Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, March 18, 2010

Drugs Are Bad, M'kay?

Posted by on Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:09 AM

The hysteria never ends. I'm a fan of daily newspapers, I've been reading 'em since I was old enough to read and I've subscribed to 'em since I first moved out on my own. I lived in Europe for a few years and used to drive my ex-boyfriend nuts by spending what little money we had on expensive, week-old copies of American newspapers. But I'm increasingly convinced that the war on drugs won't end until every last drug war propagandist currently employed at a daily paper is out of work.

 

Comments (14) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Max Solomon 1
oh, naive, trusting dan. it will take so much more than that.
Posted by Max Solomon on March 18, 2010 at 10:19 AM
The Amazing Jim 2
Hey! I put in a half-bottle of Xanax anly to come away with 3 Benedryl?
Posted by The Amazing Jim http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/profile.php?id=100000076496291&ref=profile on March 18, 2010 at 10:24 AM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 3
We've already come a lot further than I ever thought I'd see in my lifetime. Medical marijuana is legal in a fair number of places, and pot has been "decriminalized" in many other places. If you had told me back in the 70s that I'd see that happen, I never would have believed you.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on March 18, 2010 at 10:35 AM
COMTE 4
Was that supposed to be "only" or "anally" @2?
Posted by COMTE http://www.chriscomte.com on March 18, 2010 at 10:35 AM
Will in Seattle 5
Remember, must Drug Warrior writers are married to or sleeping with cops or prison guards who depend on the Drug War to pay their bills.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on March 18, 2010 at 11:10 AM
6
Wow Dan you're even more full of shit than usual- did you grow a third lung that lets you increase your fecal holding capacity?

The San Francisco Chronicle has carefully and thoroughly documented the "Pharm Party" tsunami engulfing the nation.

In fact they have a regular feature,
the "Pharm Party Watch"
where they report on the phenomenon.

That's right, every week they Google the Nets and find 3 or 4 "Pharm Parties" taking place right here in America.
Or maybe sometimes in Australia.
Or Timbuktu....

All of them gulping Fistfuls of Pills.
Or at least using hard drugs.
Or maybe having a couple of beers...

Didn't you know it is a tsunami engulfing the nation?

It's frightening!

Pull your head out of your ass, already...
Posted by 100% True! on March 18, 2010 at 11:43 AM
7
I want to know how often these "journalists" smoke pot themselves.
Posted by patrick.colvin on March 18, 2010 at 11:48 AM
Will in Seattle 8
(must == most)
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on March 18, 2010 at 1:22 PM
warreno 9
1. Build a time machine.
2. Go back in time and find the parents of William Randolph Hearst.
3. Help them "vanish", possibly into a river somewhere.*
4. Come back to the present.
5. Toke up.
6. Say woot.

* If you're too squeamish, you can simply keep them from meeting at the Enchantment Under the Sea Dance.
Posted by warreno http://www.nightwares.com on March 18, 2010 at 1:30 PM
Frau Blucher 10
The hysteria about drugs is absurd, and the war on drugs is even more absurd. The drugs are not the problem, it's the people that can't manage their "recreation" in moderation.

When I was in college, I tried and partied with just about everything that didn't involve a needle. Booze and pot. Booze and acid. Booze and Ecstasy/MDMA. Booze and meth. And yet, managed to graduate with a 3.23 GPA and go on to become a VP at a Bank. I'm beyond those days of fun now, but wouldn't change it for anything.

People are going to do drugs, and they're never going to just disappear. But the money we keep throwing at ending it accomplishes nothing, yet disappears all too easily.
Posted by Frau Blucher on March 18, 2010 at 1:45 PM
Callie 11
What about every last drug war propagandist currently employed at a weekly paper? Based on the comments thread on Grant's "Faces of Meth" post, that would mean he'd be out of a job if you had your druthers.
Posted by Callie http://www.facebook.com/Klosetnerd on March 18, 2010 at 3:13 PM
Callie 12
What about "every last drug war propagandist currently employed at a weekly paper?" Because, if the comments thread on Grant's Faces of Meth post are any indication, that would require you to fire him.
Posted by Callie http://www.facebook.com/Klosetnerd on March 18, 2010 at 3:15 PM
13
Oh, Mr. Savage. When newspapers go, don't you think the propagandists will just go digital?
Posted by DRF on March 18, 2010 at 4:46 PM
14
Stop saying M'kay.
Posted by M'Kay? on March 18, 2010 at 9:19 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy