Slog
News & ArtsFriday, April 9, 2010
Science On the New Hominid Species Discovered in South Africa
Posted by Charles Mudede on Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:20 AM
Nearly 2 million years ago, an adult and a child walking through the South African landscape somehow fell through openings in a partly eroded, underground cave and died. Today, that fatal plunge has led to their identification as representatives of a new hominid species — and a contentious debate among paleoanthropologists over the pair’s evolutionary relationship to modern humans.The one thing that separates us from other centuries and societies is we live with deep space (both outward and inward) and deep time (both past and future) all around our tiny island of the now. Great amounts of time are becoming less and less strange. The otherness of deep time is fast dissolving. The six million years it took us to evolve from a common ancestor with banobos and chimps is now just a blimp, a blink of time in our mind's ever-growing understanding of the history of the sun, the slow formation of its planets, and the emergence of life on one of those planets. Indeed, the time it took for the organic to emerge from the inorganic, a window of 300 million years, is considered to be short.
It's no longer that difficult for us to accommodate the fact that a hominid 2 million years ago lived for just 12 years—barely a flicker of life; barely a boy who saw a few moons, a few bright stars, a few clouds, and nothing more. He fell into a cave and died with his mother.
2
It amazes me how we find fossils like this. Hominids must have been relatively few, yet an unexpected accident traverses eons and finds us. And another piece of our human puzzle falls into place.
3
“There’s no compelling evidence that this newly proposed species was ancestral to Homo,” remarks Bernard Wood of George Washington University in Washington, D.C."
“I don’t see anything here that tells us much about human evolution,” comments Owen Lovejoy of Kent State University in Ohio."
“These fossils won’t clear up the question of where Homo came from,” Rightmire says"
Proof.
7
I'll mention quixotically that the two hominids found are evidence of our past, yet their DNA were taken out of the running to become future humans because they did not correctly identify danger and therefore died.
Us, yet not us. :D
Us, yet not us. :D
8
“There’s compelling evidence that Loveschild was ancestral to Homos,” remarks Bernard Shaw of George Wood University in Washington, D.C."
“I don’t see anything here that tells us much about Loveschild's evolution,” comments Owen Killjoy of Krill State University in Ohio."
“This Loveschild won’t clear up the question of where Homos came from,” Leftmire says"
Proof.
9
#3 if you are using these quotes as a method of refuting evolutionary theories about human origins then the only thing there is proof of around here is your obvious lack of understanding about evolution.
Advertisement
Most Commented on Slog
-
Hating People Doesn't Make Them Thinner by Jen Graves
-
Los Angeles Gay Bar Bans Bachelorette Parties Until Marriage Equality Is Attained by David Schmader
-
Fill in the Blank by Grant Brissey
-
This Reminds Me of the Great Calculator Scare of the Late '70s/Early '80s by David Schmader
-
Idiot Tries to Defend Bigoted Anti-Gay-Marriage Preacher on Anderson Cooper by Paul Constant
-
Six Moms with Too Much Time on Their Hands and a Shitty Website Decide to Fight Gay Superheroes by Paul Constant
-
The Saturday Morning News by Unpaid Intern
-
Why Mayor McGinn's Wife Canceled Her Family's Seattle Times Subscription by Eli Sanders
-
What the Hell Is Wrong With Seattle's Pride Parade? by Dominic Holden
-
NYC Man Ticketed for Not Riding in the Bike Lane by Jonathan Golob
RSS
Facebook
Twitter
Comments (11) RSS