or other people in the movement and their efforts on facebook,I want to do something that has real power behind it. Any ideas?
Posted by Captundrpants http://www.facebook.com/jbcII on April 20, 2010 at 12:10 PM
2
I'm not sure if Autumn Sandeen (one of the service members arrested today) is gay or lesbian but she is transgendered.

That word seems to have been omitted from your post.

Dan Choi, 4 others and 1 trans person. A trans person faces more uncertainty in the hands of the police and that fact deserves attention.
Posted by patrick66 on April 20, 2010 at 12:11 PM
3
What do you think that the president looks out the window every morning and thinks, "what jackass has chained themselves to the fence today?" I think we can be a little more clever than a silly little chaining, we might as well go full on teabag and get our poster boards out.
Posted by capnjohnny on April 20, 2010 at 12:12 PM
4
It would need to be small-scale, so as to be realizable, and have real consequences for the participants. Marching around is common and represents little to no real "cost" for the participants. Nothing is on the line. Six people getting arrested in, say, the federal building is worth more than 200 people marching around outside it.
Posted by Dan Savage on April 20, 2010 at 12:13 PM
5
I love this idea! Okay, Dan, you go first!

In all seriousness, it is a really good idea.
Posted by shaneleopard on April 20, 2010 at 12:28 PM
6
Putting Our Bodies On The Line

rewrite!

Putting YOur Bodies On The Line
Posted by doasIsay on April 20, 2010 at 12:30 PM
7
@3 We should make sure we sprinkle ours with misspellings too so we look more legitimate and not suspiciously educated.
Posted by shaneleopard on April 20, 2010 at 12:35 PM
8
Dan, you pretencious little prick.

Freedom Riders and lunch counter crashers in the Civil Right's Era were "Putting Their Bodies On The Line".
They faced (and usually endured) real violence and danger.

Yuppie photo-op protests are NOT "Putting Our Bodies On The Line" and it is an insult to people who did to say it.

Go to Iran.
Nigeria.
Uganda.
Yemen.

Engage in some clever Gay street theatre.
Then tell us you're Putting Our Bodies On The Line.....
Posted by Cowardly Lion on April 20, 2010 at 12:36 PM
9
Dan, I continue to think the DOMA arrests are a really, really good idea. My partner and I would be willing to participate, but someone with access to national attention/press/whatever needs to head it up. I think that should be you. It's your idea, and you can get enough people's attention to fund this movement (plane tickets, lawyer fees, etc) and get enough people involved to have a couple show up every day.

I'm pretty good at organizing big hassle events, and would be happy to help, but having someone like you actively involved in organizing it would make a huge difference. Put your time where your mouth is.
Posted by NomadHomebody on April 20, 2010 at 12:44 PM
10
@8: yeah, I'll give props to the Iranian protestors. But civil disobedience sure beats the he'll out of plunking down $250 for an HRC dinner and thinking of yourself to be an activist
Posted by Punditwatch on April 20, 2010 at 12:59 PM
Dingo 11
I'd donate money for their legal defence.
Posted by Dingo on April 20, 2010 at 1:12 PM
mmennonno 12
If we say lots of crazy shit and use the n word we might even get on Fox!
Posted by mmennonno http://mennonnosapiens.com on April 20, 2010 at 1:23 PM
johnnie 13
" A new phase in the gay rights movement—the era serious civil disobedience era—has arrived. It's time. "

Alright, let's ignore the errors in this writing and focus on what it blatantly forgets - this is not the era of serious civil disobedience in the name of gay rights. Though admirable, how the FUCK does this even come close to comparing to the very serious, and very much more important, civil disobedience organized by ACT-UP and others during the AIDS crisis?

Really, Dan, this is the ARRIVAL of serious civil disobedience? Hardly. A return to, maybe, but certainly still just a shadow of what was.
Posted by johnnie on April 20, 2010 at 1:39 PM
Vince 14
I'm a veteran. I believe the president when he says he'll end DADT. This should have been done when we had Bush.
Posted by Vince on April 20, 2010 at 2:23 PM
15
how precious. daniel is just laying claim to the idea behind this new strangely/poorly worded era. he's not responsible for the idea. "our bodies on the line" is a bit overstated when we are talking about these types of protests. most importantly, he's not doing anything, except maybe larry king or keith olberman.

he's too busy arranging viewings of amateur porn films while bitching about fellow passengers on planes, smoking areas at airports, facial hair on hipsters, enthusiasm from gay youth and the type of tea available in his local yuppie tea emporium. he doesn't affect change; he's a do-nothing cranky old man.

not sure what this Era will be called when all is said and done, i hope it makes more sense that what Daniel wrote. one thing is clear - Mr. Savage won't be remembered for having anything to do with the efforts. he'll be remembered as just another self-aggrandizing media whore.
Posted by freedom of speech here on slog on April 20, 2010 at 3:18 PM
16
Gah.
Posted by seeker6079 on April 20, 2010 at 4:23 PM
johnnie 17
While I find the use of "Daniel" offensive, this is correct: "he's too busy arranging viewings of amateur porn films while bitching about fellow passengers on planes, smoking areas at airports, facial hair on hipsters, enthusiasm from gay youth and the type of tea available in his local yuppie tea emporium. he doesn't affect change; he's a do-nothing cranky old man."

Dan, this is - what? The fourth through twentieth or so post you've made along these lines? (I don't know the amount, but I know I've read it many times before.) If you want to become an organizer of civil disobedience, what the fuck are you waiting for?
Posted by johnnie on April 20, 2010 at 4:32 PM
johnnie 18
Oh, though @15, you forgot hating on dogs. In fact, Dan makes more noise about dogs than about DOMA.
Posted by johnnie on April 20, 2010 at 4:33 PM
19
This is interesting... but I wonder if it would work. Indeed, I wonder what "work" would even mean--what would constitute success for such a project? Is there an explicit goal? Would it be the repeal of DOMA? An executive order related to it? I'm not trying to be negative, but I've lived most of my adult life in San Francisco and my last few years in DC, and I've seen a lot of various protests--many of which have left me scratching my head.

Something that happens over and over again is won't be considered news for long; it's not like the Post would be camped out every day for the update. Coordinating with local media for each couple is an interesting idea, but I'm not sure how much press even that would yield--or how positive the coverage would be.

Research suggests that one of the biggest predictors of attitudes about gay rights are whether or not a person has a close friend or family member who is gay. Maybe that's the ticket... Could gay couples commit to "adopting" their Congress member? Get him or her to meet up privately with a few gay constituents and get first hand accounts from the people he or she represents of why DOMA (and other issues) matter to them?

Not sure what to do about Obama. I'm sure there are some Capital Hill folk who could get an audience...

In any case, good luck.
Posted by s.n.c. on April 20, 2010 at 6:23 PM
Canuck 20
@15, 17,18
At the risk of sounding like a newbie-commenter brown-nosing Canadian, I have to respectfully disagree. Entertaining posts are just that, entertaining, which is what people need when faced with all the other crap in the world. (And if you pull the stick out of your ass, it won't hurt so much to laugh.) As far as the rest of your post, having read Dan's books on children and marriage, I can assure you he has put a very human face on something that I didn't know much about (never adopted, not gay), and while I've never been anti same-sex marriage/adopting, I honestly didn't give it a lot of thought before. Now, I do. I think I'm pretty average, so if this was my response, I'd imagine a lot of others have felt the same way. (I'd also imagine most "self-aggrandizing media whores" don't take the time to travel around answering a million college students' questions about the sex ed they didn't receive in school.) God, I'll quit before I start to sound like a "Make the world a better place" motivational poster...
Posted by Canuck on April 20, 2010 at 6:34 PM
21
If you're interested in fighting for equal rights for all, then join Seattle OUTProtest. SOP meets weekly, every Sunday, noon to 2 pm, at Kaladi Brothers Coffee on East Pike.

http://seattleoutprotest.org/
Posted by MeNotYou on April 21, 2010 at 10:33 AM
22
@21 can we please only allow registered commenting?
Posted by Kthnx on April 21, 2010 at 3:49 PM
23 Comment Pulled (Spam) Comment Policy

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy