Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, March 11, 2010

The Mountain of Mexico City

Posted by on Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:15 AM

If I had brought a book to last night's reading party at the Fireside Room (I only had a notebook with lots of quotes—Heather McHugh liked this one from Antigone: "And death it is; yet money talks"), I would have brought Future of Evolution, a work that is informing a big part of my thinking about post-Darwinian urbanism (I will discuss this during my Pop Life talk on Sunday). Here is a beautiful passage from Ward's book:

Our plane lifted from the lushly verdant Yucatan on a luminous day, and we flew over a starkly visible Mexico. The flight was not very long, and a vista of mountains and forests passed far beneath us. Eventually I spotted a distant mountain, larger than the others, and as we approached I was filled with wonder. Never had I seen a mountain like this before, perfectly dome-shaped, brown in color, impossibly tall, a vision that enlarged and degenerated into implausibility. Our pilot headed straight toward the summit of this great mount, and just as we were about to crash into it, I realized what it was: the air over Mexico City, a mountain of pollution covering the huge sprawl below.
Those are the words; this is the vision:
124360795_a8eb42f09b.jpg
  • Image by Kainet

 

Comments (7) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
no shit, they have a city there? with like 20 million people in it?

is this the same city that the publicola graph the other day showed was far more green than seattle because of the greater use of transit?

Posted by "Ai los gringos son muy tonto, no?" on March 11, 2010 at 11:36 AM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 2
Yeah, they're so "green" that people are literally dying from the pollution.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on March 11, 2010 at 11:49 AM
Fnarf 3
Sure, 5280, it would be way more green to sprawl those 20+ million people over a couple of million square miles, like the American suburban ideal. Mexico City has as people in it as Colorado, Utah, Nevada, Montana, Idaho, New Mexico, Arizona, and Wyoming put together. I think; I'm currently overdosing on Percoset, so I could be off a little.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on March 11, 2010 at 12:23 PM
4
After years of being notoriously smoggy, authorities in Mexico City have started to get a handle on the problem. The smog - occasionally brutal for decades - comes from just over two million vehicles, in a city of over 20 million. That level of car ownership is impossibly 'green' by U.S. standards. The city is in a bowl, at 6,000 feet. What (relatively, for its size) little pollution there is tends to stick around. Emissions controls have made a vast difference over what I saw when I came here two years ago. The beater cars, taxis, and buses that used to drive around looking like they had a campfire burning in the trunk - are gone. Peseros - the half-size buses you can usually flag down to anywhere within a couple minutes - have mostly switched to natural gas. The city just started putting up shared bicycle stations, at a density that is positively unAmerican. In this megalopolis, the megahighways are less than half the width of I-5. There are cabs everywhere, 12 subway lines and two new BRT lines, and more of both being built. Only the wealthiest, furthest-flung neighborhoods are anything less than extremely walkable. Today, a work day, from the center of the city I can see both snow-covered volcanoes, Popocatepetl (whose shape, height, distance and apparent size from here make it uncannily resemble Mt. Rainier from Capitol Hill) and Ixtaccihuatl: not clearly, but I can see them. After Christmas there was a newspaper cover photo of both mountains against blue sky, headlined, 'A View From the Old Days', but this year we've been able to see that view at least half the time since. Gringos who use this presumed ecological disaster of a city (lovely for the most part, really - I'm not kidding!) as a whipping boy in order to feel complacent about Americans' pitiful efforts (if you can even call them that) at real city-building or sustainability will find their suppositions shattered by any contact with the reality of Ciudad Mexico.
More...
Posted by Grant Cogswell on March 11, 2010 at 12:37 PM
5
Fantastic city, pollution or no. But it is a lot better than before.
Posted by Rhizome on March 11, 2010 at 2:17 PM
6
Charles, I love you, but why would you go to a book-reading get-together and not bring a book?
Posted by d.p. on March 11, 2010 at 2:24 PM
7
Hahaha you guys never travel? You only stay on mississippi river ?
Posted by Steve7 on June 18, 2010 at 11:30 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy