Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, March 18, 2010

A Good Bi-Partisan Compromise?

Posted by on Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:34 AM

Legislation approved by the Senate on Wednesday would significantly reduce the disparity in sentences handed out to those convicted of crack and powder cocaine charges.

Currently, a person convicted of crack cocaine possession gets the same mandatory jail time as someone with 100 times the same quantity of powder cocaine. That 100-1 ratio has been particularly hard on the black community, where convictions on federal crack laws are more prevalent.

Under the measure, approved by a voice vote, the ratio would be reduced to 18-1.

Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., who worked out the legislation with Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans, said he had initially wanted a straight 1-to-1 ratio, but that the final product was a good bipartisan compromise.

This is an improvement, true. But under the good compromise, a person found with 500 grams of powdered cocaine (more popular among white people) would face the same five-year sentence as a person found with only 28 grams of crack cocaine (more popular among black people). Viva la Democratically controlled Congress!

 

Comments (20) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
USofMH 1
So...it's going to be 1/5 less racist? Not a win...
Posted by USofMH http://www.unitedstatesofmichael.com on March 18, 2010 at 10:34 AM
TheMisanthrope 2
@1 Correction: 80% less racist.

Still a fail, but at least it is trying to target dealers now.
Posted by TheMisanthrope on March 18, 2010 at 10:46 AM
Joe Szilagyi 3
I wonder if they had open hearings what the rationale would be from the Republicans (or anyone) for ANY disparity.
Posted by Joe Szilagyi http://www.joeszilagyi.com on March 18, 2010 at 10:48 AM
4
What ever happened to the 3/5ths compromise?

Seriously, though, it seems a little absurd to charge people on mass of drug trafficked to begin with. At the bare minimum, I can see legislation that tracks the street price of the drug and treats an illegal substance based on flat price - so X grams of substance A gets the same as Y grams of substance B if they both cost $Z.

But how on earth do you conclude even 500 grams - an iPod's weight in drugs - should pass out a 5 YEAR sentence. That's still ridiculously obscene and simply illustrates how irrational our drug laws are. Jack Abramoff and Bob Ney got off on lighter sentences, and I'm very confident they did more harm to the community than 500 pounds of drugs ever could.
Posted by Zifnab on March 18, 2010 at 10:52 AM
Martin H. Duke 5
It moves the ball forward; take it and push for more.
Posted by Martin H. Duke http://seattletransitblog.com on March 18, 2010 at 11:02 AM
duckgirlie 6
Wasn't this complained about in an early episode of The West Wing? It's kind of depressing how little things have changed.
Posted by duckgirlie on March 18, 2010 at 11:02 AM
Will in Seattle 7
Maybe if we ended the unfunded Drug War, America wouldn't HAVE a deficit ... you think?
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on March 18, 2010 at 11:08 AM
Vince 8
A good example of what's wrong with our government. One stupid thing is "corrected" with another stupid thing ad infinitum.
Posted by Vince on March 18, 2010 at 11:10 AM
9
7
Let's see, Will-
the deficit for this year is
$1,600,000,000.00-
are we spending that much on
the war on drugs?
Posted by you don't think. on March 18, 2010 at 11:22 AM
10
This shows that the GOP cares about its constituents 18X as much as the Democraps.
One day Blacks will wise up and come back to the GOP...
Posted by A.Lincoln on March 18, 2010 at 11:27 AM
Will in Seattle 11
@9 - about one-third of the Drug War is in the black budget, the off-budget amount we don't publicize.

Every bit counts. Like server farm tax exemptions, for example.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on March 18, 2010 at 11:38 AM
Loveschild 12
Would've been even better if they also focused more on attaching harsher and more drastic penalties for those trafficking that garbage in the neighborhoods. As far as I'm concerned those are the true criminals and they should be treated by the system the same way that those that commit homicide are treated. Anyone who has seen a crakhead and the physical and mental destruction they live in can attest to that.
Posted by Loveschild http://www.samaritanspurse.org/index.php/articles/responding_to_haiti_earthquake/ on March 18, 2010 at 11:41 AM
13
It's the dawning of a slightly-less-racist day in America!
Posted by Free At Last on March 18, 2010 at 12:05 PM
14
11
So how close to $1,600,000,000.00 is it?
Posted by Deficit- Be Gone!! on March 18, 2010 at 12:17 PM
15
@14: You don't care about deficits. I'm surprised you can spell deficit.
Posted by Stop Frontin on March 18, 2010 at 12:30 PM
lark 16
Dominic,
I don't have a problem with the compromise. But, it would be far better if ALL races did far less cocaine (powdered or crack). BTW, check this out:

http://www.tnr.com/book/review/addiction…

Fascinating. I shall read the book.

Posted by lark on March 18, 2010 at 1:19 PM
Will in Seattle 17
You know, if we had a carbon tax, we wouldn't have deficits.

Plus, as they showed in BC, we'd be really mellow. Um, mind you, we might have to end the drug war ...
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on March 18, 2010 at 1:20 PM
Dominic Holden 18
@ 16) Agreed--it would also be far better if all races drank less booze, smoked fewer cigarettes, quaffed less soda, ate less fast food...
Posted by Dominic Holden on March 18, 2010 at 1:55 PM
seandr 19
Coke and crack are completely different drugs with wholly different consequences for the users, their families, and society. A system that treats these drugs differently is being realistic, not racist.

A better black vs white comparison would be crack vs crystal meth. Are those penalties on par with each other?
Posted by seandr on March 18, 2010 at 4:46 PM
20
15
gosh willie, is THAT all you can cum up with?
Posted by U got less than nothing. on March 19, 2010 at 8:12 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy