Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, April 19, 2010

Hillary for SCOTUS? Bill Approves.

Posted by on Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:34 PM

Bill Cinton, trampling on both Obama administration talking points and the Emily Post rules about discussing a woman's age—all in one impressive quote:

I think she'd be a great Supreme Court judge. But I think she probably thinks that it'd be better if he appointed somebody younger. Although if you look, I mean, my mother-in-law's 91. I mean, Hillary's going to live to be 110. I joke with her all the time. She might have three husbands after me. You know, she's going to live forever.

 

Comments (18) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Cato the Younger Younger 1
Did Bill finally lose his marbles? I mean he was dropping them all over the place in the 2008 campaign but now he sounds totally bonkers.
Posted by Cato the Younger Younger on April 19, 2010 at 1:40 PM
Will in Seattle 2
Why would we want a right-of-center Supreme Court nominee.

During her early law days she was right of even Republican President Ford's nominee that she would replace.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on April 19, 2010 at 1:44 PM
doesurmindglow 3
Haha. I dunno if this is news. I mean, did we expect Bill to say "You know, I don't think Hillary would be a very good nominee"?

I certainly didn't. But that would have been news.
Posted by doesurmindglow on April 19, 2010 at 1:49 PM
Wicked Virgin 4
Hillary Clinton has never done anything to position herself as a Supreme Court Justice. Please let this goddamn fantasy end. Stop treating a seat on the nation's highest court like a consolation prize.
Posted by Wicked Virgin http://userscripts.org/tags/slog on April 19, 2010 at 1:55 PM
Dougsf 5
I just want to know why POTUS and SCOTUS are household acronyms now? If journalists don't like writing them out, they should just set up their auto-complete.
Posted by Dougsf on April 19, 2010 at 2:01 PM
6
What 4 said.

And 5: "Now"? Just because you hadn't read, uh, anything before the 2008 election does not mean that journalism has suddenly taken a bizarre shift for the lazy.
Posted by Nick on April 19, 2010 at 2:03 PM
Dougsf 7
@6 - 2008 is pretty recent on the timeline of my news reading (I voted for Carter in my elementary school mock election, for whatever that's worth), and extremely recent on the timeline of these subjects being covered by the media. So yes, "now." Why have these slightly-pervy sounded acronyms besieged journalism?
Posted by Dougsf on April 19, 2010 at 2:35 PM
Cascadian 8
Bill just called Hillary old, and then had to backtrack.
Posted by Cascadian on April 19, 2010 at 2:55 PM
Urgutha Forka 9
I'd say Bill is finally inhaling now.

Posted by Urgutha Forka on April 19, 2010 at 3:37 PM
Telsa Grills 10
@7: Hey, me too! I was only one of three in a classroom of about 25 who did so. I never understood the Reagan appeal then, and never appreciated it at any day hence.

Also, re WJC: my god, if that doesn't summarize his head space in uncharacteristically succinct terms, then . . . no, there is no then. That was just impressive foot-in-mouth bluntness.
Posted by Telsa Grills on April 19, 2010 at 4:39 PM
11
@9 FTW!
Posted by Brooklyn Reader on April 19, 2010 at 4:39 PM
emma's bee 12
He does sound kind of sad and wistful in that last sentence.
Posted by emma's bee on April 19, 2010 at 6:35 PM
13
Hell, I'd put them both on the court. What fun that would be!
Posted by Yale Law '99 on April 19, 2010 at 8:11 PM
14
hahahaha... we'll always have Cher, Hillary, and cockroaches. Bill is so effing funny, and he just. can't. stop. heee-larious
Posted by jackseattle on April 19, 2010 at 9:05 PM
15
Put Bill on the Supreme Court. That ought to make the Tea-Baggers lose their shit.
Posted by Rain Monkey http://classifieds.thestranger.com/seattle/ViewAd?oid=oid%3A68649 on April 19, 2010 at 9:33 PM
16
I still think the best deterrent from would-be Obama assassins is VP Hillary Clinton.
Posted by montex on April 19, 2010 at 9:42 PM
The Max 17
As much as I'd like to see the shitstorm from the right raised by appointing Hilary to The Mudville Nine, I'd prefer to see her continue to do an excellent job at State for as long as she's needed, but hang it up in time to be fresh for the 2016 Presidential campaign.
Posted by The Max on April 19, 2010 at 9:57 PM
18
In my mind POTUS gained greater usage during "West Wing" and, I'd guess, SCOTUS gained traction with journalists who get all their information from Scotusblog - since there are so few journalists who cover the Supreme Court on a full-time, or even regular, basis. But incomplete sentences and undefined terms seem to have become regular "features" of blogs . . . in the "if you read my blog all the time you'd know" kind of way.
Posted by AE on April 20, 2010 at 4:04 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy